Skip to content

Imaging Data Commons integration relies on incorrect, outdated and incomplete information #184

Description

@fedorov

I am a technical lead of the Imaging Data Commons team. I did a quick experiment with your platform, and here are some quick suggestions.

  1. Based on the responses of the agent, you rely on a notebook that is deprecated. The below is incorrect.
Image
  1. Your integration is unaware of the latest (v23) version of IDC, and is using an old version of idc-index. I could not get the answer why!
Image
  1. Is the document/prompt describing integration with IDC available publicly? I am happy to review and offer suggestions for improvement.

  2. You may want to look at the officially supported IDC Claude skill https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/idc-claude-skill, and consider integrating it with your system.

The capabilities of your system in terms of supporting IDC are critically diminished due to the way integration is implemented at the moment. As an example, it is unaware of how to access various metadata attributes that are readily available via idc-index, and comes up with heuristics to determine pathology slide stain, leading to incorrect answers and the false claim below.

Image

Here's the response from Claude equipped with the aforementioned imaging-data-commons skill: https://claude.ai/share/4088ce4c-17fc-4359-8d70-6e4ee0d68af6. I confirm this response is accurate (and falling back to parsing SeriesDescription is exactly what your system did!).

Image

I am sorry if this is not the right place to ask questions, but the notebook interface does not appear to have any place to contact maintainers, and its interface includes pointer to this repo. I hope this is the right place!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions