data/population_sample.csv appears to be a 100-row placeholder, causing widespread "not in population sample" warnings
Problem
data/population_sample.csv contains only 100 rows, which is far too small to cover the full
range of PUMS attribute values. When running compute_reid_risk, any attribute value not present
in the sample is silently skipped when fitting the Gaussian copula model, reducing the number of
attributes used for re-identification estimation and likely underestimating risk.
This also contradicts the README (line 52), which describes the file as:
data/population_sample.csv contains the 3M sample of US census data
Specific coverage gaps in the 100-row file
| Attribute |
Present |
Expected |
| ST |
36 of ~51 state codes |
Missing 20 states including NY (36), TX (48), OH (39), PA (42), OR (41), TN (47), UT (49) |
| OCCP |
43 of 493 occupation codes |
— |
| ESR |
5 of 7 values (missing codes 5 and 7) |
— |
| DOB-Day |
28 of 31 days (day 1 missing entirely) |
— |
Additional note
uniqueness.py line 48 references a different path (data/pums/pums_pwgtp_sample_.csv) that does
not exist in the repository, suggesting a larger weighted PUMS sample was intended but not
included.
Question
Is there a larger population sample file that should be used? If it is omitted intentionally (e.g.
due to size or licensing constraints), could you document how to obtain it and what format is
expected?
data/population_sample.csvappears to be a 100-row placeholder, causing widespread "not in population sample" warningsProblem
data/population_sample.csvcontains only 100 rows, which is far too small to cover the fullrange of PUMS attribute values. When running
compute_reid_risk, any attribute value not presentin the sample is silently skipped when fitting the Gaussian copula model, reducing the number of
attributes used for re-identification estimation and likely underestimating risk.
This also contradicts the README (line 52), which describes the file as:
Specific coverage gaps in the 100-row file
Additional note
uniqueness.pyline 48 references a different path (data/pums/pums_pwgtp_sample_.csv) that doesnot exist in the repository, suggesting a larger weighted PUMS sample was intended but not
included.
Question
Is there a larger population sample file that should be used? If it is omitted intentionally (e.g.
due to size or licensing constraints), could you document how to obtain it and what format is
expected?