Skip to content

Question on stellar models distributed with Robitaille (2017) #4

Description

@mpound

Hi Thomas,

In an effort to more intuitively understand the details of these models and how to use them, I was playing with fitting photometry of standard stars as that is the simplest test case. I fit the photometry with bands SDSS-u to 2MASS-Ks to stars of known spectral type, distance, and rough Av and then checked to see if the best fit models fall in the right places on an HR diagram. Answer: sometimes they do, sometimes they don't.

Along the way, I made an HR diagram of the stellar models (s---s-i) and I am puzzled by the result. So I'm hoping you can shed light on this. The attached plot, and notebook to create it, shows (Luminosity,Temperature) phase space completely filled, whereas I was expecting something that look more like a traditional HR diagram, with pre-main sequence, main sequence, giant branch, etc. Can you explain why my expectations are incorrect?

A common misclassification in the fitting was e.g. a spectral type B main sequence star with high extinction gets "best-fit" by a G or K giant with near zero extinction. With the (L,T) phase space filled, one can see how this could happen.

thanks,
Marc

starfit.zip

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions