Roadmap Feedback: Should We Build Pro Broker Integrations for Schwab / IB? || 路线图反馈：是否值得投入开发 Schwab / IB 等 Pro 券商接入？

[memoryfraction]

We are considering whether to build a separate Pro Edition for advanced broker integrations and production trading workflows, while keeping this public repository as the Community Edition.

Before investing significant development time, we want to understand real user needs. Please reply with as much detail as you are comfortable sharing:

Question	Your Answer
Which broker do you need most?	Schwab / IB / Alpaca / Binance / Other
What is your use case?	Research / paper trading / live trading / portfolio monitoring / other
What is currently blocking you?	OAuth, token refresh, order execution, account data, reconnect, deployment, risk controls, documentation, other
Are you using Quant.Infra.Net today?	Yes / No / evaluating
Would you help test an early broker integration?	Yes / No / maybe
If Community remains free, how do you feel about a separate Pro Edition?	Acceptable / not acceptable / depends, with reasons
Would you consider early access or paid support if it solves your problem?	No / maybe / yes, individual / yes, team or company

Any feedback is welcome, including objections. We will use this discussion to decide how much effort should be invested in this direction.

我们正在考虑是否开发一个独立的 Pro Edition，用于承载更高级的券商接入和生产级交易基础设施，同时继续维护当前公开仓库作为 Community Edition。

在投入大量开发时间之前，我们希望先了解真实用户需求。欢迎尽量具体地回复以下问题：

问题	你的回答
你最需要哪个券商？	Schwab / IB / Alpaca / Binance / 其他
你的使用场景是什么？	研究 / 模拟盘 / 实盘交易 / 组合监控 / 其他
当前最阻碍你的问题是什么？	OAuth、token refresh、下单、账户数据、断线重连、部署、风控、文档、其他
你现在是否正在使用 Quant.Infra.Net？	是 / 否 / 正在评估
你是否愿意帮助测试早期券商接入？	是 / 否 / 可能
如果 Community 继续免费维护，你如何看待独立 Pro Edition？	可以接受 / 不能接受 / 视情况而定，并说明原因
如果它能解决你的问题，你是否会考虑早期访问或付费支持？	不会 / 可能 / 会，个人使用 / 会，团队或公司使用

任何反馈都欢迎，包括反对意见。我们会根据这个讨论决定是否投入、以及投入多少精力做这个方向。