Suggestion to remove the unofficial successor label in description.

[shrihari-prakash]

I think mentioning the library as Unofficial Successor in the about section would make people question the library's reputation and active maintenance. It might be good to mention this in README, but perhaps a good idea to remove from the about section which is the very first section people read.

[jankapunkt]

I think we added this to avoid using a 1:1 about section that actually sounds the same as the oauthjs one

[shrihari-prakash]

Hmm, I understand the need for it to be different from the oauthjs one. Perhaps good idea to rephrase the description maybe? In any case, you have also put tremendous efforts into refactoring and modernizing the library. It is far from the original one now 🙂.

[shrihari-prakash]

It could be a turn off for some people to see the word unofficial. Might have the risk of making the library look not maintained.

[jankapunkt]

I removed "unofficial" for now but I think we may find a more crisp and positive description.

[shrihari-prakash]

"Robust, battle-tested and compliant Node.js OAuth2 server with native async/await and PKCE support."?

[shrihari-prakash]

Closing as description has been updated.