Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
|
Or we can maintain our current naming convention: type(scope): summary |
0 replies
|
There are two options: |
0 replies
|
I think we can keep the current naming convention since most GitHub actions on the marketplace work with it. |
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Let us define our pr naming convention, and there is a proposal:
Here is an example: apache/pulsar#21048
All reactions