I am modelling a dusty red object and want to compare the best-fitting models of different model sets. The best fitting model is model
lrE4jQJW_01 from the s-p-hmi group, and is shown in the sedfitter output plot below.
BLG360.pdf
However, when I plot these myself, along with best fitting models of 3 other model sets (plot below), I can see one or two key differences. The key difference is that the profile of the absorption feature at 10 um is fitted well in the sedfitter output, replicating the relative strengths of the two wings. When I plot this myself, the model (light blue) does not show this, but instead shows a weaker blue wing. Why is this?
Another question I had is regarding the scale value in the sedfitter output (r######_params.txt). How exactly is this scaling implemented?
I am modelling a dusty red object and want to compare the best-fitting models of different model sets. The best fitting model is model
lrE4jQJW_01 from the s-p-hmi group, and is shown in the sedfitter output plot below.
BLG360.pdf
However, when I plot these myself, along with best fitting models of 3 other model sets (plot below), I can see one or two key differences. The key difference is that the profile of the absorption feature at 10 um is fitted well in the sedfitter output, replicating the relative strengths of the two wings. When I plot this myself, the model (light blue) does not show this, but instead shows a weaker blue wing. Why is this?
Another question I had is regarding the scale value in the sedfitter output (r######_params.txt). How exactly is this scaling implemented?