The documentation of CSS methods should be further classified

[ajiho]

Although further explanation is provided below, should it be further classified? Because it is not a return string

[mgol]

Thanks for the report. I agree it makes sense to separate these signatures; we'd need a separate entry for the second signature that would mostly contain the part you highlighted and that would defer to the description of the first signature for most details.

Would you like to submit a PR? The relevant file is present at entries/css.xml.

[ajiho]

of course

see: pull/1282