some ideas for an easier workflow #63
commentsonly
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
|
Appreciate you like it! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Mostly implemented as requested, let me know if ok like this |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Till I found this I got used to modbus tester www.powerhud.com which got some advantages when trying to dig undocumented modbus devices.
I think protocol_ wizard could benefit from implementing something similar.
What I do miss most is an option to be ticked which would allow for continously re-read (definable poll rate) while modifiying either datatype, sizes or addresses, so that one mustn't end up with a
do
click size +1
click READ
loop
until one reached the end of an ASCII string (e.g. the required size/numbers of addresses for that entity)
Next one, while it's pretty cool it does display ASCII besides binary and HEX .. but where the hell is DEC? :-) or why is that missing when having RAW enabled? It always takes a while to use a HEX>DEC calculator besides if you know you're after address which do hold 5550W while you only see binary and HEX as results.
Next one ... if you read some more registers in RAW mode in one go ... I'd suggest to move the output window in the card to the bottom below all buttons, because if you need to modify any value you become a mousepointerscroll expert if you have to modify a setting and then press READ. Perhaps this becomes obsolete if you think about the first idea mentioned.
And well ... Create Entity would surely benefit from an option "save as YAML" so that one could adopt/modify/adjust created entities more easily instead of looking at the details of the entity and then re-invent a YAML, wipe the created entity and add the YAML one.
Directly added this integration to my list of 'must-have-integrations' :-)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions