Skip to content

ModelFinder in IQ-TREE3 could not find the best-fit model #179

Description

@jeremiasivan

Dear IQ-TREE Development Team,

I have the following FASTA alignment with four species: window_1_025_2.fa.zip

I noticed that IQ-TREE2 and IQ-TREE3 chose different models for the respective alignment: IQ-TREE2 chose TIM2+F+G4 (iqtree2.log), while IQ-TREE3 chose TPM2u+F+I (iqtree3.log).

So, I did the following:

  1. Fix the seed number to be 12345
  2. Fix the tree topology to be iqtree2.treefile (iqtree2.treefile.zip)
  3. Fix the branch lengths with -blfix
  4. Fix the model to be TIM2+F+G4

In this case, IQ-TREE2 and IQ-TREE3 returned the same results, with tree log-likelihood of -30169.352:

However, when I did not fix the model (but fixing other parameters above), IQ-TREE3 selected TPM2u+F+I again even though it resulted in lower tree log-likelihood (-30182.924) than TIM2+F+G4: iqtree3_wtree_blfix_nomodel.log

I noticed that in iqtree3.log, the likelihood calculation for TIM2+F+G4 model was skipped. Is there any change in how ModelFinder selects the best nucleotide model?
Thanks!

Regards,
Jeremias

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions