'128K' - good or bad?

[LinuxOnTheDesktop]

    The uninitiated listener has a hard time deciding between the likes of

and

at least given that one of the entries (as one of my images show) has no bitrate listed.

My version of 'shortwave'

$ flatpak list
Name                                         Application ID                               Version       Branch            Installation
Shortwave                                    de.haeckerfelix.Shortwave                    5.1.0         stable            system

PS: I gather that BBC radio offers these bitrates, each in KB: 320; 128; 96; 48.

PPS: I presume that this is the main repository for Shortwave . .

EDITED.

[Cosebdd]

It's in the name of the radio
https://www.radio-browser.info/search?page=1&order=clickcount&reverse=true&hidebroken=true&name=BBC

The app only shows the name and the location when listing.

[Cosebdd]

Also, the main repo is probably here
https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/Shortwave

[LinuxOnTheDesktop]

Thanks.

My original post was garbled. Sorry. Just now I have edited that post so as to make it clear.

You write as follows.

It's in the name of the radio
https://www.radio-browser.info/search?page=1&order=clickcount&reverse=true&hidebroken=true&name=BBC

The app only shows the name and the location when listing.

As one of my images indicated, at least one of my BBC radio entries did include the bitrate in its title. Moreover, when investigating two BBC entries that did not include the bitrate in their respective titles, I could not find that bitrate, even in the description of the station. Still, those two entries are now marked as missing from the library (!).

At any rate: you are saying, I take it, that I should report problems to https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/Shortwave.