I'm using i3-gaps as my (tiling) WM. This makes my terminals to be whatever size is available. For most sizes the images are scaled down correctly, so that they are visible entirely. Some terminal sizes cause the image to be too large for the available space.
I would expect the images to be scaled down so that one image always fits in the available space. But the printed image gets larger the smaller the terminal is.
My screen resolution is 2560x1440.
Original image:

1 terminal: (254 columns x 60 rows) good!

2 terminals side-by-side (126 x 60) good!

3 terminals: dividing one of the terminals vertically (126 x 30) not good!

4 terminals: dividing the last terminal again (126 x 14) not good!

I'm using
i3-gapsas my (tiling) WM. This makes my terminals to be whatever size is available. For most sizes the images are scaled down correctly, so that they are visible entirely. Some terminal sizes cause the image to be too large for the available space.I would expect the images to be scaled down so that one image always fits in the available space. But the printed image gets larger the smaller the terminal is.
My screen resolution is
2560x1440.Original image:

1 terminal: (254 columns x 60 rows) good!

2 terminals side-by-side (126 x 60) good!

3 terminals: dividing one of the terminals vertically (126 x 30) not good!

4 terminals: dividing the last terminal again (126 x 14) not good!
