To whom it may concern,
Elixir test task we build for my startup use enacl for cryptography, however when we started moving to nix-docker, which is the best Docker image compilation backend (better than docker!), we needed to nixify all the dependencies too.
While hex dependencies worked with no problem, enacl couldn't build. That's why after a lot of digging and thinking, @ixahedron has produced the following pearl:
packages.default = beamPackages.mixRelease rec {
pname = "on_the_map-goo";
version = "0.1.0";
src = ./.;
buildInputs = allBuildInputs;
mixNixDeps = (import ./deps.nix) {
inherit beamPackages;
lib = pkgs.lib;
# enacl is a pain in the ass. Heed my warnings.
overrides = (final: prev: {
# deps_nix and autofetchers treat it as a mix dependency even
# though it's specified for rebar3.
enacl = beamPackages.buildRebar3 {
version = "46e2754a50f4d9192ebf008bf80ea8242e7f7986";
name = "enacl";
# Maybe that's why fetching it from hex, where it DOES EXIST,
# fail for some reason.
src = builtins.fetchGit {
url = "https://github.com/jlouis/enacl.git";
rev = "46e2754a50f4d9192ebf008bf80ea8242e7f7986";
allRefs = true;
};
# Then, it fails to compile, as rebar3's pc plugin is unavailable.
compilePorts = true;
buildPlugins = [ beamPackages.pc ];
# Also, it won't pick up mixRelease's buildInputs, so we need
# to pass libsodium explicitly.
buildInputs = [ pkgs.libsodium ];
};
});
};
};
Sorry to abuse Github issues (and, of course, feel free to close), but this needs to be indexed by search engines!
To whom it may concern,
Elixir test task we build for my startup use enacl for cryptography, however when we started moving to
nix-docker, which is the best Docker image compilation backend (better thandocker!), we needed to nixify all the dependencies too.While hex dependencies worked with no problem,
enaclcouldn't build. That's why after a lot of digging and thinking, @ixahedron has produced the following pearl:Sorry to abuse Github issues (and, of course, feel free to close), but this needs to be indexed by search engines!