You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 23, 2026. It is now read-only.
For now, the be verb is considered as a matcher itself, which enforces other passive verb based matchers to be prefixed with 'be_'.
And even if semantics of presupposition 'in' between a suite definition and an assertation (i.e. be_thrown_in) are quite similar, we have two different set of syntax/APIs to support each.
Ideally, we should be able to write as below, at least :
An_[IllegalStateException] should not be thrown in {
// (code block)
}
For now, the
beverb is considered as a matcher itself, which enforces other passive verb based matchers to be prefixed with 'be_'.And even if semantics of presupposition 'in' between a suite definition and an assertation (i.e.
be_thrown_in) are quite similar, we have two different set of syntax/APIs to support each.Ideally, we should be able to write as below, at least :