Prerequisites
Area
Email
Problem or Motivation
Google email OAuth support is present on dev, but several surrounding paths still use the older password-only or pre-OAuth contracts. The resulting failures are spread across Docker configuration, saved-account testing, MCP email, reminders, callback UI, reconnect identity, and client response serialization. The same regression pass also confirmed three adjacent persistence bugs in email-account defaults, urgency checkpoints, and lazy default-calendar creation that need focused fixes rather than being hidden inside one combined patch.
Reviewing those fixes as one combined patch would mix deployment, backend, MCP, scheduler, and frontend behavior. It would also obscure the prerequisite order between dependent slices.
This tracker gives maintainers one stabilization-first parent while keeping every implementation slice independently reviewable.
Proposed Solution
Use this issue as the parent for focused Google email OAuth regression fixes.
Initial child issues:
| Order |
Issue |
Purpose |
Candidate PR |
| 1 |
#5638 |
Verify reconnect mailbox identity and replace both credentials together |
#5648 |
| 2 |
#5639 |
Remove internal OAuth storage fields from the browser config response |
#5651 |
| 3 |
#5640 |
Forward Google OAuth configuration through all Compose variants |
#5650 (preserves #5020) |
| 4 |
#5644 |
Make saved-account connection tests OAuth-aware |
#5653 |
| 5 |
#4992 |
Add Google OAuth parity to the email MCP server |
#5022 |
| 6 |
#5642 |
Allow OAuth SMTP accounts for email reminders |
#5649 |
| 7 |
#5643 |
Show the callback result and open Integrations after redirect |
#5654 |
| 8 |
#5647 |
Preserve SMTP security and display name when Connect saves the form |
#5652 |
| 9 |
#5646 |
Serialize email-account default mutations across workers |
#5656 |
| 10 |
#5645 |
Merge email-urgency checkpoints without duplicate delivery or lost state |
#5655 |
| 11 |
#5641 |
Keep lazy default-calendar creation in the event transaction |
#5657 |
Working rules:
- One regression contract per child issue and PR.
- Preserve existing contributor authorship when replacing stale focused OAuth PRs.
- Keep Docker, main-app email, MCP, reminders, frontend, scheduler, and calendar transaction validation separate.
- Merge dependent slices in prerequisite order.
- When child branches overlap, resolve conflicts without dropping either regression contract.
- Do not broaden this tracker into Microsoft OAuth, a general mail-provider abstraction, or an email UI rewrite.
Acceptance criteria:
- Every public child has current-
dev reproduction steps, a focused candidate fix, and meaningful regression coverage.
- Concurrency fixes include deterministic overlapping-worker, cancellation, and partial-snapshot coverage where applicable.
- Existing focused PRs are reused when they are current and reviewable instead of duplicated.
- Dependent slices merge in prerequisite order.
- Validate the combined tree after resolving overlapping changes.
Alternatives Considered
One combined regression PR was rejected because it would mix unrelated owners and make callback, MCP, Docker, and UI review harder.
Leaving the fixes as an informal PR cluster was rejected because dependencies and current-dev replacement work would remain unclear.
Reopening the original feature issue was rejected because the merged feature is broader than these stabilization slices and already has separate historical context.
Prior Art / Related Issues
Are you willing to implement this?
Yes - I can open focused PRs, preserve prior authorship where applicable, and keep the dependency/order notes current.
Prerequisites
Area
Email
Problem or Motivation
Google email OAuth support is present on
dev, but several surrounding paths still use the older password-only or pre-OAuth contracts. The resulting failures are spread across Docker configuration, saved-account testing, MCP email, reminders, callback UI, reconnect identity, and client response serialization. The same regression pass also confirmed three adjacent persistence bugs in email-account defaults, urgency checkpoints, and lazy default-calendar creation that need focused fixes rather than being hidden inside one combined patch.Reviewing those fixes as one combined patch would mix deployment, backend, MCP, scheduler, and frontend behavior. It would also obscure the prerequisite order between dependent slices.
This tracker gives maintainers one stabilization-first parent while keeping every implementation slice independently reviewable.
Proposed Solution
Use this issue as the parent for focused Google email OAuth regression fixes.
Initial child issues:
Working rules:
Acceptance criteria:
devreproduction steps, a focused candidate fix, and meaningful regression coverage.Alternatives Considered
One combined regression PR was rejected because it would mix unrelated owners and make callback, MCP, Docker, and UI review harder.
Leaving the fixes as an informal PR cluster was rejected because dependencies and current-
devreplacement work would remain unclear.Reopening the original feature issue was rejected because the merged feature is broader than these stabilization slices and already has separate historical context.
Prior Art / Related Issues
.eduemail OAuth.Are you willing to implement this?
Yes - I can open focused PRs, preserve prior authorship where applicable, and keep the dependency/order notes current.