Replies: 1 comment 7 replies
-
|
I suspect that elixir-mode modifies the syntax table in some way, which changes the treatment of the single quote. However Jinx installs its own syntax table during Jinx operation, see jinx--syntax-table, so this shouldn't be a problem in principle. Maybe Jinx somewhere misses to use jinx--syntax-table somewhere, where it actually should. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
7 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm working in
elixir-mode, and Jinx is highlighting the chunk "shouldn" in "shouldn't" as misspelled. This doesn't happenemacs-lisp-modeorhaskell-mode, so it's probably a problem inelixir-mode. I would love a pointer of where to look to see if I can fix this.Here's an
elpaca-testexpression that highlights the error: (I dunno if you're using Elpaca or not. If you are, you should be able to drop the below code in a buffer and runeval-buffer, which should spin up a second Emacs session in a self-contained temporary location.)You can see in the
elixir-modebuffer that the comment has a misspelling marked undershouldninshouldn't. Any ideas where I could look to fix this?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions