From 1e02dfcddd3f42a118e46580708d7cee2cff7b5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Wallrich Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 13:37:30 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Combine generic + language-specific references per glossary entry MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Each entry's references are now built from the shared Reference column PLUS the matching language column (AR_refs / BG_refs / DE_refs / TR_refs / CN_refs), generic first, deduplicated. Both use the same \[@citekey\] format resolved via apa_lookup, so the language column is processed identically. The {LANG}_refs columns are all empty in the sheet today, so this produces no change to current output — it wires them up so localized references are picked up automatically once translators populate them, instead of being silently ignored. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py b/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py index daf0d7d143..9548650dd1 100755 --- a/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py +++ b/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py @@ -197,9 +197,12 @@ def clean_filename(title, max_length=200): else: title = en_title - # Process references - raw_references = safe_get(row, "Reference") - processed_references = process_references(raw_references, apa_lookup, missing_refs) + # Process references: always combine the generic shared column with any + # language-specific column (e.g. AR_refs, CN_refs), generic first. Both use + # the same [@citekey] format resolved via apa_lookup; dedupe across them. + processed_references = process_references(safe_get(row, "Reference"), apa_lookup, missing_refs) + lang_refs = process_references(safe_get(row, f"{language_code}_refs"), apa_lookup, missing_refs) + processed_references = list(dict.fromkeys(processed_references + lang_refs)) # Build entry definition = safe_get(row, f"{language_code}_definition" if language_code == "EN" else f"{language_code}_def") From 3b94a78a1293e7a9824c0a5496e3e8bae2d31620 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Wallrich Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 13:41:09 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/8] Warn on reference content that isn't a parseable [@citekey] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit process_references silently ignored anything that wasn't a \[@citekey\] token: free-text references (e.g. "Holcombe et al. (2020)"), bare URLs, and crucially keys with escaped underscores (e.g. \[@R\_Core\_Team2020\]) that the regex's [^\\]+ class can't capture. The misleading "All references found in lookup!" summary only ever covered the keys that did parse. Now any residual content left after stripping the [@citekey] tokens triggers a warning naming the entry and column, so these silent drops surface during generation. Print-only — no change to generated output. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py b/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py index 9548650dd1..711496ad4a 100755 --- a/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py +++ b/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ print("Warning: apa_lookup.json not found. References will not be formatted.") apa_lookup = {} -def process_references(references_text, apa_lookup, missing_refs_log=None): +def process_references(references_text, apa_lookup, missing_refs_log=None, context=""): """Convert citation keys to APA format using the lookup""" if not references_text: return [] @@ -55,6 +55,14 @@ def process_references(references_text, apa_lookup, missing_refs_log=None): citation_pattern = r'\\?\[@([^\\]+)\\?\]' matches = re.findall(citation_pattern, references_text) + # Surface content that is NOT a parseable \[@citekey\] and would otherwise be + # dropped silently: free-text references (e.g. "Pownall et al. (2021)") or keys + # the regex can't capture (e.g. escaped underscores: \[@World\_Wide\_Web2021\]). + residual = re.sub(citation_pattern, '', references_text) + if re.search(r'[A-Za-z0-9@]', residual): + where = f" in {context}" if context else "" + print(f"Warning: unparsed reference content{where} (not a [@citekey], dropped): {residual.strip(' ,;.')!r}") + formatted_refs = [] for match in matches: # Clean the key: remove markdown formatting, trailing punctuation, etc. @@ -200,8 +208,8 @@ def clean_filename(title, max_length=200): # Process references: always combine the generic shared column with any # language-specific column (e.g. AR_refs, CN_refs), generic first. Both use # the same [@citekey] format resolved via apa_lookup; dedupe across them. - processed_references = process_references(safe_get(row, "Reference"), apa_lookup, missing_refs) - lang_refs = process_references(safe_get(row, f"{language_code}_refs"), apa_lookup, missing_refs) + processed_references = process_references(safe_get(row, "Reference"), apa_lookup, missing_refs, context=f"{title} (Reference)") + lang_refs = process_references(safe_get(row, f"{language_code}_refs"), apa_lookup, missing_refs, context=f"{title} ({language_code}_refs)") processed_references = list(dict.fromkeys(processed_references + lang_refs)) # Build entry From 3f6b2478545c806e8206ced34d2b6f73a7f3f3cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Wallrich Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 13:55:58 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/8] Parse escaped-underscore citekeys instead of dropping them MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The citekey pattern used [^\\]+ for the key, which stopped at the first backslash — so a pandoc citekey with escaped underscores like \[@R\_Core\_Team2020\] only ever captured "R" and silently failed to resolve, even though "R_Core_Team2020" exists in apa_lookup. ~50 distinct keys were affected (R_Core_Team2020, coalition_s, The_jamovi_project2020, DORA_San_Francisco, OSF_StudySwap, …), dropping their references from every language version of those terms. Capture the key lazily up to the closing (optionally escaped) bracket and unescape backslash escapes (\_ -> _) before lookup. Verified: 0 missing-key warnings after the change, and previously-dropped references (e.g. the R Core Team 2020 citation on the "R" entry) now resolve. Content not regenerated in this commit — see branch note. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py b/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py index 711496ad4a..8403458294 100755 --- a/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py +++ b/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py @@ -52,7 +52,11 @@ def process_references(references_text, apa_lookup, missing_refs_log=None, conte if not references_text: return [] - citation_pattern = r'\\?\[@([^\\]+)\\?\]' + # Capture the key lazily up to the closing (optionally backslash-escaped) bracket, + # so keys with escaped characters survive — notably escaped underscores in pandoc + # citekeys (e.g. \[@R\_Core\_Team2020\]), which the old [^\\]+ class truncated at the + # first backslash. The backslashes are unescaped out of each captured key below. + citation_pattern = r'\\?\[@(.+?)\\?\]' matches = re.findall(citation_pattern, references_text) # Surface content that is NOT a parseable \[@citekey\] and would otherwise be @@ -69,6 +73,9 @@ def process_references(references_text, apa_lookup, missing_refs_log=None, conte key = match.strip() original_key = key # Keep for logging + # Unescape backslash escapes (e.g. \_ -> _) so the key matches apa_lookup + key = re.sub(r'\\(.)', r'\1', key) + # Remove markdown formatting key = re.sub(r'^\*+|\*+$', '', key) # Remove leading/trailing asterisks key = re.sub(r'^_+|_+$', '', key) # Remove leading/trailing underscores From c4cf725cf736a8532461efd402a0dce227f6318d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Wallrich Date: Sun, 31 May 2026 14:57:54 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 4/8] Keep bare URLs / markdown links as references instead of dropping them MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References that are just a URL (a tool homepage, a registry, a guideline page) were silently dropped because they aren't \[@citekey\] tokens. Treat any URL left in the residual as a reference in its own right: markdown links are kept verbatim, bare URLs are wrapped as [url](url) so Hugo renders them, and a URL already contained in a resolved citation is skipped to avoid duplicates. The leftover-after-URLs warning now fires only on genuine free-text references (e.g. "Clark et al. (2019)") that still need to be turned into citekeys. Content not regenerated here — see branch note. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py b/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py index 8403458294..6440b60933 100755 --- a/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py +++ b/content/glossary/_create_glossaries.py @@ -59,14 +59,6 @@ def process_references(references_text, apa_lookup, missing_refs_log=None, conte citation_pattern = r'\\?\[@(.+?)\\?\]' matches = re.findall(citation_pattern, references_text) - # Surface content that is NOT a parseable \[@citekey\] and would otherwise be - # dropped silently: free-text references (e.g. "Pownall et al. (2021)") or keys - # the regex can't capture (e.g. escaped underscores: \[@World\_Wide\_Web2021\]). - residual = re.sub(citation_pattern, '', references_text) - if re.search(r'[A-Za-z0-9@]', residual): - where = f" in {context}" if context else "" - print(f"Warning: unparsed reference content{where} (not a [@citekey], dropped): {residual.strip(' ,;.')!r}") - formatted_refs = [] for match in matches: # Clean the key: remove markdown formatting, trailing punctuation, etc. @@ -99,7 +91,37 @@ def process_references(references_text, apa_lookup, missing_refs_log=None, conte if missing_refs_log is not None: missing_refs_log.add(original_key) print(f"Warning: Missing reference key '{original_key}' (cleaned: '{key}') - skipping") - + + # A bare URL (or markdown link) is a valid reference type — keep any that remain + # in the residual rather than dropping them, unless the URL is already part of a + # resolved citation. Bare URLs are wrapped as markdown links so Hugo renders them. + residual = re.sub(citation_pattern, '', references_text) + md_links = re.findall(r'\[[^\]]*\]\(https?://[^)]+\)', residual) + leftover = residual + for link in md_links: + leftover = leftover.replace(link, ' ', 1) + bare_urls = re.findall(r'(?:https?://|www\.)[^\s,;)\]]+', leftover) + + def _url_of(link): + m = re.search(r'\((https?://[^)]+)\)', link) + return (m.group(1) if m else link).rstrip('.,;)') + + for link in md_links: + if not any(_url_of(link) in ref for ref in formatted_refs): + formatted_refs.append(link) + for url in bare_urls: + url = url.rstrip('.,;)') + if not any(url in ref for ref in formatted_refs): + formatted_refs.append(f'[{url}]({url})') + + # Whatever is left once citekeys and URLs are removed is genuine free-text that the + # pipeline can't resolve — surface it so it can be turned into a citekey. + for url in bare_urls: + leftover = leftover.replace(url, ' ', 1) + if re.search(r'[A-Za-z0-9@]', leftover): + where = f" in {context}" if context else "" + print(f"Warning: unresolved free-text reference{where} (needs a citekey): {leftover.strip(' ,;.')!r}") + return list(dict.fromkeys(formatted_refs)) def fix_bare_urls_in_parens(text): From e5b99cdce12d335f5826bce538d913bc3d97ddba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Wallrich Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 11:12:08 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 5/8] Regenerate apa_lookup + reference list page; auto-build the reference list Reran bibtex_to_apa.js against the corrected "Glossary BibTex" GDoc, picking up the 22 corporate-author fixes (e.g. "Team, R. C." -> "R Core Team") and the 7 new entries (Cohen 1988, Frigg & Hartmann 2020, Tenny & Abdelgawad 2021, Borsboom et al. 2004, Nimon 2012, APA SES Task Force 2007, Anderson et al. 2012). apa_lookup.json: 706 -> 713 entries. The public "List of References" page (content/glossary/references/index.md) was a years-stale hand-exported Zotero bibliography (546 entries) and is linked from all five glossary _index pages and the per-term note. Replaced it with output generated from apa_lookup.json (710 unique references) via a new generator, content/glossary/_build_references.py, and wired that into data-processing.yml to run after the APA-lookup step so the page stays in sync going forward. Note: per-term references baked into the language .md files still need a _create_glossaries.py regeneration to reflect the corrected apa_lookup. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- .github/workflows/data-processing.yml | 8 + content/glossary/_build_references.py | 72 + content/glossary/apa_lookup.json | 73 +- content/glossary/references/index.md | 1803 ++++++++++--------------- 4 files changed, 831 insertions(+), 1125 deletions(-) create mode 100644 content/glossary/_build_references.py diff --git a/.github/workflows/data-processing.yml b/.github/workflows/data-processing.yml index 3a62e04ff2..f539024e5e 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/data-processing.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/data-processing.yml @@ -269,6 +269,14 @@ jobs: cd bibtex_to_apa node bibtex_to_apa.js -o '../content/glossary/apa_lookup.json' + #======================================== + # Regenerate the glossary reference list page from apa_lookup.json so the + # public "List of References" stays in sync with the dynamic glossary. + #======================================== + - name: Build glossary reference list + continue-on-error: true # Continue even if this step fails + run: python3 content/glossary/_build_references.py + #======================================== # Process and generate glossary files #======================================== diff --git a/content/glossary/_build_references.py b/content/glossary/_build_references.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5e587600d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/glossary/_build_references.py @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +"""Generate the glossary reference list page from apa_lookup.json. + +The dynamic glossary resolves per-term references from apa_lookup.json (built by +bibtex_to_apa/bibtex_to_apa.js from the "Glossary BibTex" Google Doc). This script +renders the same data as the public "List of References" page so the two stay in +sync. Run it after apa_lookup.json is regenerated: + + python3 content/glossary/_build_references.py +""" + +import html +import json +import os +import re + +script_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)) +apa_path = os.path.join(script_dir, "apa_lookup.json") +out_path = os.path.join(script_dir, "references", "index.md") + +URL_RE = re.compile(r"(https?://[^\s<>]+[^\s<>.,;)])") + +HEADER = """--- +title: List of References +--- + +You can find the list of all references that were used to create the Glossary. + +{{< alert info >}} + +We are currently working on a better way to display and cross-link the references with the terms they are used for. + +{{< /alert >}} + +
+""" + + +def sort_key(citation): + # Sort like a bibliography: by the leading author/title text, ignoring + # leading markup/punctuation and case. + return re.sub(r"^[^\w]+", "", citation).casefold() + + +def render(citation): + """HTML-escape a citation string and turn its URLs into links.""" + escaped = html.escape(citation) + # URLs can't contain the entities introduced by escaping, so it is safe to + # linkify after escaping. + return URL_RE.sub(lambda m: f'{m.group(1)}', escaped) + + +def main(): + with open(apa_path, encoding="utf-8") as f: + apa = json.load(f) + + # Dedupe identical citation strings (distinct keys can share a reference). + citations = sorted(set(apa.values()), key=sort_key) + + lines = [HEADER] + for citation in citations: + lines.append(f'
{render(citation)}
') + lines.append("
\n") + + os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(out_path), exist_ok=True) + with open(out_path, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f: + f.write("\n".join(lines)) + + print(f"Wrote {len(citations)} references to {out_path}") + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main() diff --git a/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json b/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json index 671211dfe2..f207b64d8b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json +++ b/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ { "CESSDA_DataManagement": "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", - "Stanford_DataManagementPlans": "Stanford Libraries. (n.d.). Data Management Plans | Stanford Libraries. https://guides.library.stanford.edu/dmps", + "Stanford_DataManagementPlans": "Stanford Libraries. (n.d.). Data Management Plans | Stanford Libraries. https://library.stanford.edu/research/data-management-services/data-management-plans", "EU_DataProtection": "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en", "DataCite_MetadataSchema": "DataCite Schema. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. https://schema.datacite.org/", "cook1979quasi": "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "AlbayrakOkoroji2019": "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", "AlbayrakAydemir2020": "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", "ALLEA2017": "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "AllenMcGonagleOConnellND": "Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://credit.niso.org/", + "AllenMcGonagleOConnellND": "Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/", "Ali2021": "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", "APA2007": "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.", "Anderson2010": "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", @@ -33,11 +33,11 @@ "AnonFOSTERND": "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science", "AnonDOIHandbook2019": "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook.", "AnonSherpaRomeoND": "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/", - "AnonCodebookND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a codebook?. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/sites/icpsr/posts/shared/what-is-a-codebook", + "AnonCodebookND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a codebook?. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html", "icpsr_codebook": "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983", "AnonDOIAPA2009_2020": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a digital object identifier, or DOI?. Retrieved from https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/faqs/what-is-doi", "AnonReportingGuidelineND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline?. Retrieved from https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", - "AnonImpact2021": "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/", + "AnonImpact2021": "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/", "AnonOpenEducationND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is open education?. Retrieved from https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", "AnonPlagiarismND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is plagiarism?. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/category/preventing-plagiarism/", "AnonDataAvailabilityND": "Anon. (n.d.). Data availability statements. Retrieved from https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/data-availability-statements", @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ "BenjaminiBraun2002": "Benjamini, Y., & Braun, H. (2002). John W. Tukey’s contributions to multiple comparisons. The Annals of Statistics, 30(6), 1576–1594. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1043351247", "BenoitEtAl2016": "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", "BhopalEtAl1997": "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "LexicoBias": "BIAS | Definition of BIAS by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BIAS. (n.d.). Lexico Dictionaries | English. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/bias_1", + "LexicoBias": "BIAS | Definition of BIAS by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BIAS. (n.d.). Lexico Dictionaries | English. https://www.lexico.com/definition/bias", "BIDSModalityND": "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html", "BIDSAbout2020": "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io", "BikEtAl2016": "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", @@ -126,10 +126,10 @@ "CarterTillingMunafo2021": "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", "Case1928": "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", "CassidyEtAl2019": "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "CentreForEvaluationND": "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "CentreForOpenScience2011": "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/", - "CentreForOpenScienceND": "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/", - "CESSDATrainingTeam2017": "Team, C. T. (2017–2020). CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide. CESSDA ERIC. https://www.cessda.eu/DMGuide", + "CentreForEvaluationND": "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "CentreForOpenScience2011": "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/", + "CentreForOpenScienceND": "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/", + "CESSDATrainingTeam2017": "CESSDA Training Team. (2017–2020). CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide. CESSDA ERIC. https://www.cessda.eu/DMGuide", "Chambers2013": "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", "ChambersEtAl2015": "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", "ChambersTzavella2020": "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", @@ -146,8 +146,8 @@ "Coles2020": "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", "cos_registered_reports": "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports", "repliCATS": "Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science | The repliCATS project. (n.d.). University of Melbourne.", - "Committee2019": "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "COAR2020": "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829", + "Committee2019": "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "COAR2020": "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829", "Cook1979": "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", "Coproduction2021": "Collective, C. (2021). What Co-production means to us. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us", "Corley2011": "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ "Nature2006": "Correction or retraction? (2006). Nature, 444(7116), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b", "Corti2019": "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage.", "Cowan2020": "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "CRediT": "CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. (n.d.). Casrai. https://credit.niso.org/", + "CRediT": "CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. (n.d.). Casrai. https://casrai.org/credit/", "Crenshaw1989": "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", "Cronbach1955": "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", "Cronin2001": "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ "HerrmannovaKnoth2016": "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", "Heyman2020": "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", "Higgins2019": "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Higher_Education_Funding_Council_for_England_n_d": "for England, H. E. F. C. (n.d.). About the REF. https://ref.ac.uk/about-the-ref/what-is-the-ref/", + "Higher_Education_Funding_Council_for_England_n_d": "Higher Education Funding Council for England. (n.d.). About the REF. https://ref.ac.uk/about-the-ref/what-is-the-ref/", "Himmelstein2019": "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", "Hirsch2005": "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", "Hitchcock2002": "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ "Hurlbert1984": "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", "Ikeda2019": "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", "GitInitialRevision": "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290", - "ICMJE2019": "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf", + "ICMJE2019": "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf", "icmje_conflicts": "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", "INVOLVE": "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/", "ISO1993": "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", @@ -330,13 +330,13 @@ "Ioannidis2018": "Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468", "Ioannidis2023": "Ioannidis, J. P. (2023). Systematic reviews for basic scientists: a different beast. Physiological Reviews, 103(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00028.2022", "Ioannidis2015": "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "JabRef2021": "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org", + "JabRef2021": "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org", "Jacobson2019": "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075", "Jafar2018": "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", "James2016": "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", "Jamovi": "Jamovi. (n.d.). Jamovi—Stats. Open. Now. Jamovi. https://www.jamovi.org/", "Jannot2013": "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "JASP2020": "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].", + "JASP2020": "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].", "John2012": "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", "Jones2020": "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", "Joseph2011": "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", @@ -488,9 +488,9 @@ "OpenAire_Amnesia": "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/", "UNESCO_OER": "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer", "OERCommons_OSKB": "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", - "Open_Science_Collaboration2015": "Collaboration, O. S. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Open_Science_Collaboration2015": "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", "Open_Aire2020": "Aire, O. (2020). High accuracy Data anonymisation. Amnesia. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/", - "Open_Source_Initiative_n_d": "Initiative, O. S. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Open_Source_Initiative_n_d": "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", "Orben2019": "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", "ORCID": "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/", "OSF": "OSF. (n.d.). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/", @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ "Ottmann2011": "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", "Oxford_Dictionaries2017": "Bias—definition of bias in English. (2017). https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bias", "Oxford_Reference2017": "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530", - "CoProductionCollective": "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us", + "CoProductionCollective": "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach", "Padilla1994": "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024", "Page2021": "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", "Patience2019": "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117", @@ -534,13 +534,13 @@ "PublicationBias2019": "Publication Bias. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalog of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", "PubPeer": "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", "RProject": "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", - "R_Core_Team2020": "Team, R. C. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/", + "R_Core_Team2020": "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/", "Rabagliati2019": "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", "Rakow2014": "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405", "Ramagopalan2014": "Ramagopalan, S. V., Skingsley, A. P., Handunnetthi, L., Klingel, M., Magnus, D., Pakpoor, J., & Goldacre, B. (2014). Prevalence of primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional study. F1000Research, 3, 77. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3784.1", "RecommendedDataRepositories": "Scientific Data. (n.d.). Recommended Data Repositories. Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories", - "ReplicationMarkets": "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://replicationmarkets.org/", - "RepliCATS_project2020": "project, R. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/", + "ReplicationMarkets": "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "RepliCATS_project2020": "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/", "ReproducibiliTea_n_d": "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", "Research_Data_Alliance2020": "Alliance, R. D. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", "RetractionWatch": "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/", @@ -634,12 +634,12 @@ "Tenney2019": "Tenney, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2019). Statistical significance. In StatsPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535373/", "Tscharntke2007": "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018", "Thaler2017": "Thaler, K. M. (2017). Mixed Methods Research in the Study of Political and Social Violence and Conflict. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815585196", - "The_jamovi_project2020": "jamovi project, T. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org", + "The_jamovi_project2020": "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org", "The_Nine_Circles_of_Scientific_Hell2012": "The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell. (2012). In Perspectives on Psychological Science (Vol. 7, pp. 643–644). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", "The_R_Foundation_n_d": "The R Foundation. (n.d.). The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/", - "COPE2021": "on Publication Ethics, T. C. (n.d.). Transparency & best practice – DOAJ. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/", - "CONSORT2010": "Group, T. C., Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "ALLEA2021": "of Conduct for Research Integrity, T. E. C. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "COPE2021": "The Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Transparency & best practice – DOAJ. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/", + "CONSORT2010": "The CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "ALLEA2021": "ALLEA. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "OpenDefinition2021": "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", "OpenSourceDefinition2021": "Definition, T. O. S. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/osd", "SlowScience2010": "Academy, T. S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. SLOW-SCIENCE.Org — Bear with Us, While We Think. http://slow-science.org/", @@ -653,9 +653,9 @@ "Tukey1977": "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", "Tvina2019": "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260", "Uhlmann2019": "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "University_of_Oxford2023": "of Oxford, U. (2023). Plagiarism. https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism", + "University_of_Oxford2023": "University of Oxford. (2023). Plagiarism. https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism", "UKRN2021": "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "Burnette2016": "of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, U., Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Burnette2016": "University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", "van_de_Schoot2021": "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", "Vazire2018": "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", "Vazire2020": "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3", @@ -677,11 +677,11 @@ "Wasserstein2016": "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", "Webster2020": "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5", "Wendl2007": "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b", - "ICPSR2021": "ICPSR. (n.d.). What is a Codebook? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/sites/icpsr/posts/shared/what-is-a-codebook", + "ICPSR2021": "ICPSR. (n.d.). What is a Codebook? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html", "EQUATOR2021": "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", "CrowdsourcingWeek2021": "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", - "EUDatasharing2021": "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about", - "ESRC2021": "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/", + "EUDatasharing2021": "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing", + "ESRC2021": "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/", "OpenDataHandbook2021": "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/", "OpensourceCom2021": "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", "Whitaker2020": "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ "Wingen2020": "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", "Winter2020": "Winter, S. R., Rice, C., Capps, J., Trombley, J., Milner, M. N., Anania, E. C., Walters, N. W., & Baugh, B. S. (2020). An analysis of a pilot’s adherence to their personal weather minimums. Safety Science, 123, 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104576", "Woelfle2011": "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149", - "JCGM2008": "of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM, W. G. 1. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (pp. 1–120). JCGM. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6", + "JCGM2008": "Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (pp. 1–120). JCGM. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6", "World_Wide_Web_Consortium2021": "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", "Wren2019": "Wren, J. D., Valencia, A., & Kelso, J. (2019). Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention. Bioinformatics, 35(18), 3217–3218. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz071", "Wuchty2007": "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099", @@ -704,5 +704,12 @@ "Yeung2020a": "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/", "Zenodo": "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", "Zurn2020": "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009", - "Zwaan2018": "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan2018": "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972", + "cohen_1988": "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.", + "frigg_hartmann_2020": "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "tenny_abdelgawad_2021": "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/", + "borsboom_et_al_2004": "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061", + "nimon_2012": "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322", + "saegert_et_al_2007": "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association.", + "anderson_et_al_2012": "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/content/glossary/references/index.md b/content/glossary/references/index.md index fbb5537099..8fd0eb44cf 100644 --- a/content/glossary/references/index.md +++ b/content/glossary/references/index.md @@ -11,1096 +11,715 @@ We are currently working on a better way to display and cross-link the reference {{< /alert >}}
-
A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. (n.d.). OpenNeuro. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://openneuro.org/
- -
Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes Toward Open Science and Public Data Sharing: A Survey Among Members of the German Psychological Society. Social Psychology, 50(4), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384
- -
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Bastiaansen, J. A., Benjamin, D. J., Boehm, U., Botvinik-Nezer, R., Bringmann, L. F., Busch, N., Caruyer, E., Cataldo, A. M., Cowan, N., Delios, A., van Dongen, N. N. N., Donkin, C., van Doorn, J., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2021). Guidance for conducting and reporting multi-analyst studies [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh
- -
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., Chambers, C. D., Fisher, A., Gelman, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., Ioannidis, J. P., Johnson, E., Jonas, K., Kousta, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., Lindsay, D. S., Morey, C. C., Munafò, M., Newell, B. R., … Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
- -
Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2018a, April 16). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Contemporary Issues in Teaching and Learning. https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/
- -
Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2018b, November 29). Academics’ role on the future of higher education: Important but unrecognised. Contemporary Issues in Teaching and Learning. https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/11/29/academics-role-on-the-future-of-higher-education-important-but-unrecognised/
- -
Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020, February 20). ‘The hidden costs of being a scholar from the Global South’ is locked The hidden costs of being a scholar from the Global South. LSE Higher Education. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/
- -
Albayrak-Aydemir, N., & Okoroji, C. (n.d.). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student (A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates: Surviving Postgraduate Study, pp. 63–66). The British Psychological Society.
- -
Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806
- -
ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition). ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
- -
American Psychological Association,Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA task force on Socioeconomic status. American Psychological Association.
- -
Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032
- -
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2010). The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3
- -
Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783
- -
Australian Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from http://www.aus-rn.org/
- -
Authorship & contributorship | The BMJ. (n.d.). The British Medical Journal. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship
- -
Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. Retrieved 11 July 2021, from https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes
- -
Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104
- -
Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760
- -
Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7
- -
Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for Reproducible Research. ArXiv:1802.03311 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311
- -
Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis”  in psychology hold for experimental economics? In A. Lewis (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behavior (2nd ed.). CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
- -
Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PLOS ONE, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025
- -
Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve.2.0: Estimating Replication Rates and Discovery Rates [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn
- -
Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013
- -
Baturay, M. H. (2015). An Overview of the World of MOOCs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685
- -
Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining ‘Early Career’ in Research. Higher Education, 45(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612
- -
Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869
- -
Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131
- -
Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the Final Frontier? A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Role of Theory in Psychological Articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951
- -
Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced Text Analysis: Reproducible and Agile Production of Political Data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058
- -
Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: Views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314(7086), 1009–1009. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009
- -
BIAS | Definition of BIAS by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BIAS. (n.d.). Lexico Dictionaries | English. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/bias_1
- -
BIDS. (2020a). About BIDS. Brain Imaging Data Structure. https://bids.neuroimaging.io/
- -
BIDS. (2020b). Modality agnostic files—Brain Imaging Data Structure v1.6.0. Brain Imaging Data Structure. https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html
- -
Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications. MBio, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00809-16
- -
Bilder, G. (2013, September 20). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? [Website]. Crossref. https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/
- -
Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519
- -
Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077
- -
Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de-Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., Holcombe, A. O., Humphreys, M., Lewis, M., & Nosek, B. A. (2013). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. https://osf.io/tvyxz/
- -
BMJ. (2015, September 22). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. BMJ Open. https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/
- -
Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Grégoire, A., L’Espérance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating patient and public involvement in research. BMJ, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147
- -
Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115
- -
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.
- -
Borenstein, M. (Ed.). (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
- -
Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the $h_\alpha$ index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. ArXiv:1905.11052 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052
- -
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
- -
Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8
- -
Bortoli, S. (2021, April 1). NIHR Guidance on co-producing a research project. Learning For Involvement. https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project
- -
Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473
- -
Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics - Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0
- -
Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949
- -
Bramoulle, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2007). Research Cycles. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816
- -
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
- -
Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., Grange, J. A., Perugini, M., Spies, J. R., & van ’t Veer, A. (2014). The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
- -
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nYMQAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&ots=SqJAD7C-5w&sig=6hBnRUj4z31CbylBTRzfIudISME#v=onepage&q&f=false
- -
Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291
- -
Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691
- -
Breznau, N., Rinke, E. M., Wuttke, A., Adem, M., Adriaans, J., Alvarez-Benjumea, A., Andersen, H. K., Auer, D., Azevedo, F., Bahnsen, O., Balzer, D., Bauer, G., Bauer, P., Baumann, M., Baute, S., Benoit, V., Bernauer, J., Berning, C., Berthold, A., … Nguyen, H. H. V. (2021). Observing Many Researchers Using the Same Data and Hypothesis Reveals a Hidden Universe of Uncertainty [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/cd5j9
- -
Breznau, N., Rinke, E. M., Wuttke, A., Nguyen, H. H. V., Adem, M., Adriaans, J., Akdeniz, E., Alvarez-Benjumea, A., Andersen, H. K., Auer, D., Azevedo, F., Bahnsen, O., Bai, L., Balzer, D., Bauer, G., Bauer, P., Baumann, M., Baute, S., Benoit, V., … Żółtak, T. (2021). How Many Replicators Does It Take to Achieve Reliability? Investigating Researcher Variability in a Crowdsourced Replication [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j7qta
- -
Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christensen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
- -
Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402
- -
Brown, J. (2010). An introduction to overlay journals (Repositories Support Project, pp. 1–6). University College London.
- -
Brown, N. J. L., & Heathers, J. A. J. (2017). The GRIM Test: A Simple Technique Detects Numerous Anomalies in the Reporting of Results in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616673876
- -
Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making Academia More Accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348
- -
Brulé, J. F., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill.
- -
Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating Population Mean Power Under Conditions of Heterogeneity and Selection for Significance. Meta-Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874
- -
Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). P-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research. PLOS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144
- -
Budapest Open Access Initiative | Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002, February 14). https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
- -
Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191
- -
Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots Training for Reproducible Science: A Consortium-Based Approach to the Empirical Dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659
- -
Button, K. S., Lawrence, N., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. The Psychologist, 29(16), 158–167.
- -
Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—How can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747
- -
Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950
- -
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2011). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Wadsworth.
- -
Carp, J. (2012). On the Plurality of (Methodological) Worlds: Estimating the Analytic Flexibility of fMRI Experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149
- -
Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a Reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(01), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753
- -
Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn
- -
Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340.
- -
Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing Grade: 89% of Introduction-to-Psychology Textbooks That Define or Explain Statistical Significance Do So Incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072
- -
Center for Open Science. (n.d.). Registered Reports. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports
- -
Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Centre for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/
- -
Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
- -
Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered Reports: Realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022
- -
Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). The past, present, and future of Registered Reports [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298
- -
Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A Platform for Interlab Replication, Collaboration, and Resource Exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767
- -
Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtílek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLOS Biology, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127
- -
CKAN - The open source data management system. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://ckan.org/
- -
Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1822162
- -
Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: A meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001
- -
Closed access. (n.d.). CASRAI. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/
- -
Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186
- -
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). L. Erlbaum Associates.
- -
Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303
- -
Collaborative Assessment forTrustworthy Science|The repliCATS project. (n.d.). University of Melbourne. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/
- -
Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Board on Mathematical Sciences and Analytics, Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Research Data and Information, Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy, Policy and Global Affairs, & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303
- -
Confederation Of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories. (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4110829
- -
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally College Pub. Co.
- -
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building Theory about Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
- -
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
- -
Correction or retraction? (2006). Nature, 444(7116), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b
- -
Corti, L. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: A guide to good practice (2nd edition). SAGE Publications.
- -
Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., Naveh-Benjamin, M., Barrouillet, P., Camos, V., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes From an Extended Adversarial Collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415
- -
CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. (n.d.). Casrai. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://credit.niso.org/
- -
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 8. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8
- -
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
- -
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
- -
Crosetto, P. (2021, April 12). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? Paolo Crosetto. https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/
- -
Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G.-J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222
- -
Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387
- -
Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972
- -
Curry, S. (2012, August 13). Sick of Impact Factors | Reciprocal Space. Reciprocal Space. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/
- -
d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is Science Cumulative? A Physicist Viewpoint. In L. Soler, H. Sankey, & P. Hoyningen-Huene (Eds.), Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10
- -
Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. (n.d.). CESSDA. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide
- -
Data management plans | Stanford Libraries. (n.d.). Stanford Libraries. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://guides.library.stanford.edu/dmps
- -
Data protection. (n.d.). [Text]. European Commission - European Commission. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en
- -
Datacite Metadata Schema. (n.d.). DataCite Schema. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://schema.datacite.org/
- -
Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782
- -
Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y
- -
Declaration on Research Assessment. (n.d.). Health Research Board. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/
- -
Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A Traveler’s Guide to the Multiverse: Promises, Pitfalls, and a Framework for the Evaluation of Analytic Decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 251524592095492. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925
- -
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3923602
- -
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (Fourth edition). SAGE.
- -
Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Ozge Buzbas, E. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), rsos.200805, 200805. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805
- -
Dickersin, K., & Min, Y.-I. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1 Doing More Go), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x
- -
Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding Psychology as a Science: An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference. Palgrave Macmillan. https://books.google.ca/books?id=qCQdBQAAQBAJ
- -
Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920
- -
Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
- -
Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003
- -
Digital Object Identifier System Handbook. (n.d.). DOI. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.doi.org/hb.html
- -
Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 July 2021, from https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/
- -
Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The Mortality of Doctors in Relation to Their Smoking Habits. BMJ, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451
- -
Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). (n.d.). SKRN. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn
- -
Download JASP. (n.d.). JASP - Free and User-Friendly Statistical Software. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://jasp-stats.org/download/
- -
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.
- -
Du Bois, W. E. B. (2018). The souls of Black folk: Essays and sketches.
- -
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000a). A Nonparametric ‘Trim and Fill’ Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529
- -
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000b). Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel-Plot-Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
- -
Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M. H., Urlings, M. J. E., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1082-9
- -
Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372
- -
Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283
- -
Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., Baranski, E., Bernstein, M. J., Bonfiglio, D. B. V., Boucher, L., Brown, E. R., Budiman, N. I., Cairo, A. H., Capaldi, C. A., Chartier, C. R., Chung, J. M., Cicero, D. C., Coleman, J. A., Conway, J. G., … Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012
- -
Editorial Director. (2021, May). What is a group author (collaborative author) and does it need an ORCID? JMIR Publications. https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001449591-What-is-a-group-author-collaborative-author-and-does-it-need-an-ORCID-
- -
Eldermire, E. (n.d.). LibGuides: Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
- -
Eley, A. R. (Ed.). (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge.
- -
Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430
- -
Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making Open Science Work for Science and Society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7), 075002. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808
- -
Elm, E. von, Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 335(7624), 806–808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
- -
Elman, C., Gerring, J., & Mahoney, J. (Eds.). (2020). The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science. Cambridge University Press.
- -
Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322
- -
Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567
- -
Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2018). statcheck: Extract Statistics from Articles and Recompute p Values (1.3.0) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck
- -
Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5
- -
Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., Edelsbrunner, P. A., & Baribault, B. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5
- -
European Commission. (2021). European Commission. Responsible Research & Innovation | Horizon 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
- -
Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004
- -
Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190
- -
Evidence Synthesis. (n.d.). LSHTM. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis
- -
Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLoS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271
- -
Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114
- -
Farrow, R. (2017). Open education and critical pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991
- -
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- -
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
- -
Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: Consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023
- -
Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The Long Way From α-Error Control to Validity Proper: Problems With a Short-Sighted False-Positive Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587
- -
Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable Research Practices Revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150
- -
Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLOS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403
- -
Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can Results-Free Review Reduce Publication Bias? The Results and Implications of a Pilot Study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539
- -
Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (Eds.). (2003). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. Blackwell Science.
- -
Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
- -
Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the future together: Shaping autism research through meaningful participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318786721
- -
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067
- -
Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT) [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p
- -
FORRT - Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training. (n.d.). FORRT. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://forrt.org/
- -
Foster, MSLS, E. D., & Deardorff, MLIS, A. (2017). Open Science Framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/JMLA.2017.88
- -
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484
- -
Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22(4), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182
- -
Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005
- -
Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E. T., Hanea, A., Gould, E., Hemming, V., Hamilton, D. G., Rumpff, L., Wilkinson, D. P., Pearson, R., Singleton Thorn, F., Ashton, raquel, Willcox, A., Gray, C. T., Head, A., Ross, M., Groenewegen, R., … Fidler, F. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/2pczv
- -
Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Free Our Knowledge. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/
- -
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/
- -
Frith, U. (2020). Fast Lane to Slow Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007
- -
Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2013.10765486
- -
Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012 edition). North Carolina State University.
- -
Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642
- -
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (2013). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time [Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University]. http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/unpublished/p_hacking.pdf
- -
Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649
- -
Generalizability. (2018). In B. B. Frey, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and      Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284
- -
Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034
- -
Get Involved—Creative Commons. (n.d.). Creative Commons. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://creativecommons.org/mission/get-involved/
- -
Geyer, C., J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9) [Preprint]. Open Science Framework.
- -
Geyer, C., J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8) [Preprint]. Open Science Framework.
- -
Gilroy, P. (2002). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness (3. impr., reprint). Verso.
- -
Giner-Sorolla, R., Carpenter, T., Montoya, A., & Neil Lewis, J. (2019). SPSP Power Analysis Working Group 2019. https://osf.io/9bt5s/
- -
Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and Losers in the Global Research Village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13
- -
Ginsparg, P. (2001, February 20). Creating a global knowledge network. Cornell University. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~ginsparg/physics/blurb/pg01unesco.html
- -
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758
- -
Git—About Version Control. (n.d.). Git. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control
- -
Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A Brief History of the Hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033
- -
Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/24ncs
- -
Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027
- -
Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908
- -
Gorgolewski, K. J., Auer, T., Calhoun, V. D., Craddock, R. C., Das, S., Duff, E. P., Flandin, G., Ghosh, S. S., Glatard, T., Halchenko, Y. O., Handwerker, D. A., Hanke, M., Keator, D., Li, X., Michael, Z., Maumet, C., Nichols, B. N., Nichols, T. E., Pellman, J., … Poldrack, R. A. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44
- -
Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: The Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1), 88, s12961-019-0501–0507. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7
- -
GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/
- -
Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10, 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1
- -
Grzanka, P. R., Flores, M. J., VanDaalen, R. A., & Velez, G. (2020). Intersectionality in psychology: Translational science for social justice. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(4), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000276
- -
Guenther, E. A., & Rodriguez, J. K. (2020, October 14). What’s wrong with ‘manels’ and what can we do about them. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068
- -
Guest, O. (2017, June 5). @BrianNosek @ctitusbrown @StuartBuck1 @DaniRabaiotti @Julie_B92 @jeroenbosman @blahah404 @OSFramework Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* [Tweet]. @o_guest. https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368
- -
Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2021). How Computational Modeling Can Force Theory Building in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 174569162097058. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585
- -
Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). (2021, July 1). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/
- -
Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404
- -
Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556
- -
Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924
- -
Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., deMayo, B. E., Long, B., Yoon, E. J., & Frank, M. C. (2021). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: An observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494
- -
Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Magis-Weinberg, L. (2014). Only Human: Scientists, Systems, and Suspect Statistics. Opticon1826, 16. https://doi.org/10.5334/opt.ch
- -
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., … Oliphant, T. E. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
- -
Hart, D., & Silka, L. (n.d.). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research With Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 36(3), 79–85. https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/
- -
Hartgerink, C. H. J., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too Good to be False: Nonsignificant Results Revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71
- -
Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306
- -
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
- -
Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.
- -
Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE) [Preprint]. PeerJ Preprints. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1
- -
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in Science and the Science of Trust. In B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and Communication in a Digitized World (pp. 143–159). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_8
- -
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
- -
Henrich, J. P. (2020). The WEIRDest people in the world: How the West Became Psychologically Peculiar and Particularly Prosperous. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- -
Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (2016). Semantometrics: Towards Fulltext-based Research Evaluation. Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 235–236. https://doi.org/10.1145/2910896.2925448
- -
Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1217–1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6
- -
Higgins, J. P. T., & Cochrane Collaboration (Eds.). (2020). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Second edition). Wiley-Blackwell.
- -
Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128
- -
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
- -
Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing New Access to the General Curriculum: Universal Design for Learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990203500201
- -
Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are Assumptions of Well-Known Statistical Techniques Checked, and Why (Not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137
- -
Hogg, D. W., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. ArXiv:1008.4686 [Astro-Ph, Physics:Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.4686
- -
Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201
- -
Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, Not Authorship: Use CRediT to Indicate Who Did What. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048
- -
Holden, R. R. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (p. corpsy0341). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341
- -
Home | re3data.org. (n.d.). DataCite Schema. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://www.re3data.org/
- -
Homepage. (n.d.). Open Science MOOC. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://opensciencemooc.eu/
- -
Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2018). Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886
- -
How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. (n.d.). Kellogg Insight. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword
- -
Https://improvingpsych.org/. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://improvingpsych.org/
- -
Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097
- -
Huber, C. (2016a, November 1). The Stata Blog » Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/
- -
Huber, C. (2016b, November 15). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/
- -
Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a Name? Systematic and Non-Systematic Literature Reviews, and Why the Distinction Matters—Evidera (The Evidence Forum, pp. 34–37). https://www.evidera.com/resource/whats-in-a-name-systematic-and-non-systematic-literature-reviews-and-why-the-distinction-matters/
- -
Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009
- -
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (Third edition). SAGE.
- -
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661
- -
ICMJE | Home. (n.d.). International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Retrieved 11 July 2021, from http://www.icmje.org/
- -
Ikeda A., Xu H., Fuji N., Zhu S., & Yamada Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. 心理学評論刊行会. https://doi.org/10.24602/sjpr.62.3_281
- -
Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell · git/git@e83c516. (n.d.). GitHub. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290
- -
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (n.d.). ICMJE | Recommendations | Author Responsibilities—Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Relationships and Activities, and Conflicts of Interest. ICJME. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities--conflicts-of-interest.html
- -
INVOLVE – INVOLVE Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.invo.org.uk/
- -
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
- -
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices. PLOS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264
- -
JabRef—Free Reference Manager—Stay on top of your Literature. (n.d.). JabRef. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.jabref.org/
- -
Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691987007. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075
- -
Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, emermed-2017-207158. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158
- -
James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6
- -
Jamovi—Stats. Open. Now. (n.d.). Jamovi. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.jamovi.org/
- -
Jannot, A.-S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015
- -
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
- -
Jones, A., Worrall, S., Rudin, L., Duckworth, J. J., & Christiansen, P. (2021). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and analytical flexibility in the addiction stroop. Addiction Research & Theory, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2021.1876847
- -
Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). ‘Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489
- -
Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining GitHub. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories - MSR 2014, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/2597073.2597074
- -
kamraro. (2014, April 1). Responsible research & innovation [Text]. Horizon 2020 - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
- -
Kathawalla, U.-K., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2021). Easing Into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 18684. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18684
- -
Kelley, T. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. World Book Co.
- -
Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126
- -
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
- -
Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001
- -
Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L.-S., Kennett, C., Slowik, A., Sonnleitner, C., Hess-Holden, C., Errington, T. M., Fiedler, S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency. PLOS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456
- -
Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A Global Health Hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805
- -
Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in Research by People with Learning Disability: Origins and Issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x
- -
King, G. (1995). Replication, Replication. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28(3), 444. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301
- -
Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (Eds.). (2018). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.
- -
Kiureghian, A. D., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
- -
Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158
- -
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Brooks, B., Brumbaugh, C. C., Cemalcilar, Z., Chandler, J., Cheong, W., Davis, W. E., Devos, T., Eisner, M., Frankowska, N., Furrow, D., Galliani, E. M., … Nosek, B. A. (2014). Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project. Social Psychology, 45(3), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
- -
Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
- -
Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/w9nhb
- -
Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (n.d.). Towards Semantometrics: A New Semantic Similarity Based Measure for Assessing a Research Publication’s Contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11/12), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november14-knoth
- -
Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding Replications: A Sure and Simple Way to Improve Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586
- -
Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata: Analytic Uses of Process Information. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869
- -
Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
- -
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed). University of Chicago Press.
- -
Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812
- -
L. Haven, T., & Van Grootel, Dr. L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147
- -
Laakso, M., & Björk, B.-C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22856
- -
Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of Scooping – Case Study on Researcher Strategies against Fear of Scooping in the Context of Open Science. Data Science Journal, 16, 29. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029
- -
Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.
- -
Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses: Sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023
- -
Lakens, D. (2020a, May 11). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html
- -
Lakens, D. (2020b). Pandemic researchers—Recruit your own best critics. Nature, 581(7807), 121–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01392-8
- -
Lakens, D. (2021a). Sample Size Justification [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf
- -
Lakens, D. (2021b). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012
- -
Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving Inferences About Null Effects With Bayes Factors and Equivalence Tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065
- -
Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence Testing for Psychological Research: A Tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963
- -
Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind Peer Review by Academic Journals. In Blinding as a Solution to Bias (pp. 75–95). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X
- -
Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046
- -
Lazic, S. E. (2019, September 16). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? | BMJ Open Science. BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/
- -
Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166
- -
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Press.
- -
LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A Unified Framework to Quantify the Credibility of Scientific Findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489
- -
LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2019). A Brief Guide to Evaluate Replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843
- -
Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., Cheryan, S., Diekman, A., Dutra, N. B., Goh, J. X., Goodwin, S., Munakata, Y., Navarro, D., Onyeador, I. N., Srivastava, S., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue
- -
Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage Publications.
- -
Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature, 529(7587), 459–461. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a
- -
Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820
- -
Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). Open Source Initiative. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://opensource.org/licenses
- -
Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
- -
Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content Analysis by the Crowd: Assessing the Usability of Crowdsourcing for Coding Latent Constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338
- -
Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374
- -
Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222
- -
Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., Raddick, M. J., Nichol, R. C., Szalay, A., Andreescu, D., Murray, P., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: Morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey ★. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x
- -
Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625
- -
Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543
- -
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
- -
Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking Gender Seriously in Philosophy of Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1992(2), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1992.2.192847
- -
Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2019). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132
- -
Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag
- -
Lutz, M. (2019). Programming Python (Fourth edition). O’Reilly.
- -
Lynch, Jr., J. G. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919
- -
Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y
- -
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767
- -
Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A Discussion of Diversity and Inclusivity at the Institutional Level: The Need for a Strategic Plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education: JUNE: A Publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 16(3), A252–A260.
- -
Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging Data Analytical Work Reproducibly Using R (and Friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986
- -
Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data [Preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/m72gb/
- -
McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis, CRC Press.
- -
McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115
- -
Medical Research Centre. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Centre. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/
- -
Medin, D. L. (2012, February 1). Rigor Without Rigor Mortis: The APS Board Discusses Research Integrity [Blog]. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor
- -
Melissa S. Anderson, Emily A. Ronning, Raymond De Vries, & Brian C. Martinson. (2010). Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists’ Subscription to Norms of Research. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095
- -
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects? An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350
- -
Menke, C. (2015). A Note on Science and Democracy? Robert K. Mertons Ethos of Science. In R. Klausnitzer, C. Spoerhase, & D. Werle (Eds.), Ethos und Pathos der Geisteswissenschaften. DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013
- -
Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A.-M. (2019). Preregistration of Analyses of Preexisting Data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.493
- -
Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the Social Order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513
- -
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
- -
Meslin, E. M. (2008). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: Supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global bioethics: Issues of conscience for the twenty-first century (pp. 163–177). Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press.
- -
Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management Plan. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
- -
Mischel, W. (2009, January 1). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science
- -
Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., Coriat, A.-M., Foeger, N., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
- -
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
- -
Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089
- -
Monroe, K. R. (2018). The Rush to Transparency: DA-RT and the Potential Dangers for Qualitative Research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X
- -
Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X
- -
Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1
- -
Moretti, M. (2020, August 12). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? | by matteo moretti | Nightingale | Medium. Nightingale. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3
- -
Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1), 150547. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547
- -
Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community, 11(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1629/1147
- -
Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., Grahe, J. E., McCarthy, R. J., Musser, E. D., Antfolk, J., Castille, C. M., Evans, T. R., Fiedler, S., Flake, J. K., Forero, D. A., Janssen, S. M. J., Keene, J. R., Protzko, J., Aczel, B., … Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology Through a Distributed Collaborative Network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607
- -
Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590
- -
Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002
- -
Muller, J. Z. (2018). The tyranny of metrics. Princeton University Press.
- -
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
- -
Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) Psychology: Measuring and Mapping Scales of Cultural and Psychological Distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782
- -
Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, Steven N., J., & Moher, D. (2018, June 4). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/90753/
- -
Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wxn58
- -
Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245
- -
Neuroskeptic. (2012). The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519
- -
Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., Kriegeskorte, N., Milham, M. P., Poldrack, R. A., Poline, J.-B., Proal, E., Thirion, B., Van Essen, D. C., White, T., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500
- -
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
- -
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: A problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886
- -
Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322
- -
Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196
- -
Nittrouer, C. L., Hebl, M. R., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R. C. E., Lane, D. M., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115
- -
Nosek, B. A. (2019, June 11). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change
- -
Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215
- -
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
- -
Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
- -
Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published Results. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
- -
Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058
- -
Noy, N. F., & Guinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report  KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880. https://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101.pdf
- -
Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2
- -
Nüst, D., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. ArXiv:1806.09525 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525
- -
Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of Open Data and Computational Reproducibility in Registered Reports in Psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920918872
- -
Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2
- -
OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.oercommons.org/
- -
Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. High Accuracy Data Anonymisation. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://amnesia.openaire.eu/
- -
Open Educational Resources (OER). (2017, July 20). UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer
- -
Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB
- -
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716–aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
- -
Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. (n.d.). Foster. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science
- -
Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–465. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8
- -
ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://orcid.org/
- -
OSF. (n.d.). Open Science Framework. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://osf.io/
- -
OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/
- -
Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in Practice: Participatory Action Research to Develop a Model of Community Aged Care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(5), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x
- -
Our Approach | Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Co-Production Collective. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us
- -
Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and Comment: Ethnic Minority Scholars; Research, and Mentoring: Current and Future Issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024
- -
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
- -
Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117
- -
Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
- -
Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., Bland, A., Bradford, D. E., Bublatzky, F., Busch, N., Clayson, P. E., Cruse, D., Czeszumski, A., Dreber, A., Dumas, G., Ehinger, B. V., Ganis, G., He, X., Hinojosa, J. A., … Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr
- -
PCI Registered Reports. (n.d.). PCI. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about
- -
Peer Community In – A free recommendation process of scientific preprints based on peer-reviews. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://peercommunityin.org/
- -
Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
- -
Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847
- -
Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., … Würbel, H. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
- -
Pernet, C. (2016). Null hypothesis significance testing: A short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3
- -
Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., Salmelin, R., Schoffelen, J. M., Valdes-Sosa, P. A., & Puce, A. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0
- -
Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., & Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8
- -
Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa
- -
Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code Review For and By Scientists. ArXiv:1407.5648 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648
- -
‘Plan S’ and ‘cOAlition S’ – Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.coalition-s.org/
- -
Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012
- -
Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818
- -
Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163(1), 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887
- -
Popper, K. (2010). The logic of scientific discovery (Special Indian Edition). Routledge.
- -
Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in science: Representation, culture, and the dynamics of change in graduate education. Stanford University Press.
- -
Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2020). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f9m47
- -
Preregistration pledge. (n.d.). Google Docs. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf8RflGizFJZamE874o8aDOhyU7UsNByR4dLmzhOtEOiu8KRQ/viewform?embedded=true&usp=embed_facebook
- -
Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing, (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- -
Psychological Science Accelerator. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://psysciacc.org/
- -
Publication bias. (2019, May 2). Catalog of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/
- -
PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. (n.d.). Pubpeer. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.pubpeer.com/
- -
R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R Project. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://www.r-project.org/
- -
Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2020). Can Item Effects Explain Away the Evidence for Unconscious Sound Symbolism? An Adversarial Commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461
- -
Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2015). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405
- -
Recommended Data Repositories | Scientific Data. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories
- -
Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://replicationmarkets.org/
- -
ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). ReproducibiliTea. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://reproducibilitea.org/
- -
Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://retractionwatch.com/
- -
RIOT Science Club—Riot Science Club. (n.d.). Reproducible, Interpretable, Open, & Transparent Science. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from http://riotscience.co.uk/
- -
Rogers, A., Castree, N., & Kitchin, R. (2013). Reflexivity. In A Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530
- -
Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: Addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893
- -
Rose, D. (2000). Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307
- -
Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53(8), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3
- -
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the Digital Age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- -
Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
- -
Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2007). Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology, 179(6), 1091–1092. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140
- -
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2006). Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1
- -
Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open ? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818
- -
Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3
- -
Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social Class Differences in Social Integration at University: Implications for Academic Outcomes and Mental Health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6
- -
Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An Ethical Approach to Peeking at Data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214
- -
Salem, D. N., & Boumil, M. M. (2013). Conflict of Interest in Open-Access Publishing. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(5), 491–491. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1307577
- -
Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II Error in Multiple Comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010
- -
Schafersman, S. (1997, January). An Introduction to Science: Scientific Thinking and Scientific Method. An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html
- -
Schmidt, Robert. H. (1987). A Worksheet for Authorship of Scientific Articles on JSTOR. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68(1), 8–10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549
- -
Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2020). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS
- -
Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z
- -
Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061
- -
Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: Endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6
- -
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (n.d.). Does merely going through the same moves make for a “direct” replication? Concepts, contexts, and operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306.
- -
Science. (n.d.). Open Science Badges. Centre for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges
- -
Scopatz, A., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective computation in physics (First Edition). O’Reilly Media.
- -
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
- -
Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal Impact Factor: Its Use, Significance and Limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151
- -
Shepard, B. (2015). Community practice as social activism: From direct action to direct services. SAGE Publications, Inc.
- -
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
- -
Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0
- -
Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-Names Analysis Reveals No Evidence of Name-Meaning Effects: A Collaborative Commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802
- -
Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., Carlsson, R., Cheung, F., Christensen, G., Clay, R., Craig, M. A., Dalla Rosa, A., Dam, L., Evans, M. H., Flores Cervantes, I., … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646
- -
Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and How. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208
- -
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
- -
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630
- -
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014a). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242
- -
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014b). p -Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988
- -
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454
- -
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification Curve: Descriptive and Inferential Statistics on All Reasonable Specifications. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694998
- -
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z
- -
Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384
- -
Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4
- -
Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823
- -
Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396
- -
Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nurse Researcher, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317
- -
SORTEE. (n.d.). SORTEE. SORTEE. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://www.sortee.org/
- -
Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, Simple, and Not Wrong: In Search of a Short-Hand Interpretation of Statistical Significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185
- -
Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018, April 2). Confirmation bias. Catalog of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/
- -
Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847
- -
Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
- -
Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/
- -
Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing Samples in Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007
- -
Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust Your Science? Open Your Data and Code. https://doi.org/10.7916/D8CJ8Q0P
- -
Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: Audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4
- -
Suber, P. (2004, February 4). It’s the authors, stupid! SPARC Open Access Newsletter. https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4391161/suber_authors.htm?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- -
SwissRN. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 July 2021, from http://www.swissrn.org/
- -
Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is For All of Us [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cteyb
- -
Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U.-K. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2
- -
Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2021). Arrested Theory Development: The Misguided Distinction Between Exploratory and Confirmatory Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 174569162096679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966796
- -
Team, psyTeachR. (n.d.). P | Glossary. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary
- -
Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., … Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p
- -
Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs) [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak
- -
Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/
- -
The Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Transparency & best practice – DOAJ. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/
- -
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
- -
The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity | ALLEA. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
- -
The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. (n.d.). Open Knowledge Foundation. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://opendefinition.org/
- -
The Open Source Definition | Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). Open Source Initiative. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://opensource.org/osd
- -
The Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. SLOW-SCIENCE.Org — Bear with Us, While We Think. http://slow-science.org/
- -
Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F. G., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015
- -
Tierney, W., Hardy, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Huang, J. L., Vaughn, L. A., DeMarree, K., Igou, E. R., Chapman, H., Gantman, A., Vanaman, M., Wylie, J., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060
- -
Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002
- -
Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Morgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1
- -
Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., Evans, T. R., Henderson, E. L., Kalandadze, T., Nitschke, F. T., Staaks, J., Van den Akker, O., Yeung, S. K., Zaneva, M., Lam, A., Madan, C. R., Moreau, D., O’Mahony, A., Parker, A. J., … Westwood, S. J. (2020). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR) [Preprint]. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z
- -
Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. (2016). LIBER QUARTERLY, 25(4), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113
- -
Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018
- -
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed). Graphics Press.
- -
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
- -
Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the Peer Review Process: Can We Do Better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260
- -
Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561
- -
UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://www.ukrn.org/
- -
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Burnette, M., Williams, S., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Imker, H., & University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
- -
van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2
- -
Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884
- -
Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3
- -
Villum, C. (2014, March 10). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available – Open Knowledge Foundation blog. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/
- -
Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6
- -
Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How?: A Specification-Curve and Multiverse-Analysis Approach to Meta-Analysis. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(1), 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357
- -
Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating Research Assets: A Tutorial on the Git Version Control System. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826
- -
Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00019-9
- -
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
- -
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078
- -
Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., IJzerman, H., Legate, N., & Grahe, J. (2019). A Demonstration of the Collaborative Replication and Education Project: Replication Attempts of the Red-Romance Effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177
- -
Walker, P., & Miksa, T. (2019, November 26). RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard. GitHub. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard
- -
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717
- -
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
- -
Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582(7812), 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5
- -
Welcome to Sherpa Romeo—V2.sherpa. (n.d.). Sherpa Romeo. Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://openpolicyfinder.jisc.ac.uk/
- -
Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: However ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b
- -
What is a Codebook? (n.d.). ICPSR. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/sites/icpsr/posts/shared/what-is-a-codebook
- -
What is a reporting guideline? | The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). Retrieved 10 July 2021, from https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/
- -
What is Crowdsourcing? (2021, April 29). Crowdsourcing Week. https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/
- -
What is data sharing? | Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). Support Centre for Data Sharing. Retrieved 11 July 2021, from https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about
- -
What is impact? - Economic and Social Research Council. (n.d.). Economic and Social Research Council. Retrieved 8 July 2021, from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/
- -
What is Open Data? (n.d.). Open Data Handbook. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/
- -
What is open education? (n.d.). Opensource.Com. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education
- -
Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.
- -
Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L. S., Augusteijn, H. E. M., Bakker, M., van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2016). Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832
- -
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- -
Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012, May 9). Open Researcher &amp; Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem
- -
Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. ELife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547
- -
Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412
- -
Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149
- -
Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (pp. 1–120). JCGM. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6
- -
World Wide Web Consortium. (n.d.). Home | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) | W3C. Web Accessibility Initiative. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.w3.org/WAI/
- -
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
- -
Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
- -
Yamada, Y. (2018). How to Crack Pre-registration: Toward Transparent and Open Science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831
- -
Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685
- -
Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (n.d.). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis  Registered Report template: Main manuscript [Preprint]. Hong Kong University. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z3QBDYr86S9FxGjptZP94jJnZeeN4aQaBQP3VVT89Ec/edit#
- -
Zenodo—Research. Shared. (n.d.). Zenodo. Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://www.zenodo.org/
- -
Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009
- -
Zwaan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972
- + +
Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384
+
Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
+
Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/
+
Academy, T. S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. SLOW-SCIENCE.Org — Bear with Us, While We Think. http://slow-science.org/
+
Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/
+
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh
+
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
+
Aire, O. (2020). High accuracy Data anonymisation. Amnesia. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/
+
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021919228368
+
Albayrak, N. (2018). Academics’ role on the future of higher education: Important but unrecognised. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/11/29/academics-role-on-the-future-of-higher-education-important-but-unrecognised/
+
Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/
+
Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.
+
Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/
+
Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806
+
ALLEA. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
+
Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/
+
Alliance, R. D. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard
+
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association.
+
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.
+
Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032
+
Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095
+
Andersson, N. (2018). Participatory research—a modernizing science for primary health care. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 19(5), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.187
+
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3
+
Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b
+
Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook.
+
Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/
+
Anon. (n.d.). About arxiv. Retrieved from https://info.arxiv.org/about/index.html
+
Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/
+
Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/
+
Anon. (n.d.). Data availability statements. Retrieved from https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/data-availability-statements
+
Anon. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. Retrieved from https://schema.datacite.org/
+
Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn
+
Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/
+
Anon. (n.d.). INVOLVE – INVOLVE Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Retrieved from https://www.invo.org.uk/
+
Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses
+
Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science
+
Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is a codebook?. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is a digital object identifier, or DOI?. Retrieved from https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/faqs/what-is-doi
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline?. Retrieved from https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is open education?. Retrieved from https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is plagiarism?. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/category/preventing-plagiarism/
+
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
+
Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783
+
Arts and Humanities Research Council. (n.d.). Definition of eligibility for funding. Retrieved from https://ahrc.ukri.org/skills/earlycareerresearchers/definitionofeligibility/
+
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
+
AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/
+
Authorship & Contributorship | The BMJ. (n.d.). The British Medical Journal. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship
+
Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes
+
Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104
+
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
+
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374
+
Bahlai, C., Bartlett, L. J., Burgio, K. R., & others. (2019). Open science isn’t always open to all scientists. American Scientist, 107(2), 78.
+
Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760
+
Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7
+
Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.
+
Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/
+
Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025
+
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
+
Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn
+
Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013
+
Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685
+
Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612
+
Bazi, T. (2020). Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind? International Urogynecology Journal, 31, 481–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04187-2
+
Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869
+
Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131
+
Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951
+
Benjamini, Y., & Braun, H. (2002). John W. Tukey’s contributions to multiple comparisons. The Annals of Statistics, 30(6), 1576–1594. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1043351247
+
Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058
+
Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009
+
BIAS | Definition of BIAS by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BIAS. (n.d.). Lexico Dictionaries | English. https://www.lexico.com/definition/bias
+
Bias—definition of bias in English. (2017). https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bias
+
BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io
+
BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html
+
Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.
+
Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/
+
Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519
+
Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077
+
Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz
+
BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/
+
Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147
+
Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115
+
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.
+
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
+
Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.
+
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
+
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
+
Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8
+
Bortoli, S. (2021). NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. Learning For Involvement. https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project
+
Bos, J. (2020). Confidentiality. In Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences (pp. 149–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6_7
+
Boudry, M. (2013). The hypothesis that saves the day. Ad hoc reasoning in pseudoscience. Logique et Analyse, 245–258.
+
Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473
+
Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0
+
Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.
+
Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816
+
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
+
Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
+
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
+
Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291
+
Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691
+
Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980
+
Breznau, N., Rinke, E. M., Wuttke, A., Nguyen, H. H. V., Adem, M., Adriaans, J., Akdeniz, E., Alvarez-Benjumea, A., Andersen, H. K., Auer, D., Azevedo, F., Bahnsen, O., Bai, L., Balzer, D., Bauer, G., Bauer, P., Baumann, M., Baute, S., Benoit, V., & Żółtak, T. (2021). How Many Replicators Does It Take to Achieve Reliability? Investigating Researcher Variability in a Crowdsourced Replication. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j7qta
+
Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
+
Brodie, S., Frainer, A., Pennino, M. G., Jiang, S., Kaikkonen, L., Lopez, J., Ortega-Cisneros, K., Peters, C. A., Selim, S. A., & Vaidianu, N. (2021). Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(11), 957–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011
+
Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402
+
Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals (pp. 1–6) [Repositories Support Project]. University College London.
+
Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/
+
Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.
+
Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348
+
Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill.
+
Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874
+
Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144
+
Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., & O’Brien, J. M. (2019). Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(51), 25535–25545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910951116
+
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
+
Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
+
Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191
+
Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659
+
Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.
+
Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747
+
Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword
+
Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950
+
Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X
+
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally.
+
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2011). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Wadsworth.
+
Carney, D. R., & Banaji, M. R. (2012). First is best. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e35088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035088
+
Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149
+
Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753
+
Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn
+
Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414
+
Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072
+
Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports
+
Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis
+
Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/
+
Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/
+
CESSDA Training Team. (2017–2020). CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide. CESSDA ERIC. https://www.cessda.eu/DMGuide
+
CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide
+
Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
+
Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298
+
Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022
+
Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767
+
Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127
+
CKAN - The open source data management system. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://ckan.org/.
+
Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92
+
Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001
+
Closed access. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/.
+
Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach
+
cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/
+
Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186
+
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
+
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
+
Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303
+
Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html
+
Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science | The repliCATS project. (n.d.). University of Melbourne.
+
Collective, C. (2021). What Co-production means to us. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us
+
Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303
+
Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829
+
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.
+
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
+
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
+
Correction or retraction? (2006). Nature, 444(7116), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b
+
Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage.
+
Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415
+
CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. (n.d.). Casrai. https://casrai.org/credit/
+
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.
+
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
+
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
+
Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/
+
Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222
+
Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387
+
Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972
+
Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/
+
Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20
+
DataCite Schema. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. https://schema.datacite.org/
+
Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782
+
Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y
+
Declaration on Research Assessment. (n.d.). Health Research Board. https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/
+
Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/
+
Definition, T. O. S. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/osd
+
Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925
+
Dellavalle, R. P., Banks, M. A., & Ellis, J. I. (2007). Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Self-Plagiarism: How to Avoid Recycling Fraud. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(3), 527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.05.018
+
Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
+
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3923602
+
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
+
Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Buzbas, E. O. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 200805. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805
+
Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/
+
Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x
+
Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.
+
Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920
+
Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
+
Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003
+
Digital Object Identifier System Handbook. (n.d.). DOI. https://www.doi.org/hb.html
+
Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/
+
Dismukes, R. K. (2010). Understanding and analyzing human error in real-world operations. In E. Salas & D. Maurino (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (2nd ed., pp. 335–374). Academic Press.
+
Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451
+
Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility Network). (n.d.). SKRN. https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn
+
Download JASP. (n.d.). JASP - Free. https://jasp-stats.org/download/
+
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.
+
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.
+
Dubin, R. (1969). Theory building. The Free Press.
+
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529
+
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x
+
Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8.
+
d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10
+
Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372
+
Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283
+
Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012
+
Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/
+
Editorial Director. (2021). What is a group author (collaborative author) and does it need an ORCID? JMIR Publications. https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001449591-What-is-a-group-author-collaborative-author-and-does-it-need-an-ORCID-
+
Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300103
+
Eldermire, E. (n.d.). LibGuides: Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
+
Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360
+
Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430
+
Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808
+
Elm, E. von, Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 335(7624), 806–808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
+
Elman, C., Gerring, J., & Mahoney, J. (Eds.). (2020). The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science. Cambridge University Press.
+
Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322
+
Elsherif, M., Middleton, S., Phan, J. M., Azevedo, F., Iley, B., Grose-Hodge, M., Tyler, S., Kapp, S. K., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A., Grafton-Clarke, D., Yeung, S. K., Shaw, J. J., Hartmann, H., & Dokovova, M. (2022). Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k7a9p
+
Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567
+
Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck
+
Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.
+
Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5
+
European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
+
European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en
+
Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004
+
Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190
+
Everitt, B. S., & Skrondall, A. (2010). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics - Fourth Edition. Cambridge University Press.
+
Evidence Synthesis. (n.d.). LSHTM. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis
+
Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271
+
Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114
+
Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991
+
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
+
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
+
Ferguson, C. J. (2021). Providing a lower-bound estimate for psychology’s “crud factor”: The case of aggression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.
+
Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023
+
Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150
+
Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587
+
Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403
+
Fillon, A. A., Feldman, G., Yeung, S. K., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., Nanakdewa, K., & Brick, C. (n.d.). Correlational Meta-Analysis Registered Report Template.
+
Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539
+
Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
+
Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
+
Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.
+
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067
+
Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p
+
FORRT. (2021). Welcome to FORRT. Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training. https://forrt.org
+
Forscher, P. S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Coles, N. A., Silan, M. A., Dutra, N., Basnight-Brown, D., & IJzerman, H. (2022). The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221082970
+
Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88
+
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484
+
Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182
+
Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005
+
Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).
+
Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/
+
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/
+
Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007
+
Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003
+
Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.
+
Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642
+
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/
+
Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649
+
Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284
+
Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034
+
German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.
+
Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.
+
Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.
+
Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press.
+
Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/
+
Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13
+
Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).
+
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758
+
Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control
+
git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290
+
Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033
+
GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/
+
Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18.
+
Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.
+
Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027
+
Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908
+
Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44
+
Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7
+
GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/
+
Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1
+
Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.
+
Guenther, E. A., & Rodriguez, J. K. (2020). What’s wrong with ‘manels’ and what can we do about them. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068
+
Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368
+
Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585
+
Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404
+
Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556
+
Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924
+
Hamel, C., Michaud, A., Thuku, M., Skidmore, B., Stevens, A., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., & Garritty, C. (2021). Defining rapid reviews: A systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 129, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.041
+
Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/
+
Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494
+
Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH
+
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., & Gérard-Marchant, P. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
+
Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/
+
Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71
+
Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147
+
Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306
+
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
+
Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/
+
Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.
+
Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1
+
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.
+
Henrich, J. (2020). The weirdest people in the world: How the west became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus.
+
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
+
Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf
+
Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6
+
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
+
Higher Education Funding Council for England. (n.d.). About the REF. https://ref.ac.uk/about-the-ref/what-is-the-ref/
+
Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128
+
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
+
Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630
+
Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137
+
Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].
+
Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201
+
Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048
+
Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611.
+
Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341
+
Holm, S. (1979). A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
+
Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886
+
Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097
+
Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/
+
Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/
+
Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf
+
Hultsch, D. F., MacDonald, S. W., & Dixon, R. A. (2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(2), P101–P115. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.2.P101
+
Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
+
Hunter, J. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
+
Hunter, J. (2012). Post-publication peer review: Opening up scientific conversation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 63. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00063
+
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE.
+
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661
+
Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009
+
ICPSR. (n.d.). What is a Codebook? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html
+
Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.
+
Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/
+
Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/
+
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983
+
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
+
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html
+
INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/
+
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
+
Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468
+
Ioannidis, J. P. (2023). Systematic reviews for basic scientists: a different beast. Physiological Reviews, 103(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00028.2022
+
Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264
+
ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.
+
JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org
+
Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075
+
Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158
+
James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6
+
Jamovi. (n.d.). Jamovi—Stats. Open. Now. Jamovi. https://www.jamovi.org/
+
Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015
+
JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].
+
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
+
Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp
+
Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489
+
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
+
Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.
+
Kamraro. (2014). Responsible research & innovation. Horizon 2020 - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
+
Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2020). The consequences of data fabrication and falsification among researchers. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 1(2), 7–10.
+
Kapp, S. K. (2013). Interactions between theoretical models and practical stakeholders: the basis for an integrative, collaborative approach to disabilities. In E. Ashkenazy & M. Latimer (Eds.), Empowering Leadership: A Systems Change Guide for Autistic College Students and Those with Other Disabilities (pp. 104–113). Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN).
+
Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp
+
Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.
+
Kellogg Insight. (n.d.). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword
+
Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126
+
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
+
Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001
+
Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456
+
Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805
+
Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x
+
King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301
+
Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.
+
Kiureghian, A. D., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
+
Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158
+
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
+
Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
+
Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/
+
Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth
+
Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/
+
Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586
+
Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869
+
Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
+
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
+
Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812
+
Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.
+
Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029
+
Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.
+
Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023
+
Lakens, D. (2020). Pandemic researchers — recruit your own best critics. Nature, 581, 121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2180-7
+
Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html
+
Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf
+
Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012
+
Lakens, D. (2024). When and how to deviate from a preregistration. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), Article 117094. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117094
+
Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065
+
Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963
+
Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X
+
Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046
+
Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/
+
Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166
+
Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.
+
LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489
+
LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843
+
Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue
+
Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.
+
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
+
Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082
+
Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a
+
Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820
+
Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003
+
Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
+
Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338
+
Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374
+
Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222
+
Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x
+
Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625
+
Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543
+
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.
+
Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.
+
Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132
+
Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
+
Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919
+
Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113
+
Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag
+
Maass, W., Parsons, J., Purao, S., Storey, V. C., & Woo, C. (2018). Data-driven meets theory-driven research in the era of big data: Opportunities and challenges for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(12), 1253–1273. http://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00526
+
Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y
+
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767
+
Manalili, M. A. R., Pearson, A., Sulik, J., Creechan, L., Elsherif, M. M., Murkumbi, I., Azevedo, F., Bonnen, K. L., Kim, J. S., Kording, K., Lee, J. J., Obscura, Kapp, S. K., Roer, J. P., & Morstead, T. (2022). From Puzzle to Progress: How engaging with Neurodiversity can improve Cognitive Science.
+
Marks, D. (1997). Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289709166831
+
Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252.
+
Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986
+
Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/
+
Mayo, D. G., & Cox, D. R. (2006). Frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference. In Optimality: The second Erich L. Lehmann symposium (pp. 77–97). https://www.jstor.org/stable/i397717
+
McDaniel, G., & Corporation, I. B. M. (1994). IBM dictionary of computing. McGraw-Hill. http://archive.org/details/isbn_9780070314894
+
McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.
+
McGee, M. (2012). Neurodiversity. Contexts, 11(3), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212456175
+
McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115
+
Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. (n.d.). https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
+
Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/
+
Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor
+
Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244. https://meehl.umn.edu/sites/meehl.umn.edu/files/files/144whysummaries.pdf
+
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350
+
Menke, C. (2015). A Note on Science and Democracy? Robert K. Merton’s Ethos of Science. In R. Klausnitzer, C. Spoerhase, & D. Werle (Eds.), Ethos und Pathos der Geisteswissenschaften. DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013
+
Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.
+
Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513
+
Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013
+
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
+
Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.
+
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x
+
Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
+
Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science
+
Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
+
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
+
Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089
+
Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X
+
Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X
+
Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1
+
Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3
+
Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547
+
Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147
+
Morse, J. M. (2010). “Cherry picking”: Writing from thin data. Qualitative Health Research, 20(1), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309354285
+
Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607
+
Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590
+
Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002
+
Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.
+
Muma, J. R. (1993). The need for replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3605.927
+
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
+
Murphy, K. R., & Aguinis, H. (2019). HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9524-7
+
Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31, 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782
+
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/
+
Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
+
Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.
+
Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245
+
Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/
+
Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/
+
Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519
+
Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part I. Biometrika, 20(1/2), 175–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331945
+
Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500
+
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
+
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886
+
NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project
+
Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322
+
Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196
+
Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115
+
Nogrady, B. (2023). Hyperauthorship: The publishing challenges for “big team” science. Nature News. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00575-3 Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
+
Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change
+
Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215
+
Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
+
Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
+
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
+
Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058
+
Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf
+
Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.
+
Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525
+
Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961
+
Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2
+
OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/
+
OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB
+
of Open Science, T. T. E. T. D., & Data, O. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER QUARTERLY, 25(4), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113
+
Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People. Macmillan.
+
Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
+
Onie, S. (2020). Redesign open science for Asia, Africa and Latin America. Nature, 587, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03052-3
+
Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/
+
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
+
Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/
+
Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/licenses
+
Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd
+
OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/
+
Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education
+
Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8
+
Orben, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Crud (re)defined. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961
+
ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/
+
OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. (2021). https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/
+
OSF. (n.d.). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/
+
OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/
+
Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x
+
O’Dea, R. E., Parker, T. H., Chee, Y. E., Culina, A., Drobniak, S. M., Duncan, D. H., Fidler, F., Gould, E., Ihle, M., Kelly, C. D., Lagisz, M., Roche, D. G., Sánchez-Tójar, A., Wilkinson, D. P., Wintle, B. C., & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology. BMC Biology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01006-3
+
O’Grady, O. (2020). Psychology’s replication crisis inspires ecologists to push for more reliable research. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0894
+
O’Sullivan, L., Ma, L., & Doran, P. (2021). An overview of post-publication peer review. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.26
+
Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024
+
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
+
Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117
+
Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
+
Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr
+
PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/
+
Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about
+
Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
+
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
+
Peirce, J. W., Hirst, R. J., & MacAskill, M. R. (2022). Building Experiments in PsychoPy (2nd ed.). Sage.
+
Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022). Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13534
+
Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847
+
Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
+
Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3
+
Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., & Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8
+
Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0
+
Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
+
Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa
+
Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648
+
Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818
+
Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2017). OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data. Neuroimage, 144, 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.073
+
Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012
+
Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887
+
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
+
Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ
+
Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255
+
Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K., Hartmann, H., & others. (2020). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f9m47
+
Preregistration Pledge. (n.d.). Preregistration Pledge. Google Docs. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf8RflGizFJZamE874o8aDOhyU7UsNByR4dLmzhOtEOiu8KRQ/viewform?embedded=true&usp=embed_facebook
+
Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.
+
Protzko, J. (2018). Null-hacking, a lurking problem in the open science movement. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9y3mp
+
psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary
+
Publication Bias. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalog of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/
+
PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/
+
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
+
R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/
+
Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461
+
Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405
+
Ramagopalan, S. V., Skingsley, A. P., Handunnetthi, L., Klingel, M., Magnus, D., Pakpoor, J., & Goldacre, B. (2014). Prevalence of primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional study. F1000Research, 3, 77. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3784.1
+
Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories
+
Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530
+
Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/
+
RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/
+
ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/
+
Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/
+
RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/
+
Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068
+
Rogers, A., Castree, N., & Kitchin, R. (2013). Reflexivity. In A Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530
+
Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893
+
Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307
+
Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3
+
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision.
+
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
+
Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
+
Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140
+
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1
+
Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818
+
Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3
+
Rubin, M. (2022). Does preregistration improve the interpretability and credibility of research findings? [Powerpoint slides]. https://www.slideshare.net/MarkRubin14/does-preregistration-improve-the-interpretability-and-credibility-of-research-findings
+
Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6
+
Russell, B. (2020). A priori justification and knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/apriori/
+
Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214
+
Salem, D. N., & Boumil, M. M. (2013). Conflict of Interest in Open-Access Publishing. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(5), 491–491. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1307577
+
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/
+
Sasaki, K., & Yamada, Y. (2022). SPARKing: Sampling planning after the results are known. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ngz8k
+
Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010
+
Scargle, J. D. (1999). Publication bias (the “file-drawer problem”) in scientific inference. ArXiv Preprint Physics. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/9909033
+
Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html
+
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Sage.
+
Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549
+
Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS
+
Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419
+
Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6
+
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
+
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306.
+
Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z
+
Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061
+
Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges
+
Scientific Data. (n.d.). Recommended Data Repositories. Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories
+
Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do
+
Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental validity: A recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446302300113
+
Senn, S. (2003). Bayesian, likelihood, and frequentist approaches to statistics. Applied Clinical Trials, 12(8), 35–38.
+
Sert, N. P. du, Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
+
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
+
Shakespeare, T. (2013). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (4th ed., pp. 214–221). Routledge.
+
Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151
+
Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE.
+
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
+
Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0
+
Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802
+
Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646
+
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
+
Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208
+
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630
+
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988
+
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850
+
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454
+
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf
+
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z
+
Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384
+
Smela, B., Toumi, M., Świerk, K., Francois, C., Biernikiewicz, M., Clay, E., & Boyer, L. (2023). Rapid literature review: definition and methodology. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 11(1), Article 2241234. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234
+
Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4
+
Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823
+
Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396
+
Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317
+
SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/
+
Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185
+
Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/
+
Spiegelhalter, D., & Rice, K. (2009). Bayesian statistics. Scholarpedia, 4(8), 5230. http://dx.doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.5230
+
Stanford Libraries. (n.d.). Data Management Plans | Stanford Libraries. https://library.stanford.edu/research/data-management-services/data-management-plans
+
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174
+
Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847
+
Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
+
Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/
+
Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/
+
Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007
+
Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.
+
Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4
+
Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)
+
Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
+
Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing
+
Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/
+
Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.
+
Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2
+
Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder
+
Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123, 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5
+
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2015). Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review. In Accountability in Research (pp. 22–40). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.899909
+
Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p
+
Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak
+
Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak
+
Tenney, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2019). Statistical significance. In StatsPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535373/
+
Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/
+
Thaler, K. M. (2017). Mixed Methods Research in the Study of Political and Social Violence and Conflict. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815585196
+
The Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Transparency & best practice – DOAJ. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/
+
The CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
+
The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
+
The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell. (2012). In Perspectives on Psychological Science (Vol. 7, pp. 643–644). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519
+
The R Foundation. (n.d.). The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
+
The Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science. (2021). https://improvingpsych.org/
+
Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015
+
Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002
+
Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060
+
Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1
+
Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z
+
Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018
+
Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press.
+
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
+
Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260
+
Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561
+
UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer
+
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
+
University of Oxford. (2023). Plagiarism. https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism
+
University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
+
van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2
+
Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884
+
Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3
+
Velázquez, A. (2021). Data analysis: Definition, types and examples. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/what-is-data-analysis/
+
Verma, J. P., & Verma, P. (2020). Determining Sample Size and Power in Research Studies. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5204-5
+
Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/
+
Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6
+
Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
+
Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357
+
Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies on emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
+
Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826
+
Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9
+
Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078
+
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
+
Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177
+
Walker, N. (2021). Neuroqueer Heresies: Notes on the Neurodiversity Paradigm, Autistic Empowerment, and Postnormal Possibilities. Autonomous Press.
+
Walker, P., & Miksa, T. (2019). RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard. GitHub. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard
+
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717
+
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
+
Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5
+
Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/
+
Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b
+
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
+
Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.
+
Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832
+
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
+
Willroth, E. C., & Atherton, O. E. (2024). Best laid plans: A guide to reporting preregistration deviations. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231213802
+
Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem
+
Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547
+
Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412
+
Winter, S. R., Rice, C., Capps, J., Trombley, J., Milner, M. N., Anania, E. C., Walters, N. W., & Baugh, B. S. (2020). An analysis of a pilot’s adherence to their personal weather minimums. Safety Science, 123, 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104576
+
Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149
+
Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (pp. 1–120). JCGM. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6
+
World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/
+
Wren, J. D., Valencia, A., & Kelso, J. (2019). Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention. Bioinformatics, 35(18), 3217–3218. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz071
+
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
+
Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
+
Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831
+
Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685
+
Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/
+
Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/
+
Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009
+
Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972
From c47575d0659509a20e5770bb2e2f2c040deb3ec4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Wallrich Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:21:41 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 6/8] Italicise references (HTML APA output) and regenerate glossary content bibtex_to_apa.js now emits HTML APA citations (journal titles/volumes in ) instead of plain text, decoding citation-js's & back to a literal & so it survives Hugo's markdownify (authors re-escape correctly; URLs with query strings like ...&oldid= no longer double-escape). _build_references.py renders those HTML fragments and linkifies DOIs. Also fixed 6 more single-braced corporate authors in the source GDoc that the HTML page surfaced (Cornell University, The EQUATOR Network, Research Data Alliance, (The) Slow Science Academy, UK Reproducibility Network). Regenerated apa_lookup.json, the reference-list page, and all per-term glossary .md files (rebased onto main, so the Chinese glossary is already in the base and the per-term references now reflect the corrected/added citations with italics). Still flagged for the maintainer (left untouched, need the source library): ALLEA2017 / APA2007 look like duplicate citekeys (GDoc author != rendered author); Transparency2016 has no author in Crossref. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- bibtex_to_apa/bibtex_to_apa.js | 16 +- content/glossary/_build_references.py | 14 +- content/glossary/_glossaries.json | 6412 +++++++++-------- content/glossary/apa_lookup.json | 1426 ++-- ...1\210\331\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_.md" | 8 +- ...0\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" | 3 +- ...31\204\331\212\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" | 4 +- ...0\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261.md" | 4 +- ...30\267\331\206\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" | 2 +- ...0\250\330\257\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" | 2 +- ...30\261\331\203\330\252\331\207\330\247.md" | 4 +- ...0\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" | 8 +- ...30\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" | 6 +- ...0\247\330\263\331\210\330\250\331\212_.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" | 2 +- ...30\271\330\247\331\210\331\206\331\212.md" | 2 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" | 4 +- ...1\204\330\261_\331\202\331\205\331\212.md" | 6 +- ...31\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" | 6 +- ...30\252\330\257\330\246\331\210\331\206.md" | 6 +- ...1\205\331\204\331\201_\330\247\330\252.md" | 14 +- ...31\204\330\243\330\256\331\212\330\261.md" | 2 +- ...1\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" | 5 +- ...31\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" | 6 +- ...0\271\331\206_\330\250\330\271\330\257.md" | 3 +- ...31\206\330\252\330\261\331\206\330\252.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" | 2 +- ...\265_\331\201\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" | 6 +- ...0\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" | 2 +- ...1\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" | 3 +- ...31\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" | 3 +- ...31\210\330\261\331\203\331\212\330\257.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" | 6 +- ...0\247\331\204\330\266_\331\212\331\201.md" | 4 +- ...\212_\330\251_\331\206\330\264\330\261.md" | 6 +- ...30\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" | 4 +- ...30\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" | 2 +- ...1\201\331\204\330\263\331\201\331\212_.md" | 4 +- ...30\247\331\207\331\205\331\212\331\206.md" | 4 +- ...1\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" | 2 +- ...1\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" | 13 +- ...30\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...0\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...0\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_.md" | 2 +- ...1\204\331\206_\330\270\330\247\331\205.md" | 4 +- ...0\265\330\247\330\271\330\257\331\212_.md" | 12 +- ...\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204_\331\205.md" | 6 +- ...0\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" | 9 +- ...31\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" | 2 +- ...31\205\331\206\331\212\330\254\330\247.md" | 4 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" | 3 +- ...30\243\330\261\330\247\331\212\331\201.md" | 4 +- ...30\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257.md" | 2 +- ...31\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...31\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253.md" | 3 +- ...31\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204.md" | 9 +- ...30\252\330\271\331\205\330\247\330\261.md" | 2 +- ...0\252_\331\203\330\247\331\201\330\244.md" | 6 +- ...31\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...30\247\330\256\330\267\330\247\330\241.md" | 12 +- ...30\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" | 2 +- ...30\245\330\263\331\207\330\247\331\205.md" | 6 +- ...31\210\330\257\330\271\330\247\330\252.md" | 2 +- ...31\205\330\264\330\252\330\261\331\203.md" | 8 +- ...30\252\331\212\330\247\330\261\331\212.md" | 8 +- ...30\264\331\210\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" | 2 +- ...30\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" | 14 +- ...30\252\331\202\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" | 2 +- ...30\255\330\263\330\247\330\250\331\212.md" | 10 +- ...1\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" | 4 +- ...0\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" | 7 +- ...0\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" | 6 +- ...1\203\330\247\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...30\254\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" | 28 +- ...0\247\331\204\331\203\331\205\331\212_.md" | 2 +- ...1\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271\331\212.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\330\263\330\244\331\210\331\204.md" | 4 +- ...0\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" | 12 +- ...0\255\330\263_\330\247\330\263\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...30\265\330\255\331\212\330\255\331\212.md" | 2 +- ...31\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...1\210\330\265\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" | 3 +- ...0\247\330\257\331\212\331\205\331\212_.md" | 2 +- ...0\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" | 8 +- ...30\243\331\204\331\212\331\201\331\212.md" | 5 +- ...30\245\330\265\330\257\330\247\330\261.md" | 2 +- ...31\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" | 4 +- ...0\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...31\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212.md" | 2 +- ...\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...1\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" | 10 +- ...31\210\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\212.md" | 2 +- ...31\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...31\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" | 12 +- ...1\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" | 6 +- ...30\252\330\271\330\247\330\261\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...0\252_\330\264\330\247\330\250\331\203.md" | 2 +- ...30\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" | 10 +- ...0\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" | 8 +- ...0\271\330\257\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...0\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...0\247\330\267\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" | 6 +- ...1\204\331\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204.md" | 9 +- ...1\204\331\205\330\250\330\261_\330\261.md" | 2 +- ...0\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" | 4 +- ...31\204\331\203\330\247\330\260\330\250.md" | 6 +- ...31\205\330\250\330\247\330\264\330\261.md" | 8 +- ...30\247\331\207\331\212\331\205\331\212.md" | 6 +- ...1\204\330\252_\331\206\331\210\330\271.md" | 2 +- ...1\204\331\204_\330\247\330\255\331\202.md" | 5 +- ...31\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" | 4 +- ...0\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...0\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...1\204\330\253_\330\250\330\247\330\252.md" | 4 +- ...31\204\331\205\331\202\331\204\331\202.md" | 2 +- ...\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\330\263.md" | 4 +- ...\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\331\205.md" | 4 +- ...0\247\331\204\330\243\331\210_\331\204.md" | 2 +- ...1\204\330\253_\330\247\331\206\331\212.md" | 4 +- ...0\255\331\204_\331\204\331\212\331\206.md" | 4 +- ...0\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" | 5 +- ...0\247\331\204\330\263_\330\250\331\202.md" | 6 +- ...1\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" | 7 +- ...1\204\330\264_\331\205\331\210\331\204.md" | 4 +- ...0\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202.md" | 5 +- ...30\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" | 4 +- ...30\250\331\206\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" | 6 +- ...30\256\330\247\330\261\330\254\331\212.md" | 4 +- ...0\257_\330\247\330\256\331\204\331\212.md" | 2 +- ...30\270\330\247\331\207\330\261\331\212.md" | 2 +- ...1\202\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" | 6 +- ...0\243\331\210\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...1\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" | 7 +- ...30\271\330\257\330\247\331\204\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...0\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" | 6 +- ...31\204\330\250\330\267\331\212\330\241.md" | 6 +- ...30\261\330\247\331\203\331\205\331\212.md" | 8 +- ...31\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" | 10 +- ...1\204\330\252_\331\204\331\210\331\212.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" | 8 +- ...1\201\330\261\330\266\331\212_\330\251.md" | 10 +- ...30\263\330\247\330\271\330\257\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...30\255\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" | 4 +- ...0\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" | 12 +- ...1\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...0\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" | 15 +- ...1\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...1\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" | 7 +- ...1\203\331\210\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" | 8 +- ...31\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\331\212.md" | 4 +- ...1\204\330\256\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...1\203\331\212\330\250\331\212_\330\251.md" | 6 +- ...1\206\331\207\330\254\331\212_\330\251.md" | 8 +- ...1\204\331\212\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" | 10 +- ...0\252\331\205\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" | 6 +- ...0\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" | 13 +- ...31\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" | 3 +- ...30\250\330\257\331\212\331\204\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...31\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" | 6 +- ...31\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...1\210\330\266\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" | 3 +- ...0\266\331\210\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...31\204\331\201\331\206\330\247\330\241.md" | 4 +- ...0\272\331\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" | 2 +- ...\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...31\206\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\254.md" | 6 +- ...30\263\330\252\330\256\331\204\330\265.md" | 2 +- ...30\247\331\212\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" | 2 +- ...0\247\330\250_\330\261\331\212\331\201.md" | 2 +- ...0\254_\330\254\330\247\330\263\330\250.md" | 2 +- ...1\202\331\210\330\251_\330\254\331\212.md" | 4 +- ...31\204\331\205\330\265\330\257\330\261.md" | 3 +- ...30\263\330\247\331\212\331\206\330\263.md" | 6 +- ...\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" | 8 +- ...1\204\330\257_\331\205\330\247\330\272.md" | 4 +- ...31\207\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252.md" | 2 +- ...30\250\331\212\330\262\330\247\330\261.md" | 4 +- ...31\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" | 2 +- ...30\247\330\250\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" | 4 +- ...0\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...1\203\330\264\330\247\331\201\331\212_.md" | 8 +- ...30\247\330\265\331\201\330\247\330\252.md" | 6 +- ...30\252\330\264\331\207\330\247\330\257.md" | 8 +- ...31\206\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\241.md" | 2 +- ...0\264_\330\256\330\265\331\206\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...0\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" | 4 +- ...31\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\330\265\330\247\331\204\330\255.md" | 3 +- ...30\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" | 8 +- ...31\204\330\243\330\257\331\204\330\251.md" | 6 +- ...31\206\330\262\331\212\331\206\330\254.md" | 2 +- ...31\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" | 30 +- ...0\257\330\247\331\202\331\212_\330\251.md" | 6 +- ...30\247\331\205\331\210\331\201\331\212.md" | 4 +- ...0\262_\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212.md" | 3 +- ...30\252\330\264\330\271\330\250\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...31\210\330\266\330\271\331\212\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...1\204\330\265_\330\257\331\205\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...31\210\330\247\331\201\331\212\330\251.md" | 8 +- ...1\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" | 11 +- ...31\204\330\250\330\247\330\255\330\253.md" | 6 +- ...31\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261.md" | 8 +- ...1\204\330\261_\331\205\331\210\330\262.md" | 3 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" | 4 +- ...31\212\331\206\331\210\330\257\331\210.md" | 3 +- ...1\204\330\252_\330\271\331\210\330\257.md" | 2 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" | 2 +- ...0\264_\330\247\331\205\331\204\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...30\252\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" | 9 +- ...30\261\331\210\331\205\331\212\331\210.md" | 2 +- ...31\205\330\255\330\252\331\210\331\211.md" | 8 +- ...30\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\331\203.md" | 4 +- ...31\205\331\210\330\247\330\267\331\206.md" | 4 +- ...1\204\331\206_\330\263\331\210\331\212.md" | 6 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\255\330\270\330\261.md" | 6 +- .../\331\201\331\210\330\261\330\252.md" | 2 +- ...1\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...30\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254.md" | 11 +- ...0\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" | 9 +- ...31\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" | 5 +- ...30\257\331\207\330\247\330\261\330\252.md" | 4 +- ...1\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...30\247\331\204\331\210\331\212\330\250.md" | 2 +- ...0\251_\330\247\331\204\330\242\330\261.md" | 3 +- .../\331\205\330\244\330\264\330\261_i10.md" | 2 +- ...0\264\330\261_\330\245\330\252\330\264.md" | 4 +- ...0\247\331\204\330\253_\331\202\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...0\257\330\246_\331\201\331\212\330\261.md" | 5 +- ...30\261\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252.md" | 4 +- ...1\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" | 6 +- ...1\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" | 4 +- ...0\257\330\250\331\212_\330\247\330\252.md" | 8 +- ...30\250\330\261\331\205\330\254\331\212.md" | 4 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" | 4 +- ...1\204\330\271\331\204\331\205\331\212_.md" | 4 +- ...31\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" | 4 +- ...31\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" | 6 +- ...0\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" | 3 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\331\205.md" | 2 +- ...30\247\331\204\331\210\330\261\331\202.md" | 4 +- ...1\204_\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262.md" | 4 +- ...1\204\331\205\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" | 10 +- ...0\252_\331\205\331\212\331\212\330\262.md" | 2 +- ...0\252_\331\201\330\247\330\271\331\204.md" | 6 +- ...0\254\331\212_\330\263\331\210\331\206.md" | 2 +- ...31\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" | 4 +- ...1\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" | 8 +- ...0\255\331\206\331\211_\330\262\330\257.md" | 4 +- ...30\261\331\201\330\252\331\206\330\247.md" | 2 +- ...0\247\330\250_\331\212\330\261_pubpeer.md" | 3 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" | 6 +- ...31\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...0\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" | 4 +- ...0\261\330\247\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" | 3 +- ...30\247\331\203\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" | 2 +- ...30\255\331\210\330\247\331\201\330\262.md" | 8 +- ...00\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" | 6 +- ...4\344\274\260\345\256\243\350\250\200_.md" | 3 +- content/glossary/chinese/amnesia.md | 4 +- .../arrive\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/chinese/bizarre.md | 4 +- ...76\345\214\272\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" | 2 +- .../chinese/fair\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" | 5 +- content/glossary/chinese/g_power.md | 4 +- content/glossary/chinese/git.md | 8 +- .../chinese/h\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" | 4 +- .../chinese/i10\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/chinese/jabref.md | 2 +- content/glossary/chinese/jamovi.md | 4 +- content/glossary/chinese/jasp.md | 2 +- .../chinese/json_\346\226\207\344\273\266.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/chinese/manel.md | 8 +- .../m\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/chinese/openneuro.md | 6 +- .../chinese/p_\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" | 8 +- ...50\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" | 4 +- .../prepare_\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/chinese/pubpeer.md | 3 +- content/glossary/chinese/python.md | 2 +- "content/glossary/chinese/p\345\200\274.md" | 7 +- .../p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/chinese/r.md | 3 +- .../replicats\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" | 3 +- content/glossary/chinese/reproducibilitea.md | 3 +- ...46\344\277\261\344\271\220\351\203\250.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/chinese/sherpa_romeo.md | 2 +- content/glossary/chinese/strange.md | 2 +- content/glossary/chinese/studyswap.md | 4 +- .../s\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" | 4 +- .../chinese/s\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/chinese/tenzing.md | 2 +- .../chinese/trust\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/chinese/zenodo.md | 3 +- .../chinese/z\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" | 4 +- ...00\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" | 2 +- ...11\345\244\247\351\232\220\346\202\243.md" | 2 +- ...14\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" | 4 +- ...13\351\207\217\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" | 2 +- ...45\345\221\212\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" | 13 +- .../chinese/\344\272\213\345\220\216.md" | 2 +- ...14\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" | 4 +- ...44\344\272\222\350\260\254\350\257\257.md" | 6 +- .../\344\272\244\345\217\211\346\200\247.md" | 6 +- ...72\350\272\253\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" | 4 +- ...16\345\261\236\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" | 2 +- .../\344\273\230\350\264\271\345\242\231.md" | 3 +- ...43\347\240\201\345\256\241\346\237\245.md" | 4 +- ...27\345\214\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" | 28 +- .../\344\274\252\351\207\215\345\244\215.md" | 6 +- ...74\347\204\266\345\207\275\346\225\260.md" | 11 +- ...74\347\204\266\345\216\237\347\220\206.md" | 6 +- ...34\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" | 8 +- .../chinese/\344\277\241\345\272\246.md" | 4 +- .../\345\201\207\345\220\215\345\214\226.md" | 4 +- .../chinese/\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" | 10 +- .../\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" | 4 +- .../\345\205\203\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" | 3 +- ...26\345\205\203\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" | 4 +- ...10\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" | 4 +- ...46\347\232\204\344\277\241\344\273\273.md" | 30 +- ...54\344\274\227\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" | 4 +- .../chinese/\345\205\254\345\271\263.md" | 4 +- ...61\345\220\214\347\224\237\344\272\247.md" | 8 +- .../\345\205\261\346\234\211\346\200\247.md" | 8 +- ...05\345\256\271\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" | 8 +- ...05\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" | 2 +- ...20\347\201\265\346\264\273\346\200\247.md" | 10 +- ...40\345\274\217\345\217\221\350\241\250.md" | 2 +- ...22\347\225\214\346\240\207\345\207\206.md" | 2 +- ...15\347\216\260\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" | 4 +- ...51\347\233\212\345\206\262\347\252\201.md" | 3 +- .../\345\213\230\350\257\257\350\241\250.md" | 2 +- .../\345\214\205\345\256\271\346\200\247.md" | 4 +- .../\345\214\277\345\220\215\346\200\247.md" | 2 +- ...31\350\202\262\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" | 2 +- ...14\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" | 2 +- ...73\346\256\226\346\260\221\345\214\226.md" | 2 +- ...16\345\274\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" | 12 +- ...54\344\274\227\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" | 4 +- ...14\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" | 4 +- ...14\351\207\215\346\204\217\350\257\206.md" | 6 +- ...1p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" | 2 +- .../\345\217\215\350\272\253\346\200\247.md" | 4 +- ...75\345\261\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" | 14 +- ...50\346\210\226\347\201\255\344\272\241.md" | 4 +- ...40\345\212\240\346\234\237\345\210\212.md" | 6 +- ...10\347\211\271\345\256\232\345\276\213.md" | 4 +- ...41\345\272\246\351\235\251\345\221\275.md" | 6 +- ...57\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\200\247.md" | 9 +- ...57\346\216\250\345\271\277\346\200\247.md" | 12 +- ...57\350\256\277\351\227\256\346\200\247.md" | 9 +- ...57\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" | 11 +- ...5\347\216\260\345\215\261\346\234\272_.md" | 3 +- ...15\346\200\247\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" | 9 +- ...76\346\200\247\345\200\241\350\256\256.md" | 2 +- ...14\350\276\210\347\244\276\345\214\272.md" | 4 +- ...16\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" | 5 +- ...42\344\275\223\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" | 6 +- ...15\347\216\260\345\270\202\345\234\272.md" | 9 +- ...26\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" | 4 +- ...34\350\200\205\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" | 6 +- ...20\350\200\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" | 4 +- ...14\345\256\244\345\215\217\344\275\234.md" | 13 +- .../\345\244\232\346\240\267\346\200\247.md" | 2 +- ...32\351\207\215\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" | 4 +- .../\345\244\232\351\207\215\346\200\247.md" | 4 +- ...50\347\272\277\350\256\272\346\226\207.md" | 4 +- ...50\347\272\277\350\257\276\347\250\213.md" | 3 +- ...11\345\277\203\347\220\206\345\255\246.md" | 6 +- ...47\344\271\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" | 2 +- .../\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223.md" | 4 +- ...46\346\234\257\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" | 2 +- ...32\346\200\247\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" | 4 +- ...32\351\207\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" | 2 +- .../\345\256\242\350\247\202\346\200\247.md" | 4 +- ...4\346\200\247_\350\257\204\350\256\272.md" | 6 +- ...27\346\200\247\345\220\210\344\275\234.md" | 10 +- ...66\344\270\216\345\210\233\346\226\260.md" | 4 +- ...51\345\255\246\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" | 4 +- ...00\346\224\276\344\273\243\347\240\201.md" | 2 +- ...31\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" | 2 +- ...14\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" | 4 +- ...00\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257.md" | 3 +- ...57\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\272\223.md" | 5 +- ...31\350\202\262\350\265\204\346\272\220.md" | 3 +- ...20\345\234\250\347\272\277\345\272\223.md" | 3 +- ...00\346\224\276\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" | 4 +- ...00\346\224\276\346\235\220\346\226\231.md" | 4 +- ...00\346\224\276\346\274\202\347\231\275.md" | 8 +- ...\350\264\241\347\214\256\350\200\205id.md" | 4 +- ...00\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" | 10 +- ...21\345\255\246\344\270\255\345\277\203.md" | 2 +- ...21\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" | 4 +- ...15\345\214\226\345\267\245\345\205\267.md" | 2 +- ...00\346\224\276\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" | 4 +- ...00\346\224\276\350\256\270\345\217\257.md" | 4 +- ...00\346\272\220\350\275\257\344\273\266.md" | 3 +- ...25\347\224\250\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" | 8 +- ...67\346\200\247\345\243\260\346\230\216.md" | 2 +- .../chinese/\345\275\222\347\272\263.md" | 2 +- ...0\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246_.md" | 6 +- ...17\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" | 4 +- ...71\350\277\233\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" | 2 +- ...42\346\200\201\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" | 2 +- .../\346\205\242\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" | 6 +- .../chinese/\346\212\242\345\217\221.md" | 6 +- ...45\345\221\212\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" | 8 +- ...67\345\274\217\350\256\277\350\260\210.md" | 4 +- ...72\346\200\247\345\207\272\347\211\210.md" | 4 +- ...60\346\215\256\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" | 8 +- ...30\350\246\201\345\201\217\345\200\232.md" | 2 +- .../chinese/\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" | 5 +- ...10\346\240\207\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" | 4 +- ...17\346\204\237\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" | 4 +- ...00\346\240\207\350\257\206\347\254\246.md" | 6 +- ...60\346\215\256\345\205\261\344\272\253.md" | 6 +- ...65\345\247\224\345\221\230\344\274\232.md" | 4 +- ...56\345\217\257\350\247\206\345\214\226.md" | 4 +- ...41\347\220\206\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" | 6 +- ...66\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" | 4 +- ...07\345\214\226\347\250\216\350\264\237.md" | 6 +- ...07\347\214\256\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" | 8 +- ...24\347\251\266\344\272\272\345\221\230.md" | 6 +- ...15\346\200\247\351\231\220\345\210\266.md" | 8 +- ...77\344\273\243\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" | 4 +- ...61\345\223\215\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" | 10 +- ...2\345\267\245\346\231\272\350\203\275_.md" | 2 +- ...04\345\277\265\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" | 6 +- ...02\345\277\265\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" | 6 +- ...47\350\267\257\350\212\261\345\233\255.md" | 2 +- .../chinese/\346\261\207\347\274\226.md" | 8 +- ...50\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" | 9 +- ...00\345\212\261\346\234\272\345\210\266.md" | 8 +- ...10\346\234\254\346\216\247\345\210\266.md" | 2 +- .../\347\211\210\351\235\242\350\264\271.md" | 4 +- .../chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272.md" | 4 +- ...06\350\256\272\345\273\272\346\236\204.md" | 8 +- ...06\350\256\272\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" | 4 +- ...64\346\216\245\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" | 8 +- ...70\345\217\257\345\215\217\350\256\256.md" | 2 +- ...45\350\257\206\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" | 2 +- ...30\350\207\252\347\224\261\345\272\246.md" | 6 +- ...45\344\275\234\346\265\201\347\250\213.md" | 4 +- ...24\347\251\266\345\276\252\347\216\257.md" | 4 +- ...50\345\206\214\347\263\273\347\273\237.md" | 2 +- ...60\346\215\256\347\256\241\347\220\206.md" | 3 +- ...24\347\251\266\346\226\271\346\241\210.md" | 4 +- ...24\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" | 6 +- ...347\214\256\346\214\207\346\240\207_p_.md" | 6 +- ...56\350\256\244\345\201\217\350\257\257.md" | 8 +- ...76\344\274\232\350\236\215\345\220\210.md" | 6 +- ...76\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" | 7 +- .../\347\246\201\350\277\220\346\234\237.md" | 6 +- ...\346\200\247_\345\210\206\346\236\220_.md" | 4 +- .../\347\253\213\345\234\272\346\200\247.md" | 3 +- ...72\346\200\247\345\233\276\350\260\261.md" | 2 +- ...10\346\200\247\346\243\200\351\252\214.md" | 6 +- ...73\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" | 8 +- ...57\346\200\247\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" | 8 +- .../chinese/\347\272\242\351\230\237.md" | 4 +- ...76\344\274\232\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" | 2 +- ...45\345\220\216\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" | 4 +- ...45\345\220\216\346\211\271\350\257\204.md" | 4 +- ...16\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" | 6 +- ...37\350\256\241\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" | 7 +- ...37\350\256\241\345\212\237\346\225\210.md" | 15 +- ...37\350\256\241\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" | 4 +- ...41\346\230\276\350\221\227\346\200\247.md" | 5 +- ...37\350\256\241\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" | 2 +- ...43\346\241\210\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" | 2 +- .../\347\274\226\347\240\201\350\241\250.md" | 3 +- ...34\350\256\241\351\207\217\345\255\246.md" | 2 +- ...32\350\264\241\347\214\256\346\263\225.md" | 4 +- ...34\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" | 5 +- .../chinese/\350\201\224\351\224\201.md" | 2 +- ...60\346\215\256\347\273\223\346\236\204.md" | 4 +- ...0\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257_.md" | 12 +- ...50\351\235\242\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" | 2 +- ...62\347\272\277\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" | 6 +- ...45\350\257\206\345\271\263\345\217\260.md" | 2 +- ...57\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" | 10 +- ...41\347\256\227\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" | 4 +- ...15\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" | 4 +- .../\350\256\244\350\257\206\350\256\272.md" | 2 +- ...72\346\226\207\345\267\245\345\216\202.md" | 4 +- ...01\346\215\256\347\273\274\345\220\210.md" | 6 +- ...55\344\271\211\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" | 4 +- ...02\346\225\260\344\274\260\350\256\241.md" | 8 +- ...66\346\226\257\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" | 4 +- ...66\346\226\257\346\216\250\346\226\255.md" | 14 +- .../chinese/\350\264\241\347\214\256.md" | 6 +- ...62\345\210\206\347\261\273\346\263\225.md" | 4 +- ...7_\347\275\262\345\220\215\346\235\203.md" | 4 +- ...05\345\212\251\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" | 4 +- ...05\345\212\251\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" | 2 +- ...51\346\200\247\347\273\210\346\255\242.md" | 8 +- .../\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" | 7 +- ...16\345\272\246\346\270\205\345\215\225.md" | 4 +- ...46\344\271\240\350\256\276\350\256\241.md" | 6 +- ...35\346\212\244\346\235\241\344\276\213.md" | 5 +- .../\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" | 4 +- ...3\347\273\237_\347\251\272\345\255\220.md" | 4 +- ...31\350\257\257\346\243\200\346\265\213.md" | 12 +- ...15\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" | 2 +- ...03\350\212\202\345\217\230\351\207\217.md" | 2 +- ...00\351\252\214\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" | 6 +- ...73\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" | 2 +- .../\351\242\204\345\215\260\346\234\254.md" | 4 +- .../\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" | 12 +- ...50\345\206\214\346\211\277\350\257\272.md" | 2 +- ...72\350\260\203\350\247\204\350\214\203.md" | 2 +- ...1\345\255\246\351\242\206\345\237\237_.md" | 6 +- ...01\346\200\247\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" | 10 +- ...42\351\251\254\346\213\211\346\235\276.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/english/abstract_bias.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/academic_impact.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/accessibility.md | 9 +- content/glossary/english/ad_hominem_bias.md | 4 +- .../english/adversarial_collaboration.md | 10 +- .../adversarial_collaborative_commentary.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/affiliation_bias.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/aleatoric_uncertainty.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/altmetrics.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/amnesia.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/analytic_flexibility.md | 10 +- content/glossary/english/anonymity.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/arrive_guidelines.md | 4 +- .../english/article_processing_charge_apc_.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/authorship.md | 8 +- .../glossary/english/auxiliary_hypothesis.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/badges_open_science_.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/bayes_factor.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/bayesian_inference.md | 14 +- .../english/bayesian_parameter_estimation.md | 8 +- .../glossary/english/bids_data_structure.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/bizarre.md | 4 +- ...bottom_up_approach_to_open_scholarship_.md | 12 +- .../glossary/english/bracketing_interviews.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/bropenscience.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/carking.md | 4 +- .../english/center_for_open_science_cos_.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/citation_bias.md | 8 +- .../english/citation_diversity_statement.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/citizen_science.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/ckan.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/co_production.md | 8 +- ...work_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/code_review.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/codebook.md | 3 +- ...replication_and_education_project_crep_.md | 2 +- ...s_in_data_analysis_and_sharing_cobidas_.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/communality.md | 8 +- .../glossary/english/community_projects.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/compendium.md | 8 +- .../english/computational_reproducibility.md | 10 +- .../english/conceptual_replication.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/confirmation_bias.md | 8 +- .../glossary/english/confirmatory_analyses.md | 10 +- .../glossary/english/conflict_of_interest.md | 3 +- .../glossary/english/consortium_authorship.md | 5 +- .../english/constraints_on_generality_cog_.md | 8 +- .../glossary/english/construct_validity.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/content_validity.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/corrigendum.md | 2 +- .../english/creative_commons_cc_license.md | 2 +- ...ive_destruction_approach_to_replication.md | 4 +- .../english/credibility_revolution.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/credit.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/criterion_validity.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/crowdsourced_research.md | 28 +- content/glossary/english/cultural_taxation.md | 6 +- .../glossary/english/cumulative_science.md | 8 +- ...access_and_research_transparency_da_rt_.md | 4 +- .../english/data_management_plan_dmp_.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/data_sharing.md | 6 +- .../glossary/english/data_visualisation.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/decolonisation.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/demarcation_criterion.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/direct_replication.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/diversity.md | 2 +- .../english/doi_digital_object_identifier_.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/dora.md | 3 +- .../english/double_blind_peer_review.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/double_consciousness.md | 6 +- .../english/early_career_researchers_ecrs_.md | 6 +- .../english/economic_and_societal_impact.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/embargo_period.md | 6 +- .../glossary/english/epistemic_uncertainty.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/epistemology.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/equity.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/equivalence_testing.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/error_detection.md | 12 +- .../glossary/english/evidence_synthesis.md | 6 +- .../english/exploratory_data_analysis.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/external_validity.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/face_validity.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/fair_principles.md | 5 +- .../glossary/english/feminist_psychology.md | 6 +- .../first_last_author_emphasis_norm_flae_.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/forrt.md | 2 +- .../english/free_our_knowledge_platform.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/gaming_the_system_.md | 4 +- .../english/garden_of_forking_paths.md | 2 +- ...eneral_data_protection_regulation_gdpr_.md | 5 +- content/glossary/english/generalizability.md | 12 +- .../english/gift_or_guest_authorship.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/git.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/goodhart_s_law.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/gpower.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/h_index.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/hackathon.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/harking.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/hidden_moderators.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/hypothesis.md | 10 +- content/glossary/english/i10_index.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/ideological_bias.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/incentive_structure.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/inclusion.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/induction.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/interaction_fallacy.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/interlocking.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/internal_validity.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/intersectionality.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/jabref.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/jamovi.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/jasp.md | 2 +- .../english/journal_impact_factor_.md | 10 +- content/glossary/english/json_file.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/knowledge_acquisition.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/likelihood_function.md | 11 +- .../glossary/english/likelihood_principle.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/literature_review.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/manel.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/many_authors.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/many_labs.md | 13 +- .../massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md | 3 +- .../massively_open_online_papers_moops_.md | 4 +- .../english/matthew_effect_in_science_.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/meta_analysis.md | 4 +- .../english/meta_science_or_meta_research.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/metadata.md | 3 +- .../glossary/english/model_computational_.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/model_philosophy_.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/model_statistical_.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/multi_analyst_studies.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/multiplicity.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/multiverse_analysis.md | 4 +- .../english/name_ambiguity_problem.md | 2 +- ...anonymization_for_open_science_netanos_.md | 2 +- ...le_and_open_systematic_reviews_niro_sr_.md | 2 +- ...l_hypothesis_significance_testing_nhst_.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/objectivity.md | 4 +- .../ontology_artificial_intelligence_.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/open_access.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/open_code.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/open_data.md | 4 +- .../open_educational_resources_oer_commons.md | 3 +- .../open_educational_resources_oers_.md | 3 +- content/glossary/english/open_licenses.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/open_material.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/open_peer_review.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/open_scholarship.md | 3 +- .../open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md | 5 +- content/glossary/english/open_science.md | 10 +- .../english/open_science_framework.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/open_source_software.md | 3 +- content/glossary/english/open_washing.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/openneuro.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/optional_stopping.md | 8 +- ...cid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/overlay_journal.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/p_curve.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/p_hacking.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/p_value.md | 7 +- content/glossary/english/papermill.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/paradata.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/parking.md | 6 +- .../english/participatory_research.md | 12 +- .../patient_and_public_involvement_ppi_.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/paywall.md | 3 +- .../english/pci_peer_community_in_.md | 4 +- .../english/pci_registered_reports.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/plan_s.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/positionality.md | 3 +- content/glossary/english/positionality_map.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/post_hoc.md | 2 +- .../english/posterior_distribution.md | 5 +- .../glossary/english/predatory_publishing.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/prepare_guidelines.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/preprint.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/preregistration.md | 12 +- .../english/preregistration_pledge.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/prior_distribution.md | 4 +- .../pro_peer_review_openness_initiative.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/pseudonymisation.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/pseudoreplication.md | 6 +- .../english/psychometric_meta_analysis.md | 4 +- .../english/public_trust_in_science.md | 30 +- .../publication_bias_file_drawer_problem_.md | 14 +- content/glossary/english/publish_or_perish.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/pubpeer.md | 3 +- content/glossary/english/python.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/qualitative_research.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/quantitative_research.md | 2 +- ...questionable_measurement_practices_qmp_.md | 2 +- ..._questionable_reporting_practices_qrps_.md | 13 +- content/glossary/english/r.md | 3 +- content/glossary/english/red_teams.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/reflexivity.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/registered_report.md | 9 +- .../registry_of_research_data_repositories.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/reliability.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/repeatability.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/replicability.md | 9 +- .../glossary/english/replication_markets.md | 9 +- content/glossary/english/replicats_project.md | 3 +- .../glossary/english/reporting_guideline.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/repository.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/reproducibilitea.md | 3 +- content/glossary/english/reproducibility.md | 11 +- ...ka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_.md | 3 +- .../english/reproducibility_network.md | 9 +- .../research_contribution_metric__p_.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/research_cycle.md | 4 +- .../english/research_data_management.md | 3 +- .../glossary/english/research_integrity.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/research_protocol.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/research_workflow.md | 4 +- .../english/researcher_degrees_of_freedom.md | 6 +- .../responsible_research_and_innovation.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/reverse_p_hacking.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/riot_science_club.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/robustness_analyses_.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/salami_slicing.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/scooping.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/semantometrics.md | 4 +- .../glossary/english/sensitive_research.md | 4 +- ...equence_determines_credit_approach_sdc_.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/sherpa_romeo.md | 2 +- .../english/single_blind_peer_review.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/slow_science.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/social_class.md | 7 +- .../glossary/english/social_integration.md | 6 +- ...cology_and_evolutionary_biology_sortee_.md | 4 +- ...rovement_of_psychological_science_sips_.md | 2 +- .../english/specification_curve_analysis.md | 6 +- .../english/statistical_assumptions.md | 7 +- content/glossary/english/statistical_power.md | 15 +- .../english/statistical_significance.md | 5 +- .../glossary/english/statistical_validity.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/strange.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/studyswap.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/systematic_review.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/tenzing.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/the_troubling_trio.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/theory.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/theory_building.md | 8 +- content/glossary/english/transparency.md | 7 +- .../english/transparency_checklist.md | 4 +- .../english/triple_blind_peer_review.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/trust_principles.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/type_i_error.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/type_ii_error.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/type_m_error.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/type_s_error.md | 4 +- .../universal_design_for_learning_udl_.md | 6 +- content/glossary/english/validity.md | 5 +- content/glossary/english/version_control.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/webometrics.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/z_curve.md | 4 +- content/glossary/english/zenodo.md | 3 +- .../glossary/german/a_priori_verteilung.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/abstract_verzerrung.md | 2 +- .../glossary/german/ad_hominem_verzerrung.md | 4 +- .../german/affiliations_verzerrung.md | 2 +- ...ierbarkeitskrise_oder_replikationskrise.md | 3 +- .../glossary/german/akademischer_einfluss.md | 2 +- .../german/aleatorische_unsicherheit.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/altmetrics.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/amnesia.md | 4 +- .../german/analyses_robustheit_sanalysen.md | 4 +- .../analytische_flexibilit\303\244t.md" | 10 +- .../glossary/german/anonymit\303\244t.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/german/anreizsystem.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/arrive_leitlinien.md | 4 +- ..._in_der_k\303\274nstlichen_intelligenz.md" | 2 +- .../artikelverarbeitungsgeb\303\274hr.md" | 4 +- .../german/augenscheinvalidit\303\244t.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/barrierefreiheit.md | 9 +- content/glossary/german/bayes_faktor.md | 4 +- .../bayes_sche_parameter_sch\303\244tzung.md" | 8 +- content/glossary/german/bayessche_inferenz.md | 14 +- content/glossary/german/beitrag.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/berichtleitlinien.md | 8 +- .../german/best\303\244tigungsverzerrung.md" | 8 +- content/glossary/german/bezahlschranke.md | 3 +- content/glossary/german/bids_datenstruktur.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/bizarre.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/bropenscience.md | 6 +- .../b\303\274rger_innenwissenschaft.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/german/carking.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/cc.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/ckan.md | 2 +- ...work_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/cobidas.md | 4 +- .../german/code_\303\274berpr\303\274fung.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/german/codebuch.md | 3 +- ...303\244nkungen_der_generalisierbarkeit.md" | 8 +- ...y_gegnerischer_kollaborativer_kommentar.md | 6 +- .../german/computational_rechenmodell.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/cos.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/credit.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/crep.md | 2 +- .../german/crowdsourcing_forschung.md | 28 +- content/glossary/german/da_rt.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/data_sharing.md | 6 +- .../glossary/german/datenvisualisierung.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/dekolonialisierung.md | 2 +- .../glossary/german/demarkationskriterium.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/die_dreisten_drei.md | 2 +- .../german/digital_object_identifier.md | 6 +- .../glossary/german/direkte_replikation.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/diversity.md | 2 +- .../german/dmp_datenmanagementplan.md | 6 +- .../german/doppelblinde_begutachtung.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/doppeltes_bewusstsein.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/dora.md | 3 +- .../german/dreifach_blindes_peer_review.md | 4 +- .../german/economic_and_societal_impact.md | 2 +- .../ecrs_nachwuchswissenschaftler_innen.md | 6 +- .../german/einfachblinde_peer_begutachtung.md | 2 +- .../epistemiologie__erkenntnistheorie.md | 2 +- .../german/epistemische_unsicherheit.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/evidenzsynthese.md | 6 +- .../german/explorative_datenanalyse.md | 8 +- .../german/externe_validit\303\244t.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/german/fair_prinzipien.md | 5 +- content/glossary/german/fehlererfassung.md | 12 +- .../german/feministische_psychologie.md | 6 +- ...ationsverzerrung_aktenschubladenproblem.md | 14 +- ...ung_der_erst_und_letztautor_innenschaft.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/forrt.md | 2 +- .../german/forschungs_arbeitsablauf.md | 4 +- .../german/forschungsdatenmanagement.md | 3 +- .../german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" | 6 +- .../glossary/german/forschungsprotokoll.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/forschungszyklus.md | 4 +- .../german/free_our_knowledge_platform.md | 2 +- .../german/freiheitsgrade_von_forschenden.md | 6 +- .../german/garten_der_weggabelungen.md | 2 +- ...dpr_dt_datenschutzgrundverordnung_dsgvo.md | 5 +- .../german/gegnerische_kollaboration.md | 10 +- .../glossary/german/gemeinschaftsprojekte.md | 6 +- .../glossary/german/generalisierbarkeit.md | 12 +- content/glossary/german/git.md | 8 +- .../german/glaubhaftigkeitsrevolution.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/gleichstellung.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/goodharts_gesetz.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/gpower.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/h_index_hirsch_index.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/hackathon.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/handbuch.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/harking.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/hilfshypothese.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/hypothese.md | 10 +- content/glossary/german/i10_index.md | 2 +- .../german/ideologische_verzerrung.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/im_nachhinein.md | 2 +- ...ence_matthew_effekt_in_der_wissenschaft.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/induktion.md | 2 +- .../german/inhaltsvalidit\303\244t.md" | 8 +- .../german/inklusion_inklusivit\303\244t.md" | 4 +- .../german/interaktionsfehlschluss.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/interessenkonflikt.md | 3 +- .../german/interne_validit\303\244t.md" | 2 +- .../german/intersektionalit\303\244t.md" | 6 +- content/glossary/german/jabref.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/jamovi.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/jasp.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/json_file.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/klammer_interviews.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/knowledge_acquisition.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/ko_produktion.md | 8 +- .../glossary/german/kommunalit\303\244t.md" | 8 +- .../german/konfirmatorische_analysen.md | 10 +- .../german/konsortium_autor_innenschaft.md | 5 +- .../german/konstruktvalidit\303\244t.md" | 6 +- .../german/konzeptionelle_replikation.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/korrigendum.md | 2 +- .../german/kriteriumsvalidit\303\244t.md" | 4 +- .../glossary/german/kulturelle_taxierung.md | 6 +- .../german/kumulative_wissenschaft.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/langsame_forschung.md | 6 +- .../glossary/german/likelihood_funktion.md | 11 +- content/glossary/german/likelihood_prinzip.md | 6 +- .../german/literaturzusammenfassung.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/manel.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/many_authors.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/many_labs.md | 13 +- content/glossary/german/meta_analyse.md | 4 +- .../meta_wissenschaft_oder_meta_forschung.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/metadaten.md | 3 +- content/glossary/german/moocs.md | 3 +- content/glossary/german/moops.md | 4 +- .../german/multi_analytiker_innen_studien.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/multiplizit\303\244t.md" | 4 +- .../glossary/german/multiversumsanalyse.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/netanos.md | 2 +- .../nhst_nullhypothesen_signifikanztestung.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/niro_sr.md | 2 +- .../glossary/german/objektivit\303\244t.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/german/oer.md | 3 +- .../german/oers_offene_bildungsressourcen.md | 3 +- .../glossary/german/offene_begutachtung.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/offene_daten.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/offene_forschung.md | 10 +- content/glossary/german/offene_lizenzen.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/offene_materialien.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/offener_code.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/open_access.md | 4 +- .../open_researcher_and_contributor_id.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/open_scholarship.md | 3 +- .../german/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md | 5 +- .../glossary/german/open_science_framework.md | 4 +- .../open_science_open_science_abzeichen.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/open_washing.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/openneuro.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/optionales_stoppen.md | 8 +- ...utor_innenschaft__gastautor_innenschaft.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/overlay_zeitschrift.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/p.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/p_hacking.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/p_kurve.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/p_wert.md | 7 +- content/glossary/german/papierfabrik.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/paradaten.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/parking.md | 6 +- .../german/partizipative_forschung.md | 12 +- .../glossary/german/pci_registered_reports.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/peer_community_in.md | 4 +- ...view_openness_initiative_pro_initiative.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/philosophy.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/plan_s.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/positionalit\303\244t.md" | 3 +- .../german/positionalit\303\244tskarte.md" | 2 +- .../glossary/german/posterior_distribution.md | 5 +- ...atient_innen_und_\303\266ffentlichkeit.md" | 4 +- .../glossary/german/predatory_verlagswesen.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/prepare_leitlinien.md | 2 +- .../german/problem_mehrdeutiger_namen.md | 2 +- .../german/pr\303\244registrierung.md" | 12 +- .../pr\303\244registrierungs_versprechen.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/german/pseudonymisierung.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/pseudoreplikation.md | 6 +- .../german/psychometrische_metaanalyse.md | 4 +- .../german/publizieren_oder_untergehen.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/pubpeer.md | 3 +- content/glossary/german/python.md | 2 +- ...fragw\303\274rdige_forschungspraktiken.md" | 2 +- ...oder_ver\303\266ffentlichungspraktiken.md" | 13 +- .../glossary/german/qualitative_forschung.md | 4 +- ...ntitative_forschung_translated_reviewed.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/r.md | 3 +- .../german/rechnerische_reproduzierbarkeit.md | 10 +- .../glossary/german/reflexivit\303\244t.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/german/registered_report.md | 9 +- .../registry_of_research_data_repositories.md | 2 +- .../glossary/german/reliabilit\303\244t.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/german/replicats_project.md | 3 +- .../glossary/german/replikabilit\303\244t.md" | 9 +- .../german/replikationsm\303\244rkte.md" | 9 +- content/glossary/german/repositorium.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/reproducibilitea.md | 3 +- content/glossary/german/reproduzierbarkeit.md | 11 +- .../german/reproduzierbarkeitsnetzwerk.md | 9 +- content/glossary/german/reverse_p_hacking.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/riot_science_club.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/rote_teams.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/salamischneiden.md | 2 +- ..._als_herangehensweise_an_replikationen.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/german/sdc.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/semantometrie.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/sensitive_forschung.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/sherpa_romeo.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/sips.md | 2 +- .../german/software_mit_offenem_quellcode.md | 3 +- content/glossary/german/sortee.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/soziale_integration.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md | 7 +- content/glossary/german/sperrfrist.md | 6 +- .../german/spezifikationskurvenanalyse.md | 6 +- .../statistical_statistisches_modell.md | 2 +- .../german/statistische_signifikanz.md | 5 +- .../german/statistische_testst\303\244rke.md" | 15 +- .../german/statistische_validit\303\244t.md" | 4 +- .../german/statistische_vorannahmen.md | 7 +- content/glossary/german/strange.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/studyswap.md | 4 +- .../glossary/german/systematisches_review.md | 8 +- content/glossary/german/tenzing.md | 2 +- ...he_system_das_system_\303\274berlisten.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/german/theorie.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/theoriebildung.md | 8 +- .../to_open_scholarship_bottom_up_ansatz.md | 12 +- content/glossary/german/transparenz.md | 7 +- .../glossary/german/transparenz_checkliste.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/trust_prinzipien.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/typ_i_fehler.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/typ_ii_fehler.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/typ_m_fehler.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/typ_s_fehler.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/udl.md | 6 +- content/glossary/german/untergrabung.md | 6 +- "content/glossary/german/validit\303\244t.md" | 5 +- ...twortungsvolle_forschung_und_innovation.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/versionskontrolle.md | 2 +- .../glossary/german/versteckte_moderatoren.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/verzahnung.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/vorabdruck.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/webometrie.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/wiederholbarkeit.md | 4 +- content/glossary/german/z_kurve.md | 4 +- .../german/zeitschriften_impact_faktor.md | 10 +- content/glossary/german/zenodo.md | 3 +- ...ns_diversit\303\244ts_erkl\303\244rung.md" | 2 +- .../glossary/german/zitations_verzerrung.md | 8 +- .../german/\303\244quivalenztesten.md" | 6 +- ...ntliches_vertrauen_in_die_wissenschaft.md" | 30 +- content/glossary/references/index.md | 1420 ++-- .../turkish/ad_hominem_safsatas\304\261.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/aga\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" | 6 +- content/glossary/turkish/akademik_etki.md | 2 +- ...endirme_sistemi_pci_peer_community_in_.md" | 4 +- .../aleatorik_se\303\247kisiz_belirsizlik.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/altmetriler.md | 4 +- .../turkish/ambargo_s\303\274resi.md" | 6 +- content/glossary/turkish/amnesia.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/analitik_esneklik.md | 10 +- content/glossary/turkish/anonimlik.md | 2 +- ...04\261rma_d\303\266ng\303\274s\303\274.md" | 4 +- ...a_i\305\237_ak\304\261\305\237\304\261.md" | 4 +- ...a\305\237t\304\261rma_protokol\303\274.md" | 4 +- ...ma_veri_deposu_kay\304\261tlar\304\261.md" | 2 +- ...304\261rma_verisi_y\303\266netimi_avy_.md" | 3 +- ...\304\261n\304\261n_serbestlik_derecesi.md" | 6 +- ...ada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" | 6 +- .../turkish/arrive_k\304\261lavuzu.md" | 4 +- ..._yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" | 8 +- ...e\305\237itlili\304\237i_beyan\304\261.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_akademi.md" | 3 +- ..._oskb_open_scholarship_knowledge_base_.md" | 5 +- .../turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_aklama.md" | 8 +- ...id_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" | 10 +- ...d_text_anonymization_for_open_science_.md" | 2 +- .../a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_merkezi.md" | 2 +- ..._platformu_osf_open_science_framework_.md" | 4 +- .../a\303\247\304\261k_eri\305\237im.md" | 4 +- ...04\237itim_kaynaklar\304\261_platformu.md" | 3 +- ...ji_ve_evrimsel_biyoloji_derne\304\237i.md" | 4 +- ...\304\261k_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" | 4 +- ..._kaynakl\304\261_yaz\304\261l\304\261m.md" | 3 +- .../turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_kod.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_lisanslar.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_materyal.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_veri.md" | 4 +- ...247\304\261k_akademiye_y\303\266nelik_.md" | 12 +- .../turkish/bayes_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/bayesyen_parametre_tahmini.md | 8 +- .../bayesyen_\303\247\304\261kar\304\261m.md" | 14 +- ..._yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" | 2 +- .../bela_\303\274\303\247l\303\274.md" | 2 +- .../bids_veri_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/bilgi_edinme.md | 2 +- ...zg\303\274rle\305\237tirelim_platformu.md" | 2 +- .../bilime_duyulan_toplumsal_g\303\274ven.md" | 30 +- ..._\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274_p_.md" | 6 +- content/glossary/turkish/bizarre.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/carking.md | 4 +- ...lamalar_i\303\247in_topluluk_platformu.md" | 2 +- .../creative_commons_cc_lisans\304\261.md" | 2 +- ...edit_katk\304\261_rolleri_taksonomisi_.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/dekolonizasyon.md | 2 +- .../dergi_etki_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" | 10 +- ...304\261mlay\304\261c\304\261s\304\261_.md" | 6 +- content/glossary/turkish/dora.md | 3 +- .../turkish/do\304\237rudan_replikasyon.md" | 8 +- ..._yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" | 8 +- ...04\237rulay\304\261c\304\261_analizler.md" | 10 +- "content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274zeltme.md" | 2 +- ...\207\305\237_birlik\303\247i_yorumlama.md" | 6 +- ...manca_i\314\207\305\237_birli\304\237i.md" | 10 +- ...03\274\305\237\303\274n\303\274msellik.md" | 4 +- .../d\304\261\305\237_ge\303\247erlilik.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/ekonomik_ve_toplumsal_etki.md | 2 +- .../glossary/turkish/epistemik_belirsizlik.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/epistemoloji.md | 2 +- .../turkish/eri\305\237ilebilirlik.md" | 9 +- ...7t\304\261rmac\304\261lar\304\261_eka_.md" | 6 +- ...5\237im_yan\304\261lg\304\261s\304\261.md" | 6 +- .../e\305\237de\304\237erlik_testi.md" | 6 +- .../turkish/fair_i\314\207lkeleri.md" | 5 +- .../glossary/turkish/feminist_psikoloji.md | 6 +- content/glossary/turkish/forrt.md | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/g_power.md | 4 +- ...303\274z\303\274\304\237\303\274_gdpr_.md" | 5 +- content/glossary/turkish/genellenebilirlik.md | 12 +- ...\305\237kin_k\304\261s\304\261tlamalar.md" | 8 +- .../glossary/turkish/ge\303\247erlilik.md" | 5 +- content/glossary/turkish/git.md | 8 +- .../turkish/gizli_moderat\303\266rler.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/goodhart_yasas\304\261.md" | 4 +- .../glossary/turkish/g\303\274venilirlik.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/h_indeksi.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/hackathon.md | 2 +- ...1_giri\305\237imi_pro_giri\305\237imi_.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/hakkaniyet.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/harking.md | 4 +- .../hassas_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" | 4 +- ...61_ppi_patient_and_public_involvement_.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/hata_tespiti.md | 12 +- .../hediye_veya_misafir_yazarl\304\261k.md" | 4 +- ...304\261_yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" | 10 +- content/glossary/turkish/hipotez.md | 10 +- content/glossary/turkish/i_10_indeksi.md | 2 +- ...314\207deolojik_yanl\304\261l\304\261k.md" | 2 +- .../i\314\207lk_son_yazar_vurgusu_normu.md" | 2 +- ...\314\207sim_belirsizli\304\237i_sorunu.md" | 2 +- ...7statistiksel_anlaml\304\261l\304\261k.md" | 5 +- ...\314\207statistiksel_ge\303\247erlilik.md" | 4 +- ...\314\207statistiksel_g\303\274\303\247.md" | 15 +- ...314\207statistiksel_varsay\304\261mlar.md" | 7 +- .../turkish/i\314\207tibar_devrimi.md" | 6 +- .../i\314\207\303\247_ge\303\247erlilik.md" | 2 +- ...07\303\247_i\303\247elik_interlocking_.md" | 2 +- ...\303\247erik_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" | 8 +- ...ikasyon_ve_e\304\237itim_projesi_crep_.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/jabref.md | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/jamovi.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/jasp.md | 2 +- .../glossary/turkish/json_dosyas\304\261.md" | 2 +- .../glossary/turkish/kan\304\261t_sentezi.md" | 6 +- ..._bilgi_ar\305\237ivi_a\304\237\304\261.md" | 2 +- .../kapsay\304\261c\304\261l\304\261k.md" | 4 +- ...\261ml\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" | 12 +- .../glossary/turkish/kavramsal_replikasyon.md | 6 +- .../turkish/kay\304\261tl\304\261_rapor.md" | 9 +- .../glossary/turkish/kesi\305\237imsellik.md" | 6 +- .../turkish/ke\305\237ifsel_veri_analizi.md" | 8 +- ...aynakl\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" | 28 +- ...ler_massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md" | 3 +- ...er_moops_massively_open_online_papers_.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/kod_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" | 4 +- .../glossary/turkish/kod_kitab\304\261.md" | 3 +- content/glossary/turkish/kompendiyum.md | 8 +- .../glossary/turkish/kom\303\274nalite.md" | 8 +- ...orsiyum_yazarl\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" | 5 +- .../glossary/turkish/konumsall\304\261k.md" | 3 +- .../konumsall\304\261k_haritas\304\261.md" | 2 +- .../kriter_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" | 4 +- .../k\303\274lt\303\274rel_vergilendirme.md" | 6 +- .../turkish/k\303\274m\303\274latif_bilim.md" | 8 +- .../turkish/k\304\261z\304\261l_ekipler.md" | 4 +- .../literat\303\274r_taramas\304\261.md" | 8 +- .../turkish/makale_fabrikas\304\261.md" | 4 +- ...\314\207\305\237lem_\303\274creti_apc_.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/manel.md | 8 +- .../turkish/matthew_etkisi_bilimde_.md | 6 +- content/glossary/turkish/meta_analiz.md | 4 +- ...lim_ya_da_meta_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/metaveri.md | 3 +- content/glossary/turkish/model_felsefe_.md | 4 +- ...roducible_and_open_systematic_reviews_.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/nesnellik.md | 4 +- .../turkish/nicel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/nitel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" | 4 +- .../olas\304\261l\304\261k_fonksiyonu.md" | 11 +- .../olas\304\261l\304\261k_i\314\207lkesi.md" | 6 +- .../glossary/turkish/ontoloji_yapay_zeka_.md | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/openneuro.md | 6 +- .../glossary/turkish/opsiyonel_durdurma.md | 8 +- .../glossary/turkish/ortak_\303\274retim.md" | 8 +- "content/glossary/turkish/p_de\304\237eri.md" | 7 +- "content/glossary/turkish/p_e\304\237risi.md" | 8 +- content/glossary/turkish/p_hackleme.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/paradata.md | 2 +- ...poche_g\303\266r\303\274\305\237meleri.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/parking.md | 6 +- .../pci_kay\304\261tl\304\261_raporlar.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/plan_s.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/post_hoc.md | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/prepare_rehberi.md | 2 +- ...n_geli\305\237tirilmesi_derne\304\237i.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/psikometrik_meta_analiz.md | 4 +- .../ps\303\266donimle\305\237tirme.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/ps\303\266doreplikasyon.md" | 6 +- content/glossary/turkish/pubpeer.md | 3 +- content/glossary/turkish/python.md | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/r.md | 3 +- .../turkish/raporlama_k\304\261lavuzu.md" | 8 +- ...04\261m_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/repo.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/reproducibilitea.md | 3 +- .../riot_bilim_kul\303\274b\303\274.md" | 4 +- .../rozetler_a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_.md" | 6 +- .../sa\304\237laml\304\261k_analizleri_.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/semantometriler.md | 4 +- .../glossary/turkish/sistematik_derleme.md | 8 +- .../glossary/turkish/sistemi_oyuna_getirme.md | 4 +- .../sonsal_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" | 5 +- ...5\237t\304\261rma_ve_i\314\207novasyon.md" | 4 +- .../glossary/turkish/sosyal_entegrasyon.md | 6 +- .../turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" | 7 +- .../spesifikasyon_e\304\237risi_analizi.md" | 6 +- content/glossary/turkish/strange.md | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/studyswap.md | 4 +- ..._null_hypothesis_significance_testing_.md" | 6 +- ...rma_\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/tek_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" | 2 +- .../glossary/turkish/tekrarlanabilirlik.md | 9 +- content/glossary/turkish/tenzing.md | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/teori.md | 4 +- .../teori_i\314\207n\305\237as\304\261.md" | 8 +- .../glossary/turkish/tersine_p_hackleme.md | 2 +- .../te\305\237vik_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" | 8 +- content/glossary/turkish/tip_i_hata.md | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/tip_ii_hata.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/tip_m_hata.md | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/tip_s_hata.md | 4 +- .../glossary/turkish/topluluk_projeleri.md | 6 +- .../turkish/trust_i\314\207lkeleri.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/t\303\274mevar\304\261m.md" | 2 +- ...da_en_i\314\207yi_uygulamalar_komitesi.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/veri_dilimleme.md | 2 +- .../veri_g\303\266rselle\305\237tirme.md" | 4 +- .../veri_payla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" | 6 +- .../veri_y\303\266netim_plan\304\261_dmp_.md" | 6 +- ...7effafl\304\261\304\237\304\261_da_rt_.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/versiyon_kontrol\303\274.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/turkish/webometriler.md | 2 +- .../yap\304\261_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" | 6 +- .../yard\304\261mc\304\261_hipotez.md" | 4 +- .../glossary/turkish/yava\305\237_bilim.md" | 6 +- .../turkish/yay\304\261mla_ya_da_yok_ol.md" | 4 +- ...4\261_dosya_\303\247ekmecesi_problemi_.md" | 14 +- ...elirler_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" | 4 +- "content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" | 8 +- .../ya\304\237mac\304\261_yay\304\261n.md" | 4 +- .../yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" | 11 +- ...03\274retilebilirlik_a\304\237\304\261.md" | 9 +- ...rarlanabilirlik_veya_tekrarlama_krizi_.md" | 3 +- content/glossary/turkish/yinelenebilirlik.md | 4 +- ...304\261_\303\247atallanan_bah\303\247e.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/yurtta\305\237_bilimi.md" | 4 +- ...y\303\274zey_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" | 2 +- "content/glossary/turkish/z_e\304\237risi.md" | 4 +- content/glossary/turkish/zenodo.md | 3 +- .../turkish/\303\247e\305\237itlilik.md" | 2 +- .../\303\247ift_bilin\303\247lilik.md" | 6 +- ...\303\266r_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/\303\247ok_yazarl\304\261.md" | 6 +- ...303\247al\304\261\305\237malar\304\261.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/\303\247oklu_evren_analizi.md" | 4 +- .../\303\247oklu_laboratuvarl\304\261.md" | 13 +- "content/glossary/turkish/\303\247okluluk.md" | 4 +- ..._\303\247at\304\261\305\237mas\304\261.md" | 3 +- .../\303\266deme_duvar\304\261_paywall_.md" | 3 +- .../turkish/\303\266n_bask\304\261.md" | 4 +- ...266n_bask\304\261_tabanl\304\261_dergi.md" | 6 +- .../turkish/\303\266n_kay\304\261t.md" | 12 +- ...6n_kay\304\261t_taahh\303\274d\303\274.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/\303\266nceli\304\237i_kapma.md" | 6 +- ...3\266nsel_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" | 4 +- ..._yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" | 2 +- ...de_evrensel_tasar\304\261m_\303\266et_.md" | 6 +- ...4\303\247l\303\274_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" | 4 +- .../turkish/\305\237effafl\304\261k.md" | 7 +- ...305\237effafl\304\261k_kontrol_listesi.md" | 4 +- ...274pheli_raporlama_uygulamalar\304\261.md" | 13 +- ...303\266l\303\247me_uygulamalar\304\261.md" | 2 +- 1285 files changed, 8276 insertions(+), 7420 deletions(-) diff --git a/bibtex_to_apa/bibtex_to_apa.js b/bibtex_to_apa/bibtex_to_apa.js index 0fa21c07d3..ba702550ee 100644 --- a/bibtex_to_apa/bibtex_to_apa.js +++ b/bibtex_to_apa/bibtex_to_apa.js @@ -41,11 +41,21 @@ function bibtexToApaJson(bibtexContent, includeUrl = true) { for (const entry of cite.data) { const key = entry.id || entry['citation-key']; - let ref = new Cite(entry).format('bibliography', { - format: 'text', + // Render as HTML so journal titles / volumes keep their APA italics, then peel + // off citation-js's wrapping
… + // so each value is a clean inline HTML fragment. + const html = new Cite(entry).format('bibliography', { + format: 'html', template: 'apa', lang: 'en-US' - }).trim(); + }); + const m = html.match(/class="csl-entry"[^>]*>([\s\S]*?)<\/div>/); + let ref = (m ? m[1] : html).trim(); + // citation-js escapes every "&" as & (in author lists AND inside URLs). + // Decode to a literal "&" so it survives Hugo's markdownify cleanly: authors + // re-escape to &, and URLs with query strings (e.g. ...&oldid=) link + // correctly instead of double-escaping to &#38;. + ref = ref.replace(/&/g, '&'); if (includeUrl) { const url = extractUrl(entry); diff --git a/content/glossary/_build_references.py b/content/glossary/_build_references.py index 5e587600d2..fc2bd2ea83 100644 --- a/content/glossary/_build_references.py +++ b/content/glossary/_build_references.py @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ python3 content/glossary/_build_references.py """ -import html import json import os import re @@ -42,11 +41,14 @@ def sort_key(citation): def render(citation): - """HTML-escape a citation string and turn its URLs into links.""" - escaped = html.escape(citation) - # URLs can't contain the entities introduced by escaping, so it is safe to - # linkify after escaping. - return URL_RE.sub(lambda m: f'{m.group(1)}', escaped) + """Linkify the bare DOI/URL in an apa_lookup HTML fragment. + + Values are HTML fragments from citation-js (journal titles in /, literal + "&", the odd </> entity). They are emitted into a Markdown page rendered + with goldmark unsafe=true, which escapes bare "&" to & itself — so we only + wrap the DOI/URL here (its literal "&" gets escaped in the href too). + """ + return URL_RE.sub(lambda m: f'{m.group(1)}', citation) def main(): diff --git a/content/glossary/_glossaries.json b/content/glossary/_glossaries.json index 08c66277f0..520d649238 100644 --- a/content/glossary/_glossaries.json +++ b/content/glossary/_glossaries.json @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -95,10 +95,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" @@ -140,8 +141,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -182,11 +183,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -224,9 +225,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" @@ -262,7 +263,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -298,7 +299,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -339,8 +340,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" @@ -376,7 +377,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], @@ -412,11 +415,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -458,7 +461,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -500,7 +503,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], @@ -538,8 +543,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -581,10 +586,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -624,8 +629,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -664,8 +669,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -706,8 +713,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -747,13 +754,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -792,10 +799,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -831,8 +838,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -869,8 +876,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -904,12 +911,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" @@ -949,8 +956,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -986,9 +993,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" @@ -1028,8 +1035,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -1073,7 +1080,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -1110,10 +1117,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -1153,7 +1160,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -1189,8 +1196,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -1227,7 +1234,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" @@ -1266,7 +1273,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -1302,7 +1309,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -1338,8 +1346,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -1374,7 +1382,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -1407,8 +1415,8 @@ "definition": "طور مجتمع التَّصوير العصبي التابع لمنظمة رسم خرائط الدِّماغ البشري دليلًا لأفضل الممارسات في جمع بيانات التَّصوير العصبي، وتحليلها وإعداد التَّقارير الخاصّة بها، ومشاركة كلّ من البيانات والنَّص البرمجي للتَّحليل. يتضمن هذا المبدأ ثمانية عناصر يجب استيفاؤها عند كتابة أو تقديم مخطوطة من أجل تحسين طرق إعداد التَّقارير، والصُّور العصبيَّة النَّاتجة لتحقيق أقصى درجات الشَّفافيَّة وإعادة الإنتاج. **تعريف بديل: (إن أمكن)** قائمة مرجعية لتحليل البيانات ومشاركتها.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -1444,10 +1452,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" @@ -1486,9 +1494,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -1528,10 +1536,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" @@ -1566,11 +1574,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -1608,9 +1616,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -1653,10 +1661,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" @@ -1691,11 +1699,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -1736,7 +1744,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" @@ -1768,8 +1777,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" @@ -1812,10 +1822,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -1856,9 +1866,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -1893,10 +1903,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -1935,9 +1945,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -1975,7 +1985,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -2018,10 +2028,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -2057,7 +2067,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -2096,9 +2106,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -2140,8 +2150,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -2179,8 +2189,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -2218,8 +2228,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -2256,19 +2266,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -2305,9 +2317,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -2342,10 +2354,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" @@ -2385,8 +2397,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -2422,8 +2434,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" @@ -2457,9 +2471,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -2496,8 +2510,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -2531,7 +2545,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -2564,7 +2578,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -2597,9 +2611,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -2641,8 +2655,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -2677,9 +2691,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -2715,7 +2729,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -2750,10 +2765,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" @@ -2797,7 +2812,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" @@ -2836,9 +2851,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -2873,7 +2888,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -2908,9 +2923,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -2946,8 +2961,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -2983,7 +2998,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -3022,8 +3037,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" @@ -3066,9 +3081,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -3105,12 +3120,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -3153,9 +3168,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -3192,10 +3207,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -3234,8 +3249,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -3272,7 +3287,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -3312,8 +3327,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -3351,9 +3367,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -3389,7 +3405,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -3421,7 +3437,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -3456,7 +3472,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -3495,8 +3511,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -3532,8 +3548,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -3574,7 +3590,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -3614,8 +3630,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -3654,12 +3671,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -3696,8 +3713,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -3735,8 +3752,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -3772,8 +3789,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -3810,7 +3827,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" @@ -3851,8 +3868,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -3888,7 +3905,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -3932,11 +3949,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -3976,7 +3993,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -4010,7 +4027,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -4045,8 +4062,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -4090,10 +4107,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" @@ -4129,7 +4146,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -4160,9 +4177,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -4202,7 +4219,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" @@ -4240,7 +4257,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -4281,9 +4298,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -4321,7 +4338,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -4358,7 +4375,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], @@ -4393,7 +4412,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -4427,11 +4446,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -4465,7 +4484,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -4501,7 +4520,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" @@ -4540,11 +4559,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -4579,9 +4599,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -4617,10 +4637,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -4655,10 +4675,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -4700,9 +4720,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -4743,12 +4763,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -4784,7 +4805,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -4823,8 +4845,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -4855,9 +4877,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -4901,8 +4923,8 @@ "Systematic Review" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev; Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -4937,7 +4959,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" @@ -4969,8 +4992,8 @@ "definition": "يشير المصطلح إلى الدِّراسة العلميَّة للعلم نفسه بهدف وصف وشرح وتقييم، وتطوير الممارسات العلميَّة. يبحث علم \"ماوراء العلوم \" عادة في الأساليب العلميَّة والتَّحليل وإعداد التَّقارير عن البيانات وتقييمها وإعادة إنتاج، أو تكرار نتائج البحث، وكذلك في حوافز البحث. المصطلحات ذات الصِّلة:", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -5007,8 +5030,8 @@ "theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", - "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -5046,7 +5069,7 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" + "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -5084,7 +5107,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -5122,8 +5147,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -5163,8 +5188,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -5201,8 +5226,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -5237,7 +5262,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -5275,7 +5300,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" @@ -5310,7 +5335,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" @@ -5347,9 +5372,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -5383,8 +5408,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -5421,7 +5446,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -5458,8 +5483,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -5501,7 +5526,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -5543,8 +5568,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -5586,7 +5611,8 @@ "Open Material" ], "references": [ - "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education" + "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -5624,7 +5650,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -5659,7 +5686,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], @@ -5699,8 +5728,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -5737,9 +5766,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -5772,7 +5801,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], @@ -5810,7 +5841,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" @@ -5845,7 +5877,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], @@ -5887,11 +5922,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -5930,8 +5965,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -5971,7 +6006,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -6007,10 +6043,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -6047,10 +6083,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -6086,8 +6122,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" @@ -6124,9 +6160,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -6167,10 +6203,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -6210,8 +6246,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -6246,9 +6282,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -6290,8 +6327,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -6329,7 +6366,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" @@ -6365,8 +6402,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" @@ -6400,12 +6439,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -6440,8 +6479,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -6475,7 +6514,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -6513,7 +6553,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], @@ -6554,7 +6596,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], @@ -6588,7 +6632,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], @@ -6623,7 +6669,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -6660,7 +6707,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -6696,7 +6743,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -6768,8 +6815,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -6805,8 +6853,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -6843,7 +6891,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -6879,8 +6927,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -6923,12 +6971,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -6966,7 +7014,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -7002,7 +7050,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -7039,7 +7087,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], @@ -7075,8 +7125,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" @@ -7113,9 +7163,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -7154,8 +7204,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -7196,13 +7246,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -7242,20 +7292,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -7293,8 +7345,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" @@ -7331,7 +7383,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -7367,7 +7420,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -7406,8 +7459,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -7446,7 +7499,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -7493,12 +7546,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -7540,7 +7594,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -7576,7 +7630,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -7610,8 +7665,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -7647,8 +7702,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -7684,10 +7739,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -7732,7 +7788,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -7771,8 +7827,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -7806,8 +7862,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" @@ -7846,10 +7902,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -7890,10 +7947,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", - "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://replicationmarkets.org/" + "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", + "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "[www.replicationmarkets.com](http://www.replicationmarkets.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -7929,9 +7987,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -7971,7 +8031,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], @@ -8008,7 +8070,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -8045,11 +8108,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -8089,7 +8153,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -8122,10 +8187,11 @@ "definition": "التعريف:** شبكة التِّكرار عبارة عن اتِّحاد يتكَّون من مجموعات تهتم بالبحوث المفتوحة، غالبًا ما يقودها الأقران. وتتبع هذه المجموعات نموذج العجلة، والشُّعاع في بلد معين، حيث تقوم الشَّبكة بربط الباحثين، والمجموعات والمؤسَّسات المحليَّة في تخصُّصات مختلفة بمجموعة توجيهيَّة مركزيَّة، والتي تتواصل أيضًا مع أصحاب المصلحة الخارجيين. وتشمل أهداف شبكات التِّكرار الدَّعوة إلى مزيد من الوعي، وتعزيز أنشطة التَّدريب، ونشر أفضل الممارسات على المستوى الشَّعبي، والمؤسّسي، والبحثي، وتوجد مثل هذه الشَّبكات في المملكة المتَّحدة وألمانيا وسويسرا وسلوفاكيا وأستراليا (اعتبارًا من مارس 2021).", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" @@ -8158,9 +8224,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -8194,8 +8260,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -8234,7 +8300,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -8276,9 +8343,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -8314,8 +8381,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -8351,8 +8418,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" @@ -8395,9 +8462,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -8432,7 +8499,8 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science)." + "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", + "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -8467,7 +8535,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], @@ -8504,7 +8574,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" @@ -8540,7 +8610,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], @@ -8575,8 +8647,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -8611,7 +8683,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -8651,9 +8723,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -8690,8 +8762,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -8725,8 +8797,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -8760,8 +8832,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -8797,7 +8869,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -8836,7 +8908,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -8874,9 +8946,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -8910,7 +8982,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], @@ -8942,7 +9016,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -8976,9 +9050,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -9013,9 +9088,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -9055,9 +9130,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -9097,9 +9172,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -9142,13 +9218,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -9195,8 +9272,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -9234,8 +9312,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -9270,7 +9348,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -9307,7 +9385,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -9344,10 +9424,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -9387,7 +9467,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" @@ -9426,8 +9506,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -9465,10 +9545,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -9505,7 +9585,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -9543,9 +9623,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -9582,7 +9663,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], @@ -9618,8 +9701,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -9681,7 +9764,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -9724,7 +9807,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -9771,8 +9854,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" @@ -9808,8 +9891,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -9846,8 +9929,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -9923,9 +10006,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -9972,8 +10055,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -10015,7 +10099,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -10054,7 +10138,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -10113,8 +10197,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" @@ -10152,7 +10236,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -10188,7 +10273,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -10227,7 +10312,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -10267,10 +10352,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" @@ -10311,8 +10397,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -10351,11 +10437,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -10392,9 +10478,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" @@ -10429,7 +10515,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -10464,7 +10550,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -10504,8 +10590,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" @@ -10540,7 +10626,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], @@ -10574,11 +10662,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -10618,7 +10706,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -10658,7 +10746,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], @@ -10694,8 +10784,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -10736,10 +10826,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -10779,8 +10869,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -10819,8 +10909,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -10860,8 +10952,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -10900,13 +10992,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -10945,10 +11037,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -10984,8 +11076,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -11021,8 +11113,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -11055,12 +11147,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" @@ -11099,8 +11191,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -11137,9 +11229,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" @@ -11180,8 +11272,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -11223,7 +11315,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -11258,10 +11350,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -11300,7 +11392,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -11335,8 +11427,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -11372,7 +11464,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" @@ -11410,7 +11502,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -11445,7 +11537,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -11480,8 +11573,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -11516,7 +11609,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -11548,8 +11641,8 @@ "definition": "人类脑成像组织（Organization for Human Brain Mapping，简称OHBM）的神经影像学社区制定了一份关于神经影像数据采集、分析、报告以及数据与分析代码共享的最佳实践指南。该指南包含八个在撰写或提交论文时应该包含的关键要素，旨在提升报告方法和神经影像结果的透明度和可重复性。", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -11584,10 +11677,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" @@ -11625,9 +11718,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -11665,10 +11758,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" @@ -11702,11 +11795,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -11743,9 +11836,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -11788,10 +11881,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" @@ -11826,11 +11919,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -11871,7 +11964,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" @@ -11903,8 +11997,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" @@ -11947,10 +12042,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -11990,9 +12085,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -12027,10 +12122,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -12068,9 +12163,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -12108,7 +12203,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -12151,10 +12246,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -12190,7 +12285,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -12229,9 +12324,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -12274,8 +12369,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -12312,8 +12407,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -12351,8 +12446,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -12389,19 +12484,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -12438,9 +12535,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -12475,10 +12572,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" @@ -12518,8 +12615,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -12556,8 +12653,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" @@ -12592,9 +12691,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -12631,8 +12730,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -12667,7 +12766,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -12703,7 +12802,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -12737,9 +12836,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -12782,8 +12881,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -12818,9 +12917,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -12856,7 +12955,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -12891,10 +12991,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" @@ -12939,7 +13039,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" @@ -12978,9 +13078,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -13015,7 +13115,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -13050,9 +13150,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -13088,8 +13188,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -13124,7 +13224,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -13162,8 +13262,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" @@ -13206,9 +13306,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -13245,12 +13345,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -13293,9 +13393,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -13331,10 +13431,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -13372,8 +13472,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -13412,7 +13512,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -13451,8 +13551,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -13489,9 +13590,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -13527,7 +13628,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -13558,7 +13659,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -13592,7 +13693,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -13630,8 +13731,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -13666,8 +13767,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -13706,7 +13807,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -13745,8 +13846,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -13784,12 +13886,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -13825,8 +13927,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -13863,10 +13965,10 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", - "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", - "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" + "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", + "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", + "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -13902,8 +14004,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -13938,8 +14040,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -13974,7 +14076,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" @@ -14013,8 +14115,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -14048,7 +14150,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -14090,11 +14192,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -14133,7 +14235,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -14166,7 +14268,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -14203,8 +14305,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -14247,10 +14349,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" @@ -14285,7 +14387,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -14318,9 +14420,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -14360,7 +14462,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" @@ -14397,7 +14499,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -14437,9 +14539,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -14476,7 +14578,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -14512,7 +14614,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], @@ -14545,7 +14649,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -14578,11 +14682,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -14615,7 +14719,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -14651,7 +14755,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" @@ -14689,11 +14793,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -14728,9 +14833,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -14765,10 +14870,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -14802,10 +14907,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -14846,9 +14951,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -14888,12 +14993,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -14929,7 +15035,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -14968,8 +15075,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -14999,9 +15106,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -15044,8 +15151,8 @@ "Systematic Review" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev; Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -15080,7 +15187,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" @@ -15112,8 +15220,8 @@ "definition": "对科学本身进行的科学研究，旨在描述、解释、评估和/或改进科学实践。元科学通常研究科学方法、数据分析、数据报告、研究结果的可重复性与可复现性，以及激励机制。", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -15150,8 +15258,8 @@ "theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", - "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -15189,7 +15297,7 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" + "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -15226,7 +15334,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -15264,8 +15374,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -15306,8 +15416,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -15344,8 +15454,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -15381,7 +15491,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -15419,7 +15529,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" @@ -15455,7 +15565,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" @@ -15493,9 +15603,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -15531,8 +15641,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -15569,7 +15679,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -15605,8 +15715,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -15649,7 +15759,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -15690,8 +15800,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -15733,7 +15843,8 @@ "Open Material" ], "references": [ - "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education" + "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -15771,7 +15882,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -15806,7 +15918,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], @@ -15846,8 +15960,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -15884,9 +15998,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -15919,7 +16033,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], @@ -15957,7 +16073,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" @@ -15992,7 +16109,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], @@ -16034,11 +16154,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -16077,8 +16197,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -16118,7 +16238,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -16154,10 +16275,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -16194,10 +16315,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -16233,8 +16354,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" @@ -16271,9 +16392,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -16314,10 +16435,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -16357,8 +16478,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -16393,9 +16514,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -16437,8 +16559,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -16476,7 +16598,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" @@ -16512,8 +16634,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" @@ -16550,12 +16674,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -16590,8 +16714,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -16625,7 +16749,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -16663,7 +16788,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], @@ -16704,7 +16831,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], @@ -16738,7 +16867,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], @@ -16773,7 +16904,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -16810,7 +16942,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -16846,7 +16978,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -16918,8 +17050,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -16955,8 +17088,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -16993,7 +17126,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -17029,8 +17162,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -17073,12 +17206,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -17116,7 +17249,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -17152,7 +17285,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -17189,7 +17322,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], @@ -17225,8 +17360,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" @@ -17263,9 +17398,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -17304,8 +17439,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -17346,13 +17481,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -17392,20 +17527,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -17443,8 +17580,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" @@ -17481,7 +17618,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -17517,7 +17655,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -17556,8 +17694,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -17596,7 +17734,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -17643,12 +17781,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -17690,7 +17829,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -17726,7 +17865,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -17760,8 +17900,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -17797,8 +17937,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -17834,10 +17974,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -17882,7 +18023,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -17921,8 +18062,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -17956,8 +18097,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" @@ -17996,10 +18137,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -18040,10 +18182,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", - "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://replicationmarkets.org/" + "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", + "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "[www.replicationmarkets.com](http://www.replicationmarkets.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -18079,9 +18222,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -18121,7 +18266,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], @@ -18158,7 +18305,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -18196,11 +18344,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -18240,7 +18389,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -18273,10 +18423,11 @@ "definition": "可重复性网络是一个由开放研究工作组组成的联盟，通常由同行学者领导。这些工作组采用“轮辐模型”在特定国家内运作，其中网络将当地跨学科研究人员、研究小组和机构与中央指导小组连接起来，同时中央小组还与外部研究生态系统的利益相关方建立联系。可重复性网络的目标旨在倡导学界提高对研究可重复性问题的意识、推广培训活动，并在基层、机构以及整个研究生态系统层面推广实践规范。截至2021年3月，类似的网络已经在英国、德国、瑞士、斯洛伐克和澳大利亚等国家存在。", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" @@ -18309,9 +18460,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -18345,8 +18496,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -18385,7 +18536,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -18427,9 +18579,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -18465,8 +18617,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -18502,8 +18654,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" @@ -18546,9 +18698,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -18584,7 +18736,8 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science)." + "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", + "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -18620,7 +18773,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], @@ -18658,7 +18813,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" @@ -18695,7 +18850,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], @@ -18731,8 +18888,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -18768,7 +18925,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -18809,9 +18966,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -18850,8 +19007,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -18886,8 +19043,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -18923,8 +19080,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -18961,7 +19118,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -19001,7 +19158,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -19040,9 +19197,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -19077,7 +19234,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], @@ -19111,7 +19270,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -19146,9 +19305,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -19184,9 +19344,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -19227,9 +19387,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -19270,9 +19430,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -19316,13 +19477,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -19370,8 +19532,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -19411,8 +19574,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -19449,7 +19612,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -19487,7 +19650,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -19525,10 +19690,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -19569,7 +19734,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" @@ -19608,8 +19773,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -19648,10 +19813,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -19689,7 +19854,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -19728,9 +19893,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -19768,7 +19934,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], @@ -19805,8 +19973,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -19870,7 +20038,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -19914,7 +20082,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -19961,8 +20129,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" @@ -19998,8 +20166,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -20037,8 +20205,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -20113,9 +20281,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -20164,8 +20332,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -20206,7 +20375,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -20247,7 +20416,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -20309,8 +20478,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" @@ -20349,7 +20518,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -20385,7 +20555,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -20422,7 +20592,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -20460,10 +20630,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" @@ -20502,8 +20673,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -20540,11 +20711,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -20579,9 +20750,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" @@ -20614,7 +20785,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -20647,7 +20818,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -20685,8 +20856,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" @@ -20719,7 +20890,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], @@ -20751,11 +20924,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -20793,7 +20966,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -20831,7 +21004,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], @@ -20865,8 +21040,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -20905,10 +21080,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -20946,8 +21121,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -20984,8 +21159,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -21023,8 +21200,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -21061,13 +21238,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -21104,10 +21281,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -21141,8 +21318,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -21176,8 +21353,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -21208,12 +21385,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" @@ -21250,8 +21427,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -21286,9 +21463,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" @@ -21327,8 +21504,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -21368,7 +21545,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -21401,10 +21578,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -21441,7 +21618,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -21474,8 +21651,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -21509,7 +21686,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" @@ -21545,7 +21722,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -21578,7 +21755,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -21611,8 +21789,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -21645,7 +21823,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -21675,8 +21853,8 @@ "definition": "Die Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM; dt. Organisation für menschliche Hirnbildgebung) hat einen Leitfaden für optimale Verfahren (best practices) bei der Erhebung und Analyse von Bildgebungsdaten, der Veröffentlichung und der gemeinsamen Nutzung von Daten und Analysecodes entwickelt. Er enthält acht Elemente, die beim Verfassen oder Einreichen eines Manuskripts berücksichtigt werden sollten, um die Veröffentlichung der Methodik und die daraus resultierenden Bildgebungsdaten zu verbessern und so die Transparenz und Reproduzierbarkeit zu optimieren. **Alternative definition:** (if applicable) Checklist for data analysis and sharing", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -21709,10 +21887,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" @@ -21748,9 +21926,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -21786,10 +21964,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" @@ -21821,11 +21999,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -21860,9 +22038,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -21903,10 +22081,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" @@ -21939,11 +22117,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -21982,7 +22160,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" @@ -22012,8 +22191,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" @@ -22054,10 +22234,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -22095,9 +22275,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -22130,10 +22310,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -22169,9 +22349,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -22207,7 +22387,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -22248,10 +22428,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -22285,7 +22465,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -22322,9 +22502,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -22365,8 +22545,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -22401,8 +22581,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -22438,8 +22618,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -22474,19 +22654,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -22521,9 +22703,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -22556,10 +22738,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" @@ -22597,8 +22779,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -22633,8 +22815,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" @@ -22667,9 +22851,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -22704,8 +22888,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -22738,7 +22922,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -22772,7 +22956,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -22804,9 +22988,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -22847,8 +23031,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -22881,9 +23065,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -22917,7 +23101,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -22950,10 +23135,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" @@ -22996,7 +23181,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" @@ -23033,9 +23218,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -23068,7 +23253,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -23101,9 +23286,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -23137,8 +23322,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -23171,7 +23356,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -23207,8 +23392,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" @@ -23249,9 +23434,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -23286,12 +23471,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -23332,9 +23517,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -23368,10 +23553,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -23407,8 +23592,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -23445,7 +23630,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -23482,8 +23667,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -23518,9 +23704,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -23554,7 +23740,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -23583,7 +23769,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -23615,7 +23801,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -23651,8 +23837,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -23685,8 +23871,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -23723,7 +23909,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -23760,8 +23946,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -23797,12 +23984,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -23836,8 +24023,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -23872,10 +24059,10 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", - "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", - "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" + "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", + "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", + "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -23909,8 +24096,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -23943,8 +24130,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -23977,7 +24164,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" @@ -24014,8 +24201,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -24047,7 +24234,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -24087,11 +24274,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -24128,7 +24315,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -24159,7 +24346,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -24194,8 +24381,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -24236,10 +24423,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" @@ -24272,7 +24459,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -24303,9 +24490,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -24343,7 +24530,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" @@ -24378,7 +24565,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -24416,9 +24603,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -24453,7 +24640,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -24487,7 +24674,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], @@ -24518,7 +24707,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -24549,11 +24738,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -24584,7 +24773,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -24618,7 +24807,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" @@ -24654,11 +24843,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -24691,9 +24881,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -24726,10 +24916,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -24762,10 +24952,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -24804,9 +24994,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -24844,12 +25034,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -24883,7 +25074,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -24920,8 +25112,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -24949,9 +25141,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -24992,8 +25184,8 @@ "Systematic Review" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev; Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -25026,7 +25218,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" @@ -25056,8 +25249,8 @@ "definition": "Die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung der Wissenschaft selbst mit dem Ziel, wissenschaftliche Praktiken zu beschreiben, zu erklären, zu bewerten und/oder zu verbessern. Meta-Wissenschaft untersucht typischerweise wissenschaftliche Methoden, Analysen, die Berichterstattung und Auswertung von Daten, die Reproduzierbarkeit und Replizierbarkeit von Forschungsergebnissen sowie Anreize in der Wissenschaft.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -25092,8 +25285,8 @@ "theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", - "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -25129,7 +25322,7 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" + "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -25164,7 +25357,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -25200,8 +25395,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -25240,8 +25435,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -25276,8 +25471,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -25311,7 +25506,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -25347,7 +25542,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" @@ -25380,7 +25575,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" @@ -25416,9 +25611,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -25452,8 +25647,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -25488,7 +25683,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -25522,8 +25717,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -25564,7 +25759,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -25603,8 +25798,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -25644,7 +25839,8 @@ "Open Material" ], "references": [ - "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education" + "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -25680,7 +25876,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -25713,7 +25910,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], @@ -25751,8 +25950,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -25787,9 +25986,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -25820,7 +26019,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], @@ -25856,7 +26057,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" @@ -25889,7 +26091,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], @@ -25928,11 +26133,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -25969,8 +26174,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -26008,7 +26213,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -26042,10 +26248,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -26080,10 +26286,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -26117,8 +26323,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" @@ -26153,9 +26359,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -26194,10 +26400,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -26235,8 +26441,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -26269,9 +26475,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -26311,8 +26518,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -26348,7 +26555,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" @@ -26382,8 +26589,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" @@ -26418,12 +26627,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -26456,8 +26665,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -26489,7 +26698,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -26525,7 +26735,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], @@ -26564,7 +26776,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], @@ -26596,7 +26810,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], @@ -26629,7 +26845,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -26664,7 +26881,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -26698,7 +26915,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -26766,8 +26983,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -26801,8 +27019,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -26837,7 +27055,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -26871,8 +27089,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -26913,12 +27131,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -26954,7 +27172,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -26988,7 +27206,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -27023,7 +27241,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], @@ -27057,8 +27277,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" @@ -27093,9 +27313,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -27132,8 +27352,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -27172,13 +27392,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -27216,20 +27436,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -27265,8 +27487,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" @@ -27301,7 +27523,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -27335,7 +27558,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -27372,8 +27595,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -27410,7 +27633,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -27455,12 +27678,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -27500,7 +27724,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -27534,7 +27758,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -27566,8 +27791,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -27601,8 +27826,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -27636,10 +27861,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -27682,7 +27908,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -27719,8 +27945,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -27752,8 +27978,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" @@ -27790,10 +28016,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -27832,10 +28059,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", - "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://replicationmarkets.org/" + "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", + "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "[www.replicationmarkets.com](http://www.replicationmarkets.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -27869,9 +28097,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -27909,7 +28139,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], @@ -27944,7 +28176,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -27980,11 +28213,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -28022,7 +28256,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -28053,10 +28288,11 @@ "definition": "Ein Reproduzierbarkeitsnetzwerk ist ein Konsortium offener Forschungsarbeitsgruppen, die häufig von Peers geleitet werden. Die Gruppen arbeiten in einem bestimmten Land nach dem wheel-and-spoke-Modell (dt. Rad-und-Speichen-Modell), bei dem das Netzwerk lokale disziplinübergreifende Forschende, Gruppen und Einrichtungen mit einer zentralen Lenkungsgruppe verbindet, die auch mit externen Akteuren im Forschungsökosystem in Verbindung steht. Zu den Zielen von Reproduzierbarkeitsnetzwerken gehören die Sensibilisierung für das Thema, die Förderung von Trainingsmaßnahmen und die Verbreitung bewährter Praktiken an der Basis, in den Institutionen und im Forschungsumfeld. Solche Netzwerke gibt es im Vereinigten Königreich, in Deutschland, in der Schweiz, in der Slowakei und in Australien (Stand: März 2021).", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" @@ -28087,9 +28323,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -28121,8 +28357,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -28159,7 +28395,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -28199,9 +28436,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -28235,8 +28472,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -28270,8 +28507,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" @@ -28312,9 +28549,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -28348,7 +28585,8 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science)." + "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", + "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -28382,7 +28620,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], @@ -28418,7 +28658,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" @@ -28453,7 +28693,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], @@ -28487,8 +28729,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -28522,7 +28764,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -28561,9 +28803,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -28599,8 +28841,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -28632,8 +28874,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -28666,8 +28908,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -28701,7 +28943,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -28739,7 +28981,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -28775,9 +29017,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -28810,7 +29052,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], @@ -28841,7 +29085,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -28874,9 +29118,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -28909,9 +29154,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -28949,9 +29194,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -28989,9 +29234,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -29030,13 +29276,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -29082,8 +29329,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -29120,8 +29368,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -29155,7 +29403,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -29190,7 +29438,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -29225,10 +29475,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -29266,7 +29516,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" @@ -29303,8 +29553,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -29340,10 +29590,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -29378,7 +29628,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -29414,9 +29664,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -29452,7 +29703,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], @@ -29486,8 +29739,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -29546,7 +29799,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -29587,7 +29840,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -29632,8 +29885,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" @@ -29667,8 +29920,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -29703,8 +29956,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -29773,9 +30026,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -29821,8 +30074,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -29860,7 +30114,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -29898,7 +30152,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -29954,8 +30208,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" @@ -29991,7 +30245,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -30024,7 +30279,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -30057,7 +30312,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -30091,10 +30346,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" @@ -30129,8 +30385,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -30163,11 +30419,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -30198,9 +30454,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" @@ -30229,7 +30485,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -30258,7 +30514,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -30292,8 +30548,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" @@ -30322,7 +30578,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], @@ -30350,11 +30608,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -30388,7 +30646,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -30422,7 +30680,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], @@ -30452,8 +30712,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -30488,10 +30748,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -30525,8 +30785,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -30559,8 +30819,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -30594,8 +30856,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -30628,13 +30890,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -30667,10 +30929,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -30700,8 +30962,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -30731,8 +30993,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -30759,12 +31021,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" @@ -30797,8 +31059,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -30829,9 +31091,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" @@ -30866,8 +31128,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -30903,7 +31165,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -30932,10 +31194,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -30968,7 +31230,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -30997,8 +31259,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -31028,7 +31290,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" @@ -31060,7 +31322,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -31089,7 +31351,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -31118,8 +31381,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -31148,7 +31411,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -31174,8 +31437,8 @@ "definition": "The Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) neuroimaging community has developed a guideline for best practices in neuroimaging data acquisition, analysis, reporting, and sharing of both data and analysis code. It contains eight elements that should be included when writing up or submitting a manuscript, and when sharing neuroimages, in order to optimize transparency and reproducibility.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -31204,10 +31467,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" @@ -31239,9 +31502,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -31273,10 +31536,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" @@ -31304,11 +31567,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -31339,9 +31602,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -31378,10 +31641,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" @@ -31410,11 +31673,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -31449,7 +31712,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" @@ -31475,8 +31739,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" @@ -31513,10 +31778,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -31550,9 +31815,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -31581,10 +31846,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -31616,7 +31881,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -31653,10 +31918,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -31686,7 +31951,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -31719,9 +31984,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -31758,8 +32023,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -31790,8 +32055,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -31823,8 +32088,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -31855,19 +32120,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -31898,9 +32165,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -31929,10 +32196,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" @@ -31966,8 +32233,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -31998,8 +32265,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" @@ -32028,9 +32297,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -32061,8 +32330,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -32091,7 +32360,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -32121,7 +32390,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -32149,9 +32418,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -32188,8 +32457,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -32218,9 +32487,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -32250,7 +32519,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -32279,10 +32549,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" @@ -32321,7 +32591,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" @@ -32354,9 +32624,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -32385,7 +32655,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -32414,9 +32684,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -32446,8 +32716,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -32476,7 +32746,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -32508,8 +32778,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" @@ -32546,9 +32816,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -32579,12 +32849,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -32621,9 +32891,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -32653,10 +32923,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -32688,8 +32958,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -32722,7 +32992,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -32755,8 +33025,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -32787,9 +33058,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -32819,7 +33090,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -32844,7 +33115,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -32872,7 +33143,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -32904,8 +33175,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -32934,8 +33205,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -32968,7 +33239,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -33001,8 +33272,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -33034,12 +33306,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -33069,8 +33341,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -33101,10 +33373,10 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", - "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", - "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" + "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", + "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", + "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -33134,8 +33406,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -33164,8 +33436,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -33194,7 +33466,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" @@ -33227,8 +33499,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -33256,7 +33528,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -33292,11 +33564,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -33329,7 +33601,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -33356,7 +33628,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -33387,8 +33659,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -33425,10 +33697,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" @@ -33457,7 +33729,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -33484,9 +33756,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -33520,7 +33792,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" @@ -33551,7 +33823,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -33585,9 +33857,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -33618,7 +33890,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -33648,7 +33920,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], @@ -33675,7 +33949,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -33702,11 +33976,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -33733,7 +34007,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -33763,7 +34037,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" @@ -33795,11 +34069,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -33828,9 +34103,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -33859,10 +34134,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -33890,10 +34165,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -33928,9 +34203,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -33964,12 +34239,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -33999,7 +34275,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -34032,8 +34309,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -34057,9 +34334,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -34096,8 +34373,8 @@ "Systematic Review" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev; Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -34126,7 +34403,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" @@ -34152,8 +34430,8 @@ "definition": "The scientific study of science itself with the aim to describe, explain, evaluate and/or improve scientific practices. Meta-science typically investigates scientific methods, analyses, the reporting and evaluation of data, the reproducibility and replicability of research results, and research incentives.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -34184,8 +34462,8 @@ "theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", - "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -34217,7 +34495,7 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" + "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -34248,7 +34526,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -34280,8 +34560,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -34316,8 +34596,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -34348,8 +34628,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -34379,7 +34659,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -34411,7 +34691,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" @@ -34441,7 +34721,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" @@ -34473,9 +34753,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -34505,8 +34785,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -34537,7 +34817,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -34567,8 +34847,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -34605,7 +34885,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -34640,8 +34920,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -34677,7 +34957,8 @@ "Open Material" ], "references": [ - "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education" + "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -34709,7 +34990,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -34738,7 +35020,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], @@ -34772,8 +35056,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -34804,9 +35088,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -34833,7 +35117,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], @@ -34865,7 +35151,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" @@ -34894,7 +35181,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], @@ -34930,11 +35220,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -34967,8 +35257,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -35002,7 +35292,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -35032,10 +35323,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -35066,10 +35357,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -35099,8 +35390,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" @@ -35131,9 +35422,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -35168,10 +35459,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -35205,8 +35496,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -35235,9 +35526,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -35273,8 +35565,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -35306,7 +35598,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" @@ -35336,8 +35628,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" @@ -35368,12 +35662,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -35402,8 +35696,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -35431,7 +35725,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -35463,7 +35758,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], @@ -35498,7 +35795,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], @@ -35526,7 +35825,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], @@ -35555,7 +35856,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -35586,7 +35888,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -35616,7 +35918,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -35676,8 +35978,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -35707,8 +36010,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -35739,7 +36042,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -35769,8 +36072,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -35807,12 +36110,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -35844,7 +36147,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -35874,7 +36177,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -35905,7 +36208,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], @@ -35935,8 +36240,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" @@ -35967,9 +36272,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -36002,8 +36307,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -36038,13 +36343,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -36078,20 +36383,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -36123,8 +36430,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" @@ -36155,7 +36462,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -36185,7 +36493,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -36218,8 +36526,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -36252,7 +36560,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -36293,12 +36601,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -36334,7 +36643,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -36364,7 +36673,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -36392,8 +36702,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -36423,8 +36733,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -36454,10 +36764,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -36496,7 +36807,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -36529,8 +36840,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -36558,8 +36869,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" @@ -36592,10 +36903,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -36630,10 +36942,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", - "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://replicationmarkets.org/" + "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", + "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "[www.replicationmarkets.com](http://www.replicationmarkets.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -36663,9 +36976,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -36699,7 +37014,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], @@ -36730,7 +37047,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -36762,11 +37080,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -36800,7 +37119,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -36827,10 +37147,11 @@ "definition": "A reproducibility network is a consortium of open research working groups, often peer-led. The groups operate on a wheel-and-spoke model across a particular country, in which the network connects local cross-disciplinary researchers, groups, and institutions with a central steering group, who also connect with external stakeholders in the research ecosystem. The goals of reproducibility networks include; advocating for greater awareness, promoting training activities, and disseminating best-practices at grassroots, institutional, and research ecosystem levels. Such networks exist in the UK, Germany, Switzerland, Slovakia, and Australia (as of March 2021).", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" @@ -36857,9 +37178,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -36887,8 +37208,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -36921,7 +37242,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -36957,9 +37279,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -36989,8 +37311,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -37020,8 +37342,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" @@ -37058,9 +37380,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -37090,7 +37412,8 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science)." + "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", + "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -37120,7 +37443,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], @@ -37152,7 +37477,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" @@ -37183,7 +37508,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], @@ -37213,8 +37540,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -37244,7 +37571,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -37278,9 +37605,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -37312,8 +37639,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -37341,8 +37668,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -37371,8 +37698,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -37402,7 +37729,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -37435,7 +37762,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -37467,9 +37794,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -37497,7 +37824,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], @@ -37524,7 +37853,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -37552,9 +37881,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -37583,9 +37913,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -37619,9 +37949,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -37655,9 +37985,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -37694,13 +38025,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -37741,8 +38073,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -37775,8 +38108,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -37806,7 +38139,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -37837,7 +38170,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -37868,10 +38203,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -37905,7 +38240,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" @@ -37937,8 +38272,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -37970,10 +38305,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -38004,7 +38339,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -38036,9 +38371,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -38069,7 +38405,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], @@ -38099,8 +38437,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -38133,7 +38471,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -38170,7 +38508,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -38210,8 +38548,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" @@ -38240,8 +38578,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -38272,8 +38610,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -38334,9 +38672,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -38378,8 +38716,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -38413,7 +38752,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -38447,7 +38786,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -38478,8 +38817,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" @@ -38511,7 +38850,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -38540,7 +38880,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -38576,7 +38916,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -38613,10 +38953,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" @@ -38654,8 +38995,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -38691,11 +39032,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -38729,9 +39070,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" @@ -38763,7 +39104,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -38795,7 +39136,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -38832,8 +39173,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" @@ -38865,7 +39206,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], @@ -38896,11 +39239,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -38937,7 +39280,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -38974,7 +39317,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], @@ -39007,8 +39352,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -39046,10 +39391,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -39086,8 +39431,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -39123,8 +39468,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -39161,8 +39508,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -39198,13 +39545,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -39240,10 +39587,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -39276,8 +39623,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -39310,8 +39657,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -39341,12 +39688,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" @@ -39382,8 +39729,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -39417,9 +39764,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" @@ -39457,8 +39804,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -39497,7 +39844,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -39529,10 +39876,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -39568,7 +39915,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -39600,8 +39947,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -39634,7 +39981,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" @@ -39669,7 +40016,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -39701,7 +40048,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -39733,8 +40081,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -39766,7 +40114,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -39795,8 +40143,8 @@ "definition": "İnsan Beyin Haritalama Örgütü (OHBM; The Organization for Human Brain Mapping) nörogörüntüleme topluluğu, nörogörüntüleme verilerinin toplanması, analizi, raporlanması ve hem verilerin hem de analiz kodunun paylaşımında en iyi uygulamalar için bir kılavuz geliştirmiştir. Bu kılavuz, şeffaflığı ve tekrarlanabilirliği optimize etmek amacıyla raporlama yöntemlerini ve elde edilen nörogörüntüleri iyileştirmek için bir makale yazılırken veya bir dergiye gönderilirken dahil edilmesi gereken sekiz unsuru içermektedir.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -39828,10 +40176,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" @@ -39866,9 +40214,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -39903,10 +40251,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" @@ -39937,11 +40285,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -39975,9 +40323,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -40017,10 +40365,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" @@ -40052,11 +40400,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -40094,7 +40442,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" @@ -40123,8 +40472,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" @@ -40164,10 +40514,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -40204,9 +40554,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -40238,10 +40588,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -40276,7 +40626,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -40316,10 +40666,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -40352,7 +40702,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -40388,9 +40738,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -40430,8 +40780,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -40465,8 +40815,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -40501,8 +40851,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -40536,19 +40886,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -40582,9 +40934,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -40616,10 +40968,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" @@ -40656,8 +41008,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" @@ -40691,8 +41043,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" @@ -40724,9 +41078,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -40760,8 +41114,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -40793,7 +41147,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -40826,7 +41180,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -40857,9 +41211,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -40899,8 +41253,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -40932,9 +41286,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -40967,7 +41321,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -40999,10 +41354,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" @@ -41044,7 +41399,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" @@ -41080,9 +41435,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -41114,7 +41469,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -41146,9 +41501,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -41181,8 +41536,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -41214,7 +41569,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -41249,8 +41604,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" @@ -41290,9 +41645,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -41326,12 +41681,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -41371,9 +41726,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -41406,10 +41761,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" @@ -41444,8 +41799,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -41481,7 +41836,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -41517,8 +41872,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -41552,9 +41908,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -41587,7 +41943,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -41615,7 +41971,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -41646,7 +42002,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -41681,8 +42037,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -41714,8 +42070,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -41751,7 +42107,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -41787,8 +42143,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -41823,12 +42180,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -41861,8 +42218,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -41896,10 +42253,10 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", - "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", - "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" + "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", + "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", + "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -41932,8 +42289,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" @@ -41965,8 +42322,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -41998,7 +42355,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" @@ -42034,8 +42391,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" @@ -42066,7 +42423,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -42105,11 +42462,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" @@ -42145,7 +42502,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -42175,7 +42532,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -42209,8 +42566,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -42250,10 +42607,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" @@ -42285,7 +42642,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -42315,9 +42672,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -42354,7 +42711,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" @@ -42388,7 +42745,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -42425,9 +42782,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -42461,7 +42818,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -42494,7 +42851,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], @@ -42524,7 +42883,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" @@ -42554,11 +42913,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" @@ -42588,7 +42947,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -42621,7 +42980,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" @@ -42656,11 +43015,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -42692,9 +43052,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -42726,10 +43086,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -42760,10 +43120,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -42801,9 +43161,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" @@ -42840,12 +43200,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -42878,7 +43239,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -42914,8 +43276,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -42942,9 +43304,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -42984,8 +43346,8 @@ "Systematic Review" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev; Siu Kit Yeung" @@ -43017,7 +43379,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" @@ -43046,8 +43409,8 @@ "definition": "Bilimsel uygulamaları tanımlama, açıklama, değerlendirme ve/veya geliştirme amacıyla bilimin kendisinin bilimsel olarak incelenmesidir. Meta-bilim genellikle bilimsel yöntemleri, analizleri, verilerin raporlanmasını ve değerlendirilmesini, araştırma sonuçlarının yeniden üretilebilirliğini ve tekrarlanabilirliğini ve araştırma teşviklerini araştırır.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" @@ -43079,7 +43442,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -43114,8 +43479,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" @@ -43153,8 +43518,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -43188,8 +43553,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -43222,7 +43587,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -43257,7 +43622,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" @@ -43290,7 +43655,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" @@ -43325,9 +43690,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -43360,8 +43725,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" @@ -43395,7 +43760,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -43428,8 +43793,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -43469,7 +43834,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -43507,8 +43872,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -43547,7 +43912,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -43579,7 +43945,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], @@ -43616,8 +43984,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -43651,9 +44019,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -43683,7 +44051,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], @@ -43718,7 +44088,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" @@ -43750,7 +44121,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], @@ -43789,11 +44163,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -43829,8 +44203,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -43867,7 +44241,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" @@ -43900,10 +44275,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" @@ -43937,10 +44312,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -43973,8 +44348,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" @@ -44008,9 +44383,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -44048,10 +44423,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" @@ -44088,8 +44463,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -44121,9 +44496,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -44162,8 +44538,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -44198,7 +44574,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" @@ -44231,8 +44607,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" @@ -44266,12 +44644,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" @@ -44303,8 +44681,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -44335,7 +44713,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -44370,7 +44749,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], @@ -44408,7 +44789,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], @@ -44439,7 +44822,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], @@ -44471,7 +44856,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -44505,7 +44891,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" @@ -44538,7 +44924,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" @@ -44604,8 +44990,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -44638,8 +45025,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" @@ -44673,7 +45060,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -44706,8 +45093,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" @@ -44747,12 +45134,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -44787,7 +45174,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -44820,7 +45207,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" @@ -44854,7 +45241,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], @@ -44887,8 +45276,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" @@ -44922,9 +45311,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" @@ -44960,8 +45349,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" @@ -44999,13 +45388,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -45042,20 +45431,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -45090,8 +45481,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" @@ -45125,7 +45516,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" @@ -45158,7 +45550,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" @@ -45194,8 +45586,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -45231,7 +45623,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -45275,12 +45667,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -45319,7 +45712,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -45352,7 +45745,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -45383,8 +45777,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -45417,8 +45811,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" @@ -45451,10 +45845,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" @@ -45496,7 +45891,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -45532,8 +45927,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -45564,8 +45959,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" @@ -45601,10 +45996,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -45642,9 +46038,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" @@ -45681,7 +46079,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], @@ -45715,7 +46115,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" @@ -45750,11 +46151,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -45791,7 +46193,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -45821,10 +46224,11 @@ "definition": "Yeniden üretilebilirlik ağı, genellikle araştırmacıların öncülük ettiği açık bilim çalışma gruplarından oluşan bir konsorsiyumdur. Bu gruplar, belirli bir ülke çapında, farklı disiplinlerden yerel araştırmacılar, gruplar ve kurumları, merkezi bir yönlendirme grubuyla bağlantılı hâle getiren ve araştırma ekosistemindeki dış paydaşlarla da iletişim kuran ‘wheel-and-spoke model – tekerlek ve jant modeli’* ile çalışır. Yeniden üretilebilirlik ağlarının amaçları arasında farkındalığı artırmak, eğitim faaliyetlerini teşvik etmek ve taban düzeyinde, kurumsal düzeyde ve araştırma ekosistemi düzeyinde en iyi uygulamaları yaygınlaştırmak vardır. Mart 2021 itibarıyla bu tür ağlar; Birleşik Krallık, Almanya, İsviçre, Slovakya ve Avustralya’da mevcuttur. *Bu model, iletişim, organizasyon, ulaşım ve sinirbilim gibi alanlarda kullanılan bir ağ modelidir. Merkezî bir çekirdekten (wheel) çevreye doğru uzanan bağlantılardan (spokes) oluşan bir sistemi ifade eder.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" @@ -45854,9 +46258,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -45887,8 +46291,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" @@ -45924,7 +46328,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" @@ -45963,9 +46368,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -45998,8 +46403,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" @@ -46032,8 +46437,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" @@ -46073,9 +46478,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" @@ -46108,7 +46513,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], @@ -46143,7 +46550,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" @@ -46177,7 +46584,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], @@ -46210,8 +46619,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -46244,7 +46653,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -46281,9 +46690,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -46318,8 +46727,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" @@ -46350,8 +46759,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" @@ -46383,8 +46792,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" @@ -46418,7 +46827,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -46453,9 +46862,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" @@ -46486,7 +46895,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], @@ -46516,7 +46927,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -46547,9 +46958,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -46581,9 +46993,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -46620,9 +47032,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" @@ -46659,9 +47071,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" @@ -46701,13 +47114,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" @@ -46751,8 +47165,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -46788,8 +47203,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" @@ -46822,7 +47237,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -46856,7 +47271,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -46890,10 +47307,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" @@ -46930,7 +47347,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" @@ -46965,8 +47382,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" @@ -47001,10 +47418,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" @@ -47038,7 +47455,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" @@ -47073,9 +47490,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" @@ -47109,7 +47527,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], @@ -47142,8 +47562,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -47179,7 +47599,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" @@ -47219,7 +47639,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" @@ -47262,8 +47682,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" @@ -47295,8 +47715,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -47330,8 +47750,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" @@ -47398,9 +47818,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -47445,8 +47865,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" @@ -47483,7 +47904,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -47520,7 +47941,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" @@ -47554,8 +47975,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" @@ -47590,7 +48011,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json b/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json index f207b64d8b..88feb46d08 100644 --- a/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json +++ b/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json @@ -1,715 +1,715 @@ { - "CESSDA_DataManagement": "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", - "Stanford_DataManagementPlans": "Stanford Libraries. (n.d.). Data Management Plans | Stanford Libraries. https://library.stanford.edu/research/data-management-services/data-management-plans", - "EU_DataProtection": "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en", - "DataCite_MetadataSchema": "DataCite Schema. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. https://schema.datacite.org/", - "cook1979quasi": "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "brown2010introduction": "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/", - "OpenNeuro": "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/", - "AbeleBrehm2019": "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Aczel2021a": "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Aczel2020": "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6", - "Aksnes2003": "Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021919228368", - "Albayrak2018a": "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/", - "Albayrak2018b": "Albayrak, N. (2018). Academics’ role on the future of higher education: Important but unrecognised. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/11/29/academics-role-on-the-future-of-higher-education-important-but-unrecognised/", - "AlbayrakOkoroji2019": "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "AlbayrakAydemir2020": "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "ALLEA2017": "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "AllenMcGonagleOConnellND": "Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/", - "Ali2021": "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "APA2007": "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.", - "Anderson2010": "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Andersson2018": "Andersson, N. (2018). Participatory research—a modernizing science for primary health care. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 19(5), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.187", - "AngristPischke2010": "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "AnonArxivND": "Anon. (n.d.). About arxiv. Retrieved from https://info.arxiv.org/about/index.html", - "AnonCCND": "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/", - "AnonCkanND": "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/", - "Anon2006": "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b", - "AnonDataciteND": "Anon. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. Retrieved from https://schema.datacite.org/", - "AnonDomovND": "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AnonRe3dataND": "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/", - "AnonINVOLVEDND": "Anon. (n.d.). INVOLVE – INVOLVE Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Retrieved from https://www.invo.org.uk/", - "AnonOSI_ND": "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses", - "AnonFOSTERND": "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science", - "AnonDOIHandbook2019": "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook.", - "AnonSherpaRomeoND": "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/", - "AnonCodebookND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a codebook?. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html", - "icpsr_codebook": "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983", - "AnonDOIAPA2009_2020": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a digital object identifier, or DOI?. Retrieved from https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/faqs/what-is-doi", - "AnonReportingGuidelineND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline?. Retrieved from https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", - "AnonImpact2021": "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/", - "AnonOpenEducationND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is open education?. Retrieved from https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", - "AnonPlagiarismND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is plagiarism?. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/category/preventing-plagiarism/", - "AnonDataAvailabilityND": "Anon. (n.d.). Data availability statements. Retrieved from https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/data-availability-statements", - "ArkseyOMalley2005": "Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616", - "Arslan2019": "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", - "ArtsHumanitiesRCND": "Arts and Humanities Research Council. (n.d.). Definition of eligibility for funding. Retrieved from https://ahrc.ukri.org/skills/earlycareerresearchers/definitionofeligibility/", - "AspersCorte2019": "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "AusRNND": "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/", - "BMJ_Authorship": "Authorship & Contributorship | The BMJ. (n.d.). The British Medical Journal. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship", - "Azevedo_Ideology": "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", - "Azevedo2021": "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "BaayenDavidsonBates2008": "Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005", - "BahlaiEtAl2019": "Bahlai, C., Bartlett, L. J., Burgio, K. R., & others. (2019). Open science isn’t always open to all scientists. American Scientist, 107(2), 78.", - "Bacharach1989": "Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374", - "Bak2001": "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "BanksEtAl2016": "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Barba2018": "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Bardsley2018": "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "BarnesEtAl2018": "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "BarrEtAl2013": "Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001", - "BartosSchimmack2020": "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "BatemanEtAl2005": "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Baturay2015": "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", - "Bazeley2003": "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Bazi2020": "Bazi, T. (2020). Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind? International Urogynecology Journal, 31, 481–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04187-2", - "BeffaraBret2021": "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Behrens1997": "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "BellerBender2017": "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "BenjaminiBraun2002": "Benjamini, Y., & Braun, H. (2002). John W. Tukey’s contributions to multiple comparisons. The Annals of Statistics, 30(6), 1576–1594. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1043351247", - "BenoitEtAl2016": "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "BhopalEtAl1997": "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "LexicoBias": "BIAS | Definition of BIAS by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BIAS. (n.d.). Lexico Dictionaries | English. https://www.lexico.com/definition/bias", - "BIDSModalityND": "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html", - "BIDSAbout2020": "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io", - "BikEtAl2016": "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Bilder2013": "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Bishop2020": "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "BjornebornIngwersen2004": "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077", - "BlohowiakEtAl2020": "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "BMJ2015": "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "BoivinEtAl2018": "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "BolEtAl2018": "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bollen1989": "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "BorensteinEtAl2011": "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "BornmannEtAl2019": "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "BorsboomEtAl2004": "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061", - "BorsboomEtAl2020": "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Bortoli2021": "Bortoli, S. (2021). NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. Learning For Involvement. https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Bos2020": "Bos, J. (2020). Confidentiality. In Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences (pp. 149–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6_7", - "Boudry2013": "Boudry, M. (2013). The hypothesis that saves the day. Ad hoc reasoning in pseudoscience. Logique et Analyse, 245–258.", - "BourneEtAl2017": "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Bouvy2019": "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Box1976": "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "BramouleSaintPaul2010": "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "BrandEtAl2015": "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "BrandtEtAl2014": "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "BraunClarke2013": "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "BrembsEtAl2013": "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Brewer2013": "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Breznau2021": "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "BreznauEtAl2021": "Breznau, N., Rinke, E. M., Wuttke, A., Nguyen, H. H. V., Adem, M., Adriaans, J., Akdeniz, E., Alvarez-Benjumea, A., Andersen, H. K., Auer, D., Azevedo, F., Bahnsen, O., Bai, L., Balzer, D., Bauer, G., Bauer, P., Baumann, M., Baute, S., Benoit, V., & Żółtak, T. (2021). How Many Replicators Does It Take to Achieve Reliability? Investigating Researcher Variability in a Crowdsourced Replication. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j7qta", - "BrodEtAl2009": "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "BrodieEtAl2021": "Brodie, S., Frainer, A., Pennino, M. G., Jiang, S., Kaikkonen, L., Lopez, J., Ortega-Cisneros, K., Peters, C. A., Selim, S. A., & Vaidianu, N. (2021). Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(11), 957–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011", - "Brown2010": "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals (pp. 1–6) [Repositories Support Project]. University College London.", - "Brooks1985": "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "BrownHeathers2017": "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "BrownThompsonLeigh2018": "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "BruleBlount1989": "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill.", - "BrunnerSchimmack2020": "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874", - "BrunsIoannidis2016": "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "BryanYeagerOBrien2019": "Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., & O’Brien, J. M. (2019). Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(51), 25535–25545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910951116", - "Budapest2002": "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "BurnetteEtAl2016": "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Busse2017": "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "ButtonEtAl2020": "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "ButtonEtAl2016": "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "ByrneChristopher2020": "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Calvert2019": "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Campbell1957": "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "CampbellStanley1966": "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally.", - "Campbell2011": "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2011). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Wadsworth.", - "Campbell1979": "Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X", - "CarneyBanaji2012": "Carney, D. R., & Banaji, M. R. (2012). First is best. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e35088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035088", - "Carp2012": "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Carsey2014": "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "CarterTillingMunafo2021": "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Case1928": "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "CassidyEtAl2019": "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "CentreForEvaluationND": "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "CentreForOpenScience2011": "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/", - "CentreForOpenScienceND": "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/", - "CESSDATrainingTeam2017": "CESSDA Training Team. (2017–2020). CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide. CESSDA ERIC. https://www.cessda.eu/DMGuide", - "Chambers2013": "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "ChambersEtAl2015": "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "ChambersTzavella2020": "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "ChartierEtAl2018": "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", - "Chuard2019": "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127", - "CKAN": "CKAN - The open source data management system. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://ckan.org/.", - "Claerbout1992": "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Clark2019": "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "ClosedAccess": "Closed access. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/.", - "coalition_s": "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/", - "Cohen1962": "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen1969": "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Cohn2008": "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Coles2020": "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "cos_registered_reports": "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports", - "repliCATS": "Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science | The repliCATS project. (n.d.). University of Melbourne.", - "Committee2019": "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "COAR2020": "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829", - "Cook1979": "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Coproduction2021": "Collective, C. (2021). What Co-production means to us. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us", - "Corley2011": "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Cornell2020": "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10", - "CornwallJewkes1995": "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Nature2006": "Correction or retraction? (2006). Nature, 444(7116), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b", - "Corti2019": "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage.", - "Cowan2020": "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "CRediT": "CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. (n.d.). Casrai. https://casrai.org/credit/", - "Crenshaw1989": "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Cronbach1955": "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Cronin2001": "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Crosetto2021": "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Crowdsourcing2021": "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", - "Crutzen2019": "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Cruwell2019": "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Curran2009": "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "Curry2012": "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Despagnat2008": "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "DaviesGray2015": "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Day2020": "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", - "DORA": "Declaration on Research Assessment. (n.d.). Health Research Board. https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", - "DelGiudiceGangestad2021": "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "DellavalleBanksEllis2007": "Dellavalle, R. P., Banks, M. A., & Ellis, J. I. (2007). Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Self-Plagiarism: How to Avoid Recycling Fraud. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(3), 527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.05.018", - "DFG2019": "Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3923602", - "DerKiureghianDitlevsen2009": "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "DeVellis2017": "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Devezer2021": "Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Buzbas, E. O. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 200805. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805", - "Devito2019": "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Dickersin1993": "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Dienes2008": "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Dienes2011": "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes2014": "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes2016": "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Dismukes2010": "Dismukes, R. K. (2010). Understanding and analyzing human error in real-world operations. In E. Salas & D. Maurino (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (2nd ed., pp. 335–374). Academic Press.", - "DOIHandbook": "Digital Object Identifier System Handbook. (n.d.). DOI. https://www.doi.org/hb.html", - "DOAJ": "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/", - "DollHill1954": "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451", - "SKRN": "Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility Network). (n.d.). SKRN. https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "JASP": "Download JASP. (n.d.). JASP - Free. https://jasp-stats.org/download/", - "Drost2011": "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "DuBois1968": "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Dubin1969": "Dubin, R. (1969). Theory building. The Free Press.", - "DuvalTweedie2000a": "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "DuvalTweedie2000b": "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "DuyxEtAl2019": "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8.", - "EaglyRiger2014": "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Easterbrook2014": "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283", - "EbersoleEtAl2016": "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Edyburn2010": "Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300103", - "EditorialDirector2021": "Editorial Director. (2021). What is a group author (collaborative author) and does it need an ORCID? JMIR Publications. https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001449591-What-is-a-group-author-collaborative-author-and-does-it-need-an-ORCID-", - "Eldermire_nodate": "Eldermire, E. (n.d.). LibGuides: Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10", - "Eley2012": "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Ellemers2021": "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "ElliottResnik2019": "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "ElsherifEtAl2022": "Elsherif, M., Middleton, S., Phan, J. M., Azevedo, F., Iley, B., Grose-Hodge, M., Tyler, S., Kapp, S. K., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A., Grafton-Clarke, D., Yeung, S. K., Shaw, J. J., Hartmann, H., & Dokovova, M. (2022). Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k7a9p", - "VonElm2007": "Elm, E. von, Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 335(7624), 806–808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", - "Elman2020": "Elman, C., Gerring, J., & Mahoney, J. (Eds.). (2020). The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science. Cambridge University Press.", - "Elmore2018": "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322", - "Embargo2021": "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567", - "EpskampNuijten2016": "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "EsterlingEtAl2021": "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "EtzGronauDablander2018": "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "EuropeanCommission2021": "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation", - "Evans1995": "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "EvansRubin2021": "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "EvidenceSynthesis": "Evidence Synthesis. (n.d.). LSHTM. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "EverittSkrondall2010": "Everitt, B. S., & Skrondall, A. (2010). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics - Fourth Edition. Cambridge University Press.", - "go_fair_principles": "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/", - "Fanelli2010": "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271", - "Fanelli2018": "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", - "Farrow2017": "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "FaulEtAl2007": "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "FaulEtAl2009": "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149", - "Ferguson2021": "Ferguson, C. J. (2021). Providing a lower-bound estimate for psychology’s “crud factor”: The case of aggression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.", - "FersonEtAl2004": "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023", - "FiedlerKutznerKrueger2012": "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "FiedlerSchwarz2016": "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "FilipeEtAl2017": "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "FillonEtAl2021": "Fillon, A. A., Feldman, G., Yeung, S. K., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., Nanakdewa, K., & Brick, C. (n.d.). Correlational Meta-Analysis Registered Report Template.", - "FindleyEtAl2016": "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", - "FinlayGough2008": "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Flake2020": "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393", - "FletcherWatson2019": "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "ForemanMackey2013": "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "FORRT2019": "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p", - "FORRT2021": "FORRT. (2021). Welcome to FORRT. Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training. https://forrt.org", - "ForscherEtAl2022": "Forscher, P. S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Coles, N. A., Silan, M. A., Dutra, N., Basnight-Brown, D., & IJzerman, H. (2022). The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221082970", - "FosterDeardorff2017": "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "FrancoMalhotraSimonovits2014": "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Frank2017": "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "FranzoniSauermann2014": "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "FraserEtAl2021": "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", - "FreeOurKnowledgeND": "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/", - "Frith2020": "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007", - "FilipeRenedoMarston2017": "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "GalliganDyasCorreia2013": "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003", - "Garson2012": "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "GelmanLoken2013": "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "GelmanCarlin2014": "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "GelmanStern2006": "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Generalizability2018": "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Gentleman2005": "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "GermanResearchFoundation2019": "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "Geyer2003": "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer2007": "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Gilroy1993": "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press.", - "GinerSorolla2019": "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ginsparg1997": "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg2001": "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "GioiaPitre1990": "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "GitVersionControl": "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control", - "GlassHall2008": "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Goertzen2017": "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18.", - "Gollwitzer2020": "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "GoodmanFanelliIoannidis2016": "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Goodman2019": "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "GorgolewskiEtAl2016": "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "GrahamMcCutcheonKothari2019": "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "GRNND": "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "GrossmannBrembs2021": "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Grzanka2020": "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "GuentherRodriguez2020": "Guenther, E. A., & Rodriguez, J. K. (2020). What’s wrong with ‘manels’ and what can we do about them. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068", - "GuestTweet2017": "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "GuestMartin2020": "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", - "ICO2021": "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", - "HaakEtAl2012": "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "HackettKelly2020": "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556", - "HamelEtAl2021": "Hamel, C., Michaud, A., Thuku, M., Skidmore, B., Stevens, A., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., & Garritty, C. (2021). Defining rapid reviews: A systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 129, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.041", - "HahnMeeker1993": "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "HardwickeEtAl2014": "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "HardwickeEtAl2020": "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "HarrisEtAl2020": "Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., & Gérard-Marchant, P. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2", - "HartSilka2020": "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "HartgerinkEtAl2017": "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71", - "HayesTariq2000": "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "HaynesRichardKubany1995": "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238", - "HealthResearchBoardND": "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", - "Healy2018": "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "HeathersAnayaVanDerZeeBrown2018": "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "HendriksKienhuesBromme2016": "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Henrich2020": "Henrich, J. (2020). The weirdest people in the world: How the west became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus.", - "HenrichHeineNorenzayan2010": "Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X", - "HerrmannovaKnoth2016": "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Heyman2020": "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Higgins2019": "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Higher_Education_Funding_Council_for_England_n_d": "Higher Education Funding Council for England. (n.d.). About the REF. https://ref.ac.uk/about-the-ref/what-is-the-ref/", - "Himmelstein2019": "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Hirsch2005": "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Hitchcock2002": "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Hoekstra2012": "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", - "Hogg2010": "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Hoijtink2019": "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Holcombe2019": "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Holcombe2020": "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611.", - "Holm1979": "Holm, S. (1979). A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733", - "Holden2010": "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341", - "Homepage_n_d": "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/", - "Houtkoop2018": "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "KelloggInclusivity": "Kellogg Insight. (n.d.). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "ImprovingPsych": "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/", - "Huber2019": "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Huber2016a": "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/", - "Huber2016b": "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/", - "Huelin2015": "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Huffmeier2016": "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "Hultsch2002": "Hultsch, D. F., MacDonald, S. W., & Dixon, R. A. (2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(2), P101–P115. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.2.P101", - "Hunsley2003": "Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446", - "Hunter2007": "Hunter, J. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55", - "Hunter2012": "Hunter, J. (2012). Post-publication peer review: Opening up scientific conversation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 63. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00063", - "HunterSchmidt2015": "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE.", - "Hurlbert1984": "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Ikeda2019": "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "GitInitialRevision": "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290", - "ICMJE2019": "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf", - "icmje_conflicts": "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", - "INVOLVE": "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/", - "ISO1993": "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Ioannidis2005": "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Ioannidis2018": "Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468", - "Ioannidis2023": "Ioannidis, J. P. (2023). Systematic reviews for basic scientists: a different beast. Physiological Reviews, 103(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00028.2022", - "Ioannidis2015": "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "JabRef2021": "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org", - "Jacobson2019": "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075", - "Jafar2018": "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", - "James2016": "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Jamovi": "Jamovi. (n.d.). Jamovi—Stats. Open. Now. Jamovi. https://www.jamovi.org/", - "Jannot2013": "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "JASP2020": "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].", - "John2012": "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Jones2020": "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Joseph2011": "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Judd2012": "Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347", - "Kalliamvakou2014": "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", - "Kang2020": "Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2020). The consequences of data fabrication and falsification among researchers. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 1(2), 7–10.", - "Kamraro2014": "Kamraro. (2014). Responsible research & innovation. Horizon 2020 - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation", - "Kathawalla2020": "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Kapp2013": "Kapp, S. K. (2013). Interactions between theoretical models and practical stakeholders: the basis for an integrative, collaborative approach to disabilities. In E. Ashkenazy & M. Latimer (Eds.), Empowering Leadership: A Systems Change Guide for Autistic College Students and Those with Other Disabilities (pp. 104–113). Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN).", - "Kelley1927": "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", - "KerrWilson2021": "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Kerr1998": "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Kerr2018": "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Kidwell2016": "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", - "Kienzler2017": "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805", - "Kiernan1999": "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "King1995": "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Kitzes2017": "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "KiureghianDitlevsen2009": "Kiureghian, A. D., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Klein2018Transparency": "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Klein2014": "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein2018ManyLabs2": "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Kleinberg2017": "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/", - "Knoth2014": "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Knowledge2020": "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/", - "Koole2012": "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Kreuter2013": "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869", - "Kruschke2015": "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "Kuhn1962": "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Kukull2012": "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "HavenvanGrootel2019": "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Laakso2013": "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Laine2017": "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Lakatos1978": "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.", - "Lakens2014": "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Lakens2020a": "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens2020": "Lakens, D. (2020). Pandemic researchers — recruit your own best critics. Nature, 581, 121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2180-7", - "Lakens2021": "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", - "Lakens2024": "Lakens, D. (2024). When and how to deviate from a preregistration. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), Article 117094. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117094", - "Lakens2021b": "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Lakens2018": "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "LakensEtAl2020": "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Largent2016": "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Lariviere2016": "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", - "Lazic2019": "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/", - "Leavens2010": "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166", - "Leavy2017": "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "LeBel2017": "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "LeBel2018": "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Ledgerwood2021": "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Lee1993": "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Levac2010": "Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69", - "Levitt2017": "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082", - "Lewandowsky2016": "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "LewandowskyOberauer2021": "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "LibGuides_n_d": "Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. (n.d.). https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10", - "OpenSourceInitiative": "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/licenses", - "Lieberman2020": "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003", - "Lin2020": "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7", - "Lind2017": "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Lindsay2015": "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374", - "Lindsay2020": "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Lintott2008": "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x", - "LiuPriest2009": "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Liu2020": "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", - "Longino1990": "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino1992": "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Lu2018": "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132", - "Ludtke2020": "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", - "Lutz2001": "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc.", - "Lyon2016": "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Lynch1982": "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Maass2018": "Maass, W., Parsons, J., Purao, S., Storey, V. C., & Woo, C. (2018). Data-driven meets theory-driven research in the era of big data: Opportunities and challenges for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(12), 1253–1273. http://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00526", - "Manalili2022": "Manalili, M. A. R., Pearson, A., Sulik, J., Creechan, L., Elsherif, M. M., Murkumbi, I., Azevedo, F., Bonnen, K. L., Kim, J. S., Kording, K., Lee, J. J., Obscura, Kapp, S. K., Roer, J. P., & Morstead, T. (2022). From Puzzle to Progress: How engaging with Neurodiversity can improve Cognitive Science.", - "MacfarlaneCheng2008": "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Makowski2019": "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767", - "Marks1997": "Marks, D. (1997). Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289709166831", - "MartinezAcosta2018": "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252.", - "Marwick2018": "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Masur2020": "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Mayo2006": "Mayo, D. G., & Cox, D. R. (2006). Frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference. In Optimality: The second Erich L. Lehmann symposium (pp. 77–97). https://www.jstor.org/stable/i397717", - "McDaniel1994": "McDaniel, G., & Corporation, I. B. M. (1994). IBM dictionary of computing. McGraw-Hill. http://archive.org/details/isbn_9780070314894", - "McElreath2020": "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "McGee2012": "McGee, M. (2012). Neurodiversity. Contexts, 11(3), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212456175", - "McNutt2018": "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "MedicalResearchCouncil2019": "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/", - "Medin2012": "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Meehl1990": "Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244. https://meehl.umn.edu/sites/meehl.umn.edu/files/files/144whysummaries.pdf", - "Mellers2001": "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Menke2015": "Menke, C. (2015). A Note on Science and Democracy? Robert K. Merton’s Ethos of Science. In R. Klausnitzer, C. Spoerhase, & D. Werle (Eds.), Ethos und Pathos der Geisteswissenschaften. DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013", - "Mertens2019": "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Merton1938": "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton1942": "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013", - "Merton1968": "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56", - "Meslin2009": "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Messick1995": "Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x", - "Michener2015": "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", - "Mischel2009": "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science", - "Moher2020": "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737", - "Moher2009": "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Moher2018": "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Morey2016": "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547", - "Morse2010": "Morse, J. M. (2010). “Cherry picking”: Writing from thin data. Qualitative Health Research, 20(1), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309354285", - "Moshontz2018": "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Monroe2018": "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X", - "Morabia1997": "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Moran2020": "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Moretti2020": "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Morgan1998": "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Moshontz2021": "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Mourby2018": "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Muller2018": "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Muma1993": "Muma, J. R. (1993). The need for replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3605.927", - "Munn2018": "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Murphy2019": "Murphy, K. R., & Aguinis, H. (2019). HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9524-7", - "Muthukrishna2020": "Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31, 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782", - "National_Academies_2019": "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", - "Nature_n_d": "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories", - "Naudet2018": "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Navarro2020": "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nelson2012": "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Neyman1928": "Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part I. Biometrika, 20(1/2), 175–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331945", - "Neuroskeptic2012": "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Nichols2017": "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Nickerson1998": "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Nieuwenhuis2011": "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886", - "Nisbet2002": "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Nittrouer2018": "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "NIHR2021": "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Nogrady2023": "Nogrady, B. (2023). Hyperauthorship: The publishing challenges for “big team” science. Nature News. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00575-3 Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3", - "Nosek2019": "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change", - "Nosek2012Bar_Anan": "Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215", - "Nosek2018": "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Nosek2020": "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Nosek2014": "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192", - "Nosek2012b": "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "NoyMcGuinness2001": "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf", - "Nuijten2016": "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Nust2018": "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525", - "ODea2021": "O’Dea, R. E., Parker, T. H., Chee, Y. E., Culina, A., Drobniak, S. M., Duncan, D. H., Fidler, F., Gould, E., Ihle, M., Kelly, C. D., Lagisz, M., Roche, D. G., Sánchez-Tójar, A., Wilkinson, D. P., Wintle, B. C., & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology. BMC Biology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01006-3", - "OGrady2020": "O’Grady, O. (2020). Psychology’s replication crisis inspires ecologists to push for more reliable research. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0894", - "OSullivan2021": "O’Sullivan, L., Ma, L., & Doran, P. (2021). An overview of post-publication peer review. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.26", - "Obels2020": "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961", - "Oberauer2019": "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Oliver1983": "Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People. Macmillan.", - "Oliver2013": "Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773", - "Onie2020": "Onie, S. (2020). Redesign open science for Asia, Africa and Latin America. Nature, 587, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03052-3", - "OERCommons": "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", - "OpenAire_Amnesia": "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/", - "UNESCO_OER": "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer", - "OERCommons_OSKB": "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", - "Open_Science_Collaboration2015": "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", - "Open_Aire2020": "Aire, O. (2020). High accuracy Data anonymisation. Amnesia. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/", - "Open_Source_Initiative_n_d": "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", - "Orben2019": "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "ORCID": "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/", - "OSF": "OSF. (n.d.). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/", - "OSF_StudySwap": "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", - "OrbenLakens2020": "Orben, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Crud (re)defined. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961", - "Ottmann2011": "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Oxford_Dictionaries2017": "Bias—definition of bias in English. (2017). https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bias", - "Oxford_Reference2017": "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530", - "CoProductionCollective": "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach", - "Padilla1994": "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024", - "Page2021": "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Patience2019": "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117", - "Pautasso2013": "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Pavlov2020": "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr", - "PCI_n_d": "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/", - "PCI_rr": "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about", - "Peer2017b": "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Peirce2022": "Peirce, J. W., Hirst, R. J., & MacAskill, M. R. (2022). Building Experiments in PsychoPy (2nd ed.). Sage.", - "Peirce2007": "Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017", - "Pellicano2022": "Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022). Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13534", - "Peng2011": "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Percie_du_Sert2020": "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410", - "Pernet2015": "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Pernet2019": "Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., & Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8", - "Pernet2020": "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0", - "Peters2015": "Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050", - "Peterson2020": "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa", - "PetreWilson2014": "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Poldrack2013": "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack2014": "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "PoldrackGorgolewski2017": "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2017). OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data. Neuroimage, 144, 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.073", - "PolletBond2021": "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Popper1959": "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.", - "Posselt2020": "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ", - "Pownall2020": "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K., Hartmann, H., & others. (2020). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f9m47", - "Pownall2021": "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255", - "PreregistrationPledge": "Preregistration Pledge. (n.d.). Preregistration Pledge. Google Docs. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf8RflGizFJZamE874o8aDOhyU7UsNByR4dLmzhOtEOiu8KRQ/viewform?embedded=true&usp=embed_facebook", - "Press2007": "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Protzko2018": "Protzko, J. (2018). Null-hacking, a lurking problem in the open science movement. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9y3mp", - "Psychological_Science_Accelerator_n_d": "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", - "PublicationBias2019": "Publication Bias. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalog of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "PubPeer": "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", - "RProject": "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", - "R_Core_Team2020": "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/", - "Rabagliati2019": "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Rakow2014": "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405", - "Ramagopalan2014": "Ramagopalan, S. V., Skingsley, A. P., Handunnetthi, L., Klingel, M., Magnus, D., Pakpoor, J., & Goldacre, B. (2014). Prevalence of primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional study. F1000Research, 3, 77. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3784.1", - "RecommendedDataRepositories": "Scientific Data. (n.d.). Recommended Data Repositories. Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories", - "ReplicationMarkets": "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", - "RepliCATS_project2020": "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/", - "ReproducibiliTea_n_d": "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", - "Research_Data_Alliance2020": "Alliance, R. D. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", - "RetractionWatch": "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/", - "RIOT_Science_Club2021": "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/", - "Rodriguez2020": "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068", - "Rogers2013": "Rogers, A., Castree, N., & Kitchin, R. (2013). Reflexivity. In A Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530", - "RollsRelf2006": "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Rose2000": "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose2018": "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3", - "RoseMeyer2002": "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision.", - "Rosenthal1979": "Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638", - "Ross_Hellauer2017": "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2", - "Rossner2008": "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Rothstein2005": "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1", - "Rowhani_Farid2020": "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", - "Rubin2022": "Rubin, M. (2022). Does preregistration improve the interpretability and credibility of research findings? [Powerpoint slides]. https://www.slideshare.net/MarkRubin14/does-preregistration-improve-the-interpretability-and-credibility-of-research-findings", - "Rubin2021": "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "Rubin2019": "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Russell2020": "Russell, B. (2020). A priori justification and knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/apriori/", - "StudySwap_S2021": "OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. (2021). https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", - "Sagarin2014": "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "DORA_San_Francisco": "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/", - "Sasaki2022": "Sasaki, K., & Yamada, Y. (2022). SPARKing: Sampling planning after the results are known. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ngz8k", - "Salem2013": "Salem, D. N., & Boumil, M. M. (2013). Conflict of Interest in Open-Access Publishing. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(5), 491–491. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1307577", - "Sato1996": "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Scargle1999": "Scargle, J. D. (1999). Publication bias (the “file-drawer problem”) in scientific inference. ArXiv Preprint Physics. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/9909033", - "Schafersman1997": "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "SchmidtHunter2014": "Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Sage.", - "Schmidt1987": "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Schneider2019": "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Schonbrodt2017": "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061", - "Schonbrodt2019": "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Schuirmann1987": "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419", - "SchulzGrimes2005": "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6", - "SchulzAltmanMoher2010": "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "SchwarzStrack2014": "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306.", - "Science_C_n_d": "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges", - "ScopatzHuff2015": "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", - "Sechrest1963": "Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental validity: A recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446302300113", - "Senn2003": "Senn, S. (2003). Bayesian, likelihood, and frequentist approaches to statistics. Applied Clinical Trials, 12(8), 35–38.", - "Sert2020": "Sert, N. P. du, Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410", - "Shadish2002": "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Shakespeare2013": "Shakespeare, T. (2013). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (4th ed., pp. 214–221). Routledge.", - "Sharma2014": "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151", - "Shepard2015": "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE.", - "Siddaway2019": "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803", - "Sijtsma2016": "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", - "Silberzahn2014": "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802", - "Silberzahn2018": "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Simons2017": "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Simmons2011": "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Simmons2021": "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208", - "Simonsohn2014pcurve": "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn2015": "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn2014effect": "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn2019": "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454", - "Simonsohn2020": "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "SlowScienceAcademy2010": "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "SIPS2021": "The Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science. (2021). https://improvingpsych.org/", - "Smaldino2016": "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384", - "Smela2023": "Smela, B., Toumi, M., Świerk, K., Francois, C., Biernikiewicz, M., Clay, E., & Boyer, L. (2023). Rapid literature review: definition and methodology. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 11(1), Article 2241234. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234", - "Smith2005": "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396", - "Smith2020": "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4", - "Smith2018": "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823", - "Sorsa2015": "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317", - "SORTEE_n_d": "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/", - "Spence2018": "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185", - "Spencer2018": "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Spiegelhalter2009": "Spiegelhalter, D., & Rice, K. (2009). Bayesian statistics. Scholarpedia, 4(8), 5230. http://dx.doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.5230", - "StanfordLibraries_n_d": "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20", - "Stanovich2013": "Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174", - "Steckler2008": "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847", - "SteupNeta2020": "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/", - "Steegen2016": "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637", - "Steup2020": "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/", - "Stewart2017": "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Stodden2011": "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Strathern1997": "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4", - "Suber2004": "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Suber2015": "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm", - "SwissRN_n_d": "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", - "Syed2019": "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "SyedKathawalla2020": "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2", - "Szollosi2019": "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Szomszor2020": "Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123, 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5", - "psyTeachRGlossary": "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Teixeira2015": "Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2015). Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review. In Accountability in Research (pp. 22–40). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.899909", - "Tennant2019a": "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", - "Tennant2019b": "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Tennant2019": "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Tenney2019": "Tenney, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2019). Statistical significance. In StatsPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535373/", - "Tscharntke2007": "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018", - "Thaler2017": "Thaler, K. M. (2017). Mixed Methods Research in the Study of Political and Social Violence and Conflict. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815585196", - "The_jamovi_project2020": "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org", - "The_Nine_Circles_of_Scientific_Hell2012": "The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell. (2012). In Perspectives on Psychological Science (Vol. 7, pp. 643–644). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "The_R_Foundation_n_d": "The R Foundation. (n.d.). The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/", - "COPE2021": "The Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Transparency & best practice – DOAJ. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/", - "CONSORT2010": "The CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "ALLEA2021": "ALLEA. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "OpenDefinition2021": "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "OpenSourceDefinition2021": "Definition, T. O. S. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/osd", - "SlowScience2010": "Academy, T. S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. SLOW-SCIENCE.Org — Bear with Us, While We Think. http://slow-science.org/", - "Thombs2015": "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Tierney2020": "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney2021": "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", - "Tiokhin2021": "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1", - "Topor2021": "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z", - "Transparency2016": "of Open Science, T. T. E. T. D., & Data, O. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER QUARTERLY, 25(4), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Tufte1983": "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press.", - "Tukey1977": "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Tvina2019": "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260", - "Uhlmann2019": "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "University_of_Oxford2023": "University of Oxford. (2023). Plagiarism. https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism", - "UKRN2021": "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "Burnette2016": "University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "van_de_Schoot2021": "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", - "Vazire2018": "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire2020": "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3", - "Velazquez2021": "Velázquez, A. (2021). Data analysis: Definition, types and examples. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/what-is-data-analysis/", - "Verma2020": "Verma, J. P., & Verma, P. (2020). Determining Sample Size and Power in Research Studies. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5204-5", - "Villum2016": "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck2017": "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6", - "Von_Elm2007": "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", - "Voracek2019": "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357", - "Vul2009": "Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies on emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Vuorre2018": "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", - "Wacker1998": "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9", - "Wagenmakers2012": "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078", - "Wagenmakers2018": "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3", - "Wagge2019": "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177", - "Walker2021": "Walker, N. (2021). Neuroqueer Heresies: Notes on the Neurodiversity Paradigm, Autistic Empowerment, and Postnormal Possibilities. Autonomous Press.", - "Walker2019": "Walker, P., & Miksa, T. (2019). RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard. GitHub. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", - "Wason1960": "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717", - "Wasserstein2016": "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", - "Webster2020": "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5", - "Wendl2007": "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b", - "ICPSR2021": "ICPSR. (n.d.). What is a Codebook? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html", - "EQUATOR2021": "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", - "CrowdsourcingWeek2021": "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", - "EUDatasharing2021": "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing", - "ESRC2021": "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/", - "OpenDataHandbook2021": "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/", - "OpensourceCom2021": "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", - "Whitaker2020": "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Whetten1989": "Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371", - "Wicherts2016": "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832", - "Wilkinson2016": "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", - "Willroth2024": "Willroth, E. C., & Atherton, O. E. (2024). Best laid plans: A guide to reporting preregistration deviations. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231213802", - "WilsonFenner2012": "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem", - "WilsonCollins2019": "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547", - "Wingen2020": "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", - "Winter2020": "Winter, S. R., Rice, C., Capps, J., Trombley, J., Milner, M. N., Anania, E. C., Walters, N. W., & Baugh, B. S. (2020). An analysis of a pilot’s adherence to their personal weather minimums. Safety Science, 123, 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104576", - "Woelfle2011": "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149", - "JCGM2008": "Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (pp. 1–120). JCGM. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6", - "World_Wide_Web_Consortium2021": "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", - "Wren2019": "Wren, J. D., Valencia, A., & Kelso, J. (2019). Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention. Bioinformatics, 35(18), 3217–3218. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz071", - "Wuchty2007": "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099", - "Xia2015": "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265", - "Yamada2018": "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", - "Yarkoni2020": "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685", - "Yeung2020a": "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/", - "Zenodo": "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", - "Zurn2020": "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009", - "Zwaan2018": "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972", - "cohen_1988": "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.", - "frigg_hartmann_2020": "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", - "tenny_abdelgawad_2021": "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/", - "borsboom_et_al_2004": "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061", - "nimon_2012": "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322", - "saegert_et_al_2007": "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association.", - "anderson_et_al_2012": "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" + "CESSDA_DataManagement": "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Stanford_DataManagementPlans": "Stanford Libraries. (n.d.). Data Management Plans | Stanford Libraries. https://library.stanford.edu/research/data-management-services/data-management-plans", + "EU_DataProtection": "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en", + "DataCite_MetadataSchema": "DataCite Schema. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. https://schema.datacite.org/", + "cook1979quasi": "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "brown2010introduction": "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/", + "OpenNeuro": "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/", + "AbeleBrehm2019": "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Aczel2021a": "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Aczel2020": "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6", + "Aksnes2003": "Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021919228368", + "Albayrak2018a": "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/", + "Albayrak2018b": "Albayrak, N. (2018). Academics’ role on the future of higher education: Important but unrecognised. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/11/29/academics-role-on-the-future-of-higher-education-important-but-unrecognised/", + "AlbayrakOkoroji2019": "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "AlbayrakAydemir2020": "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "ALLEA2017": "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "AllenMcGonagleOConnellND": "Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/", + "Ali2021": "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "APA2007": "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.", + "Anderson2010": "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Andersson2018": "Andersson, N. (2018). Participatory research—a modernizing science for primary health care. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 19(5), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.187", + "AngristPischke2010": "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "AnonArxivND": "Anon. (n.d.). About arxiv. Retrieved from https://info.arxiv.org/about/index.html", + "AnonCCND": "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/", + "AnonCkanND": "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/", + "Anon2006": "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b", + "AnonDataciteND": "Anon. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. Retrieved from https://schema.datacite.org/", + "AnonDomovND": "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AnonRe3dataND": "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/", + "AnonINVOLVEDND": "Anon. (n.d.). INVOLVE – INVOLVE Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Retrieved from https://www.invo.org.uk/", + "AnonOSI_ND": "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses", + "AnonFOSTERND": "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science", + "AnonDOIHandbook2019": "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook.", + "AnonSherpaRomeoND": "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/", + "AnonCodebookND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a codebook?. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html", + "icpsr_codebook": "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983", + "AnonDOIAPA2009_2020": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a digital object identifier, or DOI?. Retrieved from https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/faqs/what-is-doi", + "AnonReportingGuidelineND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline?. Retrieved from https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "AnonImpact2021": "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/", + "AnonOpenEducationND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is open education?. Retrieved from https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "AnonPlagiarismND": "Anon. (n.d.). What is plagiarism?. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/category/preventing-plagiarism/", + "AnonDataAvailabilityND": "Anon. (n.d.). Data availability statements. Retrieved from https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/data-availability-statements", + "ArkseyOMalley2005": "Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616", + "Arslan2019": "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "ArtsHumanitiesRCND": "Arts and Humanities Research Council. (n.d.). Definition of eligibility for funding. Retrieved from https://ahrc.ukri.org/skills/earlycareerresearchers/definitionofeligibility/", + "AspersCorte2019": "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "AusRNND": "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/", + "BMJ_Authorship": "Authorship & Contributorship | The BMJ. (n.d.). The British Medical Journal. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship", + "Azevedo_Ideology": "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo2021": "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "BaayenDavidsonBates2008": "Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005", + "BahlaiEtAl2019": "Bahlai, C., Bartlett, L. J., Burgio, K. R., & others. (2019). Open science isn’t always open to all scientists. American Scientist, 107(2), 78.", + "Bacharach1989": "Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374", + "Bak2001": "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "BanksEtAl2016": "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Barba2018": "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Bardsley2018": "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "BarnesEtAl2018": "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "BarrEtAl2013": "Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001", + "BartosSchimmack2020": "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "BatemanEtAl2005": "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Baturay2015": "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Bazeley2003": "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Bazi2020": "Bazi, T. (2020). Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind? International Urogynecology Journal, 31, 481–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04187-2", + "BeffaraBret2021": "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Behrens1997": "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "BellerBender2017": "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "BenjaminiBraun2002": "Benjamini, Y., & Braun, H. (2002). John W. Tukey’s contributions to multiple comparisons. The Annals of Statistics, 30(6), 1576–1594. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1043351247", + "BenoitEtAl2016": "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "BhopalEtAl1997": "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "LexicoBias": "BIAS | Definition of BIAS by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BIAS. (n.d.). Lexico Dictionaries | English. https://www.lexico.com/definition/bias", + "BIDSModalityND": "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html", + "BIDSAbout2020": "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io", + "BikEtAl2016": "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Bilder2013": "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Bishop2020": "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "BjornebornIngwersen2004": "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077", + "BlohowiakEtAl2020": "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "BMJ2015": "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "BoivinEtAl2018": "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "BolEtAl2018": "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bollen1989": "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "BorensteinEtAl2011": "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "BornmannEtAl2019": "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "BorsboomEtAl2004": "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061", + "BorsboomEtAl2020": "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Bortoli2021": "Bortoli, S. (2021). NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. Learning For Involvement. https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Bos2020": "Bos, J. (2020). Confidentiality. In Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences (pp. 149–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6_7", + "Boudry2013": "Boudry, M. (2013). The hypothesis that saves the day. Ad hoc reasoning in pseudoscience. Logique et Analyse, 245–258.", + "BourneEtAl2017": "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Bouvy2019": "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Box1976": "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "BramouleSaintPaul2010": "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "BrandEtAl2015": "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "BrandtEtAl2014": "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "BraunClarke2013": "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "BrembsEtAl2013": "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Brewer2013": "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Breznau2021": "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "BreznauEtAl2021": "Breznau, N., Rinke, E. M., Wuttke, A., Nguyen, H. H. V., Adem, M., Adriaans, J., Akdeniz, E., Alvarez-Benjumea, A., Andersen, H. K., Auer, D., Azevedo, F., Bahnsen, O., Bai, L., Balzer, D., Bauer, G., Bauer, P., Baumann, M., Baute, S., Benoit, V., & Żółtak, T. (2021). How Many Replicators Does It Take to Achieve Reliability? Investigating Researcher Variability in a Crowdsourced Replication. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j7qta", + "BrodEtAl2009": "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "BrodieEtAl2021": "Brodie, S., Frainer, A., Pennino, M. G., Jiang, S., Kaikkonen, L., Lopez, J., Ortega-Cisneros, K., Peters, C. A., Selim, S. A., & Vaidianu, N. (2021). Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(11), 957–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011", + "Brown2010": "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals (pp. 1–6) [Repositories Support Project]. University College London.", + "Brooks1985": "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "BrownHeathers2017": "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "BrownThompsonLeigh2018": "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "BruleBlount1989": "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill.", + "BrunnerSchimmack2020": "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874", + "BrunsIoannidis2016": "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "BryanYeagerOBrien2019": "Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., & O’Brien, J. M. (2019). Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(51), 25535–25545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910951116", + "Budapest2002": "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "BurnetteEtAl2016": "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Busse2017": "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "ButtonEtAl2020": "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "ButtonEtAl2016": "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "ByrneChristopher2020": "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Calvert2019": "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Campbell1957": "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "CampbellStanley1966": "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally.", + "Campbell2011": "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2011). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Wadsworth.", + "Campbell1979": "Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X", + "CarneyBanaji2012": "Carney, D. R., & Banaji, M. R. (2012). First is best. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e35088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035088", + "Carp2012": "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Carsey2014": "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "CarterTillingMunafo2021": "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Case1928": "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "CassidyEtAl2019": "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "CentreForEvaluationND": "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "CentreForOpenScience2011": "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/", + "CentreForOpenScienceND": "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/", + "CESSDATrainingTeam2017": "CESSDA Training Team. (2017–2020). CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide. CESSDA ERIC. https://www.cessda.eu/DMGuide", + "Chambers2013": "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "ChambersEtAl2015": "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "ChambersTzavella2020": "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "ChartierEtAl2018": "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "Chuard2019": "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127", + "CKAN": "CKAN - The open source data management system. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://ckan.org/.", + "Claerbout1992": "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Clark2019": "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "ClosedAccess": "Closed access. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/.", + "coalition_s": "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/", + "Cohen1962": "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen1969": "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Cohn2008": "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Coles2020": "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "cos_registered_reports": "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports", + "repliCATS": "Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science | The repliCATS project. (n.d.). University of Melbourne.", + "Committee2019": "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "COAR2020": "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829", + "Cook1979": "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Coproduction2021": "Collective, C. (2021). What Co-production means to us. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us", + "Corley2011": "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Cornell2020": "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10", + "CornwallJewkes1995": "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Nature2006": "Correction or retraction? (2006). Nature, 444(7116), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b", + "Corti2019": "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage.", + "Cowan2020": "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "CRediT": "CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. (n.d.). Casrai. https://casrai.org/credit/", + "Crenshaw1989": "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Cronbach1955": "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Cronin2001": "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Crosetto2021": "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Crowdsourcing2021": "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "Crutzen2019": "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Cruwell2019": "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Curran2009": "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "Curry2012": "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Despagnat2008": "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "DaviesGray2015": "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Day2020": "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "DORA": "Declaration on Research Assessment. (n.d.). Health Research Board. https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "DelGiudiceGangestad2021": "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "DellavalleBanksEllis2007": "Dellavalle, R. P., Banks, M. A., & Ellis, J. I. (2007). Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Self-Plagiarism: How to Avoid Recycling Fraud. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(3), 527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.05.018", + "DFG2019": "Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3923602", + "DerKiureghianDitlevsen2009": "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "DeVellis2017": "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Devezer2021": "Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Buzbas, E. O. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 200805. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805", + "Devito2019": "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Dickersin1993": "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Dienes2008": "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Dienes2011": "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes2014": "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes2016": "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Dismukes2010": "Dismukes, R. K. (2010). Understanding and analyzing human error in real-world operations. In E. Salas & D. Maurino (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (2nd ed., pp. 335–374). Academic Press.", + "DOIHandbook": "Digital Object Identifier System Handbook. (n.d.). DOI. https://www.doi.org/hb.html", + "DOAJ": "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/", + "DollHill1954": "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451", + "SKRN": "Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility Network). (n.d.). SKRN. https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "JASP": "Download JASP. (n.d.). JASP - Free. https://jasp-stats.org/download/", + "Drost2011": "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "DuBois1968": "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Dubin1969": "Dubin, R. (1969). Theory building. The Free Press.", + "DuvalTweedie2000a": "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "DuvalTweedie2000b": "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "DuyxEtAl2019": "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8.", + "EaglyRiger2014": "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Easterbrook2014": "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283", + "EbersoleEtAl2016": "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Edyburn2010": "Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300103", + "EditorialDirector2021": "Editorial Director. (2021). What is a group author (collaborative author) and does it need an ORCID? JMIR Publications. https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001449591-What-is-a-group-author-collaborative-author-and-does-it-need-an-ORCID-", + "Eldermire_nodate": "Eldermire, E. (n.d.). LibGuides: Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10", + "Eley2012": "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Ellemers2021": "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "ElliottResnik2019": "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "ElsherifEtAl2022": "Elsherif, M., Middleton, S., Phan, J. M., Azevedo, F., Iley, B., Grose-Hodge, M., Tyler, S., Kapp, S. K., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A., Grafton-Clarke, D., Yeung, S. K., Shaw, J. J., Hartmann, H., & Dokovova, M. (2022). Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k7a9p", + "VonElm2007": "Elm, E. von, Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 335(7624), 806–808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "Elman2020": "Elman, C., Gerring, J., & Mahoney, J. (Eds.). (2020). The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science. Cambridge University Press.", + "Elmore2018": "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322", + "Embargo2021": "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567", + "EpskampNuijten2016": "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "EsterlingEtAl2021": "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "EtzGronauDablander2018": "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "EuropeanCommission2021": "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation", + "Evans1995": "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "EvansRubin2021": "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "EvidenceSynthesis": "Evidence Synthesis. (n.d.). LSHTM. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "EverittSkrondall2010": "Everitt, B. S., & Skrondall, A. (2010). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics - Fourth Edition. Cambridge University Press.", + "go_fair_principles": "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/", + "Fanelli2010": "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271", + "Fanelli2018": "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Farrow2017": "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "FaulEtAl2007": "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "FaulEtAl2009": "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149", + "Ferguson2021": "Ferguson, C. J. (2021). Providing a lower-bound estimate for psychology’s “crud factor”: The case of aggression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.", + "FersonEtAl2004": "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023", + "FiedlerKutznerKrueger2012": "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "FiedlerSchwarz2016": "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "FilipeEtAl2017": "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "FillonEtAl2021": "Fillon, A. A., Feldman, G., Yeung, S. K., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., Nanakdewa, K., & Brick, C. (n.d.). Correlational Meta-Analysis Registered Report Template.", + "FindleyEtAl2016": "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "FinlayGough2008": "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Flake2020": "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393", + "FletcherWatson2019": "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "ForemanMackey2013": "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "FORRT2019": "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p", + "FORRT2021": "FORRT. (2021). Welcome to FORRT. Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training. https://forrt.org", + "ForscherEtAl2022": "Forscher, P. S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Coles, N. A., Silan, M. A., Dutra, N., Basnight-Brown, D., & IJzerman, H. (2022). The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221082970", + "FosterDeardorff2017": "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "FrancoMalhotraSimonovits2014": "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Frank2017": "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "FranzoniSauermann2014": "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "FraserEtAl2021": "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", + "FreeOurKnowledgeND": "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/", + "Frith2020": "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007", + "FilipeRenedoMarston2017": "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "GalliganDyasCorreia2013": "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003", + "Garson2012": "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "GelmanLoken2013": "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "GelmanCarlin2014": "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "GelmanStern2006": "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Generalizability2018": "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Gentleman2005": "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "GermanResearchFoundation2019": "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "Geyer2003": "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer2007": "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Gilroy1993": "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press.", + "GinerSorolla2019": "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ginsparg1997": "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg2001": "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "GioiaPitre1990": "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "GitVersionControl": "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control", + "GlassHall2008": "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Goertzen2017": "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18.", + "Gollwitzer2020": "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "GoodmanFanelliIoannidis2016": "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Goodman2019": "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "GorgolewskiEtAl2016": "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "GrahamMcCutcheonKothari2019": "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "GRNND": "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "GrossmannBrembs2021": "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Grzanka2020": "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "GuentherRodriguez2020": "Guenther, E. A., & Rodriguez, J. K. (2020). What’s wrong with ‘manels’ and what can we do about them. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068", + "GuestTweet2017": "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "GuestMartin2020": "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "ICO2021": "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "HaakEtAl2012": "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "HackettKelly2020": "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556", + "HamelEtAl2021": "Hamel, C., Michaud, A., Thuku, M., Skidmore, B., Stevens, A., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., & Garritty, C. (2021). Defining rapid reviews: A systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 129, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.041", + "HahnMeeker1993": "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "HardwickeEtAl2014": "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "HardwickeEtAl2020": "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "HarrisEtAl2020": "Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., & Gérard-Marchant, P. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2", + "HartSilka2020": "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "HartgerinkEtAl2017": "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71", + "HayesTariq2000": "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "HaynesRichardKubany1995": "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238", + "HealthResearchBoardND": "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "Healy2018": "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "HeathersAnayaVanDerZeeBrown2018": "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "HendriksKienhuesBromme2016": "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Henrich2020": "Henrich, J. (2020). The weirdest people in the world: How the west became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus.", + "HenrichHeineNorenzayan2010": "Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X", + "HerrmannovaKnoth2016": "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Heyman2020": "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Higgins2019": "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Higher_Education_Funding_Council_for_England_n_d": "Higher Education Funding Council for England. (n.d.). About the REF. https://ref.ac.uk/about-the-ref/what-is-the-ref/", + "Himmelstein2019": "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Hirsch2005": "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Hitchcock2002": "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Hoekstra2012": "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Hogg2010": "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "Hoijtink2019": "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Holcombe2019": "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Holcombe2020": "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611.", + "Holm1979": "Holm, S. (1979). A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733", + "Holden2010": "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341", + "Homepage_n_d": "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/", + "Houtkoop2018": "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "KelloggInclusivity": "Kellogg Insight. (n.d.). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "ImprovingPsych": "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/", + "Huber2019": "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Huber2016a": "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/", + "Huber2016b": "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/", + "Huelin2015": "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Huffmeier2016": "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "Hultsch2002": "Hultsch, D. F., MacDonald, S. W., & Dixon, R. A. (2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(2), P101–P115. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.2.P101", + "Hunsley2003": "Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446", + "Hunter2007": "Hunter, J. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55", + "Hunter2012": "Hunter, J. (2012). Post-publication peer review: Opening up scientific conversation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 63. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00063", + "HunterSchmidt2015": "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE.", + "Hurlbert1984": "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Ikeda2019": "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "GitInitialRevision": "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290", + "ICMJE2019": "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf", + "icmje_conflicts": "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "INVOLVE": "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/", + "ISO1993": "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Ioannidis2005": "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Ioannidis2018": "Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468", + "Ioannidis2023": "Ioannidis, J. P. (2023). Systematic reviews for basic scientists: a different beast. Physiological Reviews, 103(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00028.2022", + "Ioannidis2015": "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "JabRef2021": "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org", + "Jacobson2019": "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075", + "Jafar2018": "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "James2016": "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Jamovi": "Jamovi. (n.d.). Jamovi—Stats. Open. Now. Jamovi. https://www.jamovi.org/", + "Jannot2013": "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "JASP2020": "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].", + "John2012": "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Jones2020": "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Joseph2011": "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Judd2012": "Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347", + "Kalliamvakou2014": "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", + "Kang2020": "Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2020). The consequences of data fabrication and falsification among researchers. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 1(2), 7–10.", + "Kamraro2014": "Kamraro. (2014). Responsible research & innovation. Horizon 2020 - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation", + "Kathawalla2020": "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Kapp2013": "Kapp, S. K. (2013). Interactions between theoretical models and practical stakeholders: the basis for an integrative, collaborative approach to disabilities. In E. Ashkenazy & M. Latimer (Eds.), Empowering Leadership: A Systems Change Guide for Autistic College Students and Those with Other Disabilities (pp. 104–113). Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN).", + "Kelley1927": "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "KerrWilson2021": "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Kerr1998": "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Kerr2018": "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Kidwell2016": "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Kienzler2017": "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805", + "Kiernan1999": "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "King1995": "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "Kitzes2017": "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "KiureghianDitlevsen2009": "Kiureghian, A. D., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Klein2018Transparency": "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Klein2014": "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein2018ManyLabs2": "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Kleinberg2017": "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/", + "Knoth2014": "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Knowledge2020": "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/", + "Koole2012": "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Kreuter2013": "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869", + "Kruschke2015": "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "Kuhn1962": "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Kukull2012": "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "HavenvanGrootel2019": "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Laakso2013": "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Laine2017": "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Lakatos1978": "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.", + "Lakens2014": "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Lakens2020a": "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens2020": "Lakens, D. (2020). Pandemic researchers — recruit your own best critics. Nature, 581, 121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2180-7", + "Lakens2021": "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Lakens2024": "Lakens, D. (2024). When and how to deviate from a preregistration. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), Article 117094. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117094", + "Lakens2021b": "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Lakens2018": "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "LakensEtAl2020": "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Largent2016": "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Lariviere2016": "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", + "Lazic2019": "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/", + "Leavens2010": "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166", + "Leavy2017": "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "LeBel2017": "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "LeBel2018": "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Ledgerwood2021": "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Lee1993": "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Levac2010": "Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69", + "Levitt2017": "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082", + "Lewandowsky2016": "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "LewandowskyOberauer2021": "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "LibGuides_n_d": "Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. (n.d.). https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10", + "OpenSourceInitiative": "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/licenses", + "Lieberman2020": "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003", + "Lin2020": "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7", + "Lind2017": "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Lindsay2015": "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374", + "Lindsay2020": "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Lintott2008": "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x", + "LiuPriest2009": "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Liu2020": "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", + "Longino1990": "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino1992": "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Lu2018": "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132", + "Ludtke2020": "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "Lutz2001": "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc.", + "Lyon2016": "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Lynch1982": "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Maass2018": "Maass, W., Parsons, J., Purao, S., Storey, V. C., & Woo, C. (2018). Data-driven meets theory-driven research in the era of big data: Opportunities and challenges for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(12), 1253–1273. http://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00526", + "Manalili2022": "Manalili, M. A. R., Pearson, A., Sulik, J., Creechan, L., Elsherif, M. M., Murkumbi, I., Azevedo, F., Bonnen, K. L., Kim, J. S., Kording, K., Lee, J. J., Obscura, Kapp, S. K., Roer, J. P., & Morstead, T. (2022). From Puzzle to Progress: How engaging with Neurodiversity can improve Cognitive Science.", + "MacfarlaneCheng2008": "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Makowski2019": "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767", + "Marks1997": "Marks, D. (1997). Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289709166831", + "MartinezAcosta2018": "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252.", + "Marwick2018": "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Masur2020": "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Mayo2006": "Mayo, D. G., & Cox, D. R. (2006). Frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference. In Optimality: The second Erich L. Lehmann symposium (pp. 77–97). https://www.jstor.org/stable/i397717", + "McDaniel1994": "McDaniel, G., & Corporation, I. B. M. (1994). IBM dictionary of computing. McGraw-Hill. http://archive.org/details/isbn_9780070314894", + "McElreath2020": "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "McGee2012": "McGee, M. (2012). Neurodiversity. Contexts, 11(3), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212456175", + "McNutt2018": "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "MedicalResearchCouncil2019": "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/", + "Medin2012": "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Meehl1990": "Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244. https://meehl.umn.edu/sites/meehl.umn.edu/files/files/144whysummaries.pdf", + "Mellers2001": "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Menke2015": "Menke, C. (2015). A Note on Science and Democracy? Robert K. Merton’s Ethos of Science. In R. Klausnitzer, C. Spoerhase, & D. Werle (Eds.), Ethos und Pathos der Geisteswissenschaften. DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013", + "Mertens2019": "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Merton1938": "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton1942": "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013", + "Merton1968": "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56", + "Meslin2009": "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Messick1995": "Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x", + "Michener2015": "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Mischel2009": "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science", + "Moher2020": "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737", + "Moher2009": "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Moher2018": "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Morey2016": "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547", + "Morse2010": "Morse, J. M. (2010). “Cherry picking”: Writing from thin data. Qualitative Health Research, 20(1), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309354285", + "Moshontz2018": "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Monroe2018": "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X", + "Morabia1997": "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Moran2020": "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Moretti2020": "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Morgan1998": "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Moshontz2021": "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Mourby2018": "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Muller2018": "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Muma1993": "Muma, J. R. (1993). The need for replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3605.927", + "Munn2018": "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Murphy2019": "Murphy, K. R., & Aguinis, H. (2019). HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9524-7", + "Muthukrishna2020": "Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31, 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782", + "National_Academies_2019": "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nature_n_d": "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories", + "Naudet2018": "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Navarro2020": "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nelson2012": "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Neyman1928": "Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part I. Biometrika, 20(1/2), 175–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331945", + "Neuroskeptic2012": "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Nichols2017": "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Nickerson1998": "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Nieuwenhuis2011": "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886", + "Nisbet2002": "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Nittrouer2018": "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "NIHR2021": "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Nogrady2023": "Nogrady, B. (2023). Hyperauthorship: The publishing challenges for “big team” science. Nature News. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00575-3 Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3", + "Nosek2019": "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change", + "Nosek2012Bar_Anan": "Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215", + "Nosek2018": "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Nosek2020": "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Nosek2014": "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192", + "Nosek2012b": "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "NoyMcGuinness2001": "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf", + "Nuijten2016": "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Nust2018": "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525", + "ODea2021": "O’Dea, R. E., Parker, T. H., Chee, Y. E., Culina, A., Drobniak, S. M., Duncan, D. H., Fidler, F., Gould, E., Ihle, M., Kelly, C. D., Lagisz, M., Roche, D. G., Sánchez-Tójar, A., Wilkinson, D. P., Wintle, B. C., & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology. BMC Biology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01006-3", + "OGrady2020": "O’Grady, O. (2020). Psychology’s replication crisis inspires ecologists to push for more reliable research. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0894", + "OSullivan2021": "O’Sullivan, L., Ma, L., & Doran, P. (2021). An overview of post-publication peer review. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.26", + "Obels2020": "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961", + "Oberauer2019": "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Oliver1983": "Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People. Macmillan.", + "Oliver2013": "Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773", + "Onie2020": "Onie, S. (2020). Redesign open science for Asia, Africa and Latin America. Nature, 587, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03052-3", + "OERCommons": "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "OpenAire_Amnesia": "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/", + "UNESCO_OER": "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer", + "OERCommons_OSKB": "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "Open_Science_Collaboration2015": "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Open_Aire2020": "Aire, O. (2020). High accuracy Data anonymisation. Amnesia. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/", + "Open_Source_Initiative_n_d": "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Orben2019": "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "ORCID": "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/", + "OSF": "OSF. (n.d.). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/", + "OSF_StudySwap": "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "OrbenLakens2020": "Orben, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Crud (re)defined. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961", + "Ottmann2011": "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Oxford_Dictionaries2017": "Bias—definition of bias in English. (2017). https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bias", + "Oxford_Reference2017": "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530", + "CoProductionCollective": "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach", + "Padilla1994": "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024", + "Page2021": "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Patience2019": "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117", + "Pautasso2013": "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Pavlov2020": "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr", + "PCI_n_d": "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/", + "PCI_rr": "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about", + "Peer2017b": "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Peirce2022": "Peirce, J. W., Hirst, R. J., & MacAskill, M. R. (2022). Building Experiments in PsychoPy (2nd ed.). Sage.", + "Peirce2007": "Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017", + "Pellicano2022": "Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022). Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13534", + "Peng2011": "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Percie_du_Sert2020": "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410", + "Pernet2015": "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Pernet2019": "Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., & Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8", + "Pernet2020": "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0", + "Peters2015": "Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050", + "Peterson2020": "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa", + "PetreWilson2014": "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Poldrack2013": "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack2014": "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "PoldrackGorgolewski2017": "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2017). OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data. Neuroimage, 144, 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.073", + "PolletBond2021": "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Popper1959": "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.", + "Posselt2020": "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ", + "Pownall2020": "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K., Hartmann, H., & others. (2020). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f9m47", + "Pownall2021": "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255", + "PreregistrationPledge": "Preregistration Pledge. (n.d.). Preregistration Pledge. Google Docs. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf8RflGizFJZamE874o8aDOhyU7UsNByR4dLmzhOtEOiu8KRQ/viewform?embedded=true&usp=embed_facebook", + "Press2007": "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Protzko2018": "Protzko, J. (2018). Null-hacking, a lurking problem in the open science movement. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9y3mp", + "Psychological_Science_Accelerator_n_d": "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "PublicationBias2019": "Publication Bias. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalog of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "PubPeer": "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "RProject": "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R_Core_Team2020": "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/", + "Rabagliati2019": "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Rakow2014": "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405", + "Ramagopalan2014": "Ramagopalan, S. V., Skingsley, A. P., Handunnetthi, L., Klingel, M., Magnus, D., Pakpoor, J., & Goldacre, B. (2014). Prevalence of primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional study. F1000Research, 3, 77. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3784.1", + "RecommendedDataRepositories": "Scientific Data. (n.d.). Recommended Data Repositories. Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories", + "ReplicationMarkets": "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "RepliCATS_project2020": "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/", + "ReproducibiliTea_n_d": "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Research_Data_Alliance2020": "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "RetractionWatch": "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/", + "RIOT_Science_Club2021": "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/", + "Rodriguez2020": "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068", + "Rogers2013": "Rogers, A., Castree, N., & Kitchin, R. (2013). Reflexivity. In A Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530", + "RollsRelf2006": "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Rose2000": "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose2018": "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3", + "RoseMeyer2002": "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision.", + "Rosenthal1979": "Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638", + "Ross_Hellauer2017": "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2", + "Rossner2008": "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Rothstein2005": "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1", + "Rowhani_Farid2020": "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Rubin2022": "Rubin, M. (2022). Does preregistration improve the interpretability and credibility of research findings? [Powerpoint slides]. https://www.slideshare.net/MarkRubin14/does-preregistration-improve-the-interpretability-and-credibility-of-research-findings", + "Rubin2021": "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "Rubin2019": "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Russell2020": "Russell, B. (2020). A priori justification and knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/apriori/", + "StudySwap_S2021": "OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. (2021). https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "Sagarin2014": "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "DORA_San_Francisco": "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/", + "Sasaki2022": "Sasaki, K., & Yamada, Y. (2022). SPARKing: Sampling planning after the results are known. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ngz8k", + "Salem2013": "Salem, D. N., & Boumil, M. M. (2013). Conflict of Interest in Open-Access Publishing. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(5), 491–491. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1307577", + "Sato1996": "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Scargle1999": "Scargle, J. D. (1999). Publication bias (the “file-drawer problem”) in scientific inference. ArXiv Preprint Physics. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/9909033", + "Schafersman1997": "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "SchmidtHunter2014": "Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Sage.", + "Schmidt1987": "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Schneider2019": "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Schonbrodt2017": "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061", + "Schonbrodt2019": "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Schuirmann1987": "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419", + "SchulzGrimes2005": "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6", + "SchulzAltmanMoher2010": "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "SchwarzStrack2014": "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306.", + "Science_C_n_d": "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges", + "ScopatzHuff2015": "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", + "Sechrest1963": "Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental validity: A recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446302300113", + "Senn2003": "Senn, S. (2003). Bayesian, likelihood, and frequentist approaches to statistics. Applied Clinical Trials, 12(8), 35–38.", + "Sert2020": "Sert, N. P. du, Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410", + "Shadish2002": "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Shakespeare2013": "Shakespeare, T. (2013). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (4th ed., pp. 214–221). Routledge.", + "Sharma2014": "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151", + "Shepard2015": "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE.", + "Siddaway2019": "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803", + "Sijtsma2016": "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Silberzahn2014": "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802", + "Silberzahn2018": "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Simons2017": "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Simmons2011": "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Simmons2021": "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208", + "Simonsohn2014pcurve": "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn2015": "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn2014effect": "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn2019": "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454", + "Simonsohn2020": "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "SlowScienceAcademy2010": "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "SIPS2021": "The Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science. (2021). https://improvingpsych.org/", + "Smaldino2016": "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384", + "Smela2023": "Smela, B., Toumi, M., Świerk, K., Francois, C., Biernikiewicz, M., Clay, E., & Boyer, L. (2023). Rapid literature review: definition and methodology. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 11(1), Article 2241234. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234", + "Smith2005": "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396", + "Smith2020": "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4", + "Smith2018": "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823", + "Sorsa2015": "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317", + "SORTEE_n_d": "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/", + "Spence2018": "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185", + "Spencer2018": "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Spiegelhalter2009": "Spiegelhalter, D., & Rice, K. (2009). Bayesian statistics. Scholarpedia, 4(8), 5230. http://dx.doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.5230", + "StanfordLibraries_n_d": "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20", + "Stanovich2013": "Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174", + "Steckler2008": "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847", + "SteupNeta2020": "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/", + "Steegen2016": "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637", + "Steup2020": "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/", + "Stewart2017": "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Stodden2011": "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Strathern1997": "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4", + "Suber2004": "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "Suber2015": "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm", + "SwissRN_n_d": "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Syed2019": "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "SyedKathawalla2020": "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2", + "Szollosi2019": "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Szomszor2020": "Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123, 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5", + "psyTeachRGlossary": "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Teixeira2015": "Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2015). Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review. In Accountability in Research (pp. 22–40). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.899909", + "Tennant2019a": "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "Tennant2019b": "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Tennant2019": "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Tenney2019": "Tenney, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2019). Statistical significance. In StatsPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535373/", + "Tscharntke2007": "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018", + "Thaler2017": "Thaler, K. M. (2017). Mixed Methods Research in the Study of Political and Social Violence and Conflict. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815585196", + "The_jamovi_project2020": "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org", + "The_Nine_Circles_of_Scientific_Hell2012": "The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell. (2012). In Perspectives on Psychological Science (Vol. 7, pp. 643–644). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "The_R_Foundation_n_d": "The R Foundation. (n.d.). The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/", + "COPE2021": "The Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Transparency & best practice – DOAJ. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/", + "CONSORT2010": "The CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "ALLEA2021": "ALLEA. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "OpenDefinition2021": "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "OpenSourceDefinition2021": "Definition, T. O. S. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/osd", + "SlowScience2010": "The Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. SLOW-SCIENCE.Org — Bear with Us, While We Think. http://slow-science.org/", + "Thombs2015": "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Tierney2020": "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney2021": "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", + "Tiokhin2021": "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1", + "Topor2021": "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z", + "Transparency2016": "of Open Science, T. T. E. T. D., & Data, O. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER QUARTERLY, 25(4), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Tufte1983": "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press.", + "Tukey1977": "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Tvina2019": "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260", + "Uhlmann2019": "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "University_of_Oxford2023": "University of Oxford. (2023). Plagiarism. https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism", + "UKRN2021": "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "Burnette2016": "University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "van_de_Schoot2021": "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Vazire2018": "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire2020": "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3", + "Velazquez2021": "Velázquez, A. (2021). Data analysis: Definition, types and examples. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/what-is-data-analysis/", + "Verma2020": "Verma, J. P., & Verma, P. (2020). Determining Sample Size and Power in Research Studies. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5204-5", + "Villum2016": "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck2017": "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6", + "Von_Elm2007": "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "Voracek2019": "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357", + "Vul2009": "Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies on emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Vuorre2018": "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", + "Wacker1998": "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9", + "Wagenmakers2012": "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078", + "Wagenmakers2018": "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3", + "Wagge2019": "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177", + "Walker2021": "Walker, N. (2021). Neuroqueer Heresies: Notes on the Neurodiversity Paradigm, Autistic Empowerment, and Postnormal Possibilities. Autonomous Press.", + "Walker2019": "Walker, P., & Miksa, T. (2019). RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard. GitHub. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Wason1960": "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717", + "Wasserstein2016": "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Webster2020": "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5", + "Wendl2007": "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b", + "ICPSR2021": "ICPSR. (n.d.). What is a Codebook? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html", + "EQUATOR2021": "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "CrowdsourcingWeek2021": "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "EUDatasharing2021": "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing", + "ESRC2021": "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/", + "OpenDataHandbook2021": "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/", + "OpensourceCom2021": "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "Whitaker2020": "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Whetten1989": "Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371", + "Wicherts2016": "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832", + "Wilkinson2016": "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "Willroth2024": "Willroth, E. C., & Atherton, O. E. (2024). Best laid plans: A guide to reporting preregistration deviations. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231213802", + "WilsonFenner2012": "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem", + "WilsonCollins2019": "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547", + "Wingen2020": "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Winter2020": "Winter, S. R., Rice, C., Capps, J., Trombley, J., Milner, M. N., Anania, E. C., Walters, N. W., & Baugh, B. S. (2020). An analysis of a pilot’s adherence to their personal weather minimums. Safety Science, 123, 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104576", + "Woelfle2011": "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149", + "JCGM2008": "Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (pp. 1–120). JCGM. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6", + "World_Wide_Web_Consortium2021": "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Wren2019": "Wren, J. D., Valencia, A., & Kelso, J. (2019). Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention. Bioinformatics, 35(18), 3217–3218. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz071", + "Wuchty2007": "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099", + "Xia2015": "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265", + "Yamada2018": "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "Yarkoni2020": "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685", + "Yeung2020a": "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/", + "Zenodo": "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "Zurn2020": "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009", + "Zwaan2018": "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972", + "cohen_1988": "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.", + "frigg_hartmann_2020": "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "tenny_abdelgawad_2021": "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/", + "borsboom_et_al_2004": "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061", + "nimon_2012": "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322", + "saegert_et_al_2007": "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association.", + "anderson_et_al_2012": "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" } \ No newline at end of file diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/_\330\247_\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\255\331\212\330\247\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\331\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/_\330\247_\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\255\331\212\330\247\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\331\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_.md" index d6d4ec4862..9fd1e12f3f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/_\330\247_\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\255\331\212\330\247\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\331\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/_\330\247_\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\255\331\212\330\247\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\331\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_\330\243\330\262\331\205\330\251_\330\245\330\271\330\247\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254_\330\243\331\210_\330\243\330\262\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_\330\243\330\262\331\205\330\251_\330\245\330\271\330\247\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254_\330\243\331\210_\330\243\330\262\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" index 9c2c0d30ee..7ea07a46fb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_\330\243\330\262\331\205\330\251_\330\245\330\271\330\247\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254_\330\243\331\210_\330\243\330\262\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_\330\243\330\262\331\205\330\251_\330\245\330\271\330\247\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254_\330\243\331\210_\330\243\330\262\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/analyses_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\247\331\206\330\251_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/analyses_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\247\331\206\330\251_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" index f6bd68ca95..a0149dc246 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/analyses_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\247\331\206\330\251_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/analyses_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\247\331\206\330\251_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/apc_\330\261\330\263\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/apc_\330\261\330\263\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261.md" index 545c0512fe..c6db152865 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/apc_\330\261\330\263\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/apc_\330\261\330\263\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/artificial_intelligence_\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\210\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\331\203\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\265\330\267\331\206\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/artificial_intelligence_\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\210\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\331\203\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\265\330\267\331\206\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" index 8913e1fd3a..6b3ada802b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/artificial_intelligence_\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\210\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\331\203\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\265\330\267\331\206\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/artificial_intelligence_\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\210\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\331\203\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\265\330\267\331\206\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/cc_license_\330\261\330\256\330\265\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\250\330\257\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/cc_license_\330\261\330\256\330\265\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\250\330\257\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" index aaeaf62712..5b2f8c7288 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/cc_license_\330\261\330\256\330\265\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\250\330\257\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/cc_license_\330\261\330\256\330\265\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\250\330\257\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/cobidas_\331\204\330\254\331\206\330\251_\330\243\331\201\330\266\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\331\201\331\212_\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\331\210\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\330\252\331\207\330\247.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/cobidas_\331\204\330\254\331\206\330\251_\330\243\331\201\330\266\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\331\201\331\212_\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\331\210\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\330\252\331\207\330\247.md" index 03d1a9547b..8e3d49a19a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/cobidas_\331\204\330\254\331\206\330\251_\330\243\331\201\330\266\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\331\201\331\212_\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\331\210\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\330\252\331\207\330\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/cobidas_\331\204\330\254\331\206\330\251_\330\243\331\201\330\266\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\331\201\331\212_\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\331\210\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\330\252\331\207\330\247.md" @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "طور مجتمع التَّصوير العصبي التابع لمنظمة رسم خرائط الدِّماغ البشري دليلًا لأفضل الممارسات في جمع بيانات التَّصوير العصبي، وتحليلها وإعداد التَّقارير الخاصّة بها، ومشاركة كلّ من البيانات والنَّص البرمجي للتَّحليل. يتضمن هذا المبدأ ثمانية عناصر يجب استيفاؤها عند كتابة أو تقديم مخطوطة من أجل تحسين طرق إعداد التَّقارير، والصُّور العصبيَّة النَّاتجة لتحقيق أقصى درجات الشَّفافيَّة وإعادة الإنتاج. **تعريف بديل: (إن أمكن)** قائمة مرجعية لتحليل البيانات ومشاركتها.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/cog_\331\202\331\212\331\210\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/cog_\331\202\331\212\331\210\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" index 8af5e7adb8..f90862fd86 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/cog_\331\202\331\212\331\210\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/cog_\331\202\331\212\331\210\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/collaborative_commentary_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\247\331\210\331\206\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/collaborative_commentary_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\247\331\210\331\206\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" index a22c7f7a0d..e7d12767c9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/collaborative_commentary_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\247\331\210\331\206\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/collaborative_commentary_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\247\331\210\331\206\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/computational_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\247\330\263\331\210\330\250\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/computational_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\247\330\263\331\210\330\250\331\212_.md" index b8336b8c26..23c84b580a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/computational_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\247\330\263\331\210\330\250\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/computational_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\247\330\263\331\210\330\250\331\212_.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", - "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/cos_\331\205\330\261\331\203\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/cos_\331\205\330\261\331\203\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" index 5166a0b995..a4594b612a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/cos_\331\205\330\261\331\203\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/cos_\331\205\330\261\331\203\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/crep_\331\205\330\264\330\261\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\247\331\210\331\206\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/crep_\331\205\330\264\330\261\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\247\331\210\331\206\331\212.md" index 584570a8e6..77e7cb53ef 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/crep_\331\205\330\264\330\261\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\247\331\210\331\206\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/crep_\331\205\330\264\330\261\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\247\331\210\331\206\331\212.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/da_rt_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204_\331\204\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\331\210\330\264\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/da_rt_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204_\331\204\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\331\210\330\264\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" index 647c341ce5..8c3d21879d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/da_rt_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204_\331\204\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\331\210\330\264\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/da_rt_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204_\331\204\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\331\210\330\264\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/digital_object_identifier_\331\205\330\271\330\261_\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\203\330\247\330\246\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\261_\331\202\331\205\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/digital_object_identifier_\331\205\330\271\330\261_\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\203\330\247\330\246\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\261_\331\202\331\205\331\212.md" index 6901cb309c..56e0a9a78f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/digital_object_identifier_\331\205\330\271\330\261_\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\203\330\247\330\246\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\261_\331\202\331\205\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/digital_object_identifier_\331\205\330\271\330\261_\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\203\330\247\330\246\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\261_\331\202\331\205\331\212.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/dmp_\330\256\330\267\330\251_\330\245\330\257\330\247\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/dmp_\330\256\330\267\330\251_\330\245\330\257\330\247\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" index beb508b573..5cceceeb67 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/dmp_\330\256\330\267\330\251_\330\245\330\257\330\247\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/dmp_\330\256\330\267\330\251_\330\245\330\257\330\247\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -11,8 +11,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/ecrs_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\330\255\330\253\331\210\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\252\330\257\330\246\331\210\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/ecrs_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\330\255\330\253\331\210\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\252\330\257\330\246\331\210\331\206.md" index 2572ad8c8f..8e19e20a9b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/ecrs_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\330\255\330\253\331\210\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\252\330\257\330\246\331\210\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/ecrs_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\330\255\330\253\331\210\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\252\330\257\330\246\331\210\331\206.md" @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/file_drawer_problem_\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\204\330\251_\330\257\330\261\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\204\331\201_\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/file_drawer_problem_\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\204\330\251_\330\257\330\261\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\204\331\201_\330\247\330\252.md" index 779bc61a7d..f2aa3ee0ef 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/file_drawer_problem_\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\204\330\251_\330\257\330\261\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\204\331\201_\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/file_drawer_problem_\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\204\330\251_\330\257\330\261\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\204\331\201_\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/flae_\331\205\330\250\330\257\330\243_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\203\331\212\330\257_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204\331\201_\331\212\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\331\204_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\256\331\212\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/flae_\331\205\330\250\330\257\330\243_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\203\331\212\330\257_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204\331\201_\331\212\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\331\204_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\256\331\212\330\261.md" index 47b07abc44..eec28880e7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/flae_\331\205\330\250\330\257\330\243_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\203\331\212\330\257_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204\331\201_\331\212\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\331\204_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\256\331\212\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/flae_\331\205\330\250\330\257\330\243_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\203\331\212\330\257_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204\331\201_\331\212\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\331\204_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\256\331\212\330\261.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/gdpr_\331\204\330\247\330\246\330\255\330\251_\330\255\331\205\330\247\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/gdpr_\331\204\330\247\330\246\330\255\330\251_\330\255\331\205\330\247\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" index a436f66ec6..a6adfb730a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/gdpr_\331\204\330\247\330\246\330\255\330\251_\330\255\331\205\330\247\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/gdpr_\331\204\330\247\330\246\330\255\330\251_\330\255\331\205\330\247\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/in_science_\330\252\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\331\205\330\247\330\253\331\212\331\210_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/in_science_\330\252\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\331\205\330\247\330\253\331\212\331\210_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" index f7d0fbdfcb..24d82b3478 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/in_science_\330\252\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\331\205\330\247\330\253\331\212\331\210_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/in_science_\330\252\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\331\205\330\247\330\253\331\212\331\210_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/moocs_\331\205\331\202\330\261_\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204_\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\266_\330\256\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\271\331\206_\330\250\330\271\330\257.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/moocs_\331\205\331\202\330\261_\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204_\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\266_\330\256\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\271\331\206_\330\250\330\271\330\257.md" index 9d5a17172d..ff09cca416 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/moocs_\331\205\331\202\330\261_\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204_\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\266_\330\256\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\271\331\206_\330\250\330\271\330\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/moocs_\331\205\331\202\330\261_\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204_\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\266_\330\256\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\271\331\206_\330\250\330\271\330\257.md" @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/moops_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\330\261\330\247\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\266\330\256\331\205\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\261\331\206\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/moops_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\330\261\330\247\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\266\330\256\331\205\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\261\331\206\330\252.md" index b871976c5d..f2831bbaf5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/moops_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\330\261\330\247\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\266\330\256\331\205\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\261\331\206\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/moops_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\330\261\330\247\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\266\330\256\331\205\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\261\331\206\330\252.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/netanos_\330\245\330\256\331\201\330\247\330\241_\331\207_\331\210\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\252\331\205\330\257_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\203\331\212\330\247\331\206_\331\204\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/netanos_\330\245\330\256\331\201\330\247\330\241_\331\207_\331\210\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\252\331\205\330\257_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\203\331\212\330\247\331\206_\331\204\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" index e08fd8ec0b..e34e0f211a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/netanos_\330\245\330\256\331\201\330\247\330\241_\331\207_\331\210\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\252\331\205\330\257_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\203\331\212\330\247\331\206_\331\204\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/netanos_\330\245\330\256\331\201\330\247\330\241_\331\207_\331\210\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\252\331\205\330\257_\330\271\331\204\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\203\331\212\330\247\331\206_\331\204\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/nhst_\330\247\330\256\330\252\330\250\330\247\330\261_\330\257\331\204\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\265_\331\201\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/nhst_\330\247\330\256\330\252\330\250\330\247\330\261_\330\257\331\204\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\265_\331\201\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" index 5f5eb801f4..26b847759b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/nhst_\330\247\330\256\330\252\330\250\330\247\330\261_\330\257\331\204\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\265_\331\201\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/nhst_\330\247\330\256\330\252\330\250\330\247\330\261_\330\257\331\204\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\265_\331\201\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/niro_sr_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\207\330\254\331\212_\330\251_\330\272\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\257\330\256\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/niro_sr_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\207\330\254\331\212_\330\251_\330\272\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\257\330\256\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" index b56e2257cf..5b7f7e074d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/niro_sr_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\207\330\254\331\212_\330\251_\330\272\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\257\330\256\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/niro_sr_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\207\330\254\331\212_\330\251_\330\272\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\257\330\256\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/oer_commons_\331\205\330\265\330\247\330\257\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\271_\331\204_\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/oer_commons_\331\205\330\265\330\247\330\257\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\271_\331\204_\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" index ee7b0df338..cd526e11c8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/oer_commons_\331\205\330\265\330\247\330\257\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\271_\331\204_\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/oer_commons_\331\205\330\265\330\247\330\257\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\271_\331\204_\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\247\331\205_\330\251.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/oers_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\247\330\257\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\205\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/oers_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\247\330\257\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\205\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" index a397d61508..92e1cee35f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/oers_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\247\330\257\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\205\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/oers_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\247\330\257\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204\331\212\331\205\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Material" ], "references": [ - "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education" + "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/open_researcher_and_contributor_id_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\330\261\331\203\331\212\330\257.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/open_researcher_and_contributor_id_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\330\261\331\203\331\212\330\257.md" index d8f74413dd..29fe0cdea3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/open_researcher_and_contributor_id_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\330\261\331\203\331\212\330\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/open_researcher_and_contributor_id_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\330\261\331\203\331\212\330\257.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/open_science_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/open_science_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" index 4d9f17a536..92a2ab0483 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/open_science_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/open_science_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" @@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/or_guest_authorship_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\205_\331\207\330\257\331\211_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\266_\331\212\331\201.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/or_guest_authorship_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\205_\331\207\330\257\331\211_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\266_\331\212\331\201.md" index 37e2b1309f..25d444cd9f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/or_guest_authorship_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\205_\331\207\330\257\331\211_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\266_\331\212\331\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/or_guest_authorship_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\205_\331\207\330\257\331\211_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\266_\331\212\331\201.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/p_\331\205\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253\331\212_\330\251_\331\206\330\264\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/p_\331\205\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253\331\212_\330\251_\331\206\330\264\330\261.md" index 4054a96ff5..5bde2fe001 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/p_\331\205\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253\331\212_\330\251_\331\206\330\264\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/p_\331\205\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253\331\212_\330\251_\331\206\330\264\330\261.md" @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/peer_community_in_\331\205\331\206\330\270_\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/peer_community_in_\331\205\331\206\330\270_\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" index 93bb00c72d..b88abadc31 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/peer_community_in_\331\205\331\206\330\270_\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/peer_community_in_\331\205\331\206\330\270_\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/peer_review_openness_initiative_\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\206\331\201\330\252\330\247\330\255_\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/peer_review_openness_initiative_\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\206\331\201\330\252\330\247\330\255_\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" index 35330de358..7c992fdeb8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/peer_review_openness_initiative_\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\206\331\201\330\252\330\247\330\255_\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/peer_review_openness_initiative_\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\206\331\201\330\252\330\247\330\255_\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/philosophy_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\201\331\204\330\263\331\201\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/philosophy_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\201\331\204\330\263\331\201\331\212_.md" index 6ecd83e1bb..322d0d805d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/philosophy_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\201\331\204\330\263\331\201\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/philosophy_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\201\331\204\330\263\331\201\331\212_.md" @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/ppi_\330\271\331\212_\331\206\330\251_\331\210\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\331\212\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/ppi_\330\271\331\212_\331\206\330\251_\331\210\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\331\212\331\206.md" index 0523927e10..45ba83d7cd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/ppi_\330\271\331\212_\331\206\330\251_\331\210\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\331\212\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/ppi_\330\271\331\212_\331\206\330\251_\331\210\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\331\212\331\206.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/qmp_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/qmp_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" index 637415dc2d..47e72f2a3d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/qmp_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/qmp_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/qrps_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247_\330\243\331\210_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/qrps_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247_\330\243\331\210_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" index cd63e6290e..28962dd648 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/qrps_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247_\330\243\331\210_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/qrps_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247_\330\243\331\210_\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\210\331\203_\331\201\331\212\331\207\330\247.md" @@ -21,12 +21,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/sdc_\331\206\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\331\204\330\263\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\260\331\212_\331\212\330\255\330\257_\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/sdc_\331\206\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\331\204\330\263\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\260\331\212_\331\212\330\255\330\257_\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\330\251.md" index 1ba625bf71..b7cac2c696 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/sdc_\331\206\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\331\204\330\263\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\260\331\212_\331\212\330\255\330\257_\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/sdc_\331\206\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\331\204\330\263\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\260\331\212_\331\212\330\255\330\257_\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\331\207\331\205\330\251.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/sips_\330\254\331\205\330\271\331\212\330\251_\330\252\330\267\331\210\331\212\330\261\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/sips_\330\254\331\205\330\271\331\212\330\251_\330\252\330\267\331\210\331\212\330\261\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" index 85d2713c13..4b39543bf5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/sips_\330\254\331\205\330\271\331\212\330\251_\330\252\330\267\331\210\331\212\330\261\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/sips_\330\254\331\205\330\271\331\212\330\251_\330\252\330\267\331\210\331\212\330\261\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/sortee_\330\254\331\205\330\271\331\212_\330\251_\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\246\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\331\210\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\212\330\247_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\267\331\210\330\261\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\201\330\252\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\253\331\210\331\202\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/sortee_\330\254\331\205\330\271\331\212_\330\251_\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\246\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\331\210\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\212\330\247_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\267\331\210\330\261\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\201\330\252\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\253\331\210\331\202\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\330\251.md" index 1fc88681d5..b98c27961d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/sortee_\330\254\331\205\330\271\331\212_\330\251_\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\246\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\331\210\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\212\330\247_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\267\331\210\330\261\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\201\330\252\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\253\331\210\331\202\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/sortee_\330\254\331\205\330\271\331\212_\330\251_\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\246\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\331\210\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\212\330\247_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\267\331\210\330\261\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\201\330\252\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\253\331\210\331\202\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\330\251.md" @@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/statistical_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/statistical_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_.md" index 57c9844c66..806ebd554b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/statistical_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/statistical_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\205\331\210\330\260\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" + "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/the_system_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\330\247\330\271\330\250_\330\250\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\247\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/the_system_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\330\247\330\271\330\250_\330\250\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\247\331\205.md" index a1516eb962..8030e48157 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/the_system_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\330\247\330\271\330\250_\330\250\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\247\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/the_system_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\330\247\330\271\330\250_\330\250\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\247\331\205.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/to_open_scholarship_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\265\330\247\330\271\330\257\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/to_open_scholarship_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\265\330\247\330\271\330\257\331\212_.md" index 67dd7fef54..effb2715b3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/to_open_scholarship_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\265\330\247\330\271\330\257\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/to_open_scholarship_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\265\330\247\330\271\330\257\331\212_.md" @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/udl_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\265\331\205\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\331\205\331\204_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204_\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/udl_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\265\331\205\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\331\205\331\204_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204_\331\205.md" index bc36397a0b..559365eade 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/udl_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\265\331\205\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\331\205\331\204_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204_\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/udl_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\265\331\205\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\331\205\331\204_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\204_\331\205.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\330\263\331\210\330\247\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\330\263\331\210\330\247\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" index 6bbc1ce5db..9ca94af7e1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\330\263\331\210\330\247\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\330\263\331\210\330\247\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -10,10 +10,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", - "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://replicationmarkets.org/" + "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", + "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "[www.replicationmarkets.com](http://www.replicationmarkets.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\330\264\330\250\330\247\331\207_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\330\264\330\250\330\247\331\207_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" index b0157dabd1..93a12efbfb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\330\264\330\250\330\247\331\207_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\330\264\330\250\330\247\331\207_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\331\205\331\206\331\212\330\254\330\247.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\331\205\331\206\331\212\330\254\330\247.md" index a7ffdbb944..c1a30d4b71 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\331\205\331\206\331\212\330\254\330\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\243\331\205\331\206\331\212\330\254\330\247.md" @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\257\330\247\330\261\330\251_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\257\330\247\330\261\330\251_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" index 820a9ad21f..aea87e24a8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\257\330\247\330\261\330\251_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\257\330\247\330\261\330\251_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\261\330\264\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252_\330\243\330\261\330\247\331\212\331\201.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\261\330\264\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252_\330\243\330\261\330\247\331\212\331\201.md" index 494bbc507d..eceb3ccf3e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\261\330\264\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252_\330\243\330\261\330\247\331\212\331\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\261\330\264\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252_\330\243\330\261\330\247\331\212\331\201.md" @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\261\330\264\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\261\330\264\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257.md" index 5860a5f25e..330842870a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\261\330\264\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\261\330\264\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\267\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\267\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" index b5b8c3776b..3a27a26168 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\267\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\267\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\271\331\204\330\247\331\206_\330\263\330\247\331\206_\331\201\330\261\330\247\331\206\330\263\331\212\330\263\331\203\331\210_\330\250\330\264\330\243\331\206_\330\252\331\202\331\212\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\271\331\204\330\247\331\206_\330\263\330\247\331\206_\331\201\330\261\330\247\331\206\330\263\331\212\330\263\331\203\331\210_\330\250\330\264\330\243\331\206_\330\252\331\202\331\212\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253.md" index 3b27b0cc0b..d2a1a92e14 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\271\331\204\330\247\331\206_\330\263\330\247\331\206_\331\201\330\261\330\247\331\206\330\263\331\212\330\263\331\203\331\210_\330\250\330\264\330\243\331\206_\330\252\331\202\331\212\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\330\271\331\204\330\247\331\206_\330\263\330\247\331\206_\331\201\330\261\330\247\331\206\330\263\331\212\330\263\331\203\331\210_\330\250\330\264\330\243\331\206_\330\252\331\202\331\212\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253.md" @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\331\205\331\203\330\247\331\206\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\331\205\331\203\330\247\331\206\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204.md" index 2bf31884cf..6f72bd4070 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\331\205\331\203\330\247\331\206\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\331\205\331\203\330\247\331\206\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204.md" @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\331\206\331\207\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\271\331\205\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\331\206\331\207\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\271\331\205\330\247\330\261.md" index 7270ba48db..b3ad2a4ad0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\331\206\331\207\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\271\331\205\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\245\331\206\331\207\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\271\331\205\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\330\256\330\252\330\250\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\247\331\201\330\244.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\330\256\330\252\330\250\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\247\331\201\330\244.md" index 4e9e4081fb..2f4a1b4b05 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\330\256\330\252\330\250\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\247\331\201\330\244.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\330\256\330\252\330\250\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\247\331\201\330\244.md" @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\203\330\252\330\263\330\247\330\250_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\203\330\252\330\263\330\247\330\250_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" index 92aa18dec3..f22624aa77 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\203\330\252\330\263\330\247\330\250_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\203\330\252\330\263\330\247\330\250_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\203\330\252\330\264\330\247\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\267\330\247\330\241.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\203\330\252\330\264\330\247\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\267\330\247\330\241.md" index bfc9fb634b..d98c5876ac 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\203\330\252\330\264\330\247\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\267\330\247\330\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\203\330\252\330\264\330\247\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\267\330\247\330\241.md" @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\253\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\202\330\252\330\265\330\247\330\257\331\212_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\253\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\202\330\252\330\265\330\247\330\257\331\212_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" index 08e9546ef0..a95b69e671 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\253\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\202\330\252\330\265\330\247\330\257\331\212_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\253\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\202\330\252\330\265\330\247\330\257\331\212_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\263\331\207\330\247\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\263\331\207\330\247\331\205.md" index f0901d8f6b..a82c51ccb1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\263\331\207\330\247\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\263\331\207\330\247\331\205.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\267\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271\331\212_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\212_\330\257\330\251_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\267\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271\331\212_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\212_\330\257\330\251_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271\330\247\330\252.md" index c7b31a8696..c65ab3be9c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\267\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271\331\212_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\212_\330\257\330\251_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\267\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271\331\212_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\205\330\247\330\261\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\212_\330\257\330\251_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\252\330\261\331\203.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\252\330\261\331\203.md" index 2bd8f4c8b8..1c8c0197c6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\252\330\261\331\203.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\252\330\261\331\203.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\212\331\202\330\247\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\252\331\212\330\247\330\261\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\212\331\202\330\247\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\252\331\212\330\247\330\261\331\212.md" index e34685f3d4..d109d67f73 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\212\331\202\330\247\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\252\331\212\330\247\330\261\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\212\331\202\330\247\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\252\331\212\330\247\330\261\331\212.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\264\331\210\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\264\331\210\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" index 3e0a7750a0..29dd66b336 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\264\331\210\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\264\331\210\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\257\331\204\330\247\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\257\331\204\330\247\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" index a9453e17b4..0e20e4cfd9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\257\331\204\330\247\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\257\331\204\330\247\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\202\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\202\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" index b671e5e207..861202e28c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\202\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\202\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\206\330\263\330\247\330\256_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\263\330\247\330\250\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\206\330\263\330\247\330\256_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\263\330\247\330\250\331\212.md" index e7e7d5ed5e..e279b723f1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\206\330\263\330\247\330\256_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\263\330\247\330\250\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\206\330\263\330\247\330\256_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\263\330\247\330\250\331\212.md" @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\247\330\266_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\247\330\266_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" index ace88f491b..8e9e8d2352 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\247\330\266_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\247\330\266_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\247\330\266\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\247\330\266\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" index 1c8d435633..e269188cf4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\247\330\266\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\247\330\266\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\257\331\205\330\247\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\257\331\205\330\247\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" index 929268f50c..1512e8b7fe 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\257\331\205\330\247\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\257\331\205\330\247\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_.md" @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\271\331\203\330\247\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\271\331\203\330\247\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" index 59b889d982..68312fbc2c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\271\331\203\330\247\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\271\331\203\330\247\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" index 3e5e6c46be..9125016611 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212.md" @@ -10,19 +10,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\203\331\205\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\203\331\205\331\212_.md" index eebbf59dcb..6fd60b1770 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\203\331\205\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\203\331\205\331\212_.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271\331\212.md" index 44e7f604f2..59cf5a9155 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271\331\212.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\250\330\252\331\203\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\244\331\210\331\204.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\250\330\252\331\203\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\244\331\210\331\204.md" index 1ff394c0af..3679cb485b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\250\330\252\331\203\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\244\331\210\331\204.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\250\330\252\331\203\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\244\331\210\331\204.md" @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" index f32c92c643..c5d1453dfc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\263_\330\247\330\263\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\263_\330\247\330\263\330\251.md" index f92fc53fa2..55cd65ed04 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\263_\330\247\330\263\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\331\210\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\263_\330\247\330\263\330\251.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\265\330\255\331\212\330\255\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\265\330\255\331\212\330\255\331\212.md" index acb57f6f46..a7b1dbf079 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\265\330\255\331\212\330\255\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206_\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\265\330\255\331\212\330\255\331\212.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" index 96cb439d14..db18db37f3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" index 9ba576a863..eae7eb2e21 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\203\330\247\330\257\331\212\331\205\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\203\330\247\330\257\331\212\331\205\331\212_.md" index 098f862f48..0d681fee68 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\203\330\247\330\257\331\212\331\205\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\203\330\247\330\257\331\212\331\205\331\212_.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" index 78820c0f09..bf9e455fca 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\330\247\331\204\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\330\247\331\204\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201\331\212.md" index 3a9600c686..bf1faeb7ac 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\330\247\331\204\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\330\247\331\204\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201\331\212.md" @@ -8,8 +8,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\205_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\265\330\257\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\205_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\265\330\257\330\247\330\261.md" index 6e8141771d..876ff38a82 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\205_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\265\330\257\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\205_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\265\330\257\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" index c70341d4b1..527ef0fe02 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\253\331\204\330\247\330\253\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\253\331\204\330\247\330\253\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" index 31d99525ec..38535eea57 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\253\331\204\330\247\330\253\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\253\331\204\330\247\330\253\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212.md" index fd343f3388..738ded1083 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\331\212\331\212\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\331\212\331\212\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" index 567d83d667..97795eb479 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\331\212\331\212\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\331\212\331\212\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\331\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\331\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" index 17e4aa7253..8fd769ff22 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\331\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\331\203\331\212\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\212\330\257\331\212\331\210\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\212\330\257\331\212\331\210\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\212.md" index 86205eec5a..413eeeffe7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\212\330\257\331\212\331\210\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\212\330\257\331\212\331\210\331\204\331\210\330\254\331\212.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\247\330\256\331\212\330\265_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\247\330\256\331\212\330\265_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" index 1b9b60598d..a1dae44c6d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\247\330\256\331\212\330\265_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\247\330\256\331\212\330\265_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" index 47c3f2eb57..5aee9476b7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" index b0ab4a35d8..1d22dcf015 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\331\205\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\330\271\330\247\330\261\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\331\205\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\330\271\330\247\330\261\330\251.md" index 44066aa32e..3d5a00b585 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\331\205\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\330\271\330\247\330\261\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\331\205\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\330\271\330\247\330\261\330\251.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\250\331\203.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\250\331\203.md" index ab33d182ae..589bcd09a8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\250\331\203.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\250\331\203.md" @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" index 941172d872..c57cbb19dc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" @@ -11,11 +11,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" index 6edca78ceb..8b8b942749 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\257\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\257\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" index 7f9ad76d7f..3634f40544 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\257\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\330\257\330\257\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" index e10a1b7eec..dca1334251 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\267\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\267\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" index 0ef2f35a22..6a34f86106 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\267\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\267\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204.md" index b0b473be8f..4b1c5345f5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204.md" @@ -11,10 +11,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\267\331\212\330\271_\330\272\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\261_\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\267\331\212\330\271_\330\272\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\261_\330\261.md" index 29cc310b57..eba243e161 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\267\331\212\330\271_\330\272\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\261_\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\267\331\212\330\271_\330\272\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\261_\330\261.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" index 0a84a491b2..a5faf3f526 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\203\330\247\330\260\330\250.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\203\330\247\330\260\330\250.md" index 5a7b902550..9086706725 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\203\330\247\330\260\330\250.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\203\330\247\330\260\330\250.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\264\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\264\330\261.md" index fd5c854f50..f822214e8e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\264\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\264\330\261.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\247\331\207\331\212\331\205\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\247\331\207\331\212\331\205\331\212.md" index 55ece6333e..ce1d9dcd6d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\247\331\207\331\212\331\205\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\247\331\207\331\212\331\205\331\212.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\206\331\210\330\271.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\206\331\210\330\271.md" index fb2624d7d0..de50529461 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\206\331\210\330\271.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\206\331\210\330\271.md" @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\330\262\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\204_\330\247\330\255\331\202.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\330\262\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\204_\330\247\330\255\331\202.md" index ddeb9129cb..69efc4b18a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\330\262\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\204_\330\247\330\255\331\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\330\262\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\204_\330\247\330\255\331\202.md" @@ -11,8 +11,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\330\262\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\330\262\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" index 88a325618b..a4304d3a65 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\330\262\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\210\330\262\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\243\330\255\330\247\330\257\331\212__\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\243\330\255\330\247\330\257\331\212__\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" index 6a460191ef..a68c764896 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\243\330\255\330\247\330\257\331\212__\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\330\243\330\255\330\247\330\257\331\212__\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\331\205\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\331\205\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" index e8f347fc5d..29226e3fe2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\331\205\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252\330\255\331\203\331\212\331\205_\331\205\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\330\251.md" @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\253_\330\250\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\253_\330\250\330\247\330\252.md" index 121cbde504..82b72c3d64 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\253_\330\250\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\253_\330\250\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\204\330\247\330\253\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\331\204\331\202.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\204\330\247\330\253\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\331\204\331\202.md" index f35bf4fa8e..971de1f243 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\204\330\247\330\253\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\331\204\331\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\204\330\247\330\253\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\331\204\331\202.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\330\263.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\330\263.md" index 2e40c1a01d..66717d74d9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\330\263.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\330\263.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\331\205.md" index 11bba59288..0f880ecb81 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\245\331\205.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210_\331\204.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210_\331\204.md" index d3f98dd514..eb1caf4628 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210_\331\204.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210_\331\204.md" @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\330\247\331\206\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\330\247\331\206\331\212.md" index d9b2620d5c..970907e774 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\330\247\331\206\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\267\330\243_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\330\247\331\206\331\212.md" @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\331\204_\331\204\331\212\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\331\204_\331\204\331\212\331\206.md" index dacc270b6a..2d08219412 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\331\204_\331\204\331\212\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\331\204_\331\204\331\212\331\206.md" @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\204\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\204\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" index c7a5e834c7..b5bd2dcc8f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\204\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\204\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\263_\330\250\331\202.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\263_\330\250\331\202.md" index 2b4c6df0c3..8c534f0253 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\263_\330\250\331\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\263_\330\250\331\202.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" index c788051b36..b9960ff66c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -11,9 +11,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\205\331\210\331\204.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\205\331\210\331\204.md" index 37cd52d60e..2681779c6e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\205\331\210\331\204.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\205\331\210\331\204.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202.md" index 7ba573b2c8..90a1884c2b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202.md" @@ -20,8 +20,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" index 36f4b62dda..93c6246898 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\206\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\206\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" index 29b8691ecd..de39b1c629 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\206\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\206\330\247\330\246\331\212.md" @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\247\330\261\330\254\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\247\330\261\330\254\331\212.md" index aac5f8bf0b..41ae00c20c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\247\330\261\330\254\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\256\330\247\330\261\330\254\331\212.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\247\330\256\331\204\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\247\330\256\331\204\331\212.md" index e0525bb4f6..8fbab4fe35 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\247\330\256\331\204\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\247\330\256\331\204\331\212.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\270\330\247\331\207\330\261\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\270\330\247\331\207\330\261\331\212.md" index 56e8c8dee8..a131431b30 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\270\330\247\331\207\330\261\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\270\330\247\331\207\330\261\331\212.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\266_\330\261\331\212\330\250\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\202\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\266_\330\261\331\212\330\250\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\202\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" index 1b223e8452..9dfd130357 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\266_\330\261\331\212\330\250\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\202\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\266_\330\261\331\212\330\250\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\202\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\330\247\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\330\247\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" index e3624f6220..803b17c505 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\330\247\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\330\247\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\210\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" index 307e25f388..3398389cae 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\331\204\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\331\204\330\251.md" index 8bb96b7cab..ee8e384e00 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\331\204\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\330\247\331\204\330\251.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\331\212\330\257_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\331\212\330\257_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" index 3739bdf936..49b5a4ef72 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\331\212\330\257_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\257\331\212\330\257_\331\205\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\267\331\212\330\241.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\267\331\212\330\241.md" index 25b0c3fd15..8e501138f0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\267\331\212\330\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\267\331\212\330\241.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\247\331\203\331\205\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\247\331\203\331\205\331\212.md" index 160ae418ca..94601473cc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\247\331\203\331\205\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\247\331\203\331\205\331\212.md" @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" index bb8747f466..7aa9df5561 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\331\210\331\212\330\251_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\331\210\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\331\210\331\212\330\251_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\331\210\331\212.md" index 2bddd6de79..6218a106a8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\331\210\331\212\330\251_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\331\210\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\331\210\331\212\330\251_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\271\330\257\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\204\331\210\331\212.md" @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "يشير المصطلح إلى الدِّراسة العلميَّة للعلم نفسه بهدف وصف وشرح وتقييم، وتطوير الممارسات العلميَّة. يبحث علم \"ماوراء العلوم \" عادة في الأساليب العلميَّة والتَّحليل وإعداد التَّقارير عن البيانات وتقييمها وإعادة إنتاج، أو تكرار نتائج البحث، وكذلك في حوافز البحث. المصطلحات ذات الصِّلة:", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\272\330\263\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\272\330\263\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" index d4cf295d95..55be2cc191 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\272\330\263\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\272\330\263\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212_\330\251.md" index 41ec392ff9..3d0960ca47 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\271\330\257\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\271\330\257\330\251.md" index aa4fd78e78..816404e3c1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\271\330\257\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\330\266\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\271\330\257\330\251.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\255\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\255\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" index 34c5f7d199..533afb15ac 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\255\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\201\330\261\331\202_\330\247\331\204\330\255\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\241.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" index e996d97488..81e97b64ae 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\205\331\212\331\205.md" @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\261\330\265\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\203\330\263\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\261\330\265\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\203\330\263\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" index 437310003e..523dca70f7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\261\330\265\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\203\330\263\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\261\330\265\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\203\330\263\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\210_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\210_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" index e23cc464d4..14b7719c15 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\210_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\210_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\255\330\265\330\247\330\246\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -16,13 +16,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" index d873e540ab..75578b06a8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" index 5251ddbcf6..fcaf1545b5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -8,9 +8,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\204_\330\254\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\331\203\331\210\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\204_\330\254\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\331\203\331\210\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" index 62b8dfdecf..4b35beb496 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\204_\330\254\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\331\203\331\210\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\204_\330\254\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\331\203\331\210\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\204\330\247\331\212\331\202\331\212\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\204\330\247\331\212\331\202\331\212\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\331\212.md" index a96f347e28..7c0400e4ab 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\204\330\247\331\212\331\202\331\212\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\204\330\247\331\212\331\202\331\212\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\331\212.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\272\331\212_\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\263\331\212\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\256\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\272\331\212_\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\263\331\212\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\256\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" index e8fef2614d..ee310e1621 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\272\331\212_\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\263\331\212\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\256\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\272\331\212_\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\263\331\212\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\256\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\331\204_\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\331\203\331\212\330\250\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\331\204_\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\331\203\331\212\330\250\331\212_\330\251.md" index 3eba4c52c8..01b43d030d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\331\204_\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\331\203\331\212\330\250\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\331\204_\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\331\203\331\212\330\250\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\207\330\254\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\207\330\254\331\212_\330\251.md" index 87b4612feb..2f6e2e2bb7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\207\330\254\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\331\207\330\254\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\331\210\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\331\210\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" index 68ac12ce0e..d9a9b1e323 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\331\210\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\261\331\210\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" index 06b2ed8be5..982003ddf8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" index 847fc42574..d2ac081e2d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" @@ -12,12 +12,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" index 87f715be86..90e2c828df 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\331\212\331\212\330\263_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\257\331\212\331\204\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\331\212\331\212\330\263_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\257\331\212\331\204\330\251.md" index b72ecf7ea4..b2e89e2cbf 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\331\212\331\212\330\263_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\257\331\212\331\204\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\331\212\331\212\330\263_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\257\331\212\331\204\330\251.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\330\265_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\265\330\250\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\330\265_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\265\330\250\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" index 0000aabbaa..94c35d0bad 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\330\265_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\265\330\250\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\206\330\265_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\271\330\265\330\250\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" index 3cec841ff7..4cf3e19f52 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" index 71d3ad66b3..6f601da6d5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\331\210\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\331\210\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" index 703d96bb21..140f74459e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\331\210\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\331\210\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\331\201\331\206\330\247\330\241.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\331\201\331\206\330\247\330\241.md" index 45b727fdba..9c2b9271db 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\331\201\331\206\330\247\330\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\330\243\331\210_\330\247\331\204\331\201\331\206\330\247\330\241.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\263_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\272\331\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\263_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\272\331\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_.md" index 09fe162441..d14202aa31 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\263_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\272\331\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\264\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\263_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\272\331\204\330\247\331\204\331\212_.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\261\331\205\330\254\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\261\331\205\330\254\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" index 5b684cfb51..bdf703d102 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\261\331\205\330\254\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\261\331\205\330\254\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" index 65d14f2de8..a28c1697b4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206\331\202\330\257_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206\331\202\330\257_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" index 4aa3c3ecde..b09e5eb81d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206\331\202\330\257_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\206\331\202\330\257_\330\250\330\271\330\257_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\246\330\254.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" index 5891a43de1..7a57e2f998 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\265\331\210\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\271\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\254.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\271\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\254.md" index cab495f752..6ee14c755d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\271\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\254.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\271\331\212_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\254.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\206\330\255\331\212\330\247\330\262_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\330\256\331\204\330\265.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\206\330\255\331\212\330\247\330\262_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\330\256\331\204\330\265.md" index bcafefc01e..847e9c44bf 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\206\330\255\331\212\330\247\330\262_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\330\256\331\204\330\265.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\206\330\255\331\212\330\247\330\262_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\252\330\256\331\204\330\265.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" index 7051f691a7..8c753ed0ad 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\330\254\330\247\330\250_\330\261\331\212\331\201.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\330\254\330\247\330\250_\330\261\331\212\331\201.md" index cd865c0997..684cc39d54 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\330\254\330\247\330\250_\330\261\331\212\331\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\330\254\330\247\330\250_\330\261\331\212\331\201.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\330\254\330\247\330\263\330\250.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\330\254\330\247\330\263\330\250.md" index 7c010c11f2..8adc6d0b4c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\330\254\330\247\330\263\330\250.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\330\254\330\247\330\263\330\250.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\331\202\331\210\330\251_\330\254\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\331\202\331\210\330\251_\330\254\331\212.md" index 427bb1fae8..a99cd52a8a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\331\202\331\210\330\251_\330\254\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\331\202\331\210\330\251_\330\254\331\212.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\257\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\257\330\261.md" index 3a3473f21f..3fa04dce3b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\257\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\206\330\247\331\205\330\254_\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\257\330\261.md" @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\210\330\250\331\206\330\263\330\247\331\212\331\206\330\263.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\210\330\250\331\206\330\263\330\247\331\212\331\206\330\263.md" index 599bde029d..287aa69db2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\210\330\250\331\206\330\263\330\247\331\212\331\206\330\263.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\330\261\331\210\330\250\331\206\330\263\330\247\331\212\331\206\330\263.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\206\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\206\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" index 6fc2d4c7a7..c851c0db63 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\206\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\206\330\247\330\241_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\206\331\212\330\251_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\252\330\265\331\210\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\205\330\247\330\272.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\206\331\212\330\251_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\252\330\265\331\210\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\205\330\247\330\272.md" index 6e08fbe88c..2eb0b5fbdd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\206\331\212\330\251_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\252\330\265\331\210\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\205\330\247\330\272.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\206\331\212\330\251_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\252\330\265\331\210\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\331\205\330\247\330\272.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206_\330\252\331\206\331\210_\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\264\331\207\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206_\330\252\331\206\331\210_\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\264\331\207\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252.md" index e37c2055ab..56effa8f50 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206_\330\252\331\206\331\210_\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\264\331\207\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206_\330\252\331\206\331\210_\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\264\331\207\330\247\330\257\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\212\330\262\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\212\330\262\330\247\330\261.md" index 976bf16862..b60471aa99 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\212\330\262\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\250\331\212\330\262\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252_\330\271\331\207\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252_\330\271\331\207\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" index b260600188..0eb61049a8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252_\330\271\331\207\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252_\330\271\331\207\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\263\330\254\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\250\331\202.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\243\330\267\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\243\330\267\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" index 7103dcb9cb..7c873e79a9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\243\330\267\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\243\330\267\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\203\331\210\330\247\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\203\331\210\330\247\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" index 30ca4f09bf..c8b6c78c18 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\203\331\210\330\247\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\203\331\210\330\247\331\206_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257\330\251.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\203\330\264\330\247\331\201\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\203\330\264\330\247\331\201\331\212_.md" index 5a607761f9..cf67409290 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\203\330\264\330\247\331\201\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\331\203\330\264\330\247\331\201\331\212_.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\265\331\201\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\265\331\201\330\247\330\252.md" index 6ffd48114d..b449eaead7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\265\331\201\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\204\331\212\331\204_\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\265\331\201\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\264\331\207\330\247\330\257.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\264\331\207\330\247\330\257.md" index 2dd7958082..989aeb78e9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\264\331\207\330\247\330\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\264\331\207\330\247\330\257.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\241.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\241.md" index fdf69f3a80..a899da5d6f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\247\331\206\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\241.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\256\330\265\331\206\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\256\330\265\331\206\330\251.md" index 265a88d644..5df736eff4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\256\330\265\331\206\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\255\331\212_\330\262_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\256\330\265\331\206\330\251.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\265\331\206\331\212\331\201_\330\243\330\257\331\210\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\265\331\206\331\212\331\201_\330\243\330\257\331\210\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" index 8e79bd5f9d..582d4b1c39 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\265\331\206\331\212\331\201_\330\243\330\257\331\210\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\265\331\206\331\212\331\201_\330\243\330\257\331\210\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\244\331\204_\331\201\331\212\331\206.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\265\331\210\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\265\331\210\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" index 3c0518abe0..d8c3455315 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\265\331\210\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\265\331\210\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\271\330\247\330\261\330\266_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\247\331\204\330\255.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\271\330\247\330\261\330\266_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\247\331\204\330\255.md" index d842f46762..554bd8ed59 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\271\330\247\330\261\330\266_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\247\331\204\330\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\330\271\330\247\330\261\330\266_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\247\331\204\330\255.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\202\330\257\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204\330\247\330\252_\330\250\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\256\330\257\330\247\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\202\330\257\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204\330\247\330\252_\330\250\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\256\330\257\330\247\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" index 0598bbf6a5..28a42adb92 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\202\330\257\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204\330\247\330\252_\330\250\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\256\330\257\330\247\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\202\330\257\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204\330\247\330\252_\330\250\330\247\330\263\330\252\330\256\330\257\330\247\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262\331\212.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\210\331\204\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\257\331\204\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\210\331\204\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\257\331\204\330\251.md" index 78b8bc7fd0..71f9dd2bf5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\210\331\204\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\257\331\204\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\210\331\204\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\257\331\204\330\251.md" @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\212\331\206\330\262\331\212\331\206\330\254.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\212\331\206\330\262\331\212\331\206\330\254.md" index aa218799e9..5b7f4626a7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\212\331\206\330\262\331\212\331\206\330\254.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\252\331\212\331\206\330\262\331\212\331\206\330\254.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\253\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\205\331\207\331\210\330\261_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\253\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\205\331\207\331\210\330\261_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" index a3a61a1296..e5711be97f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\253\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\205\331\207\331\210\330\261_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\253\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\254\331\205\331\207\331\210\330\261_\331\201\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" @@ -8,20 +8,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\253\331\210\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\257\330\247\331\202\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\253\331\210\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\257\330\247\331\202\331\212_\330\251.md" index 85f2acec54..3a82a99049 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\253\331\210\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\257\330\247\331\202\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\253\331\210\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\265\330\257\330\247\331\202\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\254\330\247\331\205\331\210\331\201\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\254\330\247\331\205\331\210\331\201\331\212.md" index 3eade019c0..91aec69db3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\254\330\247\331\205\331\210\331\201\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\254\330\247\331\205\331\210\331\201\331\212.md" @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\255\330\247\330\254\330\262_\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\255\330\247\330\254\330\262_\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212.md" index 7dace4562a..513d73e848 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\255\330\247\330\254\330\262_\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\255\330\247\330\254\330\262_\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\255\330\257\331\212\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\264\330\271\330\250\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\255\330\257\331\212\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\264\330\271\330\250\330\251.md" index 33b8b8f85e..d634af36fa 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\255\330\257\331\212\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\264\330\271\330\250\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\255\330\257\331\212\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\261\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\264\330\271\330\250\330\251.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\330\261\331\212\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\330\271\331\212\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\330\261\331\212\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\330\271\331\212\330\251.md" index 2229234b5f..4822f669b7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\330\261\331\212\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\330\271\331\212\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\330\261\331\212\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\266\330\271\331\212\330\251.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\205\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\205\330\251.md" index 6d4d9ff2b3..4e28dd4504 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\205\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\265_\330\257\331\205\330\251.md" @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\331\204\330\247\330\265\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\201\331\212\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\331\204\330\247\330\265\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\201\331\212\330\251.md" index 7c7eeb8900..803892bce1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\331\204\330\247\330\265\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\201\331\212\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\256\331\204\330\247\330\265\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\201\331\212\330\251.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" index b44da9aefc..1d65e01711 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\330\247\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -11,11 +11,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\330\261\330\254\330\247\330\252_\330\255\330\261_\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\330\255\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\330\261\330\254\330\247\330\252_\330\255\330\261_\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\330\255\330\253.md" index 33b58333e6..7f1bb7e8ec 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\330\261\330\254\330\247\330\252_\330\255\330\261_\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\330\255\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\330\261\330\254\330\247\330\252_\330\255\330\261_\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\247\330\255\330\253.md" @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261.md" index 231d7982a7..df670a589b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\245\330\271\330\257\330\247\330\257_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261.md" @@ -10,9 +10,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\261_\331\205\331\210\330\262.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\261_\331\205\331\210\330\262.md" index be79084b53..6ad03e52c6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\261_\331\205\331\210\330\262.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\204\331\212\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\261_\331\205\331\210\330\262.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\210\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\210\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" index e681d0b854..66b371f970 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\210\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\257\331\210\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\262\331\212\331\206\331\210\330\257\331\210.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\262\331\212\331\206\331\210\330\257\331\210.md" index 532155ddbe..d1bf3e8dbd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\262\331\212\331\206\331\210\330\257\331\210.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\262\331\212\331\206\331\210\330\257\331\210.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\263\330\252\330\261\331\212\331\206\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\256\331\204\331\201\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\252\330\250\330\271_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\252\331\212\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\330\247\330\252\331\212_\331\210\330\252\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\256_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\250\331\212\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\202\331\204\331\205_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\210\330\257.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\263\330\252\330\261\331\212\331\206\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\256\331\204\331\201\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\252\330\250\330\271_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\252\331\212\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\330\247\330\252\331\212_\331\210\330\252\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\256_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\250\331\212\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\202\331\204\331\205_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\210\330\257.md" index f137e35a9a..a22b3b6c4e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\263\330\252\330\261\331\212\331\206\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\256\331\204\331\201\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\252\330\250\330\271_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\252\331\212\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\330\247\330\252\331\212_\331\210\330\252\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\256_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\250\331\212\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\202\331\204\331\205_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\210\330\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\263\330\252\330\261\331\212\331\206\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\256\331\204\331\201\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\330\252\330\250\330\271_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\256\330\252\331\212\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\260_\330\247\330\252\331\212_\331\210\330\252\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\256_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\261\330\250\331\212\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\202\331\204\331\205_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\271\331\210\330\257.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\263\330\254_\331\204_\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271\330\247\330\252_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\263\330\254_\331\204_\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271\330\247\330\252_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" index 994ed20a8e..6c2ffe843f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\263\330\254_\331\204_\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271\330\247\330\252_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\263\330\254_\331\204_\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271\330\247\330\252_\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\330\250\331\203\330\251_\330\243\330\261\330\264\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\331\205\331\204\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\330\250\331\203\330\251_\330\243\330\261\330\264\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\331\205\331\204\330\251.md" index 5eb93270d5..8efd624a4c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\330\250\331\203\330\251_\330\243\330\261\330\264\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\331\205\331\204\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\330\250\331\203\330\251_\330\243\330\261\330\264\331\212\331\201_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\330\247\331\205\331\204\330\251.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\330\250\331\203\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\330\250\331\203\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" index 64522bb3e8..3591c7885a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\330\250\331\203\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\330\250\331\203\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ "definition": "التعريف:** شبكة التِّكرار عبارة عن اتِّحاد يتكَّون من مجموعات تهتم بالبحوث المفتوحة، غالبًا ما يقودها الأقران. وتتبع هذه المجموعات نموذج العجلة، والشُّعاع في بلد معين، حيث تقوم الشَّبكة بربط الباحثين، والمجموعات والمؤسَّسات المحليَّة في تخصُّصات مختلفة بمجموعة توجيهيَّة مركزيَّة، والتي تتواصل أيضًا مع أصحاب المصلحة الخارجيين. وتشمل أهداف شبكات التِّكرار الدَّعوة إلى مزيد من الوعي، وتعزيز أنشطة التَّدريب، ونشر أفضل الممارسات على المستوى الشَّعبي، والمؤسّسي، والبحثي، وتوجد مثل هذه الشَّبكات في المملكة المتَّحدة وألمانيا وسويسرا وسلوفاكيا وأستراليا (اعتبارًا من مارس 2021).", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\331\212\330\261\330\250\330\247_\330\261\331\210\331\205\331\212\331\210.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\331\212\330\261\330\250\330\247_\330\261\331\210\331\205\331\212\331\210.md" index 94586075b0..98adc5dce1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\331\212\330\261\330\250\330\247_\330\261\331\210\331\205\331\212\331\210.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\264\331\212\330\261\330\250\330\247_\330\261\331\210\331\205\331\212\331\210.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\265\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\330\252\331\210\331\211.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\265\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\330\252\331\210\331\211.md" index f98a507ff4..4163df384e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\265\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\330\252\331\210\331\211.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\265\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\330\252\331\210\331\211.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\265\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\331\203.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\265\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\331\203.md" index 0257316685..4d0c7f5f6f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\265\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\331\203.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\265\330\257\331\202_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\255\331\203.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\267\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\267\331\206.md" index ec82abf2a2..11637cc109 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\267\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\210\330\247\330\267\331\206.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\263\331\210\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\263\331\210\331\212.md" index 9e41459aca..c0c91fd4e4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\263\331\210\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\271\331\204\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\331\201\330\263_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\263\331\210\331\212.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\270\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\270\330\261.md" index 3e40aa24c6..9f76aecbf5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\270\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\201\330\252\330\261\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\255\330\270\330\261.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\201\331\210\330\261\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\201\331\210\330\261\330\252.md" index b16cc8b255..bac8a28819 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\201\331\210\330\261\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\201\331\210\330\261\330\252.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\246\331\205\330\251_\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\246\331\205\330\251_\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" index 1c994dfb2f..9b5becbe6e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\246\331\205\330\251_\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\246\331\205\330\251_\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\245\330\271\330\247\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\245\330\271\330\247\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254.md" index 14e4b5c083..1172f923f0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\245\330\271\330\247\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\245\330\271\330\247\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\245\331\206\330\252\330\247\330\254.md" @@ -9,11 +9,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" index a5e9ddc5c5..6f06e2e99c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\271\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\206\330\255_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\271\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\206\330\255_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" index 08566c4eaa..68992004bc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\271\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\206\330\255_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\330\271\330\257\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251_\331\204\331\204\331\205\331\206\330\255_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251.md" @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\331\206\331\210\331\206_\331\202\331\210\330\257\331\207\330\247\330\261\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\331\206\331\210\331\206_\331\202\331\210\330\257\331\207\330\247\330\261\330\252.md" index f318e7a8e4..4bd3dc2005 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\331\206\331\210\331\206_\331\202\331\210\330\257\331\207\330\247\330\261\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\247\331\206\331\210\331\206_\331\202\331\210\330\257\331\207\330\247\330\261\330\252.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\261\330\265\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\261\330\265\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" index 67856f3164..4d80a9a029 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\261\330\265\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\330\261\330\265\331\206\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\331\212\330\250.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\331\212\330\250.md" index 1584ed461e..dc5421f9e8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\331\212\330\250.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\202\331\212\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252_\330\247\331\204\331\210\331\212\330\250.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\204\330\272\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\242\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\204\330\272\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\242\330\261.md" index eb56754801..77717c0ddd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\204\330\272\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\242\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\204\330\272\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\242\330\261.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\244\330\264\330\261_i10.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\244\330\264\330\261_i10.md" index 0b4155d256..08fe727ffe 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\244\330\264\330\261_i10.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\244\330\264\330\261_i10.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\244\330\264\330\261_\330\245\330\252\330\264.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\244\330\264\330\261_\330\245\330\252\330\264.md" index ad5adbb8ad..759c9d7fe2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\244\330\264\330\261_\330\245\330\252\330\264.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\244\330\264\330\261_\330\245\330\252\330\264.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\246_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\202\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\246_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\202\330\251.md" index 0dc78e31b2..c748b0221a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\246_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\202\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\246_\330\247\331\204\330\253_\331\202\330\251.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\246_\331\201\331\212\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\246_\331\201\331\212\330\261.md" index 70b4af7f0a..ac5e9c00ae 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\246_\331\201\331\212\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\330\246_\331\201\331\212\330\261.md" @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252.md" index 957a52c540..ad88786ee9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\247\330\257\331\204\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\257_\330\261\330\247\330\263\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\257\330\243_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\257\330\243_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" index 276b3345e1..2840c64cb1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\257\330\243_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\250\330\257\330\243_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" index 83b41894d3..a9477d0787 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\243\331\202\330\261\330\247\331\206_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\202\330\247\330\261\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\263\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\257\330\250\331\212_\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\257\330\250\331\212_\330\247\330\252.md" index 24e0b26780..ccad82b324 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\257\330\250\331\212_\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\257\330\250\331\212_\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\261\331\205\330\254\331\212.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\261\331\205\330\254\331\212.md" index a9e8cc1187..52dc748fcd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\261\331\205\330\254\331\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\254\330\271\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\206_\330\265_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\261\331\205\330\254\331\212.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\263\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\263\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" index c6e1bd2d27..7c92ebde04 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\263\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\261\330\247\330\263\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205\331\212_.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205\331\212_.md" index e05507e329..dc2091c4e8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205\331\212_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\263\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\205\331\212_.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" index 6b339ec890..1678a31c32 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\263\330\252\331\210\330\257\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" index 13f1efa363..1c897176cf 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\330\247\330\261\331\203\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\331\212\330\247\331\206\330\247\330\252.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\330\261\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\330\261\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" index f5e1077c4c..08f7a71d87 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\330\261\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\330\261\331\210\330\271_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science)." + "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", + "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\204\330\251_\330\247\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\247\330\254\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\204\330\251_\330\247\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\247\330\254\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\331\205.md" index c10f4b053d..1323177de9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\204\330\251_\330\247\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\247\330\254\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\264\331\203\331\204\330\251_\330\247\330\262\330\257\331\210\330\247\330\254\331\212\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\263\331\205.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\265\330\247\331\206\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\261\331\202.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\265\330\247\331\206\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\261\331\202.md" index 33c60804e9..7e53a55ce8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\265\330\247\331\206\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\261\331\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\265\330\247\331\206\330\271_\330\247\331\204\331\210\330\261\331\202.md" @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262.md" index 7cd3198a63..ebbabc484a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\250\330\247\331\212\330\262.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\252\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\252\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" index 3886b59ede..6f9054b089 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\252\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\330\247\331\205\331\204_\330\252\330\243\330\253\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\254_\331\204\330\251.md" @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\331\212\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\205\331\212\331\212\330\262.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\331\212\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\205\331\212\331\212\330\262.md" index ec32aa9cfb..d5bf3b3d85 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\331\212\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\205\331\212\331\212\330\262.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\271\331\212\330\247\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\205\331\212\331\212\330\262.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\272\330\247\331\204\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\201\330\247\330\271\331\204.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\272\330\247\331\204\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\201\330\247\330\271\331\204.md" index 3329e84a0e..960e96b74e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\272\330\247\331\204\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\201\330\247\330\271\331\204.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\330\272\330\247\331\204\330\267\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\201\330\247\330\271\331\204.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\204\331\201\330\247\330\252_\330\254\331\212_\330\263\331\210\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\204\331\201\330\247\330\252_\330\254\331\212_\330\263\331\210\331\206.md" index b8ee737cb2..edc3678858 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\204\331\201\330\247\330\252_\330\254\331\212_\330\263\331\210\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\204\331\201\330\247\330\252_\330\254\331\212_\330\263\331\210\331\206.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\252\330\257\331\211_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\201\330\263\331\212\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\330\251_\331\206\330\247\330\257\331\212_\330\261\330\247\331\212\331\210\330\252_\331\204\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\252\330\257\331\211_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\201\330\263\331\212\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\330\251_\331\206\330\247\330\257\331\212_\330\261\330\247\331\212\331\210\330\252_\331\204\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" index 2b9eb558f0..77b116cd69 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\252\330\257\331\211_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\201\330\263\331\212\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\330\251_\331\206\330\247\330\257\331\212_\330\261\330\247\331\212\331\210\330\252_\331\204\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\252\330\257\331\211_\330\247\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\252\330\271\330\257_\330\257_\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\202\330\247\330\250\331\204\330\251_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\201\330\263\331\212\330\261_\331\210\330\247\331\204\331\205\331\201\330\252\331\210\330\255\330\251_\331\210\330\247\331\204\330\264_\331\201\330\247\331\201\330\251_\331\206\330\247\330\257\331\212_\330\261\330\247\331\212\331\210\330\252_\331\204\331\204\330\271\331\204\331\210\331\205.md" @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" index 3585cb9c8b..3c69f167c5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\247\331\204\331\202\331\212\331\205_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\255\330\252\331\205\330\247\331\204\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\262\330\257.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\262\330\257.md" index e5b7a00913..5474da1324 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\262\330\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\255\331\206\331\211_\330\262\330\257.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\265_\330\251_\330\255\330\261_\330\261_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\252\331\206\330\247.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\265_\330\251_\330\255\330\261_\330\261_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\252\331\206\330\247.md" index 843125903e..6b4b933648 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\265_\330\251_\330\255\330\261_\330\261_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\252\331\206\330\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\265_\330\251_\330\255\330\261_\330\261_\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\252\331\206\330\247.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\265\330\251_\330\250\330\247\330\250_\331\212\330\261_pubpeer.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\265\330\251_\330\250\330\247\330\250_\331\212\330\261_pubpeer.md" index c8c3e1ab3e..b5d87f226f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\265\330\251_\330\250\330\247\330\250_\331\212\330\261_pubpeer.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\205\331\206\330\265\330\251_\330\250\330\247\330\250_\331\212\330\261_pubpeer.md" @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" index 4e81afec1f..67e19763a1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" @@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" index 57d71102b3..b7c40a84a0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\270\330\261\331\212_\330\251_\330\247\331\204\331\205\330\271\330\261\331\201\330\251.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\257\331\205\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\250\330\257\330\247\330\271\331\212_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\257\331\205\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\250\330\257\330\247\330\271\331\212_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" index 4f4ecda588..b7f77980f9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\257\331\205\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\250\330\257\330\247\330\271\331\212_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\331\207\330\254_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\257\331\205\331\212\330\261_\330\247\331\204\330\245\330\250\330\257\330\247\330\271\331\212_\331\204\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\331\210\330\247\330\257\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\250\330\255\330\247\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\331\210\330\247\330\257\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\250\330\255\330\247\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" index 9a1d5a7f55..ea7810ce9f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\331\210\330\247\330\257\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\250\330\255\330\247\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\331\210\330\247\330\257\331\212_\330\247\331\204\330\243\330\250\330\255\330\247\330\253_\330\247\331\204\330\252_\331\203\330\261\330\247\330\261\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\207\330\247\331\203\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\207\330\247\331\203\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" index 2d13b02aaa..2d6cf3ab30 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\207\330\247\331\203\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\207\330\247\331\203\330\253\331\210\331\206.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\207\331\212\331\203\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\255\331\210\330\247\331\201\330\262.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\207\331\212\331\203\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\255\331\210\330\247\331\201\330\262.md" index 6c420a1936..4a8df0bbdd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\207\331\212\331\203\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\255\331\210\330\247\331\201\330\262.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\207\331\212\331\203\331\204_\330\247\331\204\330\255\331\210\330\247\331\201\330\262.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/_\345\205\204\345\274\237_\345\274\217\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/_\345\205\204\345\274\237_\345\274\217\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" index 0d1b9059c6..6e544e65c0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/_\345\205\204\345\274\237_\345\274\217\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/_\345\205\204\345\274\237_\345\274\217\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/_\346\227\247\351\207\221\345\261\261\347\247\221\347\240\224\350\257\204\344\274\260\345\256\243\350\250\200_.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/_\346\227\247\351\207\221\345\261\261\347\247\221\347\240\224\350\257\204\344\274\260\345\256\243\350\250\200_.md" index a517c17cb4..28e88c4abb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/_\346\227\247\351\207\221\345\261\261\347\247\221\347\240\224\350\257\204\344\274\260\345\256\243\350\250\200_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/_\346\227\247\351\207\221\345\261\261\347\247\221\347\240\224\350\257\204\344\274\260\345\256\243\350\250\200_.md" @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/amnesia.md b/content/glossary/chinese/amnesia.md index c9b3f2c6c8..5772fe277d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/amnesia.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/amnesia.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/arrive\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/arrive\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" index 4cc7be6b9f..5f60a968da 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/arrive\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/arrive\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/bizarre.md b/content/glossary/chinese/bizarre.md index c4c0eccc05..984cc66538 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/bizarre.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/bizarre.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/coar\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223\350\211\257\345\245\275\345\256\236\350\267\265\347\244\276\345\214\272\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/coar\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223\350\211\257\345\245\275\345\256\236\350\267\265\347\244\276\345\214\272\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" index 68440364ec..aba1871864 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/coar\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223\350\211\257\345\245\275\345\256\236\350\267\265\347\244\276\345\214\272\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/coar\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223\350\211\257\345\245\275\345\256\236\350\267\265\347\244\276\345\214\272\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/fair\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/fair\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" index c7903b4b33..7580e5b2f0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/fair\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/fair\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/g_power.md b/content/glossary/chinese/g_power.md index 756e2f6d07..5bf3c8000b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/g_power.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/g_power.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/git.md b/content/glossary/chinese/git.md index 9eecf1d751..4540195d4c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/git.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/git.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", - "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", - "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" + "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", + "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", + "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/h\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/h\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" index c3ab45ecbb..e27d59135d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/h\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/h\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/i10\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/i10\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" index 8d34b65488..78f0893ca1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/i10\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/i10\346\214\207\346\225\260.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/jabref.md b/content/glossary/chinese/jabref.md index 2fb8f637b1..5869cc995e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/jabref.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/jabref.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/jamovi.md b/content/glossary/chinese/jamovi.md index 736ffc1330..729cbc9782 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/jamovi.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/jamovi.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/jasp.md b/content/glossary/chinese/jasp.md index 9ca2968e0d..51e6b3e258 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/jasp.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/jasp.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/json_\346\226\207\344\273\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/json_\346\226\207\344\273\266.md" index 6ce40faeee..e900b5b030 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/json_\346\226\207\344\273\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/json_\346\226\207\344\273\266.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/manel.md b/content/glossary/chinese/manel.md index d46afe2f1d..be1d425ae6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/manel.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/manel.md @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/m\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/m\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" index 3c5a4edcc0..ff9e76c9a8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/m\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/m\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/openneuro.md b/content/glossary/chinese/openneuro.md index 262e351f48..2f5ac9f0fc 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/openneuro.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/openneuro.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/p_\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/p_\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" index b7f817a86c..56ea0a5026 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/p_\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/p_\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/pci_\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/pci_\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" index d453afcc0d..7014266b4f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/pci_\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/pci_\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/prepare_\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/prepare_\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" index 034f141def..4410754947 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/prepare_\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/prepare_\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/pubpeer.md b/content/glossary/chinese/pubpeer.md index 11ffce1721..a7e84bfd53 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/pubpeer.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/pubpeer.md @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/python.md b/content/glossary/chinese/python.md index 81afc1c158..e14722c40d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/python.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/python.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/p\345\200\274.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/p\345\200\274.md" index 73508ed674..fadf8b66a7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/p\345\200\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/p\345\200\274.md" @@ -8,9 +8,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" index 8ced19ba40..4b931ed5ee 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/r.md b/content/glossary/chinese/r.md index ff838061d2..97cb005624 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/r.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/r.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/replicats\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/replicats\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" index e77720df09..b1951748a9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/replicats\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/replicats\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science)." + "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", + "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/reproducibilitea.md b/content/glossary/chinese/reproducibilitea.md index 574d197e18..82ca79af5a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/reproducibilitea.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/reproducibilitea.md @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/riot\347\247\221\345\255\246\344\277\261\344\271\220\351\203\250.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/riot\347\247\221\345\255\246\344\277\261\344\271\220\351\203\250.md" index 06964b8b4f..a74a160d54 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/riot\347\247\221\345\255\246\344\277\261\344\271\220\351\203\250.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/riot\347\247\221\345\255\246\344\277\261\344\271\220\351\203\250.md" @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/sherpa_romeo.md b/content/glossary/chinese/sherpa_romeo.md index 80da78990e..dae212c50a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/sherpa_romeo.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/sherpa_romeo.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/strange.md b/content/glossary/chinese/strange.md index 9238d5849e..91a7a66b3e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/strange.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/strange.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/studyswap.md b/content/glossary/chinese/studyswap.md index bd63a18c4b..627a0b75c5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/studyswap.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/studyswap.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/s\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/s\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" index b7734789df..e351d3bcef 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/s\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/s\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/s\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/s\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" index def2b88fd5..5bfcb6ab17 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/s\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/s\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/tenzing.md b/content/glossary/chinese/tenzing.md index 4041712088..8ac3bce1d7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/tenzing.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/tenzing.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/trust\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/trust\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" index aab56719be..37ca1ed0c6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/trust\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/trust\345\216\237\345\210\231.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/chinese/zenodo.md b/content/glossary/chinese/zenodo.md index f7f4f32d29..ed8b0cb278 100644 --- a/content/glossary/chinese/zenodo.md +++ b/content/glossary/chinese/zenodo.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/z\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/z\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" index 534b1d1b1d..59c20d64ad 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/z\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/z\346\233\262\347\272\277.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\200\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\200\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" index 1316825f23..90168699b6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\200\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\200\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\211\345\244\247\351\232\220\346\202\243.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\211\345\244\247\351\232\220\346\202\243.md" index 1b1c78ab71..37307a209e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\211\345\244\247\351\232\220\346\202\243.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\211\345\244\247\351\232\220\346\202\243.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\211\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\211\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" index 8b0b0e0cd2..7d68d84088 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\211\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\211\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\215\345\275\223\346\265\213\351\207\217\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\215\345\275\223\346\265\213\351\207\217\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" index f78dc5ebe5..ea80f3cfa7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\215\345\275\223\346\265\213\351\207\217\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\215\345\275\223\346\265\213\351\207\217\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\215\345\275\223\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\241\214\344\270\272\346\210\226\344\270\215\345\275\223\346\212\245\345\221\212\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\215\345\275\223\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\241\214\344\270\272\346\210\226\344\270\215\345\275\223\346\212\245\345\221\212\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" index 6af24eec81..fb92312f1c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\215\345\275\223\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\241\214\344\270\272\346\210\226\344\270\215\345\275\223\346\212\245\345\221\212\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\270\215\345\275\223\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\241\214\344\270\272\346\210\226\344\270\215\345\275\223\346\212\245\345\221\212\350\241\214\344\270\272.md" @@ -21,12 +21,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\213\345\220\216.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\213\345\220\216.md" index 2a3284cba4..9b581b5515 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\213\345\220\216.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\213\345\220\216.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\214\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\214\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" index 933149d6e3..855037f2ba 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\214\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\214\347\261\273\351\224\231\350\257\257.md" @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\244\344\272\222\350\260\254\350\257\257.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\244\344\272\222\350\260\254\350\257\257.md" index 484304d305..aa89ca8564 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\244\344\272\222\350\260\254\350\257\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\244\344\272\222\350\260\254\350\257\257.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\244\345\217\211\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\244\345\217\211\346\200\247.md" index e31ca5ea84..d9c80d1ff3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\244\345\217\211\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\244\345\217\211\346\200\247.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\272\350\272\253\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\272\350\272\253\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" index 6115537c02..20e1e24caf 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\272\350\272\253\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\272\272\350\272\253\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\216\345\261\236\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\216\345\261\236\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" index 865a2bef07..f6af68fb6c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\216\345\261\236\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\216\345\261\236\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\230\350\264\271\345\242\231.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\230\350\264\271\345\242\231.md" index 1d2273f2b3..84dbe6bdbe 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\230\350\264\271\345\242\231.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\230\350\264\271\345\242\231.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\243\347\240\201\345\256\241\346\237\245.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\243\347\240\201\345\256\241\346\237\245.md" index 9873ba9c61..482ace0378 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\243\347\240\201\345\256\241\346\237\245.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\273\243\347\240\201\345\256\241\346\237\245.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\227\345\214\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\227\345\214\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" index 9c2b77cade..4ec059b352 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\227\345\214\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\227\345\214\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" @@ -10,19 +10,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\252\351\207\215\345\244\215.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\252\351\207\215\345\244\215.md" index 6adee7c01c..d8a67887cc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\252\351\207\215\345\244\215.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\252\351\207\215\345\244\215.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\274\347\204\266\345\207\275\346\225\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\274\347\204\266\345\207\275\346\225\260.md" index 5036d87f9d..7447ff749c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\274\347\204\266\345\207\275\346\225\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\274\347\204\266\345\207\275\346\225\260.md" @@ -11,11 +11,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\274\347\204\266\345\216\237\347\220\206.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\274\347\204\266\345\216\237\347\220\206.md" index 6ed61c43fd..97826e4a88 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\274\347\204\266\345\216\237\347\220\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\274\274\347\204\266\345\216\237\347\220\206.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" index 09ff531a57..7c46f1b4c0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\277\241\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\277\241\345\272\246.md" index 84fa73c678..cb3c427e37 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\277\241\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\277\241\345\272\246.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\201\207\345\220\215\345\214\226.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\201\207\345\220\215\345\214\226.md" index 5014a1fa56..8c0f4b8c0e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\201\207\345\220\215\345\214\226.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\201\207\345\220\215\345\214\226.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" index 320cb81ddf..ea45dae323 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" index 2e3bd1a39b..61832ab391 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ "Systematic Review" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev; Siu Kit Yeung" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" index f999b4d09c..b4fbf0d981 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\210\226\345\205\203\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\210\226\345\205\203\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" index 7d974e8675..2f2803417b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\210\226\345\205\203\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\203\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\210\226\345\205\203\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "对科学本身进行的科学研究，旨在描述、解释、评估和/或改进科学实践。元科学通常研究科学方法、数据分析、数据报告、研究结果的可重复性与可复现性，以及激励机制。", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\210\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\210\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" index 3419f9298b..5d0871ad63 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\210\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\210\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\344\274\227\345\257\271\347\247\221\345\255\246\347\232\204\344\277\241\344\273\273.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\344\274\227\345\257\271\347\247\221\345\255\246\347\232\204\344\277\241\344\273\273.md" index 06b4d6e406..d9b56e4354 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\344\274\227\345\257\271\347\247\221\345\255\246\347\232\204\344\277\241\344\273\273.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\344\274\227\345\257\271\347\247\221\345\255\246\347\232\204\344\277\241\344\273\273.md" @@ -8,20 +8,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\344\274\227\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\344\274\227\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" index ee51f0edcf..52edd99b9e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\344\274\227\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\344\274\227\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\345\271\263.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\345\271\263.md" index 767325a7a8..36842c4718 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\345\271\263.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\254\345\271\263.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\261\345\220\214\347\224\237\344\272\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\261\345\220\214\347\224\237\344\272\247.md" index 12cdda9a6b..61f3dea4b8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\261\345\220\214\347\224\237\344\272\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\261\345\220\214\347\224\237\344\272\247.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\261\346\234\211\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\261\346\234\211\346\200\247.md" index 75fbc379d4..01e70f809e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\261\346\234\211\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\205\261\346\234\211\346\200\247.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\206\205\345\256\271\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\206\205\345\256\271\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" index a8e517e4c1..98bf9f0234 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\206\205\345\256\271\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\206\205\345\256\271\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\206\205\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\206\205\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" index 36a0172fda..4e189604be 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\206\205\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\206\205\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\206\346\236\220\347\201\265\346\264\273\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\206\346\236\220\347\201\265\346\264\273\346\200\247.md" index 2d3c83f230..59d7d899ee 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\206\346\236\220\347\201\265\346\264\273\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\206\346\236\220\347\201\265\346\264\273\346\200\247.md" @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\207\351\246\231\350\202\240\345\274\217\345\217\221\350\241\250.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\207\351\246\231\350\202\240\345\274\217\345\217\221\350\241\250.md" index e568bba4c7..33cead46b1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\207\351\246\231\350\202\240\345\274\217\345\217\221\350\241\250.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\207\351\246\231\350\202\240\345\274\217\345\217\221\350\241\250.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\222\347\225\214\346\240\207\345\207\206.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\222\347\225\214\346\240\207\345\207\206.md" index b994e35c53..c25065a359 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\222\347\225\214\346\240\207\345\207\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\222\347\225\214\346\240\207\345\207\206.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\233\351\200\240\346\200\247\347\240\264\345\235\217\345\274\217\347\232\204\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\233\351\200\240\346\200\247\347\240\264\345\235\217\345\274\217\347\232\204\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" index 5c5ec42e49..7f2e7fd9fa 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\233\351\200\240\346\200\247\347\240\264\345\235\217\345\274\217\347\232\204\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\233\351\200\240\346\200\247\347\240\264\345\235\217\345\274\217\347\232\204\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\251\347\233\212\345\206\262\347\252\201.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\251\347\233\212\345\206\262\347\252\201.md" index 3f17225009..1e836d9df4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\251\347\233\212\345\206\262\347\252\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\210\251\347\233\212\345\206\262\347\252\201.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\213\230\350\257\257\350\241\250.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\213\230\350\257\257\350\241\250.md" index 51d2ec5392..05f26825cc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\213\230\350\257\257\350\241\250.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\213\230\350\257\257\350\241\250.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\214\205\345\256\271\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\214\205\345\256\271\346\200\247.md" index 00285dae9c..e36497b5fc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\214\205\345\256\271\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\214\205\345\256\271\346\200\247.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\214\277\345\220\215\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\214\277\345\220\215\346\200\247.md" index 1548bedcc6..adaecd5437 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\214\277\345\220\215\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\214\277\345\220\215\346\200\247.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\215\217\344\275\234\345\274\217\345\244\215\347\216\260\344\270\216\346\225\231\350\202\262\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\215\217\344\275\234\345\274\217\345\244\215\347\216\260\344\270\216\346\225\231\350\202\262\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" index 69cd47fde8..57e52c55e6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\215\217\344\275\234\345\274\217\345\244\215\347\216\260\344\270\216\346\225\231\350\202\262\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\215\217\344\275\234\345\274\217\345\244\215\347\216\260\344\270\216\346\225\231\350\202\262\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\215\225\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\215\225\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" index c9943ba094..7ffadba44d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\215\225\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\215\225\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\216\273\346\256\226\346\260\221\345\214\226.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\216\273\346\256\226\346\260\221\345\214\226.md" index 633b9e4bed..710b85dc4b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\216\273\346\256\226\346\260\221\345\214\226.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\216\273\346\256\226\346\260\221\345\214\226.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\202\344\270\216\345\274\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\202\344\270\216\345\274\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" index fd73ca423b..0d00414ab5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\202\344\270\216\345\274\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\202\344\270\216\345\274\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\202\344\270\216\350\200\205\345\222\214\345\205\254\344\274\227\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\202\344\270\216\350\200\205\345\222\214\345\205\254\344\274\227\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" index 24b1c99a74..cabf7e75bb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\202\344\270\216\350\200\205\345\222\214\345\205\254\344\274\227\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\202\344\270\216\350\200\205\345\222\214\345\205\254\344\274\227\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\214\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\214\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" index 0c0a3fc6bf..04adfb361a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\214\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\214\347\233\262\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\214\351\207\215\346\204\217\350\257\206.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\214\351\207\215\346\204\217\350\257\206.md" index e804944900..5b22ab2243 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\214\351\207\215\346\204\217\350\257\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\214\351\207\215\346\204\217\350\257\206.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\215\345\220\221p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\215\345\220\221p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" index 6000bbd54f..f36357d53a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\215\345\220\221p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\215\345\220\221p\345\200\274\346\223\215\347\272\265.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\215\350\272\253\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\215\350\272\253\346\200\247.md" index a708b849df..c03120a8cf 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\215\350\272\253\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\215\350\272\253\346\200\247.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\221\350\241\250\345\201\217\345\200\232_\346\226\207\344\273\266\346\212\275\345\261\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\221\350\241\250\345\201\217\345\200\232_\346\226\207\344\273\266\346\212\275\345\261\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" index dc5351f9af..ae2a171419 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\221\350\241\250\345\201\217\345\200\232_\346\226\207\344\273\266\346\212\275\345\261\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\221\350\241\250\345\201\217\345\200\232_\346\226\207\344\273\266\346\212\275\345\261\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\221\350\241\250\346\210\226\347\201\255\344\272\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\221\350\241\250\346\210\226\347\201\255\344\272\241.md" index 7039f18343..f2759355f8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\221\350\241\250\346\210\226\347\201\255\344\272\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\221\350\241\250\346\210\226\347\201\255\344\272\241.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\240\345\212\240\346\234\237\345\210\212.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\240\345\212\240\346\234\237\345\210\212.md" index 4d8b9b4628..4df72e8a6f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\240\345\212\240\346\234\237\345\210\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\240\345\212\240\346\234\237\345\210\212.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\244\345\276\267\345\223\210\347\211\271\345\256\232\345\276\213.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\244\345\276\267\345\223\210\347\211\271\345\256\232\345\276\213.md" index c07dfec777..8e01196250 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\244\345\276\267\345\223\210\347\211\271\345\256\232\345\276\213.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\244\345\276\267\345\223\210\347\211\271\345\256\232\345\276\213.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\344\277\241\345\272\246\351\235\251\345\221\275.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\344\277\241\345\272\246\351\235\251\345\221\275.md" index be3d5e1807..ed10bd9d0d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\344\277\241\345\272\246\351\235\251\345\221\275.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\344\277\241\345\272\246\351\235\251\345\221\275.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\200\247.md" index 77b75e8ae1..c179ade9e8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\200\247.md" @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\346\216\250\345\271\277\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\346\216\250\345\271\277\346\200\247.md" index 2b832abc52..1a3c9cd01e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\346\216\250\345\271\277\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\346\216\250\345\271\277\346\200\247.md" @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\350\256\277\351\227\256\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\350\256\277\351\227\256\346\200\247.md" index e3fdb56272..4ef972475c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\350\256\277\351\227\256\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\350\256\277\351\227\256\346\200\247.md" @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" index cc96c8cc8d..487264e256 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" @@ -9,11 +9,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247\345\215\261\346\234\272_\345\217\210\347\247\260\345\217\257\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\200\247\346\210\226\345\244\215\347\216\260\345\215\261\346\234\272_.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247\345\215\261\346\234\272_\345\217\210\347\247\260\345\217\257\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\200\247\346\210\226\345\244\215\347\216\260\345\215\261\346\234\272_.md" index afd382cb70..4995aef426 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247\345\215\261\346\234\272_\345\217\210\347\247\260\345\217\257\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\200\247\346\210\226\345\244\215\347\216\260\345\215\261\346\234\272_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247\345\215\261\346\234\272_\345\217\210\347\247\260\345\217\257\345\244\215\347\216\260\346\200\247\346\210\226\345\244\215\347\216\260\345\215\261\346\234\272_.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" index 60a84170d8..ad70f1eca1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ "definition": "可重复性网络是一个由开放研究工作组组成的联盟，通常由同行学者领导。这些工作组采用“轮辐模型”在特定国家内运作，其中网络将当地跨学科研究人员、研究小组和机构与中央指导小组连接起来，同时中央小组还与外部研究生态系统的利益相关方建立联系。可重复性网络的目标旨在倡导学界提高对研究可重复性问题的意识、推广培训活动，并在基层、机构以及整个研究生态系统层面推广实践规范。截至2021年3月，类似的网络已经在英国、德国、瑞士、斯洛伐克和澳大利亚等国家存在。", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\200\247\345\200\241\350\256\256.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\200\247\345\200\241\350\256\256.md" index 6e2f124178..a08262eae4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\200\247\345\200\241\350\256\256.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\200\247\345\200\241\350\256\256.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\214\350\276\210\347\244\276\345\214\272.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\214\350\276\210\347\244\276\345\214\272.md" index a3d7cf9f8b..75cb4d7d41 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\214\350\276\210\347\244\276\345\214\272.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\214\350\276\210\347\244\276\345\214\272.md" @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\216\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\216\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" index d1e89b9b3c..eae15c797f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\216\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\220\216\351\252\214\345\210\206\345\270\203.md" @@ -11,8 +11,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\233\242\344\275\223\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\233\242\344\275\223\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" index 8a5b7aa9e4..4d277a61fc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\233\242\344\275\223\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\233\242\344\275\223\351\241\271\347\233\256.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\215\347\216\260\345\270\202\345\234\272.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\215\347\216\260\345\270\202\345\234\272.md" index 9d7836d306..ffa023c9a8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\215\347\216\260\345\270\202\345\234\272.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\215\347\216\260\345\270\202\345\234\272.md" @@ -10,10 +10,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", - "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://replicationmarkets.org/" + "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", + "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "[www.replicationmarkets.com](http://www.replicationmarkets.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\226\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\226\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" index a430d01674..718b2e8ca8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\226\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\226\351\203\250\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\344\275\234\350\200\205\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\344\275\234\350\200\205\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" index 457c47a0dd..1527709a70 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\344\275\234\350\200\205\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\344\275\234\350\200\205\345\217\202\344\270\216.md" @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\345\210\206\346\236\220\350\200\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\345\210\206\346\236\220\350\200\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" index 640342fe76..c07bccbd85 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\345\210\206\346\236\220\350\200\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\345\210\206\346\236\220\350\200\205\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\345\256\236\351\252\214\345\256\244\345\215\217\344\275\234.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\345\256\236\351\252\214\345\256\244\345\215\217\344\275\234.md" index 379a0c9a61..8ac0c0d62b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\345\256\236\351\252\214\345\256\244\345\215\217\344\275\234.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\345\256\236\351\252\214\345\256\244\345\215\217\344\275\234.md" @@ -12,12 +12,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\346\240\267\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\346\240\267\346\200\247.md" index e2961f8f9e..fc98bff826 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\346\240\267\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\346\240\267\346\200\247.md" @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\351\207\215\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\351\207\215\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" index 1b3791b92a..c464695574 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\351\207\215\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\351\207\215\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\351\207\215\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\351\207\215\346\200\247.md" index 59f3b26c43..274659b212 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\351\207\215\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\232\351\207\215\346\200\247.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\247\345\236\213\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\274\217\345\234\250\347\272\277\350\256\272\346\226\207.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\247\345\236\213\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\274\217\345\234\250\347\272\277\350\256\272\346\226\207.md" index 40908d433a..fe28ae2aa6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\247\345\236\213\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\274\217\345\234\250\347\272\277\350\256\272\346\226\207.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\247\345\236\213\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\274\217\345\234\250\347\272\277\350\256\272\346\226\207.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\247\345\236\213\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\274\217\345\234\250\347\272\277\350\257\276\347\250\213.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\247\345\236\213\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\274\217\345\234\250\347\272\277\350\257\276\347\250\213.md" index 5e29d9a8cd..616baea2fd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\247\345\236\213\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\274\217\345\234\250\347\272\277\350\257\276\347\250\213.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\244\247\345\236\213\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\274\217\345\234\250\347\272\277\350\257\276\347\250\213.md" @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\245\263\346\200\247\344\270\273\344\271\211\345\277\203\347\220\206\345\255\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\245\263\346\200\247\344\270\273\344\271\211\345\277\203\347\220\206\345\255\246.md" index 40ef5d10b0..f029dd3400 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\245\263\346\200\247\344\270\273\344\271\211\345\277\203\347\220\206\345\255\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\245\263\346\200\247\344\270\273\344\271\211\345\277\203\347\220\206\345\255\246.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\247\223\345\220\215\346\255\247\344\271\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\247\223\345\220\215\346\255\247\344\271\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" index c0ca5eff18..121f26e208 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\247\223\345\220\215\346\255\247\344\271\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\247\223\345\220\215\346\255\247\344\271\211\351\227\256\351\242\230.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223.md" index 5bf04ffe4b..c6c266d8cc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223.md" @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\255\246\346\234\257\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\255\246\346\234\257\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" index 08be8747bd..efe773b629 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\255\246\346\234\257\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\255\246\346\234\257\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\232\346\200\247\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\232\346\200\247\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" index d2942bc9f0..7abf561921 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\232\346\200\247\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\232\346\200\247\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\232\351\207\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\232\351\207\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" index b18363c378..7e8381c85c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\232\351\207\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\232\351\207\217\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\242\350\247\202\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\242\350\247\202\346\200\247.md" index bf53c4c27a..dabad81d3a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\242\350\247\202\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\256\242\350\247\202\346\200\247.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\257\271\346\212\227\346\200\247_\345\220\210\344\275\234\346\200\247_\350\257\204\350\256\272.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\257\271\346\212\227\346\200\247_\345\220\210\344\275\234\346\200\247_\350\257\204\350\256\272.md" index 95320cf227..7fd4a1ef6f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\257\271\346\212\227\346\200\247_\345\220\210\344\275\234\346\200\247_\350\257\204\350\256\272.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\257\271\346\212\227\346\200\247_\345\220\210\344\275\234\346\200\247_\350\257\204\350\256\272.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\257\271\346\212\227\346\200\247\345\220\210\344\275\234.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\257\271\346\212\227\346\200\247\345\220\210\344\275\234.md" index 3ee55bb2dc..648fd17681 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\257\271\346\212\227\346\200\247\345\220\210\344\275\234.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\257\271\346\212\227\346\200\247\345\220\210\344\275\234.md" @@ -11,11 +11,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\260\275\350\264\243\347\232\204\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\270\216\345\210\233\346\226\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\260\275\350\264\243\347\232\204\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\270\216\345\210\233\346\226\260.md" index 27e330d3dc..70f2c8594d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\260\275\350\264\243\347\232\204\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\270\216\345\210\233\346\226\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\260\275\350\264\243\347\232\204\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\270\216\345\210\233\346\226\260.md" @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276_\345\217\257\351\235\240_\351\200\217\346\230\216\347\232\204\347\224\237\346\200\201\344\270\216\350\277\233\345\214\226\347\224\237\347\211\251\345\255\246\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276_\345\217\257\351\235\240_\351\200\217\346\230\216\347\232\204\347\224\237\346\200\201\344\270\216\350\277\233\345\214\226\347\224\237\347\211\251\345\255\246\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" index 0136fe47be..4e5d54542e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276_\345\217\257\351\235\240_\351\200\217\346\230\216\347\232\204\347\224\237\346\200\201\344\270\216\350\277\233\345\214\226\347\224\237\347\211\251\345\255\246\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276_\345\217\257\351\235\240_\351\200\217\346\230\216\347\232\204\347\224\237\346\200\201\344\270\216\350\277\233\345\214\226\347\224\237\347\211\251\345\255\246\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" @@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\344\273\243\347\240\201.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\344\273\243\347\240\201.md" index 22eff348f9..5e5b9e386e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\344\273\243\347\240\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\344\273\243\347\240\201.md" @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\270\216\346\225\231\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\270\216\346\225\231\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" index 15ae1e77d1..9218fd0e75 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\270\216\346\225\231\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\270\216\346\225\231\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" index c043ae788f..76fbca6f31 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\220\214\350\241\214\350\257\204\345\256\241.md" @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257.md" index 953407b74f..82424876aa 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\272\223.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\272\223.md" index 5fb0410528..c39d9c7f20 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\272\223.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\272\223.md" @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\231\350\202\262\350\265\204\346\272\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\231\350\202\262\350\265\204\346\272\220.md" index 1390e498cc..3aa3153a02 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\231\350\202\262\350\265\204\346\272\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\231\350\202\262\350\265\204\346\272\220.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Material" ], "references": [ - "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education" + "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\231\350\202\262\350\265\204\346\272\220\345\234\250\347\272\277\345\272\223.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\231\350\202\262\350\265\204\346\272\220\345\234\250\347\272\277\345\272\223.md" index f3398299c8..0bb465d158 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\231\350\202\262\350\265\204\346\272\220\345\234\250\347\272\277\345\272\223.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\231\350\202\262\350\265\204\346\272\220\345\234\250\347\272\277\345\272\223.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" index e582a08d9d..2900f8c1ec 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\235\220\346\226\231.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\235\220\346\226\231.md" index c87e113bbd..4a81bf0dd8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\235\220\346\226\231.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\235\220\346\226\231.md" @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\274\202\347\231\275.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\274\202\347\231\275.md" index 300481c1e4..f816d8f686 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\274\202\347\231\275.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\346\274\202\347\231\275.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\200\205\345\222\214\350\264\241\347\214\256\350\200\205id.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\200\205\345\222\214\350\264\241\347\214\256\350\200\205id.md" index 25494ea621..9bbccda7a0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\200\205\345\222\214\350\264\241\347\214\256\350\200\205id.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\200\205\345\222\214\350\264\241\347\214\256\350\200\205id.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" index 5491dcc2e8..631732306d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\344\270\255\345\277\203.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\344\270\255\345\277\203.md" index ea0122cd78..e30a5b88f3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\344\270\255\345\277\203.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\344\270\255\345\277\203.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" index f450f825f9..533f9e8f2e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\241\206\346\236\266.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\347\232\204\345\221\275\345\220\215\345\256\236\344\275\223\346\226\207\346\234\254\345\214\277\345\220\215\345\214\226\345\267\245\345\205\267.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\347\232\204\345\221\275\345\220\215\345\256\236\344\275\223\346\226\207\346\234\254\345\214\277\345\220\215\345\214\226\345\267\245\345\205\267.md" index 5a10895ce3..04a0d52d39 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\347\232\204\345\221\275\345\220\215\345\256\236\344\275\223\346\226\207\346\234\254\345\214\277\345\220\215\345\214\226\345\267\245\345\205\267.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246\347\232\204\345\221\275\345\220\215\345\256\236\344\275\223\346\226\207\346\234\254\345\214\277\345\220\215\345\214\226\345\267\245\345\205\267.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" index d3d51af1bc..dce2473f76 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\350\256\270\345\217\257.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\350\256\270\345\217\257.md" index 01e9f98553..60edf1f4cf 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\350\256\270\345\217\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\224\276\350\256\270\345\217\257.md" @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\272\220\350\275\257\344\273\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\272\220\350\275\257\344\273\266.md" index 9dd41f2c24..6bcadb74e8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\272\220\350\275\257\344\273\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\200\346\272\220\350\275\257\344\273\266.md" @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\225\347\224\250\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\225\347\224\250\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" index b19df05553..a9e8d52037 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\225\347\224\250\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\225\347\224\250\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\225\347\224\250\345\244\232\346\240\267\346\200\247\345\243\260\346\230\216.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\225\347\224\250\345\244\232\346\240\267\346\200\247\345\243\260\346\230\216.md" index 9c4ac37c03..e8a24d9d8c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\225\347\224\250\345\244\232\346\240\267\346\200\247\345\243\260\346\230\216.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\274\225\347\224\250\345\244\232\346\240\267\346\200\247\345\243\260\346\230\216.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\275\222\347\272\263.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\275\222\347\272\263.md" index d3f23edf14..2c97bab4ad 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\275\222\347\272\263.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\275\222\347\272\263.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\276\275\347\253\240_\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246_.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\276\275\347\253\240_\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246_.md" index c905012da4..ea7fec84df 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\276\275\347\253\240_\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\276\275\347\253\240_\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\247\221\345\255\246_.md" @@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\277\203\347\220\206\346\265\213\351\207\217\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\277\203\347\220\206\346\265\213\351\207\217\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" index 3eac5493d7..6ded36a1fc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\277\203\347\220\206\346\265\213\351\207\217\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\277\203\347\220\206\346\265\213\351\207\217\345\205\203\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\277\203\347\220\206\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\224\271\350\277\233\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\277\203\347\220\206\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\224\271\350\277\233\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" index eda3c7860d..50e7aa5377 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\345\277\203\347\220\206\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\224\271\350\277\233\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\345\277\203\347\220\206\347\247\221\345\255\246\346\224\271\350\277\233\345\255\246\344\274\232.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\204\217\350\257\206\345\275\242\346\200\201\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\204\217\350\257\206\345\275\242\346\200\201\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" index 55f3bafb69..b170feb8a3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\204\217\350\257\206\345\275\242\346\200\201\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\204\217\350\257\206\345\275\242\346\200\201\345\201\217\350\247\201.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\205\242\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\205\242\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" index 328077bc4c..0453d3b455 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\205\242\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\205\242\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\212\242\345\217\221.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\212\242\345\217\221.md" index a1774891bf..c9dadba3fd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\212\242\345\217\221.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\212\242\345\217\221.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\212\245\345\221\212\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\212\245\345\221\212\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" index cc99987c73..73d3f8d47c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\212\245\345\221\212\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\212\245\345\221\212\346\214\207\345\215\227.md" @@ -10,9 +10,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\213\254\345\217\267\345\274\217\350\256\277\350\260\210.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\213\254\345\217\267\345\274\217\350\256\277\350\260\210.md" index 1b88c14c7a..5c1de7795b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\213\254\345\217\267\345\274\217\350\256\277\350\260\210.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\213\254\345\217\267\345\274\217\350\256\277\350\260\210.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\216\240\345\244\272\346\200\247\345\207\272\347\211\210.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\216\240\345\244\272\346\200\247\345\207\272\347\211\210.md" index d36795c20f..37165a2027 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\216\240\345\244\272\346\200\247\345\207\272\347\211\210.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\216\240\345\244\272\346\200\247\345\207\272\347\211\210.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\216\242\347\264\242\346\200\247\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\216\242\347\264\242\346\200\247\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" index 40133d1c5d..5148562721 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\216\242\347\264\242\346\200\247\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\216\242\347\264\242\346\200\247\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\221\230\350\246\201\345\201\217\345\200\232.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\221\230\350\246\201\345\201\217\345\200\232.md" index 7b8972e9b5..c1a34dc302 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\221\230\350\246\201\345\201\217\345\200\232.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\221\230\350\246\201\345\201\217\345\200\232.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" index 531525d08b..97524e9958 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" @@ -20,8 +20,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\210\346\240\207\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\210\346\240\207\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" index cb8f21f9cf..8a5bfb15a2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\210\346\240\207\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\210\346\240\207\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\217\346\204\237\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\217\346\204\237\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" index 192b7cf4e5..f9c80b5273 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\217\346\204\237\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\217\346\204\237\347\240\224\347\251\266.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\345\255\227\345\257\271\350\261\241\345\224\257\344\270\200\346\240\207\350\257\206\347\254\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\345\255\227\345\257\271\350\261\241\345\224\257\344\270\200\346\240\207\350\257\206\347\254\246.md" index 5f9131475a..240ebccc38 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\345\255\227\345\257\271\350\261\241\345\224\257\344\270\200\346\240\207\350\257\206\347\254\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\345\255\227\345\257\271\350\261\241\345\224\257\344\270\200\346\240\207\350\257\206\347\254\246.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\205\261\344\272\253.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\205\261\344\272\253.md" index b472c30e6c..41418a5ba7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\205\261\344\272\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\205\261\344\272\253.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\210\206\346\236\220\344\270\216\345\205\261\344\272\253\346\234\200\344\275\263\345\256\236\350\267\265\345\247\224\345\221\230\344\274\232.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\210\206\346\236\220\344\270\216\345\205\261\344\272\253\346\234\200\344\275\263\345\256\236\350\267\265\345\247\224\345\221\230\344\274\232.md" index 36e7ef3dff..57f0889383 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\210\206\346\236\220\344\270\216\345\205\261\344\272\253\346\234\200\344\275\263\345\256\236\350\267\265\345\247\224\345\221\230\344\274\232.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\210\206\346\236\220\344\270\216\345\205\261\344\272\253\346\234\200\344\275\263\345\256\236\350\267\265\345\247\224\345\221\230\344\274\232.md" @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "人类脑成像组织（Organization for Human Brain Mapping，简称OHBM）的神经影像学社区制定了一份关于神经影像数据采集、分析、报告以及数据与分析代码共享的最佳实践指南。该指南包含八个在撰写或提交论文时应该包含的关键要素，旨在提升报告方法和神经影像结果的透明度和可重复性。", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\217\257\350\247\206\345\214\226.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\217\257\350\247\206\345\214\226.md" index f89392e3f1..48744158f7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\217\257\350\247\206\345\214\226.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\217\257\350\247\206\345\214\226.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\256\241\347\220\206\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\256\241\347\220\206\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" index a28e91b889..0258cca0e5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\256\241\347\220\206\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\256\241\347\220\206\350\256\241\345\210\222.md" @@ -11,8 +11,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\350\216\267\345\217\226\344\270\216\347\240\224\347\251\266\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\350\216\267\345\217\226\344\270\216\347\240\224\347\251\266\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" index e2a1edd955..21746fc2ae 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\350\216\267\345\217\226\344\270\216\347\240\224\347\251\266\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\225\260\346\215\256\350\216\267\345\217\226\344\270\216\347\240\224\347\251\266\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\226\207\345\214\226\347\250\216\350\264\237.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\226\207\345\214\226\347\250\216\350\264\237.md" index 18296a4fb6..d68c978af8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\226\207\345\214\226\347\250\216\350\264\237.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\226\207\345\214\226\347\250\216\350\264\237.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\226\207\347\214\256\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\226\207\347\214\256\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" index 6d28fed691..10847fe61f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\226\207\347\214\256\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\226\207\347\214\256\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\227\251\346\234\237\350\201\214\344\270\232\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\272\272\345\221\230.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\227\251\346\234\237\350\201\214\344\270\232\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\272\272\345\221\230.md" index 19fd650ce8..3b0a123518 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\227\251\346\234\237\350\201\214\344\270\232\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\272\272\345\221\230.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\227\251\346\234\237\350\201\214\344\270\232\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\272\272\345\221\230.md" @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\231\256\351\201\215\346\200\247\351\231\220\345\210\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\231\256\351\201\215\346\200\247\351\231\220\345\210\266.md" index 16fd217989..03882087ce 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\231\256\351\201\215\346\200\247\351\231\220\345\210\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\231\256\351\201\215\346\200\247\351\231\220\345\210\266.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\233\277\344\273\243\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\233\277\344\273\243\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" index 0bfa504edd..933e2eb9e1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\233\277\344\273\243\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\233\277\344\273\243\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\234\237\345\210\212\345\275\261\345\223\215\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\234\237\345\210\212\345\275\261\345\223\215\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" index c183807a5c..455e66067c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\234\237\345\210\212\345\275\261\345\223\215\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\234\237\345\210\212\345\275\261\345\223\215\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\234\254\344\275\223\350\256\272_\344\272\272\345\267\245\346\231\272\350\203\275_.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\234\254\344\275\223\350\256\272_\344\272\272\345\267\245\346\231\272\350\203\275_.md" index 610f70ae8c..b2a478d9fa 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\234\254\344\275\223\350\256\272_\344\272\272\345\267\245\346\231\272\350\203\275_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\234\254\344\275\223\350\256\272_\344\272\272\345\267\245\346\231\272\350\203\275_.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\236\204\345\277\265\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\236\204\345\277\265\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" index 7122850e03..73c2919c42 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\236\204\345\277\265\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\236\204\345\277\265\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\246\202\345\277\265\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\246\202\345\277\265\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" index 2e493ef8e1..bdc6871e4c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\246\202\345\277\265\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\246\202\345\277\265\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\255\247\350\267\257\350\212\261\345\233\255.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\255\247\350\267\257\350\212\261\345\233\255.md" index d71d9f883c..c0b5db464b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\255\247\350\267\257\350\212\261\345\233\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\255\247\350\267\257\350\212\261\345\233\255.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\261\207\347\274\226.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\261\207\347\274\226.md" index 6190f68a68..e61f2bef6b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\261\207\347\274\226.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\261\207\347\274\226.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" index 64c6602c92..d375474099 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\212\245\345\221\212.md" @@ -11,10 +11,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\277\200\345\212\261\346\234\272\345\210\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\277\200\345\212\261\346\234\272\345\210\266.md" index 7f7cd263ce..d852de5f8f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\346\277\200\345\212\261\346\234\272\345\210\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\346\277\200\345\212\261\346\234\272\345\210\266.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\211\210\346\234\254\346\216\247\345\210\266.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\211\210\346\234\254\346\216\247\345\210\266.md" index aa00e96f70..1890d062c7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\211\210\346\234\254\346\216\247\345\210\266.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\211\210\346\234\254\346\216\247\345\210\266.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\211\210\351\235\242\350\264\271.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\211\210\351\235\242\350\264\271.md" index 5234d7700f..4e7e4d72ab 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\211\210\351\235\242\350\264\271.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\211\210\351\235\242\350\264\271.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272.md" index 840718fa9b..166e94e2d5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272\345\273\272\346\236\204.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272\345\273\272\346\236\204.md" index 6b1cd5d481..f32f682cc1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272\345\273\272\346\236\204.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272\345\273\272\346\236\204.md" @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" index 3041583ff9..fe8afe5458 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\220\206\350\256\272\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\233\264\346\216\245\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\233\264\346\216\245\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" index b8c5e7249c..c042a928ef 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\233\264\346\216\245\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\233\264\346\216\245\345\244\215\347\216\260.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\205\261\344\272\253\350\256\270\345\217\257\345\215\217\350\256\256.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\205\261\344\272\253\350\256\270\345\217\257\345\215\217\350\256\256.md" index 8d1dd9f3d5..80f21e3293 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\205\261\344\272\253\350\256\270\345\217\257\345\215\217\350\256\256.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\205\261\344\272\253\350\256\270\345\217\257\345\215\217\350\256\256.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\237\245\350\257\206\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\237\245\350\257\206\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" index 6a1a1c68c2..89fb766f0e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\237\245\350\257\206\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\237\245\350\257\206\350\216\267\345\217\226.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\272\272\345\221\230\350\207\252\347\224\261\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\272\272\345\221\230\350\207\252\347\224\261\345\272\246.md" index f1e517758a..3f57c86b1f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\272\272\345\221\230\350\207\252\347\224\261\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\344\272\272\345\221\230\350\207\252\347\224\261\345\272\246.md" @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\345\267\245\344\275\234\346\265\201\347\250\213.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\345\267\245\344\275\234\346\265\201\347\250\213.md" index 51550dbb03..176e10ba36 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\345\267\245\344\275\234\346\265\201\347\250\213.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\345\267\245\344\275\234\346\265\201\347\250\213.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\345\276\252\347\216\257.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\345\276\252\347\216\257.md" index 77e7166875..3194f02164 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\345\276\252\347\216\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\345\276\252\347\216\257.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223\346\263\250\345\206\214\347\263\273\347\273\237.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223\346\263\250\345\206\214\347\263\273\347\273\237.md" index a7e7e91777..a769c132d7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223\346\263\250\345\206\214\347\263\273\347\273\237.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\225\260\346\215\256\345\255\230\345\202\250\345\272\223\346\263\250\345\206\214\347\263\273\347\273\237.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\256\241\347\220\206.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\256\241\347\220\206.md" index b26e487159..45e312434b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\256\241\347\220\206.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\256\241\347\220\206.md" @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\226\271\346\241\210.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\226\271\346\241\210.md" index f3c1fcbc0d..ba16c7e758 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\226\271\346\241\210.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\346\226\271\346\241\210.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" index b1affa8ae2..2a399979c3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" @@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\264\241\347\214\256\346\214\207\346\240\207_p_.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\264\241\347\214\256\346\214\207\346\240\207_p_.md" index ca185bc73d..48faaff945 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\264\241\347\214\256\346\214\207\346\240\207_p_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\264\241\347\214\256\346\214\207\346\240\207_p_.md" @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\241\256\350\256\244\345\201\217\350\257\257.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\241\256\350\256\244\345\201\217\350\257\257.md" index 7b2dfe51ba..9c26cd994d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\241\256\350\256\244\345\201\217\350\257\257.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\241\256\350\256\244\345\201\217\350\257\257.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\350\236\215\345\220\210.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\350\236\215\345\220\210.md" index 55a9e473a9..f90070129b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\350\236\215\345\220\210.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\350\236\215\345\220\210.md" @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" index 927ad56036..1b06ba8b7b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" @@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\246\201\350\277\220\346\234\237.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\246\201\350\277\220\346\234\237.md" index fe888f7e09..2143f9246e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\246\201\350\277\220\346\234\237.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\246\201\350\277\220\346\234\237.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\250\263\345\201\245\346\200\247_\345\210\206\346\236\220_.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\250\263\345\201\245\346\200\247_\345\210\206\346\236\220_.md" index 7ca3e5700e..0d5b6bff65 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\250\263\345\201\245\346\200\247_\345\210\206\346\236\220_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\250\263\345\201\245\346\200\247_\345\210\206\346\236\220_.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\253\213\345\234\272\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\253\213\345\234\272\346\200\247.md" index 720fb3ac19..46d907e600 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\253\213\345\234\272\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\253\213\345\234\272\346\200\247.md" @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\253\213\345\234\272\346\200\247\345\233\276\350\260\261.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\253\213\345\234\272\346\200\247\345\233\276\350\260\261.md" index 21ba34588b..de3044f650 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\253\213\345\234\272\346\200\247\345\233\276\350\260\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\253\213\345\234\272\346\200\247\345\233\276\350\260\261.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\255\211\346\225\210\346\200\247\346\243\200\351\252\214.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\255\211\346\225\210\346\200\247\346\243\200\351\252\214.md" index de572e0b4c..85fb6f3996 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\255\211\346\225\210\346\200\247\346\243\200\351\252\214.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\255\211\346\225\210\346\200\247\346\243\200\351\252\214.md" @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\263\273\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\263\273\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" index 8e11c37ae8..8f5bd0ab63 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\263\273\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\263\273\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\264\257\347\247\257\346\200\247\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\264\257\347\247\257\346\200\247\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" index 6d985f4509..862cef8deb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\264\257\347\247\257\346\200\247\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\264\257\347\247\257\346\200\247\347\247\221\345\255\246.md" @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\272\242\351\230\237.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\272\242\351\230\237.md" index b80fd15874..85b5b9673d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\272\242\351\230\237.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\272\242\351\230\237.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\217\346\265\216\345\222\214\347\244\276\344\274\232\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\217\346\265\216\345\222\214\347\244\276\344\274\232\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" index 19eac6221c..0b78df8250 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\217\346\265\216\345\222\214\347\244\276\344\274\232\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\217\346\265\216\345\222\214\347\244\276\344\274\232\345\275\261\345\223\215.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" index 502d9fb9a4..b3c843de06 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\346\211\271\350\257\204.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\346\211\271\350\257\204.md" index ac1ae95f7a..28981a3ff2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\346\211\271\350\257\204.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\346\211\271\350\257\204.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" index 16a2b36298..380d657bb1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\223\346\236\234\345\267\262\347\237\245\345\220\216\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" index d6f3aaed46..494804ae35 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\345\212\237\346\225\210.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\345\212\237\346\225\210.md" index 23e3fa4e9c..445e88b334 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\345\212\237\346\225\210.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\345\212\237\346\225\210.md" @@ -16,13 +16,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" index f755023138..f35be4f91a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\230\276\350\221\227\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\230\276\350\221\227\346\200\247.md" index b3776e44ad..d426ceaa7d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\230\276\350\221\227\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\230\276\350\221\227\346\200\247.md" @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" index 67a34bdfa1..2b780c7fd5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\237\350\256\241\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" + "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\274\345\220\210\347\237\245\350\257\206\346\241\243\346\241\210\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\274\345\220\210\347\237\245\350\257\206\346\241\243\346\241\210\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" index 2870dfdfd8..0184a78407 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\274\345\220\210\347\237\245\350\257\206\346\241\243\346\241\210\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\273\274\345\220\210\347\237\245\350\257\206\346\241\243\346\241\210\347\275\221\347\273\234.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\274\226\347\240\201\350\241\250.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\274\226\347\240\201\350\241\250.md" index 4fadd2bdb2..2a61885ba5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\274\226\347\240\201\350\241\250.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\274\226\347\240\201\350\241\250.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\275\221\347\273\234\350\256\241\351\207\217\345\255\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\275\221\347\273\234\350\256\241\351\207\217\345\255\246.md" index 23873c98e3..dea31e9480 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\275\221\347\273\234\350\256\241\351\207\217\345\255\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\275\221\347\273\234\350\256\241\351\207\217\345\255\246.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\275\262\345\220\215\351\241\272\345\272\217\345\206\263\345\256\232\350\264\241\347\214\256\346\263\225.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\275\262\345\220\215\351\241\272\345\272\217\345\206\263\345\256\232\350\264\241\347\214\256\346\263\225.md" index 38a5f59020..ca5db55ec4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\275\262\345\220\215\351\241\272\345\272\217\345\206\263\345\256\232\350\264\241\347\214\256\346\263\225.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\275\262\345\220\215\351\241\272\345\272\217\345\206\263\345\256\232\350\264\241\347\214\256\346\263\225.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\201\224\345\220\210\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\201\224\345\220\210\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" index 7f41ce5e21..570205bd25 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\201\224\345\220\210\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\201\224\345\220\210\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" @@ -8,8 +8,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\201\224\351\224\201.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\201\224\351\224\201.md" index 6d48b060a3..190acfeb62 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\201\224\351\224\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\201\224\351\224\201.md" @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\204\221\346\210\220\345\203\217\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\273\223\346\236\204.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\204\221\346\210\220\345\203\217\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\273\223\346\236\204.md" index 456e3da6fc..94dfcd7af1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\204\221\346\210\220\345\203\217\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\273\223\346\236\204.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\204\221\346\210\220\345\203\217\346\225\260\346\215\256\347\273\223\346\236\204.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\207\252\344\270\213\350\200\214\344\270\212\347\232\204\346\226\271\346\263\225_\347\224\250\344\272\216\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257_.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\207\252\344\270\213\350\200\214\344\270\212\347\232\204\346\226\271\346\263\225_\347\224\250\344\272\216\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257_.md" index 11c826da16..5041c8250d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\207\252\344\270\213\350\200\214\344\270\212\347\232\204\346\226\271\346\263\225_\347\224\250\344\272\216\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\207\252\344\270\213\350\200\214\344\270\212\347\232\204\346\226\271\346\263\225_\347\224\250\344\272\216\345\274\200\346\224\276\345\255\246\346\234\257_.md" @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\241\250\351\235\242\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\241\250\351\235\242\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" index c759d1a185..6b0374aab6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\241\250\351\235\242\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\241\250\351\235\242\346\225\210\345\272\246.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\247\204\350\214\203\346\233\262\347\272\277\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\247\204\350\214\203\346\233\262\347\272\277\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" index 9d9ef535e8..e9fb198e57 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\247\204\350\214\203\346\233\262\347\272\277\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\247\204\350\214\203\346\233\262\347\272\277\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\247\243\346\224\276\346\210\221\344\273\254\347\232\204\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\271\263\345\217\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\247\243\346\224\276\346\210\221\344\273\254\347\232\204\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\271\263\345\217\260.md" index ebaa5b7564..96865d89b7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\247\243\346\224\276\346\210\221\344\273\254\347\232\204\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\271\263\345\217\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\247\243\346\224\276\346\210\221\344\273\254\347\232\204\347\237\245\350\257\206\345\271\263\345\217\260.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\241\347\256\227\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\241\347\256\227\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" index a43312e735..3041ce20bf 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\241\347\256\227\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\241\347\256\227\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\241\347\256\227\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\241\347\256\227\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" index 300cf5ebb2..c18291797b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\241\347\256\227\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\241\347\256\227\346\250\241\345\236\213.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", - "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\244\350\257\206\344\270\215\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\244\350\257\206\344\270\215\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" index 09e5be357d..0ec8188862 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\244\350\257\206\344\270\215\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\244\350\257\206\344\270\215\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\244\350\257\206\350\256\272.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\244\350\257\206\350\256\272.md" index df29017546..bc01d0cbca 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\244\350\257\206\350\256\272.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\244\350\257\206\350\256\272.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\272\346\226\207\345\267\245\345\216\202.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\272\346\226\207\345\267\245\345\216\202.md" index 8b31a97fc8..b8802270e1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\272\346\226\207\345\267\245\345\216\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\256\272\346\226\207\345\267\245\345\216\202.md" @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\257\201\346\215\256\347\273\274\345\220\210.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\257\201\346\215\256\347\273\274\345\220\210.md" index 01f5f10008..3e7bb5920d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\257\201\346\215\256\347\273\274\345\220\210.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\257\201\346\215\256\347\273\274\345\220\210.md" @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\257\255\344\271\211\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\257\255\344\271\211\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" index 5c27f11968..4bd61eca47 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\257\255\344\271\211\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\257\255\344\271\211\350\256\241\351\207\217.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\345\217\202\346\225\260\344\274\260\350\256\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\345\217\202\346\225\260\344\274\260\350\256\241.md" index 875ebfb057..2fd4fdb75f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\345\217\202\346\225\260\344\274\260\350\256\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\345\217\202\346\225\260\344\274\260\350\256\241.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" index ab10f731ea..a81944908b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\345\233\240\345\255\220.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\346\216\250\346\226\255.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\346\216\250\346\226\255.md" index ea588ca001..e5fab6cb64 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\346\216\250\346\226\255.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\235\345\217\266\346\226\257\346\216\250\346\226\255.md" @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\241\347\214\256.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\241\347\214\256.md" index 701961c422..f96eb1f77d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\241\347\214\256.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\241\347\214\256.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\241\347\214\256\350\200\205\350\247\222\350\211\262\345\210\206\347\261\273\346\263\225.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\241\347\214\256\350\200\205\350\247\222\350\211\262\345\210\206\347\261\273\346\263\225.md" index fad352847e..e9f3930152 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\241\347\214\256\350\200\205\350\247\222\350\211\262\345\210\206\347\261\273\346\263\225.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\264\241\347\214\256\350\200\205\350\247\222\350\211\262\345\210\206\347\261\273\346\263\225.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\265\240\344\272\210_\346\210\226\345\256\242\345\272\247_\347\275\262\345\220\215\346\235\203.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\265\240\344\272\210_\346\210\226\345\256\242\345\272\247_\347\275\262\345\220\215\346\235\203.md" index 6912f83dfb..d3051eb112 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\265\240\344\272\210_\346\210\226\345\256\242\345\272\247_\347\275\262\345\220\215\346\235\203.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\265\240\344\272\210_\346\210\226\345\256\242\345\272\247_\347\275\262\345\220\215\346\235\203.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\276\205\345\212\251\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\276\205\345\212\251\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" index aadb9fa70f..e82110bfe6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\276\205\345\212\251\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\276\205\345\212\251\345\201\207\350\256\276.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\276\205\345\212\251\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\276\205\345\212\251\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" index a6a35da9e4..1625da3b3d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\350\276\205\345\212\251\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\350\276\205\345\212\251\346\225\260\346\215\256.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\211\346\213\251\346\200\247\347\273\210\346\255\242.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\211\346\213\251\346\200\247\347\273\210\346\255\242.md" index 904121aa9b..f713ce1f89 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\211\346\213\251\346\200\247\347\273\210\346\255\242.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\211\346\213\251\346\200\247\347\273\210\346\255\242.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" index b820d971bd..26e0707248 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246.md" @@ -11,9 +11,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246\346\270\205\345\215\225.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246\346\270\205\345\215\225.md" index 20d7943e66..c6197e776f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246\346\270\205\345\215\225.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\217\346\230\216\345\272\246\346\270\205\345\215\225.md" @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\232\347\224\250\345\255\246\344\271\240\350\256\276\350\256\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\232\347\224\250\345\255\246\344\271\240\350\256\276\350\256\241.md" index 305c63fb54..73361ee6b4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\232\347\224\250\345\255\246\344\271\240\350\256\276\350\256\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\232\347\224\250\345\255\246\344\271\240\350\256\276\350\256\241.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\232\347\224\250\346\225\260\346\215\256\344\277\235\346\212\244\346\235\241\344\276\213.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\232\347\224\250\346\225\260\346\215\256\344\277\235\346\212\244\346\235\241\344\276\213.md" index 454daba16f..fdf73f256d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\232\347\224\250\346\225\260\346\215\256\344\277\235\346\212\244\346\235\241\344\276\213.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\200\232\347\224\250\346\225\260\346\215\256\344\277\235\346\212\244\346\235\241\344\276\213.md" @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" index 605b987c4c..e441697a4b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\207\215\345\244\215\346\200\247.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\222\273_\347\263\273\347\273\237_\347\251\272\345\255\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\222\273_\347\263\273\347\273\237_\347\251\272\345\255\220.md" index f96c5de480..01794f4f6b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\222\273_\347\263\273\347\273\237_\347\251\272\345\255\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\222\273_\347\263\273\347\273\237_\347\251\272\345\255\220.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\224\231\350\257\257\346\243\200\346\265\213.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\224\231\350\257\257\346\243\200\346\265\213.md" index 56fac0d79c..c7a56953c0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\224\231\350\257\257\346\243\200\346\265\213.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\224\231\350\257\257\346\243\200\346\265\213.md" @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\232\217\346\234\272\344\270\215\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\232\217\346\234\272\344\270\215\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" index 618cc80a9f..4182b17a0d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\232\217\346\234\272\344\270\215\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\232\217\346\234\272\344\270\215\347\241\256\345\256\232\346\200\247.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\232\220\346\200\247\350\260\203\350\212\202\345\217\230\351\207\217.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\232\220\346\200\247\350\260\203\350\212\202\345\217\230\351\207\217.md" index 88889028df..704811238d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\232\220\346\200\247\350\260\203\350\212\202\345\217\230\351\207\217.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\232\220\346\200\247\350\260\203\350\212\202\345\217\230\351\207\217.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\233\266\345\201\207\350\256\276\346\230\276\350\221\227\346\200\247\346\243\200\351\252\214\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\233\266\345\201\207\350\256\276\346\230\276\350\221\227\346\200\247\346\243\200\351\252\214\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" index ac65a3377d..610eb89e5e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\233\266\345\201\207\350\256\276\346\230\276\350\221\227\346\200\247\346\243\200\351\252\214\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\233\266\345\201\207\350\256\276\346\230\276\350\221\227\346\200\247\346\243\200\351\252\214\346\226\271\346\263\225.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\235\236\345\271\262\351\242\204_\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215_\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\232\204\347\263\273\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\235\236\345\271\262\351\242\204_\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215_\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\232\204\347\263\273\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" index 75735c65c5..9297a3bd6c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\235\236\345\271\262\351\242\204_\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215_\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\232\204\347\263\273\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\235\236\345\271\262\351\242\204_\345\217\257\351\207\215\345\244\215_\345\274\200\346\224\276\347\232\204\347\263\273\347\273\237\347\273\274\350\277\260.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\345\215\260\346\234\254.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\345\215\260\346\234\254.md" index a3352fb0d0..edadb350bd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\345\215\260\346\234\254.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\345\215\260\346\234\254.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" index d19b011143..259f705781 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214.md" @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\211\277\350\257\272.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\211\277\350\257\272.md" index 2ada537d73..d77baf7bbb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\211\277\350\257\272.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\242\204\346\263\250\345\206\214\346\211\277\350\257\272.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\246\226\346\234\253\344\275\234\350\200\205\345\274\272\350\260\203\350\247\204\350\214\203.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\246\226\346\234\253\344\275\234\350\200\205\345\274\272\350\260\203\350\247\204\350\214\203.md" index 62cd18ad42..aeb8c926e4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\246\226\346\234\253\344\275\234\350\200\205\345\274\272\350\260\203\350\247\204\350\214\203.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\246\226\346\234\253\344\275\234\350\200\205\345\274\272\350\260\203\350\247\204\350\214\203.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\251\254\345\244\252\346\225\210\345\272\224_\347\247\221\345\255\246\351\242\206\345\237\237_.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\251\254\345\244\252\346\225\210\345\272\224_\347\247\221\345\255\246\351\242\206\345\237\237_.md" index 23f48c5014..b7077f2996 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\251\254\345\244\252\346\225\210\345\272\224_\347\247\221\345\255\246\351\242\206\345\237\237_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\251\254\345\244\252\346\225\210\345\272\224_\347\247\221\345\255\246\351\242\206\345\237\237_.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\252\214\350\257\201\346\200\247\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\252\214\350\257\201\346\200\247\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" index 77fdbd5175..74d75137e6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\252\214\350\257\201\346\200\247\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\252\214\350\257\201\346\200\247\345\210\206\346\236\220.md" @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\273\221\345\256\242\351\251\254\346\213\211\346\235\276.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\273\221\345\256\242\351\251\254\346\213\211\346\235\276.md" index 9f390e0309..f3373c057e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\351\273\221\345\256\242\351\251\254\346\213\211\346\235\276.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\351\273\221\345\256\242\351\251\254\346\213\211\346\235\276.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/abstract_bias.md b/content/glossary/english/abstract_bias.md index c7e26af859..369c793c2e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/abstract_bias.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/abstract_bias.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/academic_impact.md b/content/glossary/english/academic_impact.md index 06bb08cdd7..47ac2182e0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/academic_impact.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/academic_impact.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/accessibility.md b/content/glossary/english/accessibility.md index ce522966b3..b24ffce916 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/accessibility.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/accessibility.md @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/ad_hominem_bias.md b/content/glossary/english/ad_hominem_bias.md index 6446c6f033..6f12245c08 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/ad_hominem_bias.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/ad_hominem_bias.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/adversarial_collaboration.md b/content/glossary/english/adversarial_collaboration.md index 69546d188f..83eb6bffd3 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/adversarial_collaboration.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/adversarial_collaboration.md @@ -11,11 +11,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/adversarial_collaborative_commentary.md b/content/glossary/english/adversarial_collaborative_commentary.md index 5f130b4307..17271d5849 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/adversarial_collaborative_commentary.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/adversarial_collaborative_commentary.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/affiliation_bias.md b/content/glossary/english/affiliation_bias.md index aae444b950..315a95c01f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/affiliation_bias.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/affiliation_bias.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/aleatoric_uncertainty.md b/content/glossary/english/aleatoric_uncertainty.md index 3266dcc1dc..2fb243d54a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/aleatoric_uncertainty.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/aleatoric_uncertainty.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/altmetrics.md b/content/glossary/english/altmetrics.md index 67ddde6750..e154bf03f5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/altmetrics.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/altmetrics.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/amnesia.md b/content/glossary/english/amnesia.md index de7e61f93e..3cfc565d51 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/amnesia.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/amnesia.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/analytic_flexibility.md b/content/glossary/english/analytic_flexibility.md index 46feda16c2..008a1e2cf6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/analytic_flexibility.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/analytic_flexibility.md @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/anonymity.md b/content/glossary/english/anonymity.md index 5978696eb7..d049f3571a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/anonymity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/anonymity.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/arrive_guidelines.md b/content/glossary/english/arrive_guidelines.md index 9ca3841a16..8721f535ef 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/arrive_guidelines.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/arrive_guidelines.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/article_processing_charge_apc_.md b/content/glossary/english/article_processing_charge_apc_.md index 7d7229dd6e..7297fb9d19 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/article_processing_charge_apc_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/article_processing_charge_apc_.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/authorship.md b/content/glossary/english/authorship.md index 91c05ced5e..8313ad2362 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/authorship.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/authorship.md @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/auxiliary_hypothesis.md b/content/glossary/english/auxiliary_hypothesis.md index 3d7e1136ba..5d479aae2d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/auxiliary_hypothesis.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/auxiliary_hypothesis.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/badges_open_science_.md b/content/glossary/english/badges_open_science_.md index 2c4a9d503a..f96da472cf 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/badges_open_science_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/badges_open_science_.md @@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/bayes_factor.md b/content/glossary/english/bayes_factor.md index 56a8d2db93..80896f71d5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/bayes_factor.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/bayes_factor.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/bayesian_inference.md b/content/glossary/english/bayesian_inference.md index bac065dade..92950663e6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/bayesian_inference.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/bayesian_inference.md @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/bayesian_parameter_estimation.md b/content/glossary/english/bayesian_parameter_estimation.md index d6ebc6ccc4..89abd353e2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/bayesian_parameter_estimation.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/bayesian_parameter_estimation.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/bids_data_structure.md b/content/glossary/english/bids_data_structure.md index 733128cfa6..4e16cc5ea4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/bids_data_structure.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/bids_data_structure.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/bizarre.md b/content/glossary/english/bizarre.md index 1d970f4c7b..1cb73697fc 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/bizarre.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/bizarre.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/bottom_up_approach_to_open_scholarship_.md b/content/glossary/english/bottom_up_approach_to_open_scholarship_.md index af460e5534..0aa3e03a77 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/bottom_up_approach_to_open_scholarship_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/bottom_up_approach_to_open_scholarship_.md @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/bracketing_interviews.md b/content/glossary/english/bracketing_interviews.md index 20d669133f..5fc6f58aec 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/bracketing_interviews.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/bracketing_interviews.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/bropenscience.md b/content/glossary/english/bropenscience.md index 7a9a9bc8b6..2a60cb6a9e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/bropenscience.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/bropenscience.md @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/carking.md b/content/glossary/english/carking.md index e8b76afa38..41d36dc698 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/carking.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/carking.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/center_for_open_science_cos_.md b/content/glossary/english/center_for_open_science_cos_.md index 4a3ff30694..bbd09f56e0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/center_for_open_science_cos_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/center_for_open_science_cos_.md @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/citation_bias.md b/content/glossary/english/citation_bias.md index 362efdd133..c6b5a684b4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/citation_bias.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/citation_bias.md @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/citation_diversity_statement.md b/content/glossary/english/citation_diversity_statement.md index edb071c4c9..965cbc07fc 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/citation_diversity_statement.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/citation_diversity_statement.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/citizen_science.md b/content/glossary/english/citizen_science.md index 38dbe23745..5d742229c6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/citizen_science.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/citizen_science.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/ckan.md b/content/glossary/english/ckan.md index 87f482f623..382bc560c0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/ckan.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/ckan.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/co_production.md b/content/glossary/english/co_production.md index fb3e32afa3..93a7181311 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/co_production.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/co_production.md @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/coar_community_framework_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md b/content/glossary/english/coar_community_framework_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md index 80d302412e..2d17358243 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/coar_community_framework_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/coar_community_framework_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/code_review.md b/content/glossary/english/code_review.md index e124829639..214ee6bd06 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/code_review.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/code_review.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/codebook.md b/content/glossary/english/codebook.md index 864eccf32a..0ce6f8f8f8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/codebook.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/codebook.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/collaborative_replication_and_education_project_crep_.md b/content/glossary/english/collaborative_replication_and_education_project_crep_.md index 06ac672ecd..785689b7c9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/collaborative_replication_and_education_project_crep_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/collaborative_replication_and_education_project_crep_.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/committee_on_best_practices_in_data_analysis_and_sharing_cobidas_.md b/content/glossary/english/committee_on_best_practices_in_data_analysis_and_sharing_cobidas_.md index 93b0c26431..e5530091a4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/committee_on_best_practices_in_data_analysis_and_sharing_cobidas_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/committee_on_best_practices_in_data_analysis_and_sharing_cobidas_.md @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "The Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) neuroimaging community has developed a guideline for best practices in neuroimaging data acquisition, analysis, reporting, and sharing of both data and analysis code. It contains eight elements that should be included when writing up or submitting a manuscript, and when sharing neuroimages, in order to optimize transparency and reproducibility.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/communality.md b/content/glossary/english/communality.md index b5ff0e1210..c630ce79d6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/communality.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/communality.md @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/community_projects.md b/content/glossary/english/community_projects.md index aaf4878122..067e5e5b8c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/community_projects.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/community_projects.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/compendium.md b/content/glossary/english/compendium.md index 359505d715..544642e1d5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/compendium.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/compendium.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/computational_reproducibility.md b/content/glossary/english/computational_reproducibility.md index f42938b2ae..ba6713f9fa 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/computational_reproducibility.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/computational_reproducibility.md @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/conceptual_replication.md b/content/glossary/english/conceptual_replication.md index 8c0b939396..f61652fa62 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/conceptual_replication.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/conceptual_replication.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/confirmation_bias.md b/content/glossary/english/confirmation_bias.md index 242a08cf4c..c05d1311bf 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/confirmation_bias.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/confirmation_bias.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/confirmatory_analyses.md b/content/glossary/english/confirmatory_analyses.md index 5bde177c86..ac352fb764 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/confirmatory_analyses.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/confirmatory_analyses.md @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/conflict_of_interest.md b/content/glossary/english/conflict_of_interest.md index 490ff07a6a..4214b1f569 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/conflict_of_interest.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/conflict_of_interest.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/consortium_authorship.md b/content/glossary/english/consortium_authorship.md index 8f2ae91241..3f87673e56 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/consortium_authorship.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/consortium_authorship.md @@ -8,8 +8,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/constraints_on_generality_cog_.md b/content/glossary/english/constraints_on_generality_cog_.md index ee409b213c..ca425f3eda 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/constraints_on_generality_cog_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/constraints_on_generality_cog_.md @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/construct_validity.md b/content/glossary/english/construct_validity.md index bed3af1db0..f5a5a5080c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/construct_validity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/construct_validity.md @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/content_validity.md b/content/glossary/english/content_validity.md index 3912c8c142..ab3ec2e901 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/content_validity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/content_validity.md @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/corrigendum.md b/content/glossary/english/corrigendum.md index 8a58c91346..7633faf08e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/corrigendum.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/corrigendum.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/creative_commons_cc_license.md b/content/glossary/english/creative_commons_cc_license.md index d9b4ec0384..784e4138ac 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/creative_commons_cc_license.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/creative_commons_cc_license.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/creative_destruction_approach_to_replication.md b/content/glossary/english/creative_destruction_approach_to_replication.md index f63578cb29..ffb8b861fb 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/creative_destruction_approach_to_replication.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/creative_destruction_approach_to_replication.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/credibility_revolution.md b/content/glossary/english/credibility_revolution.md index 1a27ffd2e8..63fc885748 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/credibility_revolution.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/credibility_revolution.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/credit.md b/content/glossary/english/credit.md index c51ca70a09..6170c947d5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/credit.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/credit.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/criterion_validity.md b/content/glossary/english/criterion_validity.md index 6ebc125425..fc967625eb 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/criterion_validity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/criterion_validity.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/crowdsourced_research.md b/content/glossary/english/crowdsourced_research.md index 756827676d..1b615809cb 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/crowdsourced_research.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/crowdsourced_research.md @@ -10,19 +10,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/cultural_taxation.md b/content/glossary/english/cultural_taxation.md index 5641359659..f8129db8a1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/cultural_taxation.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/cultural_taxation.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/cumulative_science.md b/content/glossary/english/cumulative_science.md index d63cf75c51..b8bd9241fe 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/cumulative_science.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/cumulative_science.md @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/data_access_and_research_transparency_da_rt_.md b/content/glossary/english/data_access_and_research_transparency_da_rt_.md index 6bcede7534..5da0ae044a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/data_access_and_research_transparency_da_rt_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/data_access_and_research_transparency_da_rt_.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/data_management_plan_dmp_.md b/content/glossary/english/data_management_plan_dmp_.md index a8856c4d76..dc67fdcd9c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/data_management_plan_dmp_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/data_management_plan_dmp_.md @@ -11,8 +11,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/data_sharing.md b/content/glossary/english/data_sharing.md index 1f29eae5ab..9caba36d45 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/data_sharing.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/data_sharing.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/data_visualisation.md b/content/glossary/english/data_visualisation.md index bd00c2a313..374982e351 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/data_visualisation.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/data_visualisation.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/decolonisation.md b/content/glossary/english/decolonisation.md index 4729f256a0..df48fa13f0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/decolonisation.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/decolonisation.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/demarcation_criterion.md b/content/glossary/english/demarcation_criterion.md index 53d77f871d..dda54d9272 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/demarcation_criterion.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/demarcation_criterion.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/direct_replication.md b/content/glossary/english/direct_replication.md index 28365807d1..1369fe30bd 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/direct_replication.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/direct_replication.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/diversity.md b/content/glossary/english/diversity.md index 18c177320d..757fb8736c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/diversity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/diversity.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/doi_digital_object_identifier_.md b/content/glossary/english/doi_digital_object_identifier_.md index a2a0883cc3..3e98acbfc9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/doi_digital_object_identifier_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/doi_digital_object_identifier_.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/dora.md b/content/glossary/english/dora.md index efbeedb258..f24462408e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/dora.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/dora.md @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/double_blind_peer_review.md b/content/glossary/english/double_blind_peer_review.md index 8500d03364..ec0e124e95 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/double_blind_peer_review.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/double_blind_peer_review.md @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/double_consciousness.md b/content/glossary/english/double_consciousness.md index 29f404f9a9..d271a8f4c5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/double_consciousness.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/double_consciousness.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/early_career_researchers_ecrs_.md b/content/glossary/english/early_career_researchers_ecrs_.md index f521db8cc8..ffd98bc637 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/early_career_researchers_ecrs_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/early_career_researchers_ecrs_.md @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/economic_and_societal_impact.md b/content/glossary/english/economic_and_societal_impact.md index 3e37cf7ff1..60a6362c8a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/economic_and_societal_impact.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/economic_and_societal_impact.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/embargo_period.md b/content/glossary/english/embargo_period.md index 213c9d9e2e..8c9da64b29 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/embargo_period.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/embargo_period.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/epistemic_uncertainty.md b/content/glossary/english/epistemic_uncertainty.md index d46788690c..63071df9e5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/epistemic_uncertainty.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/epistemic_uncertainty.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/epistemology.md b/content/glossary/english/epistemology.md index 9a01d539cb..7cd79637f1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/epistemology.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/epistemology.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/equity.md b/content/glossary/english/equity.md index 8c2642ef37..1f50f2ed7b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/equity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/equity.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/equivalence_testing.md b/content/glossary/english/equivalence_testing.md index 2b15c3d529..0eddd78ceb 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/equivalence_testing.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/equivalence_testing.md @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/error_detection.md b/content/glossary/english/error_detection.md index da8bca922c..c8ad9660ad 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/error_detection.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/error_detection.md @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/evidence_synthesis.md b/content/glossary/english/evidence_synthesis.md index 0d4cb28394..0e521ed231 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/evidence_synthesis.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/evidence_synthesis.md @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/exploratory_data_analysis.md b/content/glossary/english/exploratory_data_analysis.md index e81130c494..5112d7b34d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/exploratory_data_analysis.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/exploratory_data_analysis.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/external_validity.md b/content/glossary/english/external_validity.md index 4f43aa209a..c0d7d1dfd5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/external_validity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/external_validity.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/face_validity.md b/content/glossary/english/face_validity.md index d2fba6deb0..b54e2fd35f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/face_validity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/face_validity.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/fair_principles.md b/content/glossary/english/fair_principles.md index 464084c9da..df24b5a170 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/fair_principles.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/fair_principles.md @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/feminist_psychology.md b/content/glossary/english/feminist_psychology.md index 66c1b088cc..69705c3982 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/feminist_psychology.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/feminist_psychology.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/first_last_author_emphasis_norm_flae_.md b/content/glossary/english/first_last_author_emphasis_norm_flae_.md index 0f62e5e268..cfa59f00b2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/first_last_author_emphasis_norm_flae_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/first_last_author_emphasis_norm_flae_.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/forrt.md b/content/glossary/english/forrt.md index 8956f6133e..c57a862138 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/forrt.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/forrt.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/free_our_knowledge_platform.md b/content/glossary/english/free_our_knowledge_platform.md index bea5d8eb20..33a8a464e8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/free_our_knowledge_platform.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/free_our_knowledge_platform.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/gaming_the_system_.md b/content/glossary/english/gaming_the_system_.md index e07c62802b..16771fae89 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/gaming_the_system_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/gaming_the_system_.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/garden_of_forking_paths.md b/content/glossary/english/garden_of_forking_paths.md index a7c0bbd921..f8ee494b9a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/garden_of_forking_paths.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/garden_of_forking_paths.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/general_data_protection_regulation_gdpr_.md b/content/glossary/english/general_data_protection_regulation_gdpr_.md index f1bc107339..75df00fc83 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/general_data_protection_regulation_gdpr_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/general_data_protection_regulation_gdpr_.md @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/generalizability.md b/content/glossary/english/generalizability.md index 6d10b36dea..fcfe948ef8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/generalizability.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/generalizability.md @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/gift_or_guest_authorship.md b/content/glossary/english/gift_or_guest_authorship.md index 7b9c0a8441..5c3fbfe880 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/gift_or_guest_authorship.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/gift_or_guest_authorship.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/git.md b/content/glossary/english/git.md index d16fae9cc8..0fa2d8e6ca 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/git.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/git.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", - "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", - "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" + "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", + "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", + "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/goodhart_s_law.md b/content/glossary/english/goodhart_s_law.md index 433bf97017..dc99a2c0d7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/goodhart_s_law.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/goodhart_s_law.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/gpower.md b/content/glossary/english/gpower.md index 68b94a99e8..2b5af979b6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/gpower.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/gpower.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/h_index.md b/content/glossary/english/h_index.md index aa6146aad0..48bf4b4d27 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/h_index.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/h_index.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/hackathon.md b/content/glossary/english/hackathon.md index f6656993e9..6af48a4598 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/hackathon.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/hackathon.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/harking.md b/content/glossary/english/harking.md index cfc470dcef..3865a8fb4d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/harking.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/harking.md @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/hidden_moderators.md b/content/glossary/english/hidden_moderators.md index 11a4a3b989..fe8d581c4e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/hidden_moderators.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/hidden_moderators.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/hypothesis.md b/content/glossary/english/hypothesis.md index 022aed8924..81a8373e6b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/hypothesis.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/hypothesis.md @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/i10_index.md b/content/glossary/english/i10_index.md index ba39161344..e622e9f48d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/i10_index.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/i10_index.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/ideological_bias.md b/content/glossary/english/ideological_bias.md index a925c9f9c0..efe4b4f6a0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/ideological_bias.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/ideological_bias.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/incentive_structure.md b/content/glossary/english/incentive_structure.md index 2401a12c5e..94665eddd0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/incentive_structure.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/incentive_structure.md @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/inclusion.md b/content/glossary/english/inclusion.md index 4a8b85e1e4..0f6bb39ebd 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/inclusion.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/inclusion.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/induction.md b/content/glossary/english/induction.md index d21e423f15..2379ff6639 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/induction.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/induction.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/interaction_fallacy.md b/content/glossary/english/interaction_fallacy.md index 295d6eb2c3..c9bfe68245 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/interaction_fallacy.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/interaction_fallacy.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/interlocking.md b/content/glossary/english/interlocking.md index feaa4dfb46..cdb64b283f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/interlocking.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/interlocking.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/internal_validity.md b/content/glossary/english/internal_validity.md index 49918daa83..0c778f3544 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/internal_validity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/internal_validity.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/intersectionality.md b/content/glossary/english/intersectionality.md index 7093cea60b..7cdb838222 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/intersectionality.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/intersectionality.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/jabref.md b/content/glossary/english/jabref.md index aaa8298450..9f61e42634 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/jabref.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/jabref.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/jamovi.md b/content/glossary/english/jamovi.md index e55dad801a..41782a6623 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/jamovi.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/jamovi.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/jasp.md b/content/glossary/english/jasp.md index 135719ddbd..2ac8085706 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/jasp.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/jasp.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/journal_impact_factor_.md b/content/glossary/english/journal_impact_factor_.md index 7189ded759..20c4f3fc19 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/journal_impact_factor_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/journal_impact_factor_.md @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/json_file.md b/content/glossary/english/json_file.md index 3f23288981..b96601f2b4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/json_file.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/json_file.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/knowledge_acquisition.md b/content/glossary/english/knowledge_acquisition.md index 67d2dd3fb2..ab26db68c7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/knowledge_acquisition.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/knowledge_acquisition.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/likelihood_function.md b/content/glossary/english/likelihood_function.md index 2ea0b1b3cf..d3d55bcd0d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/likelihood_function.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/likelihood_function.md @@ -11,11 +11,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/likelihood_principle.md b/content/glossary/english/likelihood_principle.md index dc8a63b179..75f10f817c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/likelihood_principle.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/likelihood_principle.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/literature_review.md b/content/glossary/english/literature_review.md index 6421e129c5..f87dcabc66 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/literature_review.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/literature_review.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/manel.md b/content/glossary/english/manel.md index 1c354f417a..a611ff724a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/manel.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/manel.md @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/many_authors.md b/content/glossary/english/many_authors.md index 84f06b8939..2e4bc5dd6e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/many_authors.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/many_authors.md @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/many_labs.md b/content/glossary/english/many_labs.md index b548b5c5ca..3e7f48cb6e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/many_labs.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/many_labs.md @@ -12,12 +12,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md b/content/glossary/english/massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md index 6584745545..f7ca0f9c8b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/massively_open_online_papers_moops_.md b/content/glossary/english/massively_open_online_papers_moops_.md index 52ee6b4ff3..f85c60e53e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/massively_open_online_papers_moops_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/massively_open_online_papers_moops_.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/matthew_effect_in_science_.md b/content/glossary/english/matthew_effect_in_science_.md index 02ec882949..4c1aa93cea 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/matthew_effect_in_science_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/matthew_effect_in_science_.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/meta_analysis.md b/content/glossary/english/meta_analysis.md index 23a03ec2ed..cb084bb3f2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/meta_analysis.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/meta_analysis.md @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ "Systematic Review" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev; Siu Kit Yeung" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/meta_science_or_meta_research.md b/content/glossary/english/meta_science_or_meta_research.md index 9e3e5b4909..870fc1dc2a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/meta_science_or_meta_research.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/meta_science_or_meta_research.md @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "The scientific study of science itself with the aim to describe, explain, evaluate and/or improve scientific practices. Meta-science typically investigates scientific methods, analyses, the reporting and evaluation of data, the reproducibility and replicability of research results, and research incentives.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/metadata.md b/content/glossary/english/metadata.md index 018cd70117..d9e4e8fbf9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/metadata.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/metadata.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/model_computational_.md b/content/glossary/english/model_computational_.md index af42069c09..dd28cbf839 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/model_computational_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/model_computational_.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", - "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/model_philosophy_.md b/content/glossary/english/model_philosophy_.md index bd2decba90..ba69ff2291 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/model_philosophy_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/model_philosophy_.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/model_statistical_.md b/content/glossary/english/model_statistical_.md index 20373950af..cd5b885e0e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/model_statistical_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/model_statistical_.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" + "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/multi_analyst_studies.md b/content/glossary/english/multi_analyst_studies.md index 01098c327d..62b084c9d8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/multi_analyst_studies.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/multi_analyst_studies.md @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/multiplicity.md b/content/glossary/english/multiplicity.md index 37f88c2b82..aec933da0c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/multiplicity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/multiplicity.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/multiverse_analysis.md b/content/glossary/english/multiverse_analysis.md index f4a1ae4931..e664376406 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/multiverse_analysis.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/multiverse_analysis.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/name_ambiguity_problem.md b/content/glossary/english/name_ambiguity_problem.md index 342aac1f1d..3f6a311c14 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/name_ambiguity_problem.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/name_ambiguity_problem.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/named_entity_based_text_anonymization_for_open_science_netanos_.md b/content/glossary/english/named_entity_based_text_anonymization_for_open_science_netanos_.md index 2839d861c9..5bf41f2310 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/named_entity_based_text_anonymization_for_open_science_netanos_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/named_entity_based_text_anonymization_for_open_science_netanos_.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/non_intervention_reproducible_and_open_systematic_reviews_niro_sr_.md b/content/glossary/english/non_intervention_reproducible_and_open_systematic_reviews_niro_sr_.md index 1917a91702..f095d2e383 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/non_intervention_reproducible_and_open_systematic_reviews_niro_sr_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/non_intervention_reproducible_and_open_systematic_reviews_niro_sr_.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/null_hypothesis_significance_testing_nhst_.md b/content/glossary/english/null_hypothesis_significance_testing_nhst_.md index 434906fa6f..8e539f6d21 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/null_hypothesis_significance_testing_nhst_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/null_hypothesis_significance_testing_nhst_.md @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/objectivity.md b/content/glossary/english/objectivity.md index cec33a4c6d..55860f1977 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/objectivity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/objectivity.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/ontology_artificial_intelligence_.md b/content/glossary/english/ontology_artificial_intelligence_.md index 489ef98ae7..a2fcf08b85 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/ontology_artificial_intelligence_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/ontology_artificial_intelligence_.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_access.md b/content/glossary/english/open_access.md index 6392ee52ad..872290ff34 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_access.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_access.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_code.md b/content/glossary/english/open_code.md index c4d2db624e..e88843b737 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_code.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_code.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_data.md b/content/glossary/english/open_data.md index 3c2f9cb4fc..fd55759423 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_data.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_data.md @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oer_commons.md b/content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oer_commons.md index 9b0e67b965..0815409f54 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oer_commons.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oer_commons.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oers_.md b/content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oers_.md index 8537e3f980..f85e2c0b6f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oers_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_educational_resources_oers_.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Material" ], "references": [ - "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education" + "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_licenses.md b/content/glossary/english/open_licenses.md index 99f144a303..47001a8300 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_licenses.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_licenses.md @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_material.md b/content/glossary/english/open_material.md index 749539943a..87d0f89b8e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_material.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_material.md @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_peer_review.md b/content/glossary/english/open_peer_review.md index 9d5999b17b..bf71ed0bdf 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_peer_review.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_peer_review.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_scholarship.md b/content/glossary/english/open_scholarship.md index 774ade602a..989e3cf61d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_scholarship.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_scholarship.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md b/content/glossary/english/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md index ecc618757b..8dcde3b252 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_science.md b/content/glossary/english/open_science.md index 8723c69923..46b783ed14 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_science.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_science.md @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_science_framework.md b/content/glossary/english/open_science_framework.md index a5454d3cdb..5eade0813c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_science_framework.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_science_framework.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_source_software.md b/content/glossary/english/open_source_software.md index 02ce504681..dd6872e73e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_source_software.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_source_software.md @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/open_washing.md b/content/glossary/english/open_washing.md index 8c4449e483..a4299be81e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/open_washing.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/open_washing.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/openneuro.md b/content/glossary/english/openneuro.md index 96b95f7b7e..47a2c91b6b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/openneuro.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/openneuro.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/optional_stopping.md b/content/glossary/english/optional_stopping.md index 620244db8c..e148db7c12 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/optional_stopping.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/optional_stopping.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md b/content/glossary/english/orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md index 915a1aa3b0..0c5f50dee1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/overlay_journal.md b/content/glossary/english/overlay_journal.md index 2fd96c6c52..3d55d05d03 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/overlay_journal.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/overlay_journal.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/p_curve.md b/content/glossary/english/p_curve.md index 588f757b27..06f280cf30 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/p_curve.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/p_curve.md @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/p_hacking.md b/content/glossary/english/p_hacking.md index b27eae6133..99b3f965f8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/p_hacking.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/p_hacking.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/p_value.md b/content/glossary/english/p_value.md index 8c6c52d5ca..1b92ce69db 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/p_value.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/p_value.md @@ -8,9 +8,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/papermill.md b/content/glossary/english/papermill.md index e3172bdac4..f6272f4431 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/papermill.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/papermill.md @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/paradata.md b/content/glossary/english/paradata.md index 416f87cad1..6a5e6dd809 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/paradata.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/paradata.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/parking.md b/content/glossary/english/parking.md index ed2a231ddc..f85131cb05 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/parking.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/parking.md @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/participatory_research.md b/content/glossary/english/participatory_research.md index 0271905035..68edff7605 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/participatory_research.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/participatory_research.md @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/patient_and_public_involvement_ppi_.md b/content/glossary/english/patient_and_public_involvement_ppi_.md index 443a07e149..787a0d15c1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/patient_and_public_involvement_ppi_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/patient_and_public_involvement_ppi_.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/paywall.md b/content/glossary/english/paywall.md index 564fa2764f..3eb6988a7e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/paywall.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/paywall.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/pci_peer_community_in_.md b/content/glossary/english/pci_peer_community_in_.md index 236113a799..42edc0d26a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/pci_peer_community_in_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/pci_peer_community_in_.md @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/pci_registered_reports.md b/content/glossary/english/pci_registered_reports.md index 5ea2b3c59d..a4b4ea34ca 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/pci_registered_reports.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/pci_registered_reports.md @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/plan_s.md b/content/glossary/english/plan_s.md index 9e1502df1c..9afce09667 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/plan_s.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/plan_s.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/positionality.md b/content/glossary/english/positionality.md index bb3f71a97f..3bac3a13f6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/positionality.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/positionality.md @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/positionality_map.md b/content/glossary/english/positionality_map.md index 7124ff444f..39a61808b2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/positionality_map.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/positionality_map.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/post_hoc.md b/content/glossary/english/post_hoc.md index 0e11541383..f5afbe1093 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/post_hoc.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/post_hoc.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/posterior_distribution.md b/content/glossary/english/posterior_distribution.md index 16ffa04026..a954b807dc 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/posterior_distribution.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/posterior_distribution.md @@ -11,8 +11,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/predatory_publishing.md b/content/glossary/english/predatory_publishing.md index 069c8f8ca1..3368b8ade6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/predatory_publishing.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/predatory_publishing.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/prepare_guidelines.md b/content/glossary/english/prepare_guidelines.md index 1a4f355fb7..186dd259cd 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/prepare_guidelines.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/prepare_guidelines.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/preprint.md b/content/glossary/english/preprint.md index bdb9a8444d..8939e87c14 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/preprint.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/preprint.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/preregistration.md b/content/glossary/english/preregistration.md index 73e7648c16..9d13d9fcc8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/preregistration.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/preregistration.md @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/preregistration_pledge.md b/content/glossary/english/preregistration_pledge.md index f3c35d396e..3dab831aa1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/preregistration_pledge.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/preregistration_pledge.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/prior_distribution.md b/content/glossary/english/prior_distribution.md index 031570871a..e111ffa05d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/prior_distribution.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/prior_distribution.md @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/pro_peer_review_openness_initiative.md b/content/glossary/english/pro_peer_review_openness_initiative.md index 3b57f20da4..def4fced72 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/pro_peer_review_openness_initiative.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/pro_peer_review_openness_initiative.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/pseudonymisation.md b/content/glossary/english/pseudonymisation.md index 9c0b99a5d5..f8cf08d7a1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/pseudonymisation.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/pseudonymisation.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/pseudoreplication.md b/content/glossary/english/pseudoreplication.md index f3963dc241..9ac928f53c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/pseudoreplication.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/pseudoreplication.md @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/psychometric_meta_analysis.md b/content/glossary/english/psychometric_meta_analysis.md index 946652bc39..fbf45b0c70 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/psychometric_meta_analysis.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/psychometric_meta_analysis.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/public_trust_in_science.md b/content/glossary/english/public_trust_in_science.md index edb8201a1e..2f7e56c4b8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/public_trust_in_science.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/public_trust_in_science.md @@ -8,20 +8,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/publication_bias_file_drawer_problem_.md b/content/glossary/english/publication_bias_file_drawer_problem_.md index fbdf97d77d..9616070770 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/publication_bias_file_drawer_problem_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/publication_bias_file_drawer_problem_.md @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/publish_or_perish.md b/content/glossary/english/publish_or_perish.md index b78be0c6c2..2008c9ddc8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/publish_or_perish.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/publish_or_perish.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/pubpeer.md b/content/glossary/english/pubpeer.md index 199e7489ca..ffb6e36ac9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/pubpeer.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/pubpeer.md @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/python.md b/content/glossary/english/python.md index 002185284c..ea8f3e7284 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/python.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/python.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/qualitative_research.md b/content/glossary/english/qualitative_research.md index d7f64c57ae..1aa82894ae 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/qualitative_research.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/qualitative_research.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/quantitative_research.md b/content/glossary/english/quantitative_research.md index dad2ffc91d..3355fe8830 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/quantitative_research.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/quantitative_research.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/questionable_measurement_practices_qmp_.md b/content/glossary/english/questionable_measurement_practices_qmp_.md index c8b8b5d327..a1a5c693bf 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/questionable_measurement_practices_qmp_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/questionable_measurement_practices_qmp_.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/questionable_research_practices_or_questionable_reporting_practices_qrps_.md b/content/glossary/english/questionable_research_practices_or_questionable_reporting_practices_qrps_.md index f6620aa87c..5732061d4b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/questionable_research_practices_or_questionable_reporting_practices_qrps_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/questionable_research_practices_or_questionable_reporting_practices_qrps_.md @@ -21,12 +21,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/r.md b/content/glossary/english/r.md index ba9ba8279c..39ccfc2823 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/r.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/r.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/red_teams.md b/content/glossary/english/red_teams.md index ba10b78253..c0170cd33b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/red_teams.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/red_teams.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/reflexivity.md b/content/glossary/english/reflexivity.md index bb82150163..c6b8a0be67 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/reflexivity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/reflexivity.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/registered_report.md b/content/glossary/english/registered_report.md index 91307487ca..cd91085e86 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/registered_report.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/registered_report.md @@ -11,10 +11,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/registry_of_research_data_repositories.md b/content/glossary/english/registry_of_research_data_repositories.md index 1ee31ef8a5..b8d2880486 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/registry_of_research_data_repositories.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/registry_of_research_data_repositories.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/reliability.md b/content/glossary/english/reliability.md index 6fb44f8280..d2a00cd6d2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/reliability.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/reliability.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/repeatability.md b/content/glossary/english/repeatability.md index 1e57d8bf12..ad0b1bfb00 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/repeatability.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/repeatability.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/replicability.md b/content/glossary/english/replicability.md index 8235097784..ded9de1e47 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/replicability.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/replicability.md @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/replication_markets.md b/content/glossary/english/replication_markets.md index fb872e44f2..22e64a5fb7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/replication_markets.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/replication_markets.md @@ -10,10 +10,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", - "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://replicationmarkets.org/" + "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", + "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "[www.replicationmarkets.com](http://www.replicationmarkets.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/replicats_project.md b/content/glossary/english/replicats_project.md index caac9067e6..8722cfe0f6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/replicats_project.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/replicats_project.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science)." + "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", + "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/reporting_guideline.md b/content/glossary/english/reporting_guideline.md index 6d25307c4a..5783e55b0f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/reporting_guideline.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/reporting_guideline.md @@ -10,9 +10,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/repository.md b/content/glossary/english/repository.md index 3f34e0fee3..3776722af8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/repository.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/repository.md @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/reproducibilitea.md b/content/glossary/english/reproducibilitea.md index 668672f8e1..2e433499e5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/reproducibilitea.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/reproducibilitea.md @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/reproducibility.md b/content/glossary/english/reproducibility.md index 54a4a5f013..0ac23ccc6f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/reproducibility.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/reproducibility.md @@ -9,11 +9,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/reproducibility_crisis_aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_.md b/content/glossary/english/reproducibility_crisis_aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_.md index 52ea45106f..ca5348fb2f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/reproducibility_crisis_aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/reproducibility_crisis_aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/reproducibility_network.md b/content/glossary/english/reproducibility_network.md index 6851573b0a..c7e5c4e277 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/reproducibility_network.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/reproducibility_network.md @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ "definition": "A reproducibility network is a consortium of open research working groups, often peer-led. The groups operate on a wheel-and-spoke model across a particular country, in which the network connects local cross-disciplinary researchers, groups, and institutions with a central steering group, who also connect with external stakeholders in the research ecosystem. The goals of reproducibility networks include; advocating for greater awareness, promoting training activities, and disseminating best-practices at grassroots, institutional, and research ecosystem levels. Such networks exist in the UK, Germany, Switzerland, Slovakia, and Australia (as of March 2021).", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/research_contribution_metric__p_.md b/content/glossary/english/research_contribution_metric__p_.md index 09df6152b0..82d41f868f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/research_contribution_metric__p_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/research_contribution_metric__p_.md @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/research_cycle.md b/content/glossary/english/research_cycle.md index c6125691f0..209ee6312a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/research_cycle.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/research_cycle.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/research_data_management.md b/content/glossary/english/research_data_management.md index 3915fda896..7723733fb7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/research_data_management.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/research_data_management.md @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md b/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md index 6ab3b9e83b..60c16fc9ca 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md @@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/research_protocol.md b/content/glossary/english/research_protocol.md index 4a22b95310..ad5bb69ef6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/research_protocol.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/research_protocol.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/research_workflow.md b/content/glossary/english/research_workflow.md index b6cab9bc2d..031b442f9f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/research_workflow.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/research_workflow.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/researcher_degrees_of_freedom.md b/content/glossary/english/researcher_degrees_of_freedom.md index 518b2c5621..beb2260170 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/researcher_degrees_of_freedom.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/researcher_degrees_of_freedom.md @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/responsible_research_and_innovation.md b/content/glossary/english/responsible_research_and_innovation.md index 4a188f0254..cf47d533fe 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/responsible_research_and_innovation.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/responsible_research_and_innovation.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/reverse_p_hacking.md b/content/glossary/english/reverse_p_hacking.md index e4d783f549..a802473051 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/reverse_p_hacking.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/reverse_p_hacking.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/riot_science_club.md b/content/glossary/english/riot_science_club.md index 07b982895c..c670ffb1d4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/riot_science_club.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/riot_science_club.md @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/robustness_analyses_.md b/content/glossary/english/robustness_analyses_.md index c89711c1ad..5695a85c72 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/robustness_analyses_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/robustness_analyses_.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/salami_slicing.md b/content/glossary/english/salami_slicing.md index 5585964460..5ca870a948 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/salami_slicing.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/salami_slicing.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/scooping.md b/content/glossary/english/scooping.md index b24ee34798..010a969a75 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/scooping.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/scooping.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/semantometrics.md b/content/glossary/english/semantometrics.md index 9a9bed1f30..a089d7542e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/semantometrics.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/semantometrics.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/sensitive_research.md b/content/glossary/english/sensitive_research.md index 55fde1537e..502bc5e2ff 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/sensitive_research.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/sensitive_research.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/sequence_determines_credit_approach_sdc_.md b/content/glossary/english/sequence_determines_credit_approach_sdc_.md index d154d7eea6..5315bdae59 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/sequence_determines_credit_approach_sdc_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/sequence_determines_credit_approach_sdc_.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/sherpa_romeo.md b/content/glossary/english/sherpa_romeo.md index 9ce8720425..9b65b89bee 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/sherpa_romeo.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/sherpa_romeo.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/single_blind_peer_review.md b/content/glossary/english/single_blind_peer_review.md index 43014e4cc3..44e9797c1c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/single_blind_peer_review.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/single_blind_peer_review.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/slow_science.md b/content/glossary/english/slow_science.md index d59644316b..ff8aee7838 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/slow_science.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/slow_science.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/social_class.md b/content/glossary/english/social_class.md index 5400a6ad5b..6dfa8a0082 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/social_class.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/social_class.md @@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/social_integration.md b/content/glossary/english/social_integration.md index f3090240e7..8d6c44764f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/social_integration.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/social_integration.md @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/society_for_open_reliable_and_transparent_ecology_and_evolutionary_biology_sortee_.md b/content/glossary/english/society_for_open_reliable_and_transparent_ecology_and_evolutionary_biology_sortee_.md index 6523fefb5c..fba70c8ac3 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/society_for_open_reliable_and_transparent_ecology_and_evolutionary_biology_sortee_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/society_for_open_reliable_and_transparent_ecology_and_evolutionary_biology_sortee_.md @@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/society_for_the_improvement_of_psychological_science_sips_.md b/content/glossary/english/society_for_the_improvement_of_psychological_science_sips_.md index b307c19a7b..e8b00ea688 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/society_for_the_improvement_of_psychological_science_sips_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/society_for_the_improvement_of_psychological_science_sips_.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/specification_curve_analysis.md b/content/glossary/english/specification_curve_analysis.md index e63d4c3fcc..ea966b095b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/specification_curve_analysis.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/specification_curve_analysis.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/statistical_assumptions.md b/content/glossary/english/statistical_assumptions.md index f484736a3c..4cbe0f83df 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/statistical_assumptions.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/statistical_assumptions.md @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/statistical_power.md b/content/glossary/english/statistical_power.md index 0bae45fe35..0ad967888c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/statistical_power.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/statistical_power.md @@ -16,13 +16,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/statistical_significance.md b/content/glossary/english/statistical_significance.md index d5b34da004..d035da39df 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/statistical_significance.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/statistical_significance.md @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/statistical_validity.md b/content/glossary/english/statistical_validity.md index 68f3df0ac2..89f3262ab1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/statistical_validity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/statistical_validity.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/strange.md b/content/glossary/english/strange.md index d58366806d..50d3d03203 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/strange.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/strange.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/studyswap.md b/content/glossary/english/studyswap.md index 9d81f6fa98..d606cfebf1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/studyswap.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/studyswap.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/systematic_review.md b/content/glossary/english/systematic_review.md index f0243798f2..e64be9a525 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/systematic_review.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/systematic_review.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/tenzing.md b/content/glossary/english/tenzing.md index 8c9d8f67d2..0274199fe9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/tenzing.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/tenzing.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/the_troubling_trio.md b/content/glossary/english/the_troubling_trio.md index d22a6b0c03..2e3665d20c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/the_troubling_trio.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/the_troubling_trio.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/theory.md b/content/glossary/english/theory.md index 289465b3be..cf0efd6b5b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/theory.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/theory.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/theory_building.md b/content/glossary/english/theory_building.md index 04bcbaa545..29c7c5562a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/theory_building.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/theory_building.md @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/transparency.md b/content/glossary/english/transparency.md index 2b25626a55..61bec3dd0b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/transparency.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/transparency.md @@ -11,9 +11,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/transparency_checklist.md b/content/glossary/english/transparency_checklist.md index 5c1a1219e2..c53341cb36 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/transparency_checklist.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/transparency_checklist.md @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/triple_blind_peer_review.md b/content/glossary/english/triple_blind_peer_review.md index 75e5097833..39a460ceb2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/triple_blind_peer_review.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/triple_blind_peer_review.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/trust_principles.md b/content/glossary/english/trust_principles.md index 07ba40fa5d..c4e4add522 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/trust_principles.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/trust_principles.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/type_i_error.md b/content/glossary/english/type_i_error.md index 5244d38564..d2ccc14c50 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/type_i_error.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/type_i_error.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/type_ii_error.md b/content/glossary/english/type_ii_error.md index eae1580533..841be4366c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/type_ii_error.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/type_ii_error.md @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/type_m_error.md b/content/glossary/english/type_m_error.md index 3d4b1d49af..a730862c6f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/type_m_error.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/type_m_error.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/type_s_error.md b/content/glossary/english/type_s_error.md index c95f6dc6de..29e107e772 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/type_s_error.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/type_s_error.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/universal_design_for_learning_udl_.md b/content/glossary/english/universal_design_for_learning_udl_.md index b2d5675047..f8091c9c2b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/universal_design_for_learning_udl_.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/universal_design_for_learning_udl_.md @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/validity.md b/content/glossary/english/validity.md index 508503b726..4189f6dd1c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/validity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/validity.md @@ -20,8 +20,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/version_control.md b/content/glossary/english/version_control.md index 103f32a48c..870c9d8841 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/version_control.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/version_control.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/webometrics.md b/content/glossary/english/webometrics.md index 6d17f7c5b7..cce4f548a5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/webometrics.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/webometrics.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/z_curve.md b/content/glossary/english/z_curve.md index 1e1b37b0ae..c8f7e4911e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/z_curve.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/z_curve.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/zenodo.md b/content/glossary/english/zenodo.md index ca5886178e..47c0e0e592 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/zenodo.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/zenodo.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/a_priori_verteilung.md b/content/glossary/german/a_priori_verteilung.md index 544c00f0e8..8a3fab1d81 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/a_priori_verteilung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/a_priori_verteilung.md @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/abstract_verzerrung.md b/content/glossary/german/abstract_verzerrung.md index 91c54da724..5efc76bb18 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/abstract_verzerrung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/abstract_verzerrung.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/ad_hominem_verzerrung.md b/content/glossary/german/ad_hominem_verzerrung.md index 4bfa51f0d3..6548c8b17e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/ad_hominem_verzerrung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/ad_hominem_verzerrung.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/affiliations_verzerrung.md b/content/glossary/german/affiliations_verzerrung.md index 968cbf9a96..4b2f46724a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/affiliations_verzerrung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/affiliations_verzerrung.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_reproduzierbarkeitskrise_auch_replizierbarkeitskrise_oder_replikationskrise.md b/content/glossary/german/aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_reproduzierbarkeitskrise_auch_replizierbarkeitskrise_oder_replikationskrise.md index 58a8d674c7..13805fdcd9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_reproduzierbarkeitskrise_auch_replizierbarkeitskrise_oder_replikationskrise.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/aka_replicability_or_replication_crisis_reproduzierbarkeitskrise_auch_replizierbarkeitskrise_oder_replikationskrise.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/akademischer_einfluss.md b/content/glossary/german/akademischer_einfluss.md index d38ad260fd..1f830803c5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/akademischer_einfluss.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/akademischer_einfluss.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/aleatorische_unsicherheit.md b/content/glossary/german/aleatorische_unsicherheit.md index 4f48ae1b20..1831c43f85 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/aleatorische_unsicherheit.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/aleatorische_unsicherheit.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/altmetrics.md b/content/glossary/german/altmetrics.md index 7246a78b18..80fb85058c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/altmetrics.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/altmetrics.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/amnesia.md b/content/glossary/german/amnesia.md index a531efe7d8..cc3c06428e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/amnesia.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/amnesia.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/analyses_robustheit_sanalysen.md b/content/glossary/german/analyses_robustheit_sanalysen.md index 260a5636a3..75a1bb0e75 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/analyses_robustheit_sanalysen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/analyses_robustheit_sanalysen.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/analytische_flexibilit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/analytische_flexibilit\303\244t.md" index 28deb86859..dcbccd6efb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/analytische_flexibilit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/analytische_flexibilit\303\244t.md" @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/anonymit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/anonymit\303\244t.md" index d7673a72a0..6140a50ec2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/anonymit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/anonymit\303\244t.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/anreizsystem.md b/content/glossary/german/anreizsystem.md index 1897267ffc..96407c03a9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/anreizsystem.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/anreizsystem.md @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/arrive_leitlinien.md b/content/glossary/german/arrive_leitlinien.md index 42902b3eb3..33b9f46677 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/arrive_leitlinien.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/arrive_leitlinien.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/artificial_intelligence_ontologie_in_der_k\303\274nstlichen_intelligenz.md" "b/content/glossary/german/artificial_intelligence_ontologie_in_der_k\303\274nstlichen_intelligenz.md" index b04e614685..775df72daf 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/artificial_intelligence_ontologie_in_der_k\303\274nstlichen_intelligenz.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/artificial_intelligence_ontologie_in_der_k\303\274nstlichen_intelligenz.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/artikelverarbeitungsgeb\303\274hr.md" "b/content/glossary/german/artikelverarbeitungsgeb\303\274hr.md" index bb7c2da431..c20e744782 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/artikelverarbeitungsgeb\303\274hr.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/artikelverarbeitungsgeb\303\274hr.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/augenscheinvalidit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/augenscheinvalidit\303\244t.md" index afc7ab3506..47188cce6b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/augenscheinvalidit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/augenscheinvalidit\303\244t.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md b/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md index dbd6e2b2b1..6534f7bec6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/barrierefreiheit.md b/content/glossary/german/barrierefreiheit.md index 6263dd0b93..b9d788cba7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/barrierefreiheit.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/barrierefreiheit.md @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/bayes_faktor.md b/content/glossary/german/bayes_faktor.md index 99694d3ac6..d87c097831 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/bayes_faktor.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/bayes_faktor.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/bayes_sche_parameter_sch\303\244tzung.md" "b/content/glossary/german/bayes_sche_parameter_sch\303\244tzung.md" index 12bad250de..0fa558d0f5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/bayes_sche_parameter_sch\303\244tzung.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/bayes_sche_parameter_sch\303\244tzung.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/bayessche_inferenz.md b/content/glossary/german/bayessche_inferenz.md index 4c83378470..4f406ba342 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/bayessche_inferenz.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/bayessche_inferenz.md @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/beitrag.md b/content/glossary/german/beitrag.md index 76628d10a6..c94024a8d6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/beitrag.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/beitrag.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/berichtleitlinien.md b/content/glossary/german/berichtleitlinien.md index d1ed6e9cc9..1bbcbc77f2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/berichtleitlinien.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/berichtleitlinien.md @@ -10,9 +10,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/best\303\244tigungsverzerrung.md" "b/content/glossary/german/best\303\244tigungsverzerrung.md" index 3659a2c6fa..1edb66045a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/best\303\244tigungsverzerrung.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/best\303\244tigungsverzerrung.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/bezahlschranke.md b/content/glossary/german/bezahlschranke.md index 133ef936b9..edf9941eaf 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/bezahlschranke.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/bezahlschranke.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/bids_datenstruktur.md b/content/glossary/german/bids_datenstruktur.md index 2672e1a38f..bec9a05dfa 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/bids_datenstruktur.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/bids_datenstruktur.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/bizarre.md b/content/glossary/german/bizarre.md index 74ebe8860e..d3e40f20b8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/bizarre.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/bizarre.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/bropenscience.md b/content/glossary/german/bropenscience.md index e190b2149e..53a9ff2ce7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/bropenscience.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/bropenscience.md @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/b\303\274rger_innenwissenschaft.md" "b/content/glossary/german/b\303\274rger_innenwissenschaft.md" index 894784304d..9c0cd5b557 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/b\303\274rger_innenwissenschaft.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/b\303\274rger_innenwissenschaft.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/carking.md b/content/glossary/german/carking.md index dc0cd43136..368c937d84 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/carking.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/carking.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/cc.md b/content/glossary/german/cc.md index b58893fcf7..7b34cd9d8a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/cc.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/cc.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/ckan.md b/content/glossary/german/ckan.md index 90f8dd94b9..fe4bdc0829 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/ckan.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/ckan.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/coar_community_framework_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md b/content/glossary/german/coar_community_framework_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md index 46bdacee1d..6f91b96055 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/coar_community_framework_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/coar_community_framework_for_good_practices_in_repositories.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/cobidas.md b/content/glossary/german/cobidas.md index aa16a880ee..3ffe66f399 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/cobidas.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/cobidas.md @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "Die Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM; dt. Organisation für menschliche Hirnbildgebung) hat einen Leitfaden für optimale Verfahren (best practices) bei der Erhebung und Analyse von Bildgebungsdaten, der Veröffentlichung und der gemeinsamen Nutzung von Daten und Analysecodes entwickelt. Er enthält acht Elemente, die beim Verfassen oder Einreichen eines Manuskripts berücksichtigt werden sollten, um die Veröffentlichung der Methodik und die daraus resultierenden Bildgebungsdaten zu verbessern und so die Transparenz und Reproduzierbarkeit zu optimieren. **Alternative definition:** (if applicable) Checklist for data analysis and sharing", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/code_\303\274berpr\303\274fung.md" "b/content/glossary/german/code_\303\274berpr\303\274fung.md" index 299e5af23b..f209083308 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/code_\303\274berpr\303\274fung.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/code_\303\274berpr\303\274fung.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/codebuch.md b/content/glossary/german/codebuch.md index 804efbe111..0dcb3dc078 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/codebuch.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/codebuch.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/cog_beschr\303\244nkungen_der_generalisierbarkeit.md" "b/content/glossary/german/cog_beschr\303\244nkungen_der_generalisierbarkeit.md" index 4589a40689..09d846ec06 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/cog_beschr\303\244nkungen_der_generalisierbarkeit.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/cog_beschr\303\244nkungen_der_generalisierbarkeit.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/collaborative_commentary_gegnerischer_kollaborativer_kommentar.md b/content/glossary/german/collaborative_commentary_gegnerischer_kollaborativer_kommentar.md index 88f0cf2d93..d3f280bd64 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/collaborative_commentary_gegnerischer_kollaborativer_kommentar.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/collaborative_commentary_gegnerischer_kollaborativer_kommentar.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/computational_rechenmodell.md b/content/glossary/german/computational_rechenmodell.md index 02746b41be..09d65bff14 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/computational_rechenmodell.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/computational_rechenmodell.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", - "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/cos.md b/content/glossary/german/cos.md index e3fba4ca52..1aa090e00c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/cos.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/cos.md @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/credit.md b/content/glossary/german/credit.md index 24700bd316..a69516cb59 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/credit.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/credit.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/crep.md b/content/glossary/german/crep.md index 85fa78c427..6f499b7936 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/crep.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/crep.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/crowdsourcing_forschung.md b/content/glossary/german/crowdsourcing_forschung.md index 8aeaf877a9..3f04b5d39a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/crowdsourcing_forschung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/crowdsourcing_forschung.md @@ -10,19 +10,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/da_rt.md b/content/glossary/german/da_rt.md index 0ddb3291b8..955a75d58f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/da_rt.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/da_rt.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/data_sharing.md b/content/glossary/german/data_sharing.md index 21f7cdebd2..b1ee3b8faa 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/data_sharing.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/data_sharing.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/datenvisualisierung.md b/content/glossary/german/datenvisualisierung.md index 604b14528b..e95f7adf49 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/datenvisualisierung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/datenvisualisierung.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/dekolonialisierung.md b/content/glossary/german/dekolonialisierung.md index 6893c218da..60d5d96ad7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/dekolonialisierung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/dekolonialisierung.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/demarkationskriterium.md b/content/glossary/german/demarkationskriterium.md index e0e884caf5..7ca94d8126 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/demarkationskriterium.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/demarkationskriterium.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/die_dreisten_drei.md b/content/glossary/german/die_dreisten_drei.md index af0059e35e..8c028d6f39 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/die_dreisten_drei.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/die_dreisten_drei.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/digital_object_identifier.md b/content/glossary/german/digital_object_identifier.md index 09da0d1ea7..4d212f274b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/digital_object_identifier.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/digital_object_identifier.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/direkte_replikation.md b/content/glossary/german/direkte_replikation.md index 35bc644b67..8f0d54ee11 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/direkte_replikation.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/direkte_replikation.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/diversity.md b/content/glossary/german/diversity.md index e0ad82225f..8dc6b96f52 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/diversity.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/diversity.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/dmp_datenmanagementplan.md b/content/glossary/german/dmp_datenmanagementplan.md index 10d7db43d1..b6f1914258 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/dmp_datenmanagementplan.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/dmp_datenmanagementplan.md @@ -11,8 +11,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/doppelblinde_begutachtung.md b/content/glossary/german/doppelblinde_begutachtung.md index 299887a7ce..e8143e7fb6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/doppelblinde_begutachtung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/doppelblinde_begutachtung.md @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/doppeltes_bewusstsein.md b/content/glossary/german/doppeltes_bewusstsein.md index d93aced077..e4fa2672c0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/doppeltes_bewusstsein.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/doppeltes_bewusstsein.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/dora.md b/content/glossary/german/dora.md index 1596ec2a5f..3fdbe7d51d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/dora.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/dora.md @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/dreifach_blindes_peer_review.md b/content/glossary/german/dreifach_blindes_peer_review.md index d373ffe80b..ce8d730877 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/dreifach_blindes_peer_review.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/dreifach_blindes_peer_review.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/economic_and_societal_impact.md b/content/glossary/german/economic_and_societal_impact.md index 82b2ddd31a..9384f06f99 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/economic_and_societal_impact.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/economic_and_societal_impact.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/ecrs_nachwuchswissenschaftler_innen.md b/content/glossary/german/ecrs_nachwuchswissenschaftler_innen.md index 8debe45725..300f0eebce 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/ecrs_nachwuchswissenschaftler_innen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/ecrs_nachwuchswissenschaftler_innen.md @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/einfachblinde_peer_begutachtung.md b/content/glossary/german/einfachblinde_peer_begutachtung.md index 744c5a844e..1c60b8035a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/einfachblinde_peer_begutachtung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/einfachblinde_peer_begutachtung.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/epistemiologie__erkenntnistheorie.md b/content/glossary/german/epistemiologie__erkenntnistheorie.md index 6046932786..b86c513955 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/epistemiologie__erkenntnistheorie.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/epistemiologie__erkenntnistheorie.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/epistemische_unsicherheit.md b/content/glossary/german/epistemische_unsicherheit.md index 0fd9781bdb..7144ab9f71 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/epistemische_unsicherheit.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/epistemische_unsicherheit.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/evidenzsynthese.md b/content/glossary/german/evidenzsynthese.md index e13b2daa4f..17993fe55d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/evidenzsynthese.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/evidenzsynthese.md @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/explorative_datenanalyse.md b/content/glossary/german/explorative_datenanalyse.md index c2b2d612ed..2d2b5af133 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/explorative_datenanalyse.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/explorative_datenanalyse.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/externe_validit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/externe_validit\303\244t.md" index 4f08f0a724..805c235441 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/externe_validit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/externe_validit\303\244t.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/fair_prinzipien.md b/content/glossary/german/fair_prinzipien.md index c7697c6393..53dd6f5626 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/fair_prinzipien.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/fair_prinzipien.md @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/fehlererfassung.md b/content/glossary/german/fehlererfassung.md index 1df4ac8816..6f84904e69 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/fehlererfassung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/fehlererfassung.md @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/feministische_psychologie.md b/content/glossary/german/feministische_psychologie.md index 90e02477c8..bc3065b0eb 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/feministische_psychologie.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/feministische_psychologie.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/file_drawer_problem_publikationsverzerrung_aktenschubladenproblem.md b/content/glossary/german/file_drawer_problem_publikationsverzerrung_aktenschubladenproblem.md index 8d9a0590f7..5a81384e7a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/file_drawer_problem_publikationsverzerrung_aktenschubladenproblem.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/file_drawer_problem_publikationsverzerrung_aktenschubladenproblem.md @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/flae_norm_der_betonung_der_erst_und_letztautor_innenschaft.md b/content/glossary/german/flae_norm_der_betonung_der_erst_und_letztautor_innenschaft.md index 7aa60fa9bc..3365096126 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/flae_norm_der_betonung_der_erst_und_letztautor_innenschaft.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/flae_norm_der_betonung_der_erst_und_letztautor_innenschaft.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/forrt.md b/content/glossary/german/forrt.md index 8ef3a2af25..e406d9f4f5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/forrt.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/forrt.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/forschungs_arbeitsablauf.md b/content/glossary/german/forschungs_arbeitsablauf.md index 29907f3914..8487042f71 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/forschungs_arbeitsablauf.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/forschungs_arbeitsablauf.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/forschungsdatenmanagement.md b/content/glossary/german/forschungsdatenmanagement.md index 29b57801b5..ded2353a0c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/forschungsdatenmanagement.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/forschungsdatenmanagement.md @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" index 4fd4a1eb3f..a5ca6bd5a2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" @@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/forschungsprotokoll.md b/content/glossary/german/forschungsprotokoll.md index 569a1c792c..5a78d3f5c2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/forschungsprotokoll.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/forschungsprotokoll.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/forschungszyklus.md b/content/glossary/german/forschungszyklus.md index c185c218e7..b63eac73f9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/forschungszyklus.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/forschungszyklus.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/free_our_knowledge_platform.md b/content/glossary/german/free_our_knowledge_platform.md index 8edddb7f79..5bf03e1afb 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/free_our_knowledge_platform.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/free_our_knowledge_platform.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/freiheitsgrade_von_forschenden.md b/content/glossary/german/freiheitsgrade_von_forschenden.md index e38cc5fffa..9f5ed66518 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/freiheitsgrade_von_forschenden.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/freiheitsgrade_von_forschenden.md @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/garten_der_weggabelungen.md b/content/glossary/german/garten_der_weggabelungen.md index 86e11dc62f..bd016ac579 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/garten_der_weggabelungen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/garten_der_weggabelungen.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/gdpr_dt_datenschutzgrundverordnung_dsgvo.md b/content/glossary/german/gdpr_dt_datenschutzgrundverordnung_dsgvo.md index 7e88ee9d75..353fc38cd8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/gdpr_dt_datenschutzgrundverordnung_dsgvo.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/gdpr_dt_datenschutzgrundverordnung_dsgvo.md @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/gegnerische_kollaboration.md b/content/glossary/german/gegnerische_kollaboration.md index 70f3add00a..7fdac31d41 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/gegnerische_kollaboration.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/gegnerische_kollaboration.md @@ -11,11 +11,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/gemeinschaftsprojekte.md b/content/glossary/german/gemeinschaftsprojekte.md index cbec977fb6..d2fe7ecd32 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/gemeinschaftsprojekte.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/gemeinschaftsprojekte.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/generalisierbarkeit.md b/content/glossary/german/generalisierbarkeit.md index 84bedb437c..892baa602c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/generalisierbarkeit.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/generalisierbarkeit.md @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/git.md b/content/glossary/german/git.md index 572f6629fb..542b9daec8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/git.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/git.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", - "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", - "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" + "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", + "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", + "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/glaubhaftigkeitsrevolution.md b/content/glossary/german/glaubhaftigkeitsrevolution.md index 42aed409f5..7da9cffa7d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/glaubhaftigkeitsrevolution.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/glaubhaftigkeitsrevolution.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/gleichstellung.md b/content/glossary/german/gleichstellung.md index 306676bafe..009855c4ac 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/gleichstellung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/gleichstellung.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/goodharts_gesetz.md b/content/glossary/german/goodharts_gesetz.md index 59c186d909..50fbbd4fdc 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/goodharts_gesetz.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/goodharts_gesetz.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/gpower.md b/content/glossary/german/gpower.md index cd175ce656..b6a7a90c47 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/gpower.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/gpower.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/h_index_hirsch_index.md b/content/glossary/german/h_index_hirsch_index.md index 442f3a32eb..00aacff49b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/h_index_hirsch_index.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/h_index_hirsch_index.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/hackathon.md b/content/glossary/german/hackathon.md index 34b5f9e21d..e532e0df75 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/hackathon.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/hackathon.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/handbuch.md b/content/glossary/german/handbuch.md index ad8759e0d0..319d46029f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/handbuch.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/handbuch.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/harking.md b/content/glossary/german/harking.md index d094b792bb..f0f7efc140 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/harking.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/harking.md @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/hilfshypothese.md b/content/glossary/german/hilfshypothese.md index 493d28bb85..22e3be41b0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/hilfshypothese.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/hilfshypothese.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/hypothese.md b/content/glossary/german/hypothese.md index 17922899cb..57c80bd7de 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/hypothese.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/hypothese.md @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/i10_index.md b/content/glossary/german/i10_index.md index 45858b503f..c1bb1db57f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/i10_index.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/i10_index.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/ideologische_verzerrung.md b/content/glossary/german/ideologische_verzerrung.md index 6d7bd510d9..ddb73e8c13 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/ideologische_verzerrung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/ideologische_verzerrung.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/im_nachhinein.md b/content/glossary/german/im_nachhinein.md index 0671a47211..b4ed09d370 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/im_nachhinein.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/im_nachhinein.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/in_science_matthew_effekt_in_der_wissenschaft.md b/content/glossary/german/in_science_matthew_effekt_in_der_wissenschaft.md index b7db841ccc..6c857adb8b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/in_science_matthew_effekt_in_der_wissenschaft.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/in_science_matthew_effekt_in_der_wissenschaft.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/induktion.md b/content/glossary/german/induktion.md index 52c8efc31a..d95d50e67c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/induktion.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/induktion.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/inhaltsvalidit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/inhaltsvalidit\303\244t.md" index 0d309500e0..eb0f0e2aee 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/inhaltsvalidit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/inhaltsvalidit\303\244t.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/inklusion_inklusivit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/inklusion_inklusivit\303\244t.md" index 2c55977249..1775667505 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/inklusion_inklusivit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/inklusion_inklusivit\303\244t.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/interaktionsfehlschluss.md b/content/glossary/german/interaktionsfehlschluss.md index 4a5dded2fa..06ac733466 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/interaktionsfehlschluss.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/interaktionsfehlschluss.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/interessenkonflikt.md b/content/glossary/german/interessenkonflikt.md index c74c328b0f..b26da3c160 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/interessenkonflikt.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/interessenkonflikt.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/interne_validit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/interne_validit\303\244t.md" index 591207a3ae..020d9d31b3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/interne_validit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/interne_validit\303\244t.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/intersektionalit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/intersektionalit\303\244t.md" index 9d522a5d44..a1b2a7a04c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/intersektionalit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/intersektionalit\303\244t.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/jabref.md b/content/glossary/german/jabref.md index 3e58413ffd..4a3ceb296d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/jabref.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/jabref.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/jamovi.md b/content/glossary/german/jamovi.md index d023de3d05..4ce4a0c758 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/jamovi.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/jamovi.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/jasp.md b/content/glossary/german/jasp.md index 841903b1e9..e31752c6a8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/jasp.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/jasp.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/json_file.md b/content/glossary/german/json_file.md index d6228a7d6c..e3593e54da 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/json_file.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/json_file.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/klammer_interviews.md b/content/glossary/german/klammer_interviews.md index 38d16a8a0f..602a563a5f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/klammer_interviews.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/klammer_interviews.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/knowledge_acquisition.md b/content/glossary/german/knowledge_acquisition.md index 8802f26d06..af1ad06be7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/knowledge_acquisition.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/knowledge_acquisition.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/ko_produktion.md b/content/glossary/german/ko_produktion.md index 170a9afd66..12d7a72afa 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/ko_produktion.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/ko_produktion.md @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/kommunalit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/kommunalit\303\244t.md" index 4b375af27e..937db86050 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/kommunalit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/kommunalit\303\244t.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/konfirmatorische_analysen.md b/content/glossary/german/konfirmatorische_analysen.md index 28f452e33c..88c681d556 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/konfirmatorische_analysen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/konfirmatorische_analysen.md @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/konsortium_autor_innenschaft.md b/content/glossary/german/konsortium_autor_innenschaft.md index ba1e6d5ef9..a8adf91620 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/konsortium_autor_innenschaft.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/konsortium_autor_innenschaft.md @@ -8,8 +8,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/konstruktvalidit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/konstruktvalidit\303\244t.md" index f6fe55e88a..cdf333ba70 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/konstruktvalidit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/konstruktvalidit\303\244t.md" @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/konzeptionelle_replikation.md b/content/glossary/german/konzeptionelle_replikation.md index 4d48c06f53..08ccb468ae 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/konzeptionelle_replikation.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/konzeptionelle_replikation.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/korrigendum.md b/content/glossary/german/korrigendum.md index 8cc9fe1443..6cd8fc15a3 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/korrigendum.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/korrigendum.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/kriteriumsvalidit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/kriteriumsvalidit\303\244t.md" index 8210346ae1..a7b07c1e71 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/kriteriumsvalidit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/kriteriumsvalidit\303\244t.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/kulturelle_taxierung.md b/content/glossary/german/kulturelle_taxierung.md index 4396fdc727..5fef657f0f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/kulturelle_taxierung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/kulturelle_taxierung.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/kumulative_wissenschaft.md b/content/glossary/german/kumulative_wissenschaft.md index 5e39c61ac4..18076f696b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/kumulative_wissenschaft.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/kumulative_wissenschaft.md @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/langsame_forschung.md b/content/glossary/german/langsame_forschung.md index a7eaca302e..19ff13c8c7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/langsame_forschung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/langsame_forschung.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/likelihood_funktion.md b/content/glossary/german/likelihood_funktion.md index d670d7decf..dad57f73a2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/likelihood_funktion.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/likelihood_funktion.md @@ -11,11 +11,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/likelihood_prinzip.md b/content/glossary/german/likelihood_prinzip.md index 2957425887..fca28779ab 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/likelihood_prinzip.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/likelihood_prinzip.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/literaturzusammenfassung.md b/content/glossary/german/literaturzusammenfassung.md index cacd6ff357..20aa9f9fb4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/literaturzusammenfassung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/literaturzusammenfassung.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/manel.md b/content/glossary/german/manel.md index 2f20629942..1b9d5d00ea 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/manel.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/manel.md @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/many_authors.md b/content/glossary/german/many_authors.md index 5ccbb3b32c..9afa0c80ff 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/many_authors.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/many_authors.md @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/many_labs.md b/content/glossary/german/many_labs.md index 3541f766b2..1e91c5514a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/many_labs.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/many_labs.md @@ -12,12 +12,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/meta_analyse.md b/content/glossary/german/meta_analyse.md index 787b271343..069ca15af9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/meta_analyse.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/meta_analyse.md @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ "Systematic Review" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev; Siu Kit Yeung" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/meta_wissenschaft_oder_meta_forschung.md b/content/glossary/german/meta_wissenschaft_oder_meta_forschung.md index 759d52a3e7..f6e3153a58 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/meta_wissenschaft_oder_meta_forschung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/meta_wissenschaft_oder_meta_forschung.md @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "Die wissenschaftliche Untersuchung der Wissenschaft selbst mit dem Ziel, wissenschaftliche Praktiken zu beschreiben, zu erklären, zu bewerten und/oder zu verbessern. Meta-Wissenschaft untersucht typischerweise wissenschaftliche Methoden, Analysen, die Berichterstattung und Auswertung von Daten, die Reproduzierbarkeit und Replizierbarkeit von Forschungsergebnissen sowie Anreize in der Wissenschaft.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/metadaten.md b/content/glossary/german/metadaten.md index 62720fe747..0108e96185 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/metadaten.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/metadaten.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/moocs.md b/content/glossary/german/moocs.md index e377c8276d..e0869dc298 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/moocs.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/moocs.md @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/moops.md b/content/glossary/german/moops.md index a289c7b443..7af17ebdaf 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/moops.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/moops.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/multi_analytiker_innen_studien.md b/content/glossary/german/multi_analytiker_innen_studien.md index 0419fdfc09..37d5ecc8b9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/multi_analytiker_innen_studien.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/multi_analytiker_innen_studien.md @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/multiplizit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/multiplizit\303\244t.md" index 2ca091cb4b..fd68faac14 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/multiplizit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/multiplizit\303\244t.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/multiversumsanalyse.md b/content/glossary/german/multiversumsanalyse.md index a5de262959..822004729a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/multiversumsanalyse.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/multiversumsanalyse.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/netanos.md b/content/glossary/german/netanos.md index 77899e5729..73681a0a94 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/netanos.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/netanos.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/nhst_nullhypothesen_signifikanztestung.md b/content/glossary/german/nhst_nullhypothesen_signifikanztestung.md index ba530f07d0..16861eef0d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/nhst_nullhypothesen_signifikanztestung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/nhst_nullhypothesen_signifikanztestung.md @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/niro_sr.md b/content/glossary/german/niro_sr.md index c9871d50e2..1632e30707 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/niro_sr.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/niro_sr.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/objektivit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/objektivit\303\244t.md" index 2336f855ae..2b4a4b9984 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/objektivit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/objektivit\303\244t.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/oer.md b/content/glossary/german/oer.md index e6e1279664..8243794fd6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/oer.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/oer.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/oers_offene_bildungsressourcen.md b/content/glossary/german/oers_offene_bildungsressourcen.md index 2918b9c9cc..5ebd38ead8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/oers_offene_bildungsressourcen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/oers_offene_bildungsressourcen.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Material" ], "references": [ - "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education" + "Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education", + "UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/offene_begutachtung.md b/content/glossary/german/offene_begutachtung.md index 6da1db776a..ea10c6cf20 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/offene_begutachtung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/offene_begutachtung.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/offene_daten.md b/content/glossary/german/offene_daten.md index a70995afa3..f20360858e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/offene_daten.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/offene_daten.md @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/offene_forschung.md b/content/glossary/german/offene_forschung.md index ba16e297b0..f05f770172 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/offene_forschung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/offene_forschung.md @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/offene_lizenzen.md b/content/glossary/german/offene_lizenzen.md index 2e69cd9080..e4a4741623 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/offene_lizenzen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/offene_lizenzen.md @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/offene_materialien.md b/content/glossary/german/offene_materialien.md index 39da6d3eb8..559cdd2e57 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/offene_materialien.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/offene_materialien.md @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/offener_code.md b/content/glossary/german/offener_code.md index 785b789eb0..4fa7e2b873 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/offener_code.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/offener_code.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/open_access.md b/content/glossary/german/open_access.md index ad1651ec52..6881b66a89 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/open_access.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/open_access.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/open_researcher_and_contributor_id.md b/content/glossary/german/open_researcher_and_contributor_id.md index 785764efed..65c380f7d7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/open_researcher_and_contributor_id.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/open_researcher_and_contributor_id.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/open_scholarship.md b/content/glossary/german/open_scholarship.md index c3a16c1ae8..4b7b38930b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/open_scholarship.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/open_scholarship.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md b/content/glossary/german/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md index 67df993db5..c6f735abc5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/open_scholarship_knowledge_base.md @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/open_science_framework.md b/content/glossary/german/open_science_framework.md index 6adb65a6cd..a68624c75e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/open_science_framework.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/open_science_framework.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/open_science_open_science_abzeichen.md b/content/glossary/german/open_science_open_science_abzeichen.md index d0356c1865..c9f69b4cd4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/open_science_open_science_abzeichen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/open_science_open_science_abzeichen.md @@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/open_washing.md b/content/glossary/german/open_washing.md index df328ffbf5..e55654399d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/open_washing.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/open_washing.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/openneuro.md b/content/glossary/german/openneuro.md index bc5f1c5a39..3be577c71c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/openneuro.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/openneuro.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/optionales_stoppen.md b/content/glossary/german/optionales_stoppen.md index 6cb76e82d0..425ef60668 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/optionales_stoppen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/optionales_stoppen.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/or_guest_authorship_geschenkte_autor_innenschaft__gastautor_innenschaft.md b/content/glossary/german/or_guest_authorship_geschenkte_autor_innenschaft__gastautor_innenschaft.md index 0dc60f4d72..ae5c17853c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/or_guest_authorship_geschenkte_autor_innenschaft__gastautor_innenschaft.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/or_guest_authorship_geschenkte_autor_innenschaft__gastautor_innenschaft.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/overlay_zeitschrift.md b/content/glossary/german/overlay_zeitschrift.md index 0952fea856..56dcec4055 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/overlay_zeitschrift.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/overlay_zeitschrift.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/p.md b/content/glossary/german/p.md index 6c76ad5924..c4dc79737f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/p.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/p.md @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/p_hacking.md b/content/glossary/german/p_hacking.md index 4c42cd5dbf..c078f56730 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/p_hacking.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/p_hacking.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/p_kurve.md b/content/glossary/german/p_kurve.md index bc38329c9b..bcdc5cfd44 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/p_kurve.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/p_kurve.md @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/p_wert.md b/content/glossary/german/p_wert.md index fb95027538..0eba876438 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/p_wert.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/p_wert.md @@ -8,9 +8,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/papierfabrik.md b/content/glossary/german/papierfabrik.md index 1f22c71256..865ebe1928 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/papierfabrik.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/papierfabrik.md @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/paradaten.md b/content/glossary/german/paradaten.md index b91eca34b5..0a5bdedb36 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/paradaten.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/paradaten.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/parking.md b/content/glossary/german/parking.md index a00d0682cf..383542bd4f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/parking.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/parking.md @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/partizipative_forschung.md b/content/glossary/german/partizipative_forschung.md index e31699db27..a98babae0c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/partizipative_forschung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/partizipative_forschung.md @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/pci_registered_reports.md b/content/glossary/german/pci_registered_reports.md index 7e28de7f59..3251579d02 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/pci_registered_reports.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/pci_registered_reports.md @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/peer_community_in.md b/content/glossary/german/peer_community_in.md index a6704b1992..d7926dcf1b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/peer_community_in.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/peer_community_in.md @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/peer_review_openness_initiative_pro_initiative.md b/content/glossary/german/peer_review_openness_initiative_pro_initiative.md index 633b3de23c..d6b62b1d97 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/peer_review_openness_initiative_pro_initiative.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/peer_review_openness_initiative_pro_initiative.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/philosophy.md b/content/glossary/german/philosophy.md index 4afd660ec1..4be242fef1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/philosophy.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/philosophy.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/plan_s.md b/content/glossary/german/plan_s.md index 00b69f8873..2f95df5720 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/plan_s.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/plan_s.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/positionalit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/positionalit\303\244t.md" index 1a9805caa5..157501c4a6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/positionalit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/positionalit\303\244t.md" @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/positionalit\303\244tskarte.md" "b/content/glossary/german/positionalit\303\244tskarte.md" index 0d9776d5eb..dc6e2dc52a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/positionalit\303\244tskarte.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/positionalit\303\244tskarte.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/posterior_distribution.md b/content/glossary/german/posterior_distribution.md index ad0491592b..847c385547 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/posterior_distribution.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/posterior_distribution.md @@ -11,8 +11,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/ppi_einbindung_von_patient_innen_und_\303\266ffentlichkeit.md" "b/content/glossary/german/ppi_einbindung_von_patient_innen_und_\303\266ffentlichkeit.md" index 5c430a5f19..7c0a3bd2ed 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/ppi_einbindung_von_patient_innen_und_\303\266ffentlichkeit.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/ppi_einbindung_von_patient_innen_und_\303\266ffentlichkeit.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/predatory_verlagswesen.md b/content/glossary/german/predatory_verlagswesen.md index 01d8766cc5..e9c30697e3 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/predatory_verlagswesen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/predatory_verlagswesen.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/prepare_leitlinien.md b/content/glossary/german/prepare_leitlinien.md index 0d160c64d8..18cb72cea7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/prepare_leitlinien.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/prepare_leitlinien.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/problem_mehrdeutiger_namen.md b/content/glossary/german/problem_mehrdeutiger_namen.md index f37e32e331..7e35cb65d7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/problem_mehrdeutiger_namen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/problem_mehrdeutiger_namen.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/pr\303\244registrierung.md" "b/content/glossary/german/pr\303\244registrierung.md" index b3cc951358..504b7928dd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/pr\303\244registrierung.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/pr\303\244registrierung.md" @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/pr\303\244registrierungs_versprechen.md" "b/content/glossary/german/pr\303\244registrierungs_versprechen.md" index f09313cf0e..9fca7fd779 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/pr\303\244registrierungs_versprechen.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/pr\303\244registrierungs_versprechen.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/pseudonymisierung.md b/content/glossary/german/pseudonymisierung.md index c556fa58cc..c318c7c17b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/pseudonymisierung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/pseudonymisierung.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/pseudoreplikation.md b/content/glossary/german/pseudoreplikation.md index 2f1a2946bd..06efd730f8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/pseudoreplikation.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/pseudoreplikation.md @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/psychometrische_metaanalyse.md b/content/glossary/german/psychometrische_metaanalyse.md index 1cab20a5a8..3711d251d1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/psychometrische_metaanalyse.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/psychometrische_metaanalyse.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/publizieren_oder_untergehen.md b/content/glossary/german/publizieren_oder_untergehen.md index f5844df985..9ae5dcb4f0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/publizieren_oder_untergehen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/publizieren_oder_untergehen.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/pubpeer.md b/content/glossary/german/pubpeer.md index edf236b462..ce247b1fe7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/pubpeer.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/pubpeer.md @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/python.md b/content/glossary/german/python.md index 640e766395..589b1f6120 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/python.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/python.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/qmp_fragw\303\274rdige_forschungspraktiken.md" "b/content/glossary/german/qmp_fragw\303\274rdige_forschungspraktiken.md" index 434ef4b72e..badde46c17 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/qmp_fragw\303\274rdige_forschungspraktiken.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/qmp_fragw\303\274rdige_forschungspraktiken.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/qrps_fragw\303\274rdige_forschungs_oder_ver\303\266ffentlichungspraktiken.md" "b/content/glossary/german/qrps_fragw\303\274rdige_forschungs_oder_ver\303\266ffentlichungspraktiken.md" index 24b672110b..d3d8620686 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/qrps_fragw\303\274rdige_forschungs_oder_ver\303\266ffentlichungspraktiken.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/qrps_fragw\303\274rdige_forschungs_oder_ver\303\266ffentlichungspraktiken.md" @@ -21,12 +21,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/qualitative_forschung.md b/content/glossary/german/qualitative_forschung.md index cb69c9c796..1910bcc7fd 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/qualitative_forschung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/qualitative_forschung.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/quantitative_forschung_translated_reviewed.md b/content/glossary/german/quantitative_forschung_translated_reviewed.md index 1e165eac50..4389f7861f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/quantitative_forschung_translated_reviewed.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/quantitative_forschung_translated_reviewed.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/r.md b/content/glossary/german/r.md index 0a50060641..44e6660f6f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/r.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/r.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/rechnerische_reproduzierbarkeit.md b/content/glossary/german/rechnerische_reproduzierbarkeit.md index 6b5a07a0b6..f0be820452 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/rechnerische_reproduzierbarkeit.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/rechnerische_reproduzierbarkeit.md @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/reflexivit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/reflexivit\303\244t.md" index 90ee76dc18..361974cd79 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/reflexivit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/reflexivit\303\244t.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/registered_report.md b/content/glossary/german/registered_report.md index 8cae1079b9..ab00fe87c4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/registered_report.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/registered_report.md @@ -11,10 +11,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/registry_of_research_data_repositories.md b/content/glossary/german/registry_of_research_data_repositories.md index ec9559829e..d5d0a91e08 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/registry_of_research_data_repositories.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/registry_of_research_data_repositories.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/reliabilit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/reliabilit\303\244t.md" index d9a23b2cfc..e16f9b8b77 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/reliabilit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/reliabilit\303\244t.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/replicats_project.md b/content/glossary/german/replicats_project.md index 1ca9608faf..ef3c87476f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/replicats_project.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/replicats_project.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science)." + "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", + "RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/replikabilit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/replikabilit\303\244t.md" index ac0340db12..d75796330d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/replikabilit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/replikabilit\303\244t.md" @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/replikationsm\303\244rkte.md" "b/content/glossary/german/replikationsm\303\244rkte.md" index 18c0e9e81e..f00cb9b027 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/replikationsm\303\244rkte.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/replikationsm\303\244rkte.md" @@ -10,10 +10,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", - "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://replicationmarkets.org/" + "Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060", + "Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/", + "[www.replicationmarkets.com](http://www.replicationmarkets.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/repositorium.md b/content/glossary/german/repositorium.md index d16e58225e..f937343a59 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/repositorium.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/repositorium.md @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/reproducibilitea.md b/content/glossary/german/reproducibilitea.md index 352265a130..9b3d56c032 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/reproducibilitea.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/reproducibilitea.md @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/reproduzierbarkeit.md b/content/glossary/german/reproduzierbarkeit.md index 3d82cfccff..bf0771a00b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/reproduzierbarkeit.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/reproduzierbarkeit.md @@ -9,11 +9,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/reproduzierbarkeitsnetzwerk.md b/content/glossary/german/reproduzierbarkeitsnetzwerk.md index 63ce9dc46b..6e75cd8649 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/reproduzierbarkeitsnetzwerk.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/reproduzierbarkeitsnetzwerk.md @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ "definition": "Ein Reproduzierbarkeitsnetzwerk ist ein Konsortium offener Forschungsarbeitsgruppen, die häufig von Peers geleitet werden. Die Gruppen arbeiten in einem bestimmten Land nach dem wheel-and-spoke-Modell (dt. Rad-und-Speichen-Modell), bei dem das Netzwerk lokale disziplinübergreifende Forschende, Gruppen und Einrichtungen mit einer zentralen Lenkungsgruppe verbindet, die auch mit externen Akteuren im Forschungsökosystem in Verbindung steht. Zu den Zielen von Reproduzierbarkeitsnetzwerken gehören die Sensibilisierung für das Thema, die Förderung von Trainingsmaßnahmen und die Verbreitung bewährter Praktiken an der Basis, in den Institutionen und im Forschungsumfeld. Solche Netzwerke gibt es im Vereinigten Königreich, in Deutschland, in der Schweiz, in der Slowakei und in Australien (Stand: März 2021).", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/reverse_p_hacking.md b/content/glossary/german/reverse_p_hacking.md index abec32215a..c593951767 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/reverse_p_hacking.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/reverse_p_hacking.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/riot_science_club.md b/content/glossary/german/riot_science_club.md index ef415a9af9..f7b72ac704 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/riot_science_club.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/riot_science_club.md @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/rote_teams.md b/content/glossary/german/rote_teams.md index 99c1a6e0cd..58b6fb6391 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/rote_teams.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/rote_teams.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/salamischneiden.md b/content/glossary/german/salamischneiden.md index f5adfc010f..509c1f2e02 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/salamischneiden.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/salamischneiden.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/sch\303\266pferische_zerst\303\266rung_als_herangehensweise_an_replikationen.md" "b/content/glossary/german/sch\303\266pferische_zerst\303\266rung_als_herangehensweise_an_replikationen.md" index b86fc2bdcd..67bdbcf323 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/sch\303\266pferische_zerst\303\266rung_als_herangehensweise_an_replikationen.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/sch\303\266pferische_zerst\303\266rung_als_herangehensweise_an_replikationen.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/sdc.md b/content/glossary/german/sdc.md index 6a0d8f7016..16d9c00426 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/sdc.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/sdc.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/semantometrie.md b/content/glossary/german/semantometrie.md index 6c05761611..78921e7e1d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/semantometrie.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/semantometrie.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/sensitive_forschung.md b/content/glossary/german/sensitive_forschung.md index 1b54fc11c9..e7267c0ae2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/sensitive_forschung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/sensitive_forschung.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/sherpa_romeo.md b/content/glossary/german/sherpa_romeo.md index d5b1da9690..aec7f06e02 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/sherpa_romeo.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/sherpa_romeo.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/sips.md b/content/glossary/german/sips.md index 3845780934..dcf15c07bc 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/sips.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/sips.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/software_mit_offenem_quellcode.md b/content/glossary/german/software_mit_offenem_quellcode.md index b1060210f8..dd45e13e86 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/software_mit_offenem_quellcode.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/software_mit_offenem_quellcode.md @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/sortee.md b/content/glossary/german/sortee.md index 92b76d324f..2097c188ae 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/sortee.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/sortee.md @@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/soziale_integration.md b/content/glossary/german/soziale_integration.md index c83d1876d6..0289c0fce7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/soziale_integration.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/soziale_integration.md @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md b/content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md index 4e0b2299b0..3f21c87e90 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md @@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/sperrfrist.md b/content/glossary/german/sperrfrist.md index 8810e83ab3..ae3cf9a24c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/sperrfrist.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/sperrfrist.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/spezifikationskurvenanalyse.md b/content/glossary/german/spezifikationskurvenanalyse.md index 6b8c9498d6..41ac3359ed 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/spezifikationskurvenanalyse.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/spezifikationskurvenanalyse.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/statistical_statistisches_modell.md b/content/glossary/german/statistical_statistisches_modell.md index 223608a0c5..5a4ef2ff9d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/statistical_statistisches_modell.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/statistical_statistisches_modell.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" + "Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/statistische_signifikanz.md b/content/glossary/german/statistische_signifikanz.md index c0995b7cb1..c3ce712749 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/statistische_signifikanz.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/statistische_signifikanz.md @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/statistische_testst\303\244rke.md" "b/content/glossary/german/statistische_testst\303\244rke.md" index eddb16680a..aeac27a37d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/statistische_testst\303\244rke.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/statistische_testst\303\244rke.md" @@ -16,13 +16,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/statistische_validit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/statistische_validit\303\244t.md" index 2d9200339c..a2b9b79410 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/statistische_validit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/statistische_validit\303\244t.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/statistische_vorannahmen.md b/content/glossary/german/statistische_vorannahmen.md index 735c33ae44..e27ffddaa3 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/statistische_vorannahmen.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/statistische_vorannahmen.md @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/strange.md b/content/glossary/german/strange.md index 3cab40dc10..96e603e536 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/strange.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/strange.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/studyswap.md b/content/glossary/german/studyswap.md index cda8908165..2e721cd41c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/studyswap.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/studyswap.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/systematisches_review.md b/content/glossary/german/systematisches_review.md index 4e38320fd1..3d9c002fc3 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/systematisches_review.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/systematisches_review.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/tenzing.md b/content/glossary/german/tenzing.md index 65cf55291b..3301de3508 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/tenzing.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/tenzing.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/the_system_das_system_\303\274berlisten.md" "b/content/glossary/german/the_system_das_system_\303\274berlisten.md" index c5f3d0ec3c..5b6c1ed790 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/the_system_das_system_\303\274berlisten.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/the_system_das_system_\303\274berlisten.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/theorie.md b/content/glossary/german/theorie.md index f1861218bb..6eabb245f9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/theorie.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/theorie.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/theoriebildung.md b/content/glossary/german/theoriebildung.md index 25b8f4e188..ae956ca822 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/theoriebildung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/theoriebildung.md @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/to_open_scholarship_bottom_up_ansatz.md b/content/glossary/german/to_open_scholarship_bottom_up_ansatz.md index 6c12d17ac9..5a918fb61b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/to_open_scholarship_bottom_up_ansatz.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/to_open_scholarship_bottom_up_ansatz.md @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/transparenz.md b/content/glossary/german/transparenz.md index a468e2ec15..724c5d86b5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/transparenz.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/transparenz.md @@ -11,9 +11,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/transparenz_checkliste.md b/content/glossary/german/transparenz_checkliste.md index f9449f0349..772030671f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/transparenz_checkliste.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/transparenz_checkliste.md @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/trust_prinzipien.md b/content/glossary/german/trust_prinzipien.md index 9c0c8506b2..cf6e9e1ba7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/trust_prinzipien.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/trust_prinzipien.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/typ_i_fehler.md b/content/glossary/german/typ_i_fehler.md index 733493a5d1..c5598f2ca0 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/typ_i_fehler.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/typ_i_fehler.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/typ_ii_fehler.md b/content/glossary/german/typ_ii_fehler.md index 1cdb02e1f5..9826d7ee4a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/typ_ii_fehler.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/typ_ii_fehler.md @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/typ_m_fehler.md b/content/glossary/german/typ_m_fehler.md index 9064035a78..53b8148060 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/typ_m_fehler.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/typ_m_fehler.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/typ_s_fehler.md b/content/glossary/german/typ_s_fehler.md index 7292f7679d..4790a573eb 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/typ_s_fehler.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/typ_s_fehler.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/udl.md b/content/glossary/german/udl.md index 1bee4f92b0..0528d4845f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/udl.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/udl.md @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/untergrabung.md b/content/glossary/german/untergrabung.md index 0aa2d8a9d0..9f879dab20 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/untergrabung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/untergrabung.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/validit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/validit\303\244t.md" index 8aa7594b56..816d5b36ba 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/validit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/validit\303\244t.md" @@ -20,8 +20,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/verantwortungsvolle_forschung_und_innovation.md b/content/glossary/german/verantwortungsvolle_forschung_und_innovation.md index 6071fe56de..232e570c06 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/verantwortungsvolle_forschung_und_innovation.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/verantwortungsvolle_forschung_und_innovation.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/versionskontrolle.md b/content/glossary/german/versionskontrolle.md index 06f8e17824..23d99da8f2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/versionskontrolle.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/versionskontrolle.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/versteckte_moderatoren.md b/content/glossary/german/versteckte_moderatoren.md index 08b2dcfbd9..db7b32bbeb 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/versteckte_moderatoren.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/versteckte_moderatoren.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/verzahnung.md b/content/glossary/german/verzahnung.md index 8f4a144a7b..29174b140b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/verzahnung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/verzahnung.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/vorabdruck.md b/content/glossary/german/vorabdruck.md index 993896fdf2..755542d20c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/vorabdruck.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/vorabdruck.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/webometrie.md b/content/glossary/german/webometrie.md index 6ddf48ba8d..fa222ccc26 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/webometrie.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/webometrie.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/wiederholbarkeit.md b/content/glossary/german/wiederholbarkeit.md index 5003e60aab..dcce7f09e2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/wiederholbarkeit.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/wiederholbarkeit.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/z_kurve.md b/content/glossary/german/z_kurve.md index e68d487031..b06d2c82f9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/z_kurve.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/z_kurve.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/zeitschriften_impact_faktor.md b/content/glossary/german/zeitschriften_impact_faktor.md index 29be285e94..415559a1fe 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/zeitschriften_impact_faktor.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/zeitschriften_impact_faktor.md @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/zenodo.md b/content/glossary/german/zenodo.md index e21ad7e79c..9d2eb5d3bc 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/zenodo.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/zenodo.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/zitations_diversit\303\244ts_erkl\303\244rung.md" "b/content/glossary/german/zitations_diversit\303\244ts_erkl\303\244rung.md" index 18fb655a5e..fa9b86fc85 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/zitations_diversit\303\244ts_erkl\303\244rung.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/zitations_diversit\303\244ts_erkl\303\244rung.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/zitations_verzerrung.md b/content/glossary/german/zitations_verzerrung.md index f0f163f361..201a174920 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/zitations_verzerrung.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/zitations_verzerrung.md @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/\303\244quivalenztesten.md" "b/content/glossary/german/\303\244quivalenztesten.md" index 6006ab441f..f010c1932d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/\303\244quivalenztesten.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/\303\244quivalenztesten.md" @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/\303\266ffentliches_vertrauen_in_die_wissenschaft.md" "b/content/glossary/german/\303\266ffentliches_vertrauen_in_die_wissenschaft.md" index 3a06feccb7..d27754eedb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/\303\266ffentliches_vertrauen_in_die_wissenschaft.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/\303\266ffentliches_vertrauen_in_die_wissenschaft.md" @@ -8,20 +8,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/references/index.md b/content/glossary/references/index.md index 8fd0eb44cf..9fcd2184f1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/references/index.md +++ b/content/glossary/references/index.md @@ -12,714 +12,714 @@ We are currently working on a better way to display and cross-link the reference
-
Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384
-
Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
-
Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/
-
Academy, T. S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. SLOW-SCIENCE.Org — Bear with Us, While We Think. http://slow-science.org/
-
Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/
-
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh
-
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
-
Aire, O. (2020). High accuracy Data anonymisation. Amnesia. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/
-
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021919228368
-
Albayrak, N. (2018). Academics’ role on the future of higher education: Important but unrecognised. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/11/29/academics-role-on-the-future-of-higher-education-important-but-unrecognised/
-
Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/
-
Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.
-
Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/
-
Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806
-
ALLEA. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
-
Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/
-
Alliance, R. D. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard
-
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association.
-
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.
-
Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032
-
Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095
-
Andersson, N. (2018). Participatory research—a modernizing science for primary health care. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 19(5), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.187
-
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3
-
Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b
-
Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook.
-
Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/
-
Anon. (n.d.). About arxiv. Retrieved from https://info.arxiv.org/about/index.html
-
Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/
-
Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/
-
Anon. (n.d.). Data availability statements. Retrieved from https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/data-availability-statements
-
Anon. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. Retrieved from https://schema.datacite.org/
-
Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn
-
Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/
-
Anon. (n.d.). INVOLVE – INVOLVE Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Retrieved from https://www.invo.org.uk/
-
Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses
-
Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science
-
Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
-
Anon. (n.d.). What is a codebook?. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html
-
Anon. (n.d.). What is a digital object identifier, or DOI?. Retrieved from https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/faqs/what-is-doi
-
Anon. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline?. Retrieved from https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/
-
Anon. (n.d.). What is open education?. Retrieved from https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education
-
Anon. (n.d.). What is plagiarism?. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/category/preventing-plagiarism/
-
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
-
Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783
-
Arts and Humanities Research Council. (n.d.). Definition of eligibility for funding. Retrieved from https://ahrc.ukri.org/skills/earlycareerresearchers/definitionofeligibility/
-
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
-
AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/
-
Authorship & Contributorship | The BMJ. (n.d.). The British Medical Journal. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship
-
Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes
-
Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104
-
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
-
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374
-
Bahlai, C., Bartlett, L. J., Burgio, K. R., & others. (2019). Open science isn’t always open to all scientists. American Scientist, 107(2), 78.
-
Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760
-
Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7
-
Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.
-
Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/
-
Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025
-
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
-
Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn
-
Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013
-
Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685
-
Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612
-
Bazi, T. (2020). Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind? International Urogynecology Journal, 31, 481–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04187-2
-
Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869
-
Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131
-
Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951
-
Benjamini, Y., & Braun, H. (2002). John W. Tukey’s contributions to multiple comparisons. The Annals of Statistics, 30(6), 1576–1594. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1043351247
-
Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058
-
Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009
-
BIAS | Definition of BIAS by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BIAS. (n.d.). Lexico Dictionaries | English. https://www.lexico.com/definition/bias
-
Bias—definition of bias in English. (2017). https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bias
-
BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io
-
BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html
-
Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.
-
Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/
-
Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519
-
Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077
-
Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz
-
BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/
-
Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147
-
Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115
-
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.
-
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
-
Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.
-
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
-
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
-
Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8
-
Bortoli, S. (2021). NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. Learning For Involvement. https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project
-
Bos, J. (2020). Confidentiality. In Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences (pp. 149–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6_7
-
Boudry, M. (2013). The hypothesis that saves the day. Ad hoc reasoning in pseudoscience. Logique et Analyse, 245–258.
-
Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473
-
Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0
-
Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.
-
Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816
-
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
-
Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
-
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
-
Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291
-
Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691
-
Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980
-
Breznau, N., Rinke, E. M., Wuttke, A., Nguyen, H. H. V., Adem, M., Adriaans, J., Akdeniz, E., Alvarez-Benjumea, A., Andersen, H. K., Auer, D., Azevedo, F., Bahnsen, O., Bai, L., Balzer, D., Bauer, G., Bauer, P., Baumann, M., Baute, S., Benoit, V., & Żółtak, T. (2021). How Many Replicators Does It Take to Achieve Reliability? Investigating Researcher Variability in a Crowdsourced Replication. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j7qta
-
Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
-
Brodie, S., Frainer, A., Pennino, M. G., Jiang, S., Kaikkonen, L., Lopez, J., Ortega-Cisneros, K., Peters, C. A., Selim, S. A., & Vaidianu, N. (2021). Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(11), 957–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011
-
Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402
-
Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals (pp. 1–6) [Repositories Support Project]. University College London.
-
Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/
-
Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.
-
Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348
-
Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill.
-
Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874
-
Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144
-
Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., & O’Brien, J. M. (2019). Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(51), 25535–25545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910951116
-
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
-
Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
-
Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191
-
Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659
-
Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.
-
Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747
-
Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword
-
Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950
-
Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X
-
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally.
-
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2011). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Wadsworth.
-
Carney, D. R., & Banaji, M. R. (2012). First is best. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e35088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035088
-
Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149
-
Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753
-
Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn
-
Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414
-
Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072
-
Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports
-
Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis
-
Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/
-
Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/
-
CESSDA Training Team. (2017–2020). CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide. CESSDA ERIC. https://www.cessda.eu/DMGuide
-
CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide
-
Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
-
Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298
-
Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022
-
Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767
-
Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127
-
CKAN - The open source data management system. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://ckan.org/.
-
Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92
-
Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001
-
Closed access. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/.
-
Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach
-
cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/
-
Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186
-
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
-
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
-
Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303
-
Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html
-
Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science | The repliCATS project. (n.d.). University of Melbourne.
-
Collective, C. (2021). What Co-production means to us. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us
-
Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303
-
Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829
-
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.
-
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
-
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
-
Correction or retraction? (2006). Nature, 444(7116), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b
-
Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage.
-
Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415
-
CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. (n.d.). Casrai. https://casrai.org/credit/
-
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.
-
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
-
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
-
Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/
-
Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222
-
Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387
-
Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972
-
Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/
-
Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20
-
DataCite Schema. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. https://schema.datacite.org/
-
Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782
-
Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y
-
Declaration on Research Assessment. (n.d.). Health Research Board. https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/
-
Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/
-
Definition, T. O. S. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/osd
-
Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925
-
Dellavalle, R. P., Banks, M. A., & Ellis, J. I. (2007). Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Self-Plagiarism: How to Avoid Recycling Fraud. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(3), 527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.05.018
-
Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
-
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3923602
-
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
-
Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Buzbas, E. O. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 200805. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805
-
Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/
-
Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x
-
Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.
-
Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920
-
Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
-
Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003
-
Digital Object Identifier System Handbook. (n.d.). DOI. https://www.doi.org/hb.html
-
Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/
-
Dismukes, R. K. (2010). Understanding and analyzing human error in real-world operations. In E. Salas & D. Maurino (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (2nd ed., pp. 335–374). Academic Press.
-
Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451
-
Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility Network). (n.d.). SKRN. https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn
-
Download JASP. (n.d.). JASP - Free. https://jasp-stats.org/download/
-
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.
-
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.
-
Dubin, R. (1969). Theory building. The Free Press.
-
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529
-
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x
-
Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8.
-
d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10
-
Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372
-
Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283
-
Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012
-
Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/
-
Editorial Director. (2021). What is a group author (collaborative author) and does it need an ORCID? JMIR Publications. https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001449591-What-is-a-group-author-collaborative-author-and-does-it-need-an-ORCID-
-
Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300103
-
Eldermire, E. (n.d.). LibGuides: Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
-
Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360
-
Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430
-
Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808
-
Elm, E. von, Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 335(7624), 806–808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
-
Elman, C., Gerring, J., & Mahoney, J. (Eds.). (2020). The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science. Cambridge University Press.
-
Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322
-
Elsherif, M., Middleton, S., Phan, J. M., Azevedo, F., Iley, B., Grose-Hodge, M., Tyler, S., Kapp, S. K., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A., Grafton-Clarke, D., Yeung, S. K., Shaw, J. J., Hartmann, H., & Dokovova, M. (2022). Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k7a9p
-
Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567
-
Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck
-
Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.
-
Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5
-
European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
-
European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en
-
Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004
-
Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190
-
Everitt, B. S., & Skrondall, A. (2010). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics - Fourth Edition. Cambridge University Press.
-
Evidence Synthesis. (n.d.). LSHTM. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis
-
Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271
-
Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114
-
Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991
-
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
-
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
-
Ferguson, C. J. (2021). Providing a lower-bound estimate for psychology’s “crud factor”: The case of aggression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.
-
Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023
-
Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150
-
Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587
-
Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403
-
Fillon, A. A., Feldman, G., Yeung, S. K., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., Nanakdewa, K., & Brick, C. (n.d.). Correlational Meta-Analysis Registered Report Template.
-
Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539
-
Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
-
Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
-
Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.
-
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067
-
Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p
-
FORRT. (2021). Welcome to FORRT. Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training. https://forrt.org
-
Forscher, P. S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Coles, N. A., Silan, M. A., Dutra, N., Basnight-Brown, D., & IJzerman, H. (2022). The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221082970
-
Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88
-
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484
-
Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182
-
Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005
-
Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).
-
Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/
-
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/
-
Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007
-
Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003
-
Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.
-
Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642
-
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/
-
Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649
-
Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284
-
Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034
-
German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.
-
Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.
-
Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.
-
Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press.
-
Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/
-
Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13
-
Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).
-
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758
-
Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control
-
git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290
-
Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033
-
GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/
-
Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18.
-
Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.
-
Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027
-
Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908
-
Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44
-
Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7
-
GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/
-
Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1
-
Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.
-
Guenther, E. A., & Rodriguez, J. K. (2020). What’s wrong with ‘manels’ and what can we do about them. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068
-
Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368
-
Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585
-
Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404
-
Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556
-
Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924
-
Hamel, C., Michaud, A., Thuku, M., Skidmore, B., Stevens, A., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., & Garritty, C. (2021). Defining rapid reviews: A systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 129, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.041
-
Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/
-
Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494
-
Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH
-
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., & Gérard-Marchant, P. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
-
Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/
-
Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71
-
Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147
-
Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306
-
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
-
Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/
-
Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.
-
Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1
-
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.
-
Henrich, J. (2020). The weirdest people in the world: How the west became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus.
-
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
-
Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf
-
Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6
-
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
-
Higher Education Funding Council for England. (n.d.). About the REF. https://ref.ac.uk/about-the-ref/what-is-the-ref/
-
Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128
-
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
-
Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630
-
Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137
-
Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].
-
Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201
-
Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048
-
Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611.
-
Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341
-
Holm, S. (1979). A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
-
Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886
-
Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097
-
Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/
-
Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/
-
Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf
-
Hultsch, D. F., MacDonald, S. W., & Dixon, R. A. (2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(2), P101–P115. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.2.P101
-
Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
-
Hunter, J. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
-
Hunter, J. (2012). Post-publication peer review: Opening up scientific conversation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 63. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00063
-
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE.
-
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661
-
Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009
-
ICPSR. (n.d.). What is a Codebook? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html
-
Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.
-
Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/
-
Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/
-
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983
-
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
-
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html
-
INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/
-
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
-
Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468
-
Ioannidis, J. P. (2023). Systematic reviews for basic scientists: a different beast. Physiological Reviews, 103(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00028.2022
-
Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264
-
ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.
-
JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org
-
Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075
-
Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158
-
James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6
-
Jamovi. (n.d.). Jamovi—Stats. Open. Now. Jamovi. https://www.jamovi.org/
-
Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015
-
JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].
-
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
-
Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp
-
Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489
-
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
-
Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.
-
Kamraro. (2014). Responsible research & innovation. Horizon 2020 - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
-
Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2020). The consequences of data fabrication and falsification among researchers. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 1(2), 7–10.
-
Kapp, S. K. (2013). Interactions between theoretical models and practical stakeholders: the basis for an integrative, collaborative approach to disabilities. In E. Ashkenazy & M. Latimer (Eds.), Empowering Leadership: A Systems Change Guide for Autistic College Students and Those with Other Disabilities (pp. 104–113). Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN).
-
Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp
-
Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.
-
Kellogg Insight. (n.d.). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword
-
Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126
-
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
-
Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001
-
Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456
-
Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805
-
Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x
-
King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301
-
Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.
-
Kiureghian, A. D., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
-
Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158
-
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
-
Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
-
Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/
-
Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth
-
Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/
-
Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586
-
Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869
-
Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
-
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
-
Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812
-
Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.
-
Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029
-
Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.
-
Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023
-
Lakens, D. (2020). Pandemic researchers — recruit your own best critics. Nature, 581, 121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2180-7
-
Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html
-
Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf
-
Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012
-
Lakens, D. (2024). When and how to deviate from a preregistration. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), Article 117094. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117094
-
Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065
-
Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963
-
Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X
-
Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046
-
Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/
-
Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166
-
Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.
-
LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489
-
LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843
-
Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue
-
Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.
-
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
-
Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082
-
Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a
-
Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820
-
Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003
-
Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
-
Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338
-
Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374
-
Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222
-
Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x
-
Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625
-
Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543
-
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.
-
Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.
-
Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132
-
Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
-
Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919
-
Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113
-
Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag
-
Maass, W., Parsons, J., Purao, S., Storey, V. C., & Woo, C. (2018). Data-driven meets theory-driven research in the era of big data: Opportunities and challenges for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(12), 1253–1273. http://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00526
-
Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y
-
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767
-
Manalili, M. A. R., Pearson, A., Sulik, J., Creechan, L., Elsherif, M. M., Murkumbi, I., Azevedo, F., Bonnen, K. L., Kim, J. S., Kording, K., Lee, J. J., Obscura, Kapp, S. K., Roer, J. P., & Morstead, T. (2022). From Puzzle to Progress: How engaging with Neurodiversity can improve Cognitive Science.
-
Marks, D. (1997). Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289709166831
-
Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252.
-
Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986
-
Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/
-
Mayo, D. G., & Cox, D. R. (2006). Frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference. In Optimality: The second Erich L. Lehmann symposium (pp. 77–97). https://www.jstor.org/stable/i397717
-
McDaniel, G., & Corporation, I. B. M. (1994). IBM dictionary of computing. McGraw-Hill. http://archive.org/details/isbn_9780070314894
-
McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.
-
McGee, M. (2012). Neurodiversity. Contexts, 11(3), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212456175
-
McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115
-
Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. (n.d.). https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
-
Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/
-
Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor
-
Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244. https://meehl.umn.edu/sites/meehl.umn.edu/files/files/144whysummaries.pdf
-
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350
-
Menke, C. (2015). A Note on Science and Democracy? Robert K. Merton’s Ethos of Science. In R. Klausnitzer, C. Spoerhase, & D. Werle (Eds.), Ethos und Pathos der Geisteswissenschaften. DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013
-
Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.
-
Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513
-
Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013
-
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
-
Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.
-
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x
-
Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
-
Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science
-
Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
-
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
-
Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089
-
Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X
-
Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X
-
Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1
-
Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3
-
Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547
-
Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147
-
Morse, J. M. (2010). “Cherry picking”: Writing from thin data. Qualitative Health Research, 20(1), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309354285
-
Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607
-
Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590
-
Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002
-
Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.
-
Muma, J. R. (1993). The need for replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3605.927
-
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
-
Murphy, K. R., & Aguinis, H. (2019). HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9524-7
-
Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31, 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782
-
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/
-
Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
-
Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.
-
Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245
-
Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/
-
Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/
-
Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519
-
Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part I. Biometrika, 20(1/2), 175–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331945
-
Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500
-
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
-
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886
-
NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project
-
Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322
-
Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196
-
Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115
-
Nogrady, B. (2023). Hyperauthorship: The publishing challenges for “big team” science. Nature News. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00575-3 Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
-
Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change
-
Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215
-
Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
-
Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
-
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
-
Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058
-
Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf
-
Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.
-
Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525
-
Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961
-
Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2
-
OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/
-
OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB
-
of Open Science, T. T. E. T. D., & Data, O. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER QUARTERLY, 25(4), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113
-
Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People. Macmillan.
-
Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
-
Onie, S. (2020). Redesign open science for Asia, Africa and Latin America. Nature, 587, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03052-3
-
Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/
-
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
-
Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/
-
Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/licenses
-
Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd
-
OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/
-
Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education
-
Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8
-
Orben, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Crud (re)defined. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961
-
ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/
-
OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. (2021). https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/
-
OSF. (n.d.). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/
-
OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/
-
Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x
-
O’Dea, R. E., Parker, T. H., Chee, Y. E., Culina, A., Drobniak, S. M., Duncan, D. H., Fidler, F., Gould, E., Ihle, M., Kelly, C. D., Lagisz, M., Roche, D. G., Sánchez-Tójar, A., Wilkinson, D. P., Wintle, B. C., & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology. BMC Biology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01006-3
-
O’Grady, O. (2020). Psychology’s replication crisis inspires ecologists to push for more reliable research. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0894
-
O’Sullivan, L., Ma, L., & Doran, P. (2021). An overview of post-publication peer review. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.26
-
Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024
-
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
-
Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117
-
Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
-
Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr
-
PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/
-
Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about
-
Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
-
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
-
Peirce, J. W., Hirst, R. J., & MacAskill, M. R. (2022). Building Experiments in PsychoPy (2nd ed.). Sage.
-
Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022). Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13534
-
Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847
-
Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
-
Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3
-
Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., & Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8
-
Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0
-
Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
-
Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa
-
Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648
-
Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818
-
Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2017). OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data. Neuroimage, 144, 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.073
-
Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012
-
Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887
-
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
-
Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ
-
Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255
-
Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K., Hartmann, H., & others. (2020). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f9m47
-
Preregistration Pledge. (n.d.). Preregistration Pledge. Google Docs. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf8RflGizFJZamE874o8aDOhyU7UsNByR4dLmzhOtEOiu8KRQ/viewform?embedded=true&usp=embed_facebook
-
Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.
-
Protzko, J. (2018). Null-hacking, a lurking problem in the open science movement. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9y3mp
-
psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary
-
Publication Bias. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalog of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/
-
PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/
-
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
-
R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/
-
Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461
-
Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405
-
Ramagopalan, S. V., Skingsley, A. P., Handunnetthi, L., Klingel, M., Magnus, D., Pakpoor, J., & Goldacre, B. (2014). Prevalence of primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional study. F1000Research, 3, 77. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3784.1
-
Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories
-
Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530
-
Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/
-
RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/
-
ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/
-
Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/
-
RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/
-
Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068
-
Rogers, A., Castree, N., & Kitchin, R. (2013). Reflexivity. In A Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530
-
Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893
-
Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307
-
Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3
-
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision.
-
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
-
Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
-
Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140
-
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1
-
Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818
-
Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3
-
Rubin, M. (2022). Does preregistration improve the interpretability and credibility of research findings? [Powerpoint slides]. https://www.slideshare.net/MarkRubin14/does-preregistration-improve-the-interpretability-and-credibility-of-research-findings
-
Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6
-
Russell, B. (2020). A priori justification and knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/apriori/
-
Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214
-
Salem, D. N., & Boumil, M. M. (2013). Conflict of Interest in Open-Access Publishing. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(5), 491–491. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1307577
-
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/
-
Sasaki, K., & Yamada, Y. (2022). SPARKing: Sampling planning after the results are known. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ngz8k
-
Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010
-
Scargle, J. D. (1999). Publication bias (the “file-drawer problem”) in scientific inference. ArXiv Preprint Physics. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/9909033
-
Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html
-
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Sage.
-
Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549
-
Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS
-
Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419
-
Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6
-
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
-
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306.
-
Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z
-
Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061
-
Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges
-
Scientific Data. (n.d.). Recommended Data Repositories. Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories
-
Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do
-
Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental validity: A recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446302300113
-
Senn, S. (2003). Bayesian, likelihood, and frequentist approaches to statistics. Applied Clinical Trials, 12(8), 35–38.
-
Sert, N. P. du, Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
-
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
-
Shakespeare, T. (2013). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (4th ed., pp. 214–221). Routledge.
-
Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151
-
Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE.
-
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
-
Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0
-
Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802
-
Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646
-
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
-
Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208
-
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630
-
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988
-
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850
-
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454
-
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf
-
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z
-
Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384
-
Smela, B., Toumi, M., Świerk, K., Francois, C., Biernikiewicz, M., Clay, E., & Boyer, L. (2023). Rapid literature review: definition and methodology. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 11(1), Article 2241234. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234
-
Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4
-
Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823
-
Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396
-
Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317
-
SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/
-
Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185
-
Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/
-
Spiegelhalter, D., & Rice, K. (2009). Bayesian statistics. Scholarpedia, 4(8), 5230. http://dx.doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.5230
-
Stanford Libraries. (n.d.). Data Management Plans | Stanford Libraries. https://library.stanford.edu/research/data-management-services/data-management-plans
-
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174
-
Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847
-
Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
-
Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/
-
Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/
-
Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007
-
Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.
-
Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4
-
Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)
-
Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
-
Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing
-
Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/
-
Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.
-
Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2
-
Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder
-
Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123, 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5
-
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2015). Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review. In Accountability in Research (pp. 22–40). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.899909
-
Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p
-
Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak
-
Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak
-
Tenney, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2019). Statistical significance. In StatsPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535373/
-
Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/
-
Thaler, K. M. (2017). Mixed Methods Research in the Study of Political and Social Violence and Conflict. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815585196
-
The Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Transparency & best practice – DOAJ. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/
-
The CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
-
The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
-
The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell. (2012). In Perspectives on Psychological Science (Vol. 7, pp. 643–644). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519
-
The R Foundation. (n.d.). The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
-
The Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science. (2021). https://improvingpsych.org/
-
Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015
-
Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002
-
Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060
-
Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1
-
Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z
-
Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018
-
Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press.
-
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
-
Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260
-
Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561
-
UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
-
University of Oxford. (2023). Plagiarism. https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism
-
University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
-
van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2
-
Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884
-
Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3
-
Velázquez, A. (2021). Data analysis: Definition, types and examples. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/what-is-data-analysis/
-
Verma, J. P., & Verma, P. (2020). Determining Sample Size and Power in Research Studies. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5204-5
-
Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/
-
Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6
-
Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
-
Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357
-
Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies on emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
-
Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826
-
Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9
-
Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078
-
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
-
Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177
-
Walker, N. (2021). Neuroqueer Heresies: Notes on the Neurodiversity Paradigm, Autistic Empowerment, and Postnormal Possibilities. Autonomous Press.
-
Walker, P., & Miksa, T. (2019). RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard. GitHub. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard
-
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717
-
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
-
Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5
-
Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/
-
Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b
-
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
-
Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.
-
Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832
-
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
-
Willroth, E. C., & Atherton, O. E. (2024). Best laid plans: A guide to reporting preregistration deviations. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231213802
-
Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem
-
Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547
-
Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412
-
Winter, S. R., Rice, C., Capps, J., Trombley, J., Milner, M. N., Anania, E. C., Walters, N. W., & Baugh, B. S. (2020). An analysis of a pilot’s adherence to their personal weather minimums. Safety Science, 123, 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104576
-
Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149
-
Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (pp. 1–120). JCGM. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6
-
World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/
-
Wren, J. D., Valencia, A., & Kelso, J. (2019). Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention. Bioinformatics, 35(18), 3217–3218. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz071
-
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
-
Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
-
Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831
-
Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685
-
Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/
-
Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/
-
Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009
-
Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972
+
Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384
+
Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
+
Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/
+
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh
+
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
+
Aire, O. (2020). High accuracy Data anonymisation. Amnesia. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/
+
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics, 56(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021919228368
+
Albayrak, N. (2018). Academics’ role on the future of higher education: Important but unrecognised. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/11/29/academics-role-on-the-future-of-higher-education-important-but-unrecognised/
+
Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/
+
Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.
+
Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/
+
Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806
+
ALLEA. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
+
Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/
+
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association.
+
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.
+
Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032
+
Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095
+
Andersson, N. (2018). Participatory research—a modernizing science for primary health care. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 19(5), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgf2.187
+
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3
+
Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b
+
Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook.
+
Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/
+
Anon. (n.d.). About arxiv. Retrieved from https://info.arxiv.org/about/index.html
+
Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/
+
Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/
+
Anon. (n.d.). Data availability statements. Retrieved from https://www.springernature.com/gp/authors/research-data-policy/data-availability-statements
+
Anon. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. Retrieved from https://schema.datacite.org/
+
Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn
+
Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/
+
Anon. (n.d.). INVOLVE – INVOLVE Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Retrieved from https://www.invo.org.uk/
+
Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses
+
Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science
+
Anon. (n.d.). Welcome to Sherpa Romeo - v2.sherpa. Retrieved from https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is a codebook?. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is a digital object identifier, or DOI?. Retrieved from https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/faqs/what-is-doi
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline?. Retrieved from https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is open education?. Retrieved from https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education
+
Anon. (n.d.). What is plagiarism?. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/category/preventing-plagiarism/
+
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
+
Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783
+
Arts and Humanities Research Council. (n.d.). Definition of eligibility for funding. Retrieved from https://ahrc.ukri.org/skills/earlycareerresearchers/definitionofeligibility/
+
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
+
AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/
+
Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes
+
Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104
+
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
+
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308374
+
Bahlai, C., Bartlett, L. J., Burgio, K. R., & others. (2019). Open science isn’t always open to all scientists. American Scientist, 107(2), 78.
+
Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760
+
Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7
+
Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.
+
Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/
+
Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025
+
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
+
Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn
+
Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013
+
Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685
+
Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612
+
Bazi, T. (2020). Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind? International Urogynecology Journal, 31, 481–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-04187-2
+
Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869
+
Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131
+
Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951
+
Benjamini, Y., & Braun, H. (2002). John W. Tukey’s contributions to multiple comparisons. The Annals of Statistics, 30(6), 1576–1594. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1043351247
+
Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058
+
Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009
+
BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io
+
BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html
+
Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.
+
Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/
+
Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519
+
Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077
+
Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz
+
BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/
+
Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147
+
Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115
+
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.
+
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
+
Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.
+
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
+
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061
+
Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8
+
Bortoli, S. (2021). NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. Learning For Involvement. https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project
+
Bos, J. (2020). Confidentiality. In Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences (pp. 149–173). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6_7
+
Boudry, M. (2013). The hypothesis that saves the day. Ad hoc reasoning in pseudoscience. Logique et Analyse, 245–258.
+
Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473
+
Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0
+
Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.
+
Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816
+
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211
+
Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
+
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
+
Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291
+
Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691
+
Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980
+
Breznau, N., Rinke, E. M., Wuttke, A., Nguyen, H. H. V., Adem, M., Adriaans, J., Akdeniz, E., Alvarez-Benjumea, A., Andersen, H. K., Auer, D., Azevedo, F., Bahnsen, O., Bai, L., Balzer, D., Bauer, G., Bauer, P., Baumann, M., Baute, S., Benoit, V., & Żółtak, T. (2021). How Many Replicators Does It Take to Achieve Reliability? Investigating Researcher Variability in a Crowdsourced Replication. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/j7qta
+
Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
+
Brodie, S., Frainer, A., Pennino, M. G., Jiang, S., Kaikkonen, L., Lopez, J., Ortega-Cisneros, K., Peters, C. A., Selim, S. A., & Vaidianu, N. (2021). Equity in science: advocating for a triple-blind review system. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 36(11), 957–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.07.011
+
Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402
+
Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals (pp. 1–6) [Repositories Support Project]. University College London.
+
Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/
+
Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.
+
Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348
+
Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill.
+
Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874
+
Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144
+
Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., & O’Brien, J. M. (2019). Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(51), 25535–25545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910951116
+
Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read
+
Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
+
Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191
+
Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659
+
Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.
+
Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747
+
Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword
+
Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950
+
Campbell, D. T. (1979). Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X
+
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally.
+
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2011). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Wadsworth.
+
Carney, D. R., & Banaji, M. R. (2012). First is best. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e35088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035088
+
Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149
+
Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753
+
Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn
+
Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414
+
Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072
+
Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports
+
Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis
+
Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/
+
Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/
+
CESSDA Training Team. (2017–2020). CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide. CESSDA ERIC. https://www.cessda.eu/DMGuide
+
CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide
+
Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016
+
Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298
+
Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022
+
Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767
+
Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127
+
Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92
+
Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001
+
Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach
+
cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/
+
Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186
+
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.
+
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
+
Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303
+
Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html
+
Collective, C. (2021). What Co-production means to us. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us
+
Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303
+
Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829
+
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.
+
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486
+
Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
+
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
+
Correction or retraction? (2006). Nature, 444(7116), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b
+
Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage.
+
Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415
+
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.
+
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
+
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
+
Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/
+
Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222
+
Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387
+
Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972
+
Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/
+
DataCite Schema. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. https://schema.datacite.org/
+
Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782
+
Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y
+
Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/
+
Definition, T. O. S. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/osd
+
Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925
+
Dellavalle, R. P., Banks, M. A., & Ellis, J. I. (2007). Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Self-Plagiarism: How to Avoid Recycling Fraud. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57(3), 527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2007.05.018
+
Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
+
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3923602
+
DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
+
Devezer, B., Navarro, D. J., Vandekerckhove, J., & Buzbas, E. O. (2021). The case for formal methodology in scientific reform. Royal Society Open Science, 8(3), 200805. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805
+
Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/
+
Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x
+
Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.
+
Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920
+
Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781
+
Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003
+
Dismukes, R. K. (2010). Understanding and analyzing human error in real-world operations. In E. Salas & D. Maurino (Eds.), Human factors in aviation (2nd ed., pp. 335–374). Academic Press.
+
Doll, R., & Hill, A. B. (1954). The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits; a preliminary report. British Medical Journal, 1(4877), 1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4877.1451
+
Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.
+
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.
+
Dubin, R. (1969). Theory building. The Free Press.
+
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529
+
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x
+
Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8.
+
d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10
+
Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372
+
Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283
+
Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012
+
Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/
+
Editorial Director. (2021). What is a group author (collaborative author) and does it need an ORCID? JMIR Publications. https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/articles/115001449591-What-is-a-group-author-collaborative-author-and-does-it-need-an-ORCID-
+
Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300103
+
Eldermire, E. (n.d.). LibGuides: Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
+
Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360
+
Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430
+
Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808
+
Elm, E. von, Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ, 335(7624), 806–808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
+
Elman, C., Gerring, J., & Mahoney, J. (Eds.). (2020). The production of knowledge: Enhancing progress in social science. Cambridge University Press.
+
Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322
+
Elsherif, M., Middleton, S., Phan, J. M., Azevedo, F., Iley, B., Grose-Hodge, M., Tyler, S., Kapp, S. K., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, A., Grafton-Clarke, D., Yeung, S. K., Shaw, J. J., Hartmann, H., & Dokovova, M. (2022). Bridging Neurodiversity and Open Scholarship: How Shared Values Can Guide Best Practices for Research Integrity, Social Justice, and Principled Education. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k7a9p
+
Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck
+
Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.
+
Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5
+
European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
+
European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en
+
Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004
+
Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190
+
Everitt, B. S., & Skrondall, A. (2010). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics - Fourth Edition. Cambridge University Press.
+
Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271
+
Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114
+
Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991
+
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
+
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
+
Ferguson, C. J. (2021). Providing a lower-bound estimate for psychology’s “crud factor”: The case of aggression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.
+
Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023
+
Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150
+
Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587
+
Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403
+
Fillon, A. A., Feldman, G., Yeung, S. K., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., Nanakdewa, K., & Brick, C. (n.d.). Correlational Meta-Analysis Registered Report Template.
+
Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539
+
Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
+
Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393
+
Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.
+
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067
+
Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p
+
FORRT. (2021). Welcome to FORRT. Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training. https://forrt.org
+
Forscher, P. S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Coles, N. A., Silan, M. A., Dutra, N., Basnight-Brown, D., & IJzerman, H. (2022). The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221082970
+
Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88
+
Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484
+
Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182
+
Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005
+
Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).
+
Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/
+
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/
+
Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007
+
Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003
+
Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.
+
Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642
+
Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/
+
Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649
+
Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284
+
Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034
+
German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.
+
Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.
+
Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.
+
Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press.
+
Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/
+
Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13
+
Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).
+
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758
+
Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control
+
git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290
+
Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033
+
GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/
+
Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18.
+
Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.
+
Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027
+
Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908
+
Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44
+
Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7
+
GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/
+
Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1
+
Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.
+
Guenther, E. A., & Rodriguez, J. K. (2020). What’s wrong with ‘manels’ and what can we do about them. The Conversation. http://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068
+
Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368
+
Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585
+
Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404
+
Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556
+
Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924
+
Hamel, C., Michaud, A., Thuku, M., Skidmore, B., Stevens, A., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., & Garritty, C. (2021). Defining rapid reviews: A systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 129, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.041
+
Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/
+
Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494
+
Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH
+
Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N. J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., van Kerkwijk, M. H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., del Río, J. F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., & Gérard-Marchant, P. (2020). Array programming with NumPy. Nature, 585(7825), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
+
Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/
+
Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71
+
Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147
+
Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306
+
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238
+
Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/
+
Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.
+
Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1
+
Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.
+
Henrich, J. (2020). The weirdest people in the world: How the west became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Farrar, Straus.
+
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
+
Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf
+
Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6
+
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
+
Higher Education Funding Council for England. (n.d.). About the REF. https://ref.ac.uk/about-the-ref/what-is-the-ref/
+
Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128
+
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
+
Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630
+
Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137
+
Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].
+
Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201
+
Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048
+
Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611.
+
Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341
+
Holm, S. (1979). A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615733
+
Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886
+
Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097
+
Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/
+
Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/
+
Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf
+
Hultsch, D. F., MacDonald, S. W., & Dixon, R. A. (2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57(2), P101–P115. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.2.P101
+
Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. J. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
+
Hunter, J. (2007). Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
+
Hunter, J. (2012). Post-publication peer review: Opening up scientific conversation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 63. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00063
+
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE.
+
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661
+
Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009
+
Authorship & Contributorship | The BMJ. (n.d.). The British Medical Journal. https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship
+
BIAS | Definition of BIAS by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of BIAS. (n.d.). Lexico Dictionaries | English. https://www.lexico.com/definition/bias
+
Bias—definition of bias in English. (2017). https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bias
+
CKAN - The open source data management system. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://ckan.org/.
+
Closed access. (n.d.). Retrieved 9 July 2021, from https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/.
+
Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science | The repliCATS project. (n.d.). University of Melbourne.
+
CRediT - Contributor Roles Taxonomy. (n.d.). Casrai. https://casrai.org/credit/
+
Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20
+
Declaration on Research Assessment. (n.d.). Health Research Board. https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/
+
Digital Object Identifier System Handbook. (n.d.). DOI. https://www.doi.org/hb.html
+
Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/
+
Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility Network). (n.d.). SKRN. https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn
+
Download JASP. (n.d.). JASP - Free. https://jasp-stats.org/download/
+
Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567
+
Evidence Synthesis. (n.d.). LSHTM. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis
+
Measuring your research impact: i10-Index. (n.d.). https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10
+
NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project
+
Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/
+
OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. (2021). https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/
+
PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/
+
Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories
+
Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530
+
ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/
+
RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/
+
San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/
+
SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/
+
Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/
+
The Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science. (2021). https://improvingpsych.org/
+
ICPSR. (n.d.). What is a Codebook? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/what-is-a-codebook.html
+
Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.
+
Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/
+
Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/
+
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983
+
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
+
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html
+
INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/
+
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
+
Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Meta-research: Why research on research matters. PLoS Biology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005468
+
Ioannidis, J. P. (2023). Systematic reviews for basic scientists: a different beast. Physiological Reviews, 103(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00028.2022
+
Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264
+
ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.
+
JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org
+
Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075
+
Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158
+
James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6
+
Jamovi. (n.d.). Jamovi—Stats. Open. Now. Jamovi. https://www.jamovi.org/
+
Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015
+
JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software].
+
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
+
Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp
+
Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489
+
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347
+
Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.
+
Kamraro. (2014). Responsible research & innovation. Horizon 2020 - European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
+
Kang, E., & Hwang, H. J. (2020). The consequences of data fabrication and falsification among researchers. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 1(2), 7–10.
+
Kapp, S. K. (2013). Interactions between theoretical models and practical stakeholders: the basis for an integrative, collaborative approach to disabilities. In E. Ashkenazy & M. Latimer (Eds.), Empowering Leadership: A Systems Change Guide for Autistic College Students and Those with Other Disabilities (pp. 104–113). Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN).
+
Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp
+
Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.
+
Kellogg Insight. (n.d.). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword
+
Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126
+
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
+
Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001
+
Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456
+
Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805
+
Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x
+
King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301
+
Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.
+
Kiureghian, A. D., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
+
Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158
+
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
+
Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
+
Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/
+
Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth
+
Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/
+
Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586
+
Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869
+
Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
+
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
+
Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812
+
Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.
+
Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029
+
Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.
+
Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023
+
Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html
+
Lakens, D. (2020). Pandemic researchers — recruit your own best critics. Nature, 581, 121. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2180-7
+
Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf
+
Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012
+
Lakens, D. (2024). When and how to deviate from a preregistration. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1), Article 117094. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.117094
+
Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065
+
Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963
+
Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X
+
Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046
+
Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/
+
Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166
+
Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.
+
LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489
+
LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843
+
Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue
+
Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.
+
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
+
Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082
+
Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a
+
Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820
+
Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003
+
Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
+
Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338
+
Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374
+
Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222
+
Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x
+
Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625
+
Liu, Y., Gordon, M., Wang, J., Bishop, M., Chen, Y., Pfeiffer, T., Twardy, C., & Viganola, D. (2020). Replication Markets: Results, Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities in AI Replication. ArXiv:2005.04543 . http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04543
+
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.
+
Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.
+
Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132
+
Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
+
Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919
+
Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113
+
Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag
+
Maass, W., Parsons, J., Purao, S., Storey, V. C., & Woo, C. (2018). Data-driven meets theory-driven research in the era of big data: Opportunities and challenges for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(12), 1253–1273. http://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00526
+
Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y
+
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767
+
Manalili, M. A. R., Pearson, A., Sulik, J., Creechan, L., Elsherif, M. M., Murkumbi, I., Azevedo, F., Bonnen, K. L., Kim, J. S., Kording, K., Lee, J. J., Obscura, Kapp, S. K., Roer, J. P., & Morstead, T. (2022). From Puzzle to Progress: How engaging with Neurodiversity can improve Cognitive Science.
+
Marks, D. (1997). Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 19(3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638289709166831
+
Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252.
+
Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986
+
Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/
+
Mayo, D. G., & Cox, D. R. (2006). Frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference. In Optimality: The second Erich L. Lehmann symposium (pp. 77–97). https://www.jstor.org/stable/i397717
+
McDaniel, G., & Corporation, I. B. M. (1994). IBM dictionary of computing. McGraw-Hill. http://archive.org/details/isbn_9780070314894
+
McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.
+
McGee, M. (2012). Neurodiversity. Contexts, 11(3), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212456175
+
McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115
+
Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/
+
Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor
+
Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244. https://meehl.umn.edu/sites/meehl.umn.edu/files/files/144whysummaries.pdf
+
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350
+
Menke, C. (2015). A Note on Science and Democracy? Robert K. Merton’s Ethos of Science. In R. Klausnitzer, C. Spoerhase, & D. Werle (Eds.), Ethos und Pathos der Geisteswissenschaften. DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013
+
Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.
+
Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513
+
Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013
+
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
+
Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.
+
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x
+
Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525
+
Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science
+
Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
+
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
+
Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089
+
Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X
+
Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X
+
Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1
+
Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3
+
Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547
+
Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147
+
Morse, J. M. (2010). “Cherry picking”: Writing from thin data. Qualitative Health Research, 20(1), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309354285
+
Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607
+
Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590
+
Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002
+
Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.
+
Muma, J. R. (1993). The need for replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3605.927
+
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
+
Murphy, K. R., & Aguinis, H. (2019). HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9524-7
+
Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31, 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782
+
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/
+
Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
+
Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.
+
Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245
+
Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519
+
Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1928). On the use and interpretation of certain test criteria for purposes of statistical inference: Part I. Biometrika, 20(1/2), 175–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331945
+
Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500
+
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
+
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886
+
Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322
+
Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196
+
Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115
+
Nogrady, B. (2023). Hyperauthorship: The publishing challenges for “big team” science. Nature News. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00575-3 Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3
+
Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change
+
Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215
+
Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691
+
Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192
+
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
+
Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058
+
Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf
+
Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.
+
Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525
+
Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961
+
Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2
+
OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/
+
OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB
+
of Open Science, T. T. E. T. D., & Data, O. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER QUARTERLY, 25(4), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113
+
Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People. Macmillan.
+
Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
+
Onie, S. (2020). Redesign open science for Asia, Africa and Latin America. Nature, 587, 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03052-3
+
Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/
+
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
+
Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/licenses
+
Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd
+
OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/
+
Opensource.Com. (n.d.). What is open education? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-education
+
Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8
+
Orben, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Crud (re)defined. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961
+
ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/
+
OSF. (n.d.). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/
+
OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/
+
Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x
+
O’Dea, R. E., Parker, T. H., Chee, Y. E., Culina, A., Drobniak, S. M., Duncan, D. H., Fidler, F., Gould, E., Ihle, M., Kelly, C. D., Lagisz, M., Roche, D. G., Sánchez-Tójar, A., Wilkinson, D. P., Wintle, B. C., & Nakagawa, S. (2021). Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology. BMC Biology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01006-3
+
O’Grady, O. (2020). Psychology’s replication crisis inspires ecologists to push for more reliable research. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0894
+
O’Sullivan, L., Ma, L., & Doran, P. (2021). An overview of post-publication peer review. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.26
+
Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024
+
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
+
Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117
+
Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
+
Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr
+
Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about
+
Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
+
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
+
Peirce, J. W., Hirst, R. J., & MacAskill, M. R. (2022). Building Experiments in PsychoPy (2nd ed.). Sage.
+
Pellicano, E., & den Houting, J. (2022). Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(4), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13534
+
Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847
+
Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
+
Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3
+
Pernet, C. R., Appelhoff, S., Gorgolewski, K. J., Flandin, G., Phillips, C., Delorme, A., & Oostenveld, R. (2019). EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Scientific Data, 6(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8
+
Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0
+
Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
+
Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa
+
Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648
+
Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818
+
Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2017). OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data. Neuroimage, 144, 259–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.073
+
Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012
+
Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887
+
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
+
Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ
+
Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255
+
Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K., Hartmann, H., & others. (2020). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f9m47
+
Preregistration Pledge. (n.d.). Preregistration Pledge. Google Docs. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf8RflGizFJZamE874o8aDOhyU7UsNByR4dLmzhOtEOiu8KRQ/viewform?embedded=true&usp=embed_facebook
+
Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.
+
Protzko, J. (2018). Null-hacking, a lurking problem in the open science movement. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9y3mp
+
psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary
+
Publication Bias. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalog of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/
+
PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/
+
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
+
R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/
+
Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461
+
Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405
+
Ramagopalan, S. V., Skingsley, A. P., Handunnetthi, L., Klingel, M., Magnus, D., Pakpoor, J., & Goldacre, B. (2014). Prevalence of primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional study. F1000Research, 3, 77. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3784.1
+
Replication Markets. (n.d.). Replication Markets – Reliable research replicates…you can bet on it. Replication Markets. https://www.replicationmarkets.com/
+
RepliCATS project. (2020). Collaborative Assessment for Trustworthy Science. The University of Melbourne. https://replicats.research.unimelb.edu.au/
+
Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard
+
Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/
+
Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068
+
Rogers, A., Castree, N., & Kitchin, R. (2013). Reflexivity. In A Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530
+
Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893
+
Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307
+
Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3
+
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision.
+
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
+
Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
+
Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140
+
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1
+
Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818
+
Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3
+
Rubin, M. (2022). Does preregistration improve the interpretability and credibility of research findings? [Powerpoint slides]. https://www.slideshare.net/MarkRubin14/does-preregistration-improve-the-interpretability-and-credibility-of-research-findings
+
Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6
+
Russell, B. (2020). A priori justification and knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/apriori/
+
Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214
+
Salem, D. N., & Boumil, M. M. (2013). Conflict of Interest in Open-Access Publishing. New England Journal of Medicine, 369(5), 491–491. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1307577
+
Sasaki, K., & Yamada, Y. (2022). SPARKing: Sampling planning after the results are known. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ngz8k
+
Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010
+
Scargle, J. D. (1999). Publication bias (the “file-drawer problem”) in scientific inference. ArXiv Preprint Physics. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/9909033
+
Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html
+
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Sage.
+
Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549
+
Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS
+
Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419
+
Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6
+
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
+
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306.
+
Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z
+
Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061
+
Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges
+
Scientific Data. (n.d.). Recommended Data Repositories. Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories
+
Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do
+
Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental validity: A recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23(1), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446302300113
+
Senn, S. (2003). Bayesian, likelihood, and frequentist approaches to statistics. Applied Clinical Trials, 12(8), 35–38.
+
Sert, N. P. du, Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
+
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
+
Shakespeare, T. (2013). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (4th ed., pp. 214–221). Routledge.
+
Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151
+
Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE.
+
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
+
Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0
+
Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802
+
Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646
+
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
+
Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208
+
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630
+
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988
+
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850
+
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454
+
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf
+
Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z
+
Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/
+
Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384
+
Smela, B., Toumi, M., Świerk, K., Francois, C., Biernikiewicz, M., Clay, E., & Boyer, L. (2023). Rapid literature review: definition and methodology. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy, 11(1), Article 2241234. https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234
+
Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4
+
Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823
+
Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396
+
Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317
+
Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185
+
Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/
+
Spiegelhalter, D., & Rice, K. (2009). Bayesian statistics. Scholarpedia, 4(8), 5230. http://dx.doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.5230
+
Stanford Libraries. (n.d.). Data Management Plans | Stanford Libraries. https://library.stanford.edu/research/data-management-services/data-management-plans
+
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174
+
Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847
+
Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
+
Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/
+
Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology/
+
Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007
+
Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.
+
Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4
+
Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)
+
Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
+
Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing
+
Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.
+
Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2
+
Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder
+
Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123, 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5
+
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2015). Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review. In Accountability in Research (pp. 22–40). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.899909
+
Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p
+
Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak
+
Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak
+
Tenney, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2019). Statistical significance. In StatsPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535373/
+
Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/
+
Thaler, K. M. (2017). Mixed Methods Research in the Study of Political and Social Violence and Conflict. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815585196
+
The Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Transparency & best practice – DOAJ. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/
+
The CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32
+
The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/
+
The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
+
The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell. (2012). In Perspectives on Psychological Science (Vol. 7, pp. 643–644). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519
+
The R Foundation. (n.d.). The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
+
The Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. SLOW-SCIENCE.Org — Bear with Us, While We Think. http://slow-science.org/
+
Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015
+
Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002
+
Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060
+
Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1
+
Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z
+
Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018
+
Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press.
+
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.
+
Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260
+
Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561
+
UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/
+
UNESCO. (2017). Open Educational Resources (OER). https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer
+
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of EScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101
+
University of Oxford. (2023). Plagiarism. https://www.ox.ac.uk/students/academic/guidance/skills/plagiarism
+
van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2
+
Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884
+
Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3
+
Velázquez, A. (2021). Data analysis: Definition, types and examples. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/what-is-data-analysis/
+
Verma, J. P., & Verma, P. (2020). Determining Sample Size and Power in Research Studies. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5204-5
+
Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/
+
Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6
+
Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
+
Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357
+
Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies on emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
+
Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826
+
Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9
+
Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078
+
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
+
Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177
+
Walker, N. (2021). Neuroqueer Heresies: Notes on the Neurodiversity Paradigm, Autistic Empowerment, and Postnormal Possibilities. Autonomous Press.
+
Walker, P., & Miksa, T. (2019). RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard. GitHub. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard
+
Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717
+
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
+
Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5
+
Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/
+
Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b
+
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
+
Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.
+
Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832
+
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
+
Willroth, E. C., & Atherton, O. E. (2024). Best laid plans: A guide to reporting preregistration deviations. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231213802
+
Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem
+
Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8, e49547. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49547
+
Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412
+
Winter, S. R., Rice, C., Capps, J., Trombley, J., Milner, M. N., Anania, E. C., Walters, N. W., & Baugh, B. S. (2020). An analysis of a pilot’s adherence to their personal weather minimums. Safety Science, 123, 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104576
+
Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149
+
Working Group 1 of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology JCGM. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data—Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (pp. 1–120). JCGM. https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6
+
World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/
+
Wren, J. D., Valencia, A., & Kelso, J. (2019). Reviewer-coerced citation: case report, update on journal policy and suggestions for future prevention. Bioinformatics, 35(18), 3217–3218. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz071
+
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
+
Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265
+
Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831
+
Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685
+
Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/
+
Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/
+
Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009
+
Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972
diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ad_hominem_safsatas\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ad_hominem_safsatas\304\261.md" index 597b5f94d2..42c46b180f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ad_hominem_safsatas\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ad_hominem_safsatas\304\261.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Barnes, R. M., Johnston, H. M., MacKenzie, N., Tobin, S. J., & Taglang, C. M. (2018). The effect of ad hominem attacks on the evaluation of claims promoted by scientists. PloS One, 13(1), e0192025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192025", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/aga\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/aga\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" index d122699a98..d825353b89 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/aga\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/aga\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", - "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. *hides* . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368", + "Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34–37.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Zoe Flack" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/akademik_etki.md b/content/glossary/turkish/akademik_etki.md index 4a72ec79cb..9e3b7312aa 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/akademik_etki.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/akademik_etki.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "REF" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Anon. (2021). What is impact?. Retrieved from https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/akran_toplulu\304\237u_i\314\207\303\247inde_de\304\237erlendirme_sistemi_pci_peer_community_in_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/akran_toplulu\304\237u_i\314\207\303\247inde_de\304\237erlendirme_sistemi_pci_peer_community_in_.md" index 76e350835a..9c796c4ef5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/akran_toplulu\304\237u_i\314\207\303\247inde_de\304\237erlendirme_sistemi_pci_peer_community_in_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/akran_toplulu\304\237u_i\314\207\303\247inde_de\304\237erlendirme_sistemi_pci_peer_community_in_.md" @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Peer review", "Preprints" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "PCI IN A FEW LINES. (n.d.). https://peercommunityin.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Henderson" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/aleatorik_se\303\247kisiz_belirsizlik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/aleatorik_se\303\247kisiz_belirsizlik.md" index d05fc1f48c..1f99c70f2b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/aleatorik_se\303\247kisiz_belirsizlik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/aleatorik_se\303\247kisiz_belirsizlik.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/altmetriler.md b/content/glossary/turkish/altmetriler.md index c1171d9245..4916e30458 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/altmetriler.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/altmetriler.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Journal impact factor" ], "references": [ - "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", - "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" + "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", + "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mirela Zaneva" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ambargo_s\303\274resi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ambargo_s\303\274resi.md" index 2fbe5bfacb..f0734437e1 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ambargo_s\303\274resi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ambargo_s\303\274resi.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", - "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", - "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" + "Klein, O., Hardwicke, T. E., Aust, F., Breuer, J., Danielsson, H., Mohr, A. H., IJzerman, H., Nilsonne, G., Vanpaemel, W., & Frank, M. C. (2018). A practical guide for transparency in psychological science. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.158", + "Laakso, M., & Björk, B. C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high‐impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323–1329.", + "Embargo (academic publishing). (2021). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Embargo_(academic_publishing)&oldid=1016895567" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/amnesia.md b/content/glossary/turkish/amnesia.md index 36c01fa004..c2f0b976c5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/amnesia.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/amnesia.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Confidentiality", "Research ethics" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Open Aire. (n.d.). Amnesia Anonymization Tool—Data anonymization made easy. https://amnesia.openaire.eu/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/analitik_esneklik.md b/content/glossary/turkish/analitik_esneklik.md index 728746b72b..b85d94a095 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/analitik_esneklik.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/analitik_esneklik.md @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Researcher degrees of freedom" ], "references": [ - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", - "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", - "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Carp, J. (2012). On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00149", + "Jones, A., Dr, J., Duckworth, & Christiansen, P. (2020). May I have your attention, please? Methodological and Analytical Flexibility in the Addiction Stroop. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ws8xp", + "Masur, P. K. (2020). Understanding the Effects of Analytical Choices on Finding the Privacy Paradox: A Specification Curve Analysis of Large-Scale Survey Data. Preprint. https://osf.io/m72gb/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/anonimlik.md b/content/glossary/turkish/anonimlik.md index 4ad030f316..d05a808167 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/anonimlik.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/anonimlik.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Vulnerable population" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_d\303\266ng\303\274s\303\274.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_d\303\266ng\303\274s\303\274.md" index fa2bd0b068..5a910d24be 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_d\303\266ng\303\274s\303\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_d\303\266ng\303\274s\303\274.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Research process" ], "references": [ - "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", - "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" + "Bramoullé, Y., & Saint-Paul, G. (2010). Research cycles. In Journal of Economic Theory (Vol. 145, pp. 1890–1920). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965816", + "Lieberman, E. (2020). Research Cycles. In C. Elman, J. Gerring, & J. Mahoney (Eds.), The Production of Knowledge: Enhancing Progress in Social Science (pp. 42–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.003" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_i\305\237_ak\304\261\305\237\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_i\305\237_ak\304\261\305\237\304\261.md" index 3bd3daff33..d07db3a054 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_i\305\237_ak\304\261\305\237\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_i\305\237_ak\304\261\305\237\304\261.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Research pipeline" ], "references": [ - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "James E Bartlett" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_protokol\303\274.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_protokol\303\274.md" index acd64984bd..8192bf5800 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_protokol\303\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_protokol\303\274.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" + "BMJ. (2015). Introducing ‘How to write and publish a Study Protocol’ using BMJ’s new eLearning programme: Research to Publication. Retrieved from https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjopen/2015/09/22/introducing-how-to-write-and-publish-a-study-protocol-using-bmjs-new-elearning-programme-research-to-publication/", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_veri_deposu_kay\304\261tlar\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_veri_deposu_kay\304\261tlar\304\261.md" index 71545752e8..14ec654171 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_veri_deposu_kay\304\261tlar\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_veri_deposu_kay\304\261tlar\304\261.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Home | re3data.org. Retrieved from https://www.re3data.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_verisi_y\303\266netimi_avy_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_verisi_y\303\266netimi_avy_.md" index ae98928e79..dc6e010f93 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_verisi_y\303\266netimi_avy_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rma_verisi_y\303\266netimi_avy_.md" @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ "Research data management" ], "references": [ - "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." + "CESSDA. (n.d.). Data Management Expert Guide—CESSDA TRAINING. https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide", + "Corti, L., Van den Eynden, V., Bishop, L., & Woollard, M. (2019). Managing and sharing research data: a guide to good practice. Sage." ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261n\304\261n_serbestlik_derecesi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261n\304\261n_serbestlik_derecesi.md" index 2a8a060e6e..2255c61ca2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261n\304\261n_serbestlik_derecesi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261n\304\261n_serbestlik_derecesi.md" @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Specification curve analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", - "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632", + "Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Augusteijn, H. E., Bakker, M., Van Aert, R., & Van Assen, M. A. (2016). Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1832. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" index 1dcf237376..f2791f668d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" @@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", - "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", + "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/arrive_k\304\261lavuzu.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/arrive_k\304\261lavuzu.md" index d0ed147199..0b6ee146c4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/arrive_k\304\261lavuzu.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/arrive_k\304\261lavuzu.md" @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Reporting Guideline", "STRANGE" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Holgate, S. T., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., Lazic, S. E., Lidster, K., MacCallum, C. J., Macleod, M., & others. (2020). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLOS Biology, 18(7), e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/at\304\261f_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/at\304\261f_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" index c9c7608aaa..f53a3d8b6d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/at\304\261f_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/at\304\261f_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Reporting bias" ], "references": [ - "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", - "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", - "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630360402", + "Jannot, A. S., Agoritsas, T., Gayet-Ageron, A., & Perneger, T. V. (2013). Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(3), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.015", + "Thombs, B. D., Levis, A. W., Razykov, I., Syamchandra, A., Leentjens, A. F., Levenson, J. L., & Lumley, M. A. (2015). Potentially coercive self-citation by peer reviewers: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.09.015", + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/at\304\261f_\303\247e\305\237itlili\304\237i_beyan\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/at\304\261f_\303\247e\305\237itlili\304\237i_beyan\304\261.md" index 92fe217438..c414bb3548 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/at\304\261f_\303\247e\305\237itlili\304\237i_beyan\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/at\304\261f_\303\247e\305\237itlili\304\237i_beyan\304\261.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" + "Zurn, P., Bassett, D. S., & Rust, N. C. (2020). The Citation Diversity Statement: A Practice of Transparency, A Way of Life. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(9), 669–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.009" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_akademi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_akademi.md" index 36a897bc4c..a971783587 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_akademi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_akademi.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p" + "Tennant, J., Beamer, J. E., Bosman, J., Brembs, B., Chung, N. C., Clement, G., Crick, T., Dugan, J., Dunning, A., Eccles, D., Enkhbayar, A., Graziotin, D., Harding, R., Havemann, J., Katz, D. S., Khanal, K., Kjaer, J. N., Koder, T., Macklin, P., & Turner, A. (2019). Foundations for Open Scholarship Strategy Development. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/b4v8p", + "[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805\\_Foundations\\_for\\_Open\\_Scholarship\\_Strategy\\_Development](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330742805_Foundations_for_Open_Scholarship_Strategy_Development)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gerald Vineyard" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_akademi_bilgi_taban\304\261_oskb_open_scholarship_knowledge_base_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_akademi_bilgi_taban\304\261_oskb_open_scholarship_knowledge_base_.md" index b5678fa747..e6a1ef4e2f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_akademi_bilgi_taban\304\261_oskb_open_scholarship_knowledge_base_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_akademi_bilgi_taban\304\261_oskb_open_scholarship_knowledge_base_.md" @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ "Open scholarship", "Open Science" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "OER Commons. (n.d.). Open Scholarship Knowledge Base | OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB", + "[www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB](http://www.oercommons.org/hubs/OSKB)" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_aklama.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_aklama.md" index 1dde5bd858..c3f0d67d04 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_aklama.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_aklama.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Open Source" ], "references": [ - "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", - "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", - "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", - "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" + "Farrow, R. (2017). Open Education and Critical Pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2016.1113991", + "Moretti, M. (2020). Beyond Open-washing: Are Narratives the Future of Open Data Portals? Medium Blog. https://medium.com/nightingale/beyond-open-washing-are-stories-and-narratives-the-future-of-open-data-portals-93228d8882f3", + "Villum, C. (2016). “Open-washing” – The difference between opening your data and simply making them available. https://blog.okfn.org/2014/03/10/open-washing-the-difference-between-opening-your-data-and-simply-making-them-available/", + "Vlaeminck, S., & Podkrajac, F. (2017). Journals in Economic Sciences: Paying Lip Service to Reproducible Research? IASSIST Quarterly, 41(1–4), 16. https://doi.org/10.29173/iq6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261_ve_katk\304\261_sa\304\237lay\304\261c\304\261_kimli\304\237i_orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261_ve_katk\304\261_sa\304\237lay\304\261c\304\261_kimli\304\237i_orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md" index 8ee5173376..e5e0490db2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261_ve_katk\304\261_sa\304\237lay\304\261c\304\261_kimli\304\237i_orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261_ve_katk\304\261_sa\304\237lay\304\261c\304\261_kimli\304\237i_orcid_open_researcher_and_contributor_id_.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Name Ambiguity Problem" ], "references": [ - "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", - "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" + "Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., & Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404", + "ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID. https://orcid.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" index 24e7ea4919..5c4f5f590e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim.md" @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", - "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Kathawalla, U., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2020). Easing into Open Science: A Guide for Graduate Students and Their Advisors. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vzjdp Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/vzjdp", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_i\303\247in_adland\304\261r\304\261lm\304\261\305\237_varl\304\261k_tabanl\304\261_metin_anonimle\305\237tirme_netanos_named_entity_based_text_anonymization_for_open_science_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_i\303\247in_adland\304\261r\304\261lm\304\261\305\237_varl\304\261k_tabanl\304\261_metin_anonimle\305\237tirme_netanos_named_entity_based_text_anonymization_for_open_science_.md" index 53a352b110..67023010ae 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_i\303\247in_adland\304\261r\304\261lm\304\261\305\237_varl\304\261k_tabanl\304\261_metin_anonimle\305\237tirme_netanos_named_entity_based_text_anonymization_for_open_science_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_i\303\247in_adland\304\261r\304\261lm\304\261\305\237_varl\304\261k_tabanl\304\261_metin_anonimle\305\237tirme_netanos_named_entity_based_text_anonymization_for_open_science_.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" + "Kleinberg, B., Mozes, M., van der Toolen, Y., & Verschuere, B. (2017). NETANOS - Named entity-based Text Anonymization for Open Science. https://osf.io/w9nhb/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Norbert Vanek" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_merkezi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_merkezi.md" index 17a9419b4e..84da62bf9b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_merkezi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_merkezi.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Transparency and Openness Promotion Guidelines (TOP)" ], "references": [ - "for Open Science, C. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" + "Centre for Open Science. (n.d.). Show Your Work. Share Your Work. Advance Science. That’s Open Science. https://www.cos.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_platformu_osf_open_science_framework_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_platformu_osf_open_science_framework_.md" index 6827ef43e7..14b8db7080 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_platformu_osf_open_science_framework_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_platformu_osf_open_science_framework_.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", - "for Open Science, C. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" + "Foster, E. D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88", + "Centre for Open Science. (2011–2021). Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_eri\305\237im.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_eri\305\237im.md" index b139ebcef1..f8e8865dc2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_eri\305\237im.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_eri\305\237im.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", - "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" + "Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2002). Read the Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read", + "Suber, P. (2015). Open Access Overview. http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_e\304\237itim_kaynaklar\304\261_platformu.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_e\304\237itim_kaynaklar\304\261_platformu.md" index c3961873a7..2b1b347457 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_e\304\237itim_kaynaklar\304\261_platformu.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_e\304\237itim_kaynaklar\304\261_platformu.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Open Science Framework" ], "references": [ - "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/" + "OER Commons. (n.d.). OER Commons. https://www.oercommons.org/", + "[www.oercommons.org](http://www.oercommons.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_g\303\274venilir_ve_\305\237effaf_ekoloji_ve_evrimsel_biyoloji_derne\304\237i.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_g\303\274venilir_ve_\305\237effaf_ekoloji_ve_evrimsel_biyoloji_derne\304\237i.md" index 17dd5f3364..585bf5657e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_g\303\274venilir_ve_\305\237effaf_ekoloji_ve_evrimsel_biyoloji_derne\304\237i.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_g\303\274venilir_ve_\305\237effaf_ekoloji_ve_evrimsel_biyoloji_derne\304\237i.md" @@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ "related_terms": [ "Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS)" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "SORTEE. (n.d.). Society for Open, Reliable and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. https://www.sortee.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Dominique Roche" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" index 1fb5aca10e..1f39a182d9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "PRO (peer review openness) initiative", "Transparent peer review" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review [version 2; peer review: 4 approved]. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_kaynakl\304\261_yaz\304\261l\304\261m.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_kaynakl\304\261_yaz\304\261l\304\261m.md" index d235734e0d..85ccb2b7f6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_kaynakl\304\261_yaz\304\261l\304\261m.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_kaynakl\304\261_yaz\304\261l\304\261m.md" @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" + "Open Source Initiative. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd", + "Anon. (n.d.). Open Source in Open Science | FOSTER. Retrieved from https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/foster-taxonomy/open-source-open-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_kod.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_kod.md" index 5c5e853312..5f9355f3be 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_kod.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_kod.md" @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "Syntax" ], "references": [ - "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" + "Easterbrook, S. M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7(11), 779–781. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2283" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_lisanslar.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_lisanslar.md" index 0858c454ce..3c6320b65b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_lisanslar.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_lisanslar.md" @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ "Open Data", "Open Source" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Anon. (n.d.). Licenses & Standards | Open Source Initiative. Retrieved from https://opensource.org/licenses" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Andrew J. Stewart" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_materyal.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_materyal.md" index 048f89c7f5..70a8dbd8f6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_materyal.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_materyal.md" @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Blohowiak, B. B., Cohoon, J., de Wit, L., Eich, E., Farach, F. J., Hasselman, F., & others. (2020). Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_veri.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_veri.md" index b0a615172c..80a7d434d6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_veri.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\303\247\304\261k_veri.md" @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Secondary data analysis" ], "references": [ - "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", - "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" + "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", + "Handbook, O. D. (n.d.). What is Open Data? Retrieved 9 July 2021. https://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/what-is-open-data/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\305\237a\304\237\304\261dan_yukar\304\261ya_yakla\305\237\304\261m_a\303\247\304\261k_akademiye_y\303\266nelik_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\305\237a\304\237\304\261dan_yukar\304\261ya_yakla\305\237\304\261m_a\303\247\304\261k_akademiye_y\303\266nelik_.md" index f3ab4700dc..c8a84a6cc8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/a\305\237a\304\237\304\261dan_yukar\304\261ya_yakla\305\237\304\261m_a\303\247\304\261k_akademiye_y\303\266nelik_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/a\305\237a\304\237\304\261dan_yukar\304\261ya_yakla\305\237\304\261m_a\303\247\304\261k_akademiye_y\303\266nelik_.md" @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ "Grassroot initiatives" ], "references": [ - "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", - "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", - "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", - "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", - "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", - "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" + "Button, K. S., Lawrence, N. S., Chambers, C. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Instilling scientific rigour at the grassroots. Psychologist, 29(3), 158–159.", + "Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Lawrence, N., & Munafò, M. R. (2020). Grassroots training for reproducible science: a consortium-based approach to the empirical dissertation. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 19(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719857659", + "Hart, D. D., & Silka, L. (2020). Rebuilding the Ivory Tower: A Bottom-Up Experiment in Aligning Research with Societal Needs. Issues in Science and Technology, 79–85. Retrieved from https://issues.org/aligning-research-with-societal-needs/", + "Meslin, E. M. (2009). Achieving global justice in health through global research ethics: supplementing Macklin’s ‘top-down’ approach with one from the ‘ground up’. In R. M. Green, A. Donovan, & S. A. Jauss (Eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 163–177). University Press.", + "Moran, H., Karlin, L., Lauchlan, E., Rappaport, S. J., Bleasdale, B., Wild, L., & Dorr, J. (2020). Understanding Research Culture: What researchers think about the culture they work in. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 201. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15832.1", + "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catherine Laverty" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/bayes_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/bayes_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" index 27b2ea0036..4a6306a39d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/bayes_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/bayes_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "*p*\\-value" ], "references": [ - "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", - "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" + "Hoijtink, H., Mulder, J., van Lissa, C., & Gu, X. (2019). A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor. Psychological Methods, 24(5), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000201", + "Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767" ], "drafted_by": [ "Meng Liu" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/bayesyen_parametre_tahmini.md b/content/glossary/turkish/bayesyen_parametre_tahmini.md index bc5f076050..05464587f2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/bayesyen_parametre_tahmini.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/bayesyen_parametre_tahmini.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", - "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" + "Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013). emcee: The MCMC Hammer. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125(925), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/670067", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Press, W. (2007). Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing, 3rd edition.", + "Huber, C. (2016). Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 2: MCMC and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/15/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-2-mcmc-and-the-metropolis-hastings-algorithm/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/bayesyen_\303\247\304\261kar\304\261m.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/bayesyen_\303\247\304\261kar\304\261m.md" index ab67eb0f5a..9a7e4a3e56 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/bayesyen_\303\247\304\261kar\304\261m.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/bayesyen_\303\247\304\261kar\304\261m.md" @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@ "Bayesian Parameter Estimation" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", - "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", - "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", - "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", - "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" + "Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406920", + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003", + "Etz, A., Gronau, Q. F., Dablander, F., & others. (2018). How to become a Bayesian in eight easy steps: An annotated reading list. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1317-5", + "Kruschke, J. K. (2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). Academic Press.", + "McElreath, R. (2020). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan (2nd ed.). Taylor.", + "Wagenmakers, E.-J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ba\304\237lant\304\261_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ba\304\237lant\304\261_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" index 55feccc0a4..4b33a33079 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ba\304\237lant\304\261_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ba\304\237lant\304\261_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/bela_\303\274\303\247l\303\274.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/bela_\303\274\303\247l\303\274.md" index c11d5ef016..36ddce571e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/bela_\303\274\303\247l\303\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/bela_\303\274\303\247l\303\274.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" + "Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science . Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615616374" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/bids_veri_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/bids_veri_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" index f853464aa3..535bd7ea97 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/bids_veri_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/bids_veri_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", - "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" + "Gorgolewski, K., Auer, T., Calhoun, V., & others. (2016). The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments. Scientific Data, 3, 160044. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.44", + "BIDS. (2020). About BIDS. Retrieved from https://bids.neuroimaging.io" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/bilgi_edinme.md b/content/glossary/turkish/bilgi_edinme.md index dcbcbab4dd..0a36ac6dde 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/bilgi_edinme.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/bilgi_edinme.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Learning" ], "references": [ - "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." + "Brule, J., & Blount, A. (1989). Knowledge acquisition. McGraw-Hill." ], "drafted_by": [ "Oscar Lecuona" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/bilgimizi_\303\266zg\303\274rle\305\237tirelim_platformu.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/bilgimizi_\303\266zg\303\274rle\305\237tirelim_platformu.md" index 56e224d47d..8ef02ad641 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/bilgimizi_\303\266zg\303\274rle\305\237tirelim_platformu.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/bilgimizi_\303\266zg\303\274rle\305\237tirelim_platformu.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Preregistration Pledge" ], "references": [ - "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" + "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/bilime_duyulan_toplumsal_g\303\274ven.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/bilime_duyulan_toplumsal_g\303\274ven.md" index 0bd4ad19a3..c89703baa8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/bilime_duyulan_toplumsal_g\303\274ven.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/bilime_duyulan_toplumsal_g\303\274ven.md" @@ -8,20 +8,22 @@ "Epistemic Trust" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", - "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", - "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", - "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", - "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", - "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", - "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", - "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", - "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", - "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", - "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Azevedo, F. (n.d.). Ideology May Help Explain Anti-Scientific Attitudes | Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/social-justice-pacifists/202107/ideology-may-help-explain-anti-scientific-attitudes", + "Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104", + "Bak, H.-J. (2001). Education and Public Attitudes toward Science: Implications for the ‘Deficit Model’ of Education and Support for Science and Technology. Social Science Quarterly, 82(4), 779–795. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42955760", + "Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2013). Whose Science Do You Believe? Explaining Trust in Sources of Scientific Information About the Environment. Science Communication, 35(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441691", + "Evans, G., & Durant, J. (1995). The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in Britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/4/1/004", + "Hayes, B. C., & Tariq, V. N. (2000). Gender differences in scientific knowledge and attitudes toward science: A comparative study of four Anglo-American nations. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/306", + "Hendriks, F., Kienhues, D., & Bromme, R. (2016). Trust in science and the science of trust. Trust and Communication in a Digitized World, 143–159.", + "Huber, B., Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Fostering public trust in science: The role of social media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(7), 759–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519869097", + "Kerr, J. R., & Wilson, M. S. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict rejection of science and scientists. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 550–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2021). Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science. Cognition, 215, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820", + "Liu, H., & Priest, S. (2009). Understanding public support for stem cell research: Media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508097625", + "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", + "Schneider, J., Merk, S., & Rosman, T. (2019). (Re)Building Trust? Investigating the effects of open science badges on perceived trustworthiness in journal articles. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VGBRS", + "Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2020). No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619877412", + "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tobias Wingen; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/bilimsel_katk\304\261_\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274_p_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/bilimsel_katk\304\261_\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274_p_.md" index 43de8ce9e4..cab5eff700 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/bilimsel_katk\304\261_\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274_p_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/bilimsel_katk\304\261_\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274_p_.md" @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Semantometrics" ], "references": [ - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", - "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048", + "Larivière, V., Desrochers, N., Macaluso, B., Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production. Social Studies of Science, 46(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716650046" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/bizarre.md b/content/glossary/turkish/bizarre.md index 679f35f3b7..650b0947cf 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/bizarre.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/bizarre.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", - "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" + "Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M., & Leavens, D. A. (2019). Ontogeny vs. phylogeny in primate/canid comparisons: a meta-analysis of the object choice task. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.001", + "Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/carking.md b/content/glossary/turkish/carking.md index 804cea5d84..63e0fad771 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/carking.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/carking.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Registered Report" ], "references": [ - "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Bardsley, N. (2018). What lessons does the “replication crisis” in psychology hold for experimental economics? In Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/69874/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/coar_repolardaki_i\314\207yi_uygulamalar_i\303\247in_topluluk_platformu.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/coar_repolardaki_i\314\207yi_uygulamalar_i\303\247in_topluluk_platformu.md" index 56ea33f440..f261450ec2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/coar_repolardaki_i\314\207yi_uygulamalar_i\303\247in_topluluk_platformu.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/coar_repolardaki_i\314\207yi_uygulamalar_i\303\247in_topluluk_platformu.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "TRUST principles" ], "references": [ - "of Open Access Repositories, C. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" + "Confederation of Open Access Repositories. (2020). COAR Community Framework for Best Practices in Repositories (Version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4110829" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/creative_commons_cc_lisans\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/creative_commons_cc_lisans\304\261.md" index 8fa2881539..a09b4ad785 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/creative_commons_cc_lisans\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/creative_commons_cc_lisans\304\261.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Licence" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" + "Anon. (n.d.). About CC Licenses. Retrieved from https://creativecommons.org/about/cclicenses/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/credit_katk\304\261_rolleri_taksonomisi_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/credit_katk\304\261_rolleri_taksonomisi_.md" index 9b9686bee5..853c653509 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/credit_katk\304\261_rolleri_taksonomisi_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/credit_katk\304\261_rolleri_taksonomisi_.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contributions" ], "references": [ - "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", - "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" + "Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211", + "Holcombe, A. O. (2019). Contributorship, not authorship: Use CRediT to indicate who did what. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/dekolonizasyon.md b/content/glossary/turkish/dekolonizasyon.md index 4aad213e46..f3394e1ba1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/dekolonizasyon.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/dekolonizasyon.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Inclusion" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" + "Albayrak, N. (2018). Diversity helps but decolonisation is the key to equality in higher education. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/04/16/diversity-helps-but-decolonisation-is-the-key-to-equality-in-higher-education/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/dergi_etki_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/dergi_etki_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" index 8437fb9df9..08d47fa65b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/dergi_etki_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/dergi_etki_fakt\303\266r\303\274.md" @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "H-index" ], "references": [ - "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", - "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", - "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", - "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" + "Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291", + "Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.", + "Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., & Hill, E. (2008). Show me the data. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200711140", + "Sharma, M., Sarin, A., Gupta, P., Sachdeva, S., & Desai, A. (2014). Journal impact factor: its use, significance and limitations. World Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 13(2), 146. https://doi.org/10.4103/1450-1147.139151" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/doi_dijital_nesne_tan\304\261mlay\304\261c\304\261s\304\261_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/doi_dijital_nesne_tan\304\261mlay\304\261c\304\261s\304\261_.md" index a16eb386de..7459f10b40 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/doi_dijital_nesne_tan\304\261mlay\304\261c\304\261s\304\261_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/doi_dijital_nesne_tan\304\261mlay\304\261c\304\261s\304\261_.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Permalink" ], "references": [ - "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", - "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", - "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." + "Bilder, G. (2013). DOIs unambiguously and persistently identify published, trustworthy, citable online scholarly literature. Right? https://www.crossref.org/blog/dois-unambiguously-and-persistently-identify-published-trustworthy-citable-online-scholarly-literature-right/", + "Morgan, C. (1998). The DOI (Digital Object Identifier). Serials, 11(1), 47–51. http://doi.org/10.1629/1147", + "Anon. (2019). The DOI Handbook." ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/dora.md b/content/glossary/turkish/dora.md index 86ab7c86fe..21abd07ee1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/dora.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/dora.md @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/" + "Health Research Board. (n.d.). Declaration on Research Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.hrb.ie/funding/funding-schemes/before-you-apply/how-we-assess-applications/declaration-on-research-assessment/", + "San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). (n.d.). https://sfdora.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rudan_replikasyon.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rudan_replikasyon.md" index 959e963f1e..ee10e73ddf 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rudan_replikasyon.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rudan_replikasyon.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (2014). Does Merely Going Through the Same Moves Make for a “Direct” Replication?: Concepts, Contexts, and Operationalizations. Social Psychology, 45(4), 305–306." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif (original); Thomas Rhys Evans (alternative); Tina Lonsdorf (alternative)" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rulama_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rulama_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" index a8584e4d27..60c9585cc7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rulama_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rulama_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Myside bias" ], "references": [ - "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", - "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", - "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", - "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" + "Bishop, D. V. (2020). The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519", + "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", + "Spencer, E. A., & Heneghan, C. (2018). Confirmation bias. Catalogue Of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/confirmation-bias/", + "Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717" ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi; Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rulay\304\261c\304\261_analizler.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rulay\304\261c\304\261_analizler.md" index ae35119808..8362029ff0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rulay\304\261c\304\261_analizler.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/do\304\237rulay\304\261c\304\261_analizler.md" @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", - "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Oberauer, K., & Lewandowsky, S. (2019). Addressing the theory crisis in psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), 1596–1618. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2", + "Szollosi, A., & Donkin, C. (2019). Arrested theory development: The misguided distinction between exploratory and confirmatory research. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/your_doi_placeholder", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274zeltme.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274zeltme.md" index f3aa363bd7..7386c9b543 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274zeltme.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274zeltme.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Retraction" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" + "Anon. (2006). Correction or retraction? In Nature (Vol. 444, pp. 123–124). https://doi.org/10.1038/444123b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237manca_i\314\207\305\237_birlik\303\247i_yorumlama.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237manca_i\314\207\305\237_birlik\303\247i_yorumlama.md" index 59e3f4579c..2909bf33ff 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237manca_i\314\207\305\237_birlik\303\247i_yorumlama.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237manca_i\314\207\305\237_birlik\303\247i_yorumlama.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Collaborative commentary" ], "references": [ - "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", - "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", - "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" + "Heyman, T., Moors, P., & Rabagliati, H. (2020). The benefits of adversarial collaboration for commentaries. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00978-6", + "Rabagliati, H., Moors, P., & Heyman, T. (2019). Can item effects explain away the evidence for unconscious sound symbolism? An adversarial commentary on Heyman, Maerten, Vankrunkelsven, Voorspoels, and Moors (2019). Psychological Science, 31(9), 1200–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620949461", + "Silberzahn, R., Simonsohn, U., & Ulhmann, E. L. (2014). Matched-names analysis reveals no evidence of name-meaning effects: A collaborative commentary on Silberzahn and Uhlmann (2013). Psychological Science, 25(7), 1504–1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533802" ], "drafted_by": [ "Steven Verheyen" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237manca_i\314\207\305\237_birli\304\237i.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237manca_i\314\207\305\237_birli\304\237i.md" index 6bce8ba2b3..bee231671c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237manca_i\314\207\305\237_birli\304\237i.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237manca_i\314\207\305\237_birli\304\237i.md" @@ -11,11 +11,11 @@ "Publication bias (File Drawer Problem)" ], "references": [ - "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", - "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", - "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", - "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", - "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" + "Bateman, I., Kahneman, D., Munro, A., Starmer, C., & Sugden, R. (2005). Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8), 1561–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.013", + "Cowan, N., Belletier, C., Doherty, J. M., Jaroslawska, A. J., Rhodes, S., Forsberg, A., & Logie, R. H. (2020). How do scientific views change? Notes from an extended adversarial collaboration. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906415", + "Kerr, N. L., Ao, X., Hogg, M. A., & Zhang, J. (2018). Addressing replicability concerns via adversarial collaboration: Discovering hidden moderators of the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.001", + "Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350", + "Rakow, T., Thompson, V., Ball, L., & Markovits, H. (2014). Rationale and guidelines for empirical adversarial collaboration: A Thinking & Reasoning initiative. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.975405" ], "drafted_by": [ "Siu Kit Yeung" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237\303\274n\303\274msellik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237\303\274n\303\274msellik.md" index 38067f21f8..e689d4beba 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237\303\274n\303\274msellik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\303\274\305\237\303\274n\303\274msellik.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Qualitative Research" ], "references": [ - "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", - "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." + "Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.", + "Finlay, L., & Gough, B. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences. John Wiley & Sons." ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\304\261\305\237_ge\303\247erlilik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\304\261\305\237_ge\303\247erlilik.md" index cbd34263ad..5f15dc259d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/d\304\261\305\237_ge\303\247erlilik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/d\304\261\305\237_ge\303\247erlilik.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", - "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" + "Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1982). On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(3), 225. https://doi.org/10.1086/208919", + "Steckler, A., & McLeroy, K. R. (2008). The Importance of External Validity. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126847" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/ekonomik_ve_toplumsal_etki.md b/content/glossary/turkish/ekonomik_ve_toplumsal_etki.md index 2b98549aad..69dcab6422 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/ekonomik_ve_toplumsal_etki.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/ekonomik_ve_toplumsal_etki.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Academic Impact" ], "references": [ - "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/impact-toolkit-for-economic-and-social-sciences/defining-impact/" + "Economic, & Council, S. R. (n.d.). What is impact? Retrieved 8 July 2021. https://esrc.ukri.org/research/impact-toolkit/what-is-impact/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/epistemik_belirsizlik.md b/content/glossary/turkish/epistemik_belirsizlik.md index 4e3a22568b..6d3c9a1f1e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/epistemik_belirsizlik.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/epistemik_belirsizlik.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Knightian uncertainty" ], "references": [ - "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", - "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" + "Der Kiureghian, A., & Ditlevsen, O. (2009). Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Structural Safety, 31(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020", + "Ferson, S., Joslyn, C. A., Helton, J. C., Oberkampf, W. L., & Sentz, K. (2004). Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 85(1–3), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.03.023" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/epistemoloji.md b/content/glossary/turkish/epistemoloji.md index ea36926752..26ec398a3a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/epistemoloji.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/epistemoloji.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Ontology (Artificial Intelligence)" ], "references": [ - "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" + "Steup, M., & Neta, R. (2020). Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/eri\305\237ilebilirlik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/eri\305\237ilebilirlik.md" index f6b13811b7..ee2540364a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/eri\305\237ilebilirlik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/eri\305\237ilebilirlik.md" @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Universal design for learning (UDL)" ], "references": [ - "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", - "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", - "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Brown, N., Thompson, P., & Leigh, J. S. (2018). Making academia more accessible. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(2), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.348", + "Pollet, I. L., & Bond, A. L. (2021). Evaluation and recommendations for greater accessibility of colour figures in ornithology. Ibis, 163, 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12887", + "Suber, P. (2004). The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access. In Nature. Retrieved from http://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4391161)", + "World Wide Web Consortium. (2021). Web Accessibility Initiative. https://www.w3.org/WAI/", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Kai Krautter" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/erken_kariyer_ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261lar\304\261_eka_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/erken_kariyer_ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261lar\304\261_eka_.md" index a1510efa21..cd1c943142 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/erken_kariyer_ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261lar\304\261_eka_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/erken_kariyer_ara\305\237t\304\261rmac\304\261lar\304\261_eka_.md" @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Early Career Investigator" ], "references": [ - "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", - "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining “Early Career” in Research. Higher Education, 45, 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022698529612", + "Eley, A. R. (2012). Becoming a successful early career researcher. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/934369360", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Micah Vandegrift" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/etkile\305\237im_yan\304\261lg\304\261s\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/etkile\305\237im_yan\304\261lg\304\261s\304\261.md" index a4e30e1b9b..7cde3b1a4b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/etkile\305\237im_yan\304\261lg\304\261s\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/etkile\305\237im_yan\304\261lg\304\261s\304\261.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", - "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", - "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" + "Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328–331. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313006X152649", + "Morabia, A., Have, T. T., & Landis, J. R. (1997). Interaction Fallacy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(7), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00053-X", + "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/e\305\237de\304\237erlik_testi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/e\305\237de\304\237erlik_testi.md" index 9783609ec8..a243b3f2a3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/e\305\237de\304\237erlik_testi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/e\305\237de\304\237erlik_testi.md" @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "TOST procedure." ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", - "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2020). Improving inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065", + "Schuirmann, D. J. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15, 657–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068419" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/fair_i\314\207lkeleri.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/fair_i\314\207lkeleri.md" index 6d26746d24..20d5ae32d8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/fair_i\314\207lkeleri.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/fair_i\314\207lkeleri.md" @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18", + "GO FAIR Initiative. (2025). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/feminist_psikoloji.md b/content/glossary/turkish/feminist_psikoloji.md index 23d674efba..d0adb48d5a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/feminist_psikoloji.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/feminist_psikoloji.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Equity" ], "references": [ - "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" + "Eagly, A. H., & Riger, S. (2014). Feminism and psychology: Critiques of methods and epistemology. American Psychologist, 69(7), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037372", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/forrt.md b/content/glossary/turkish/forrt.md index 25bbdb3923..9e3c9263ec 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/forrt.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/forrt.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Integrating open and reproducible science tenets into higher education" ], "references": [ - "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" + "Forrt. (2019). Introducing a Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT). Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bnh7p" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/g_power.md b/content/glossary/turkish/g_power.md index 9d7ab76e89..bd1c48b34d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/g_power.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/g_power.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", - "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146", + "Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/genel_veri_koruma_t\303\274z\303\274\304\237\303\274_gdpr_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/genel_veri_koruma_t\303\274z\303\274\304\237\303\274_gdpr_.md" index 9bc7b9bf5a..3be64ef908 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/genel_veri_koruma_t\303\274z\303\274\304\237\303\274_gdpr_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/genel_veri_koruma_t\303\274z\303\274\304\237\303\274_gdpr_.md" @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", - "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/" + "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", + "Information Commissioner’s Office. (2021). Guide to the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR). ICO. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/", + "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/genellenebilirlik.md b/content/glossary/turkish/genellenebilirlik.md index fde0d18edc..0f74b9797d 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/genellenebilirlik.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/genellenebilirlik.md @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", - "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", - "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", - "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Esterling, K., Brady, D., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2021). The Necessity of Construct and External Validity for Generalized Causal Claims. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/2s8w5.", + "Generalizability. (2018). Generalizability. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n284", + "Kukull, W. A., & Ganguli, M. (2012). Generalizability: The trees, the forest, and the low-hanging fruit. Neurology, 78(23), 1886–1891. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f812", + "LeBel, E. P., Vanpaemel, W., Cheung, I., & Campbell, L. (2017). A brief guide to evaluate replications. Meta-Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.843", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/genelli\304\237e_i\314\207li\305\237kin_k\304\261s\304\261tlamalar.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/genelli\304\237e_i\314\207li\305\237kin_k\304\261s\304\261tlamalar.md" index 58ebc62e60..bb16349c74 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/genelli\304\237e_i\314\207li\305\237kin_k\304\261s\304\261tlamalar.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/genelli\304\237e_i\314\207li\305\237kin_k\304\261s\304\261tlamalar.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", - "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", - "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", - "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" + "Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary Conditions: What They Are, How to Explore Them, Why We Need Them, and When to Consider Them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191", + "Brandt, M. J., IJzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., & others. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005", + "Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630", + "Yarkoni, T. (2020). The generalizability crisis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X20001685" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ge\303\247erlilik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ge\303\247erlilik.md" index b40f8d27eb..a7c5c5418a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ge\303\247erlilik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ge\303\247erlilik.md" @@ -20,8 +20,9 @@ "Test" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", - "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan." + "Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950", + "Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Macmillan.", + "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze; Madeleine Pownall; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/git.md b/content/glossary/turkish/git.md index 4ab33a6987..7ef5aa63a8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/git.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/git.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", - "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", - "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" + "Kalliamvakou, E., Gousios, G., Blincoe, K., Singer, L., German, D. M., & Damian, D. (2014). The promises and perils of mining github. Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 92–101.", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do", + "Vuorre, M., & Curley, J. P. (2018). Curating research assets: A tutorial on the Git version control system. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918754826", + "git/git. (n.d.). Initial revision of ‘git’, the information manager from hell. GitHub. https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23ca2e25604af290" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/gizli_moderat\303\266rler.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/gizli_moderat\303\266rler.md" index f6c5af9ff2..97e86b1bd0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/gizli_moderat\303\266rler.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/gizli_moderat\303\266rler.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Auxiliary Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" + "Zwaan, R., Etz, A., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, E120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/goodhart_yasas\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/goodhart_yasas\304\261.md" index 07918693f3..8da181c8ed 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/goodhart_yasas\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/goodhart_yasas\304\261.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Reification (fallacy)" ], "references": [ - "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", - "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" + "Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press.", + "Strathern, M. (1997). ‘Improving ratings’: audit in the British University system. European Review, 5(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1234-981X(199707)5:3<305::AID-EURO184>3.0.CO;2-4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Adam Parker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/g\303\274venilirlik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/g\303\274venilirlik.md" index 8afbc16d43..c3fd896302 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/g\303\274venilirlik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/g\303\274venilirlik.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/h_indeksi.md b/content/glossary/turkish/h_indeksi.md index 5e7fd48711..8081c51b0f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/h_indeksi.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/h_indeksi.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", - "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" + "Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102", + "Wendl, M. C. (2007). H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature, 449(7161), 403–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/449403b" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/hackathon.md b/content/glossary/turkish/hackathon.md index 8a0a64ccc9..c248e274fd 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/hackathon.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/hackathon.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Edithaton" ], "references": [ - "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" + "Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2017). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1221805" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi_\305\237effafl\304\261\304\237\304\261_giri\305\237imi_pro_giri\305\237imi_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi_\305\237effafl\304\261\304\237\304\261_giri\305\237imi_pro_giri\305\237imi_.md" index 1780b83847..2991123283 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi_\305\237effafl\304\261\304\237\304\261_giri\305\237imi_pro_giri\305\237imi_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi_\305\237effafl\304\261\304\237\304\261_giri\305\237imi_pro_giri\305\237imi_.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparent peer review" ], "references": [ - "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" + "Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., Lewandowsky, S., Morey, C. C., Newman, D. P., Schönbrodt, F. D., Vanpaemel, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150547" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jamie P. Cockcroft" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/hakkaniyet.md b/content/glossary/turkish/hakkaniyet.md index bdae0640a2..812594b042 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/hakkaniyet.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/hakkaniyet.md @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Social justice" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", + "Posselt, J. R. (2020). Equity in Science: Representation, Culture, and the Dynamics of Change in Graduate Education. Stanford University Press. https://books.google.de/books?id=2CjwDwAAQBAJ" ], "drafted_by": [ "Gisela H. Govaart" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/harking.md b/content/glossary/turkish/harking.md index fd82feefe2..6517a2a10f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/harking.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/harking.md @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", - "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" + "Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4", + "Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports. Social Psychology, 45, 137–141. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrix Arendt" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/hassas_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/hassas_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" index beafcd5c39..bfd5a2052b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/hassas_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/hassas_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Anonymity" ], "references": [ - "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", - "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" + "Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. Sage.", + "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/hasta_ve_topluluk_kat\304\261l\304\261m\304\261_ppi_patient_and_public_involvement_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/hasta_ve_topluluk_kat\304\261l\304\261m\304\261_ppi_patient_and_public_involvement_.md" index 5c25ffda73..95791d2ee5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/hasta_ve_topluluk_kat\304\261l\304\261m\304\261_ppi_patient_and_public_involvement_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/hasta_ve_topluluk_kat\304\261l\304\261m\304\261_ppi_patient_and_public_involvement_.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Participatory research" ], "references": [ - "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", - "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" + "Boivin, A., Richards, T., Forsythe, L., Gregoire, A., L’Esperance, A., Abelson, J., & Carman, K. L. (2018). Evaluating the patient and public involvement in research. British Medical Journal, 363, k5147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5147", + "INVOLVE. (n.d.). INVOLVE – Supporting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. https://www.invo.org.uk/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/hata_tespiti.md b/content/glossary/turkish/hata_tespiti.md index ef9ed1829b..32f321bef3 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/hata_tespiti.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/hata_tespiti.md @@ -9,12 +9,12 @@ "retraction" ], "references": [ - "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", - "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", - "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", - "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", - "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", - "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" + "Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research publications. MBio, 7(3), e00809-16.", + "Brown, N. J., & Heathers, J. A. (2017). The grim test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.", + "Epskamp, S., & Nuijten, M. B. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=statcheck", + "Heathers, J. A., Anaya, J., van der Zee, T., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Recovering data from summary statistics: Sample Parameter Reconstruction via Iterative TEchniques (SPRITE). PeerJ Preprints, 6, e26968v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26968v1", + "Nuijten, M. B., Hartgerink, C. H., van Assen, M. A., Epskamp, S., & Wicherts, J. M. (2016). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1205–1226.", + "Retraction Watch. (n.d.). Retraction Watch. Retraction Watch. https://retractionwatch.com/" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/hediye_veya_misafir_yazarl\304\261k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/hediye_veya_misafir_yazarl\304\261k.md" index ea0738eba8..d3c00f0fe6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/hediye_veya_misafir_yazarl\304\261k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/hediye_veya_misafir_yazarl\304\261k.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", - "of Medical Journal Editors, I. C. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" + "Bhopal, R., Rankin, J., McColl, E., Thomas, L., Kaner, E., Stacy, R., Pearson, P., Vernon, B., & Rodgers, H. (1997). The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ, 314, 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1009", + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, eduting, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/hesaplamal\304\261_yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/hesaplamal\304\261_yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" index fc165d0410..7b4afd777d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/hesaplamal\304\261_yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/hesaplamal\304\261_yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "on Reproducibility, C., & in Science et al., R. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", - "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", - "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" + "Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (p. 25303). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303", + "Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (2017). The practice of reproducible research: Case studies and lessons from the data-intensive sciences. University of California Press.", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691", + "Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/hipotez.md b/content/glossary/turkish/hipotez.md index 0e67f7c805..ba2024277c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/hipotez.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/hipotez.md @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", - "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", - "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", - "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", - "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." + "Beller, S., & Bender, A. (2017). Theory, the final frontier? A corpus-based analysis of the role of theory in psychological articles. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00951", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033", + "Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.", + "Longino, H. E. (1992). Taking gender seriously in philosophy of science. PSA, 2, 333–340.", + "Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/i_10_indeksi.md b/content/glossary/turkish/i_10_indeksi.md index 9e6c80020f..080ff975b5 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/i_10_indeksi.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/i_10_indeksi.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Impact" ], "references": [ - "University, C. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" + "Cornell University. (2020). Measuring your research impact: i10 index. Cornell University Library. https://guides.library.cornell.edu/impact/author-impact-10" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207deolojik_yanl\304\261l\304\261k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207deolojik_yanl\304\261l\304\261k.md" index 2098610fc4..b4e248390f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207deolojik_yanl\304\261l\304\261k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207deolojik_yanl\304\261l\304\261k.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Peer review" ], "references": [ - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207lk_son_yazar_vurgusu_normu.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207lk_son_yazar_vurgusu_normu.md" index f78490c8dd..57a155db94 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207lk_son_yazar_vurgusu_normu.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207lk_son_yazar_vurgusu_normu.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "CreDit taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207sim_belirsizli\304\237i_sorunu.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207sim_belirsizli\304\237i_sorunu.md" index 1d7b997ef0..d1d71c3d2c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207sim_belirsizli\304\237i_sorunu.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207sim_belirsizli\304\237i_sorunu.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID)" ], "references": [ - "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" + "Wilson, B., & Fenner, M. (2012). Open Researcher & Contributor ID (ORCID): Solving the Name Ambiguity Problem. Educause Review - E-Content, 47(3), 54–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/5/open-researcher--contributor-id-orcid-solving-the-name-ambiguity-problem" ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_anlaml\304\261l\304\261k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_anlaml\304\261l\304\261k.md" index 003c521725..675a88aee6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_anlaml\304\261l\304\261k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_anlaml\304\261l\304\261k.md" @@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ "Type I error **Incorrect definition:** Statistical significance describes the likelihood of the observed result against chance (regardless of the null hypotheses)" ], "references": [ - "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "Cassidy, S. A., Dimova, R., Giguère, B., Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2019). Failing grade: 89% of introduction-to-psychology textbooks that define or explain statistical significance do so incorrectly. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919858072", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_ge\303\247erlilik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_ge\303\247erlilik.md" index c32cae645b..1329dea801 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_ge\303\247erlilik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_ge\303\247erlilik.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Statistical assumptions" ], "references": [ - "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_g\303\274\303\247.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_g\303\274\303\247.md" index 4dd16dcaa6..626b8aba29 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_g\303\274\303\247.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_g\303\274\303\247.md" @@ -16,13 +16,14 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", - "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", - "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", - "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", - "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf" + "Carter, A., Tilling, K., & Munafo, M. R. (2021). Considerations of sample size and power calculations given a range of analytical scenarios. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tcqrn", + "Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186", + "Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.", + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Giner-Sorolla, R., Aberson, C. L., Bostyn, D. H., Carpenter, T., Conrique, B. G., Lewis, N. A., & Soderberg, C. (2019). Power to detect what? Considerations for planning and evaluating sample size. Retrieved from https://osf.io/jnmya/", + "Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124", + "Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf", + "Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates." ], "drafted_by": [ "Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_varsay\304\261mlar.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_varsay\304\261mlar.md" index d50b85235a..ca10bfcc2b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_varsay\304\261mlar.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207statistiksel_varsay\304\261mlar.md" @@ -14,9 +14,10 @@ "Type S error" ], "references": [ - "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", - "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", - "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137" + "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", + "Hahn, G. J., & Meeker, W. Q. (1993). Assumptions for Statistical Inference. The American Statistician, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1993.10475924", + "Hoekstra, R., Kiers, H., & Johnson, A. (2012). Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(137), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00137", + "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207tibar_devrimi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207tibar_devrimi.md" index 8679fb4f1a..7d2f0ae26f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207tibar_devrimi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207tibar_devrimi.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", - "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", - "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" + "Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2010). The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.2.3", + "Vazire, S. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884", + "Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2020). Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bu4d3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247_ge\303\247erlilik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247_ge\303\247erlilik.md" index daf2de2968..800d7782fd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247_ge\303\247erlilik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247_ge\303\247erlilik.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Construct validity" ], "references": [ - "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." + "Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs. Rand McNally." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247_i\303\247elik_interlocking_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247_i\303\247elik_interlocking_.md" index 32234cd58a..c0668dd6f6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247_i\303\247elik_interlocking_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247_i\303\247elik_interlocking_.md" @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christina Pomareda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247erik_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247erik_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" index c9d4c91ed7..114543a53c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247erik_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\303\247erik_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", - "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", - "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" + "Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables (pp. 179–225). John Wiley & Sons.", + "Brod, M., Tesler, L., & Christensen, T. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123.", + "Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\305\237_birli\304\237ine_dayal\304\261_replikasyon_ve_e\304\237itim_projesi_crep_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\305\237_birli\304\237ine_dayal\304\261_replikasyon_ve_e\304\237itim_projesi_crep_.md" index bbf5c40c30..c9c01c8b0f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\305\237_birli\304\237ine_dayal\304\261_replikasyon_ve_e\304\237itim_projesi_crep_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/i\314\207\305\237_birli\304\237ine_dayal\304\261_replikasyon_ve_e\304\237itim_projesi_crep_.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Exact replication" ], "references": [ - "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" + "Wagge, J. R., Baciu, C., Banas, K., Nadler, J. T., Schwarz, S., Weisberg, Y., & others. (2019). A demonstration of the collaborative replication and education project: Replication attempts of the red-romance effect. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.177" ], "drafted_by": [ "Connor Keating" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/jabref.md b/content/glossary/turkish/jabref.md index 0c87bfa62a..9baa287943 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/jabref.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/jabref.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Open source software" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. D. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" + "JabRef Development Team. (2021). JabRef - An open-source, cross-platform citation and reference management software. https://www.jabref.org" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/jamovi.md b/content/glossary/turkish/jamovi.md index b8217584d2..1a9de32041 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/jamovi.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/jamovi.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "R", "Reproducibility" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/jasp.md b/content/glossary/turkish/jasp.md index c6ef9b3bff..f914cc13b4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/jasp.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/jasp.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Open source" ], "references": [ - "Team, J. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." + "JASP Team. (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software]." ], "drafted_by": [ "Amélie Beffara Bret" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/json_dosyas\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/json_dosyas\304\261.md" index 5e6ebdabb0..5185312175 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/json_dosyas\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/json_dosyas\304\261.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" + "BIDS. (n.d.). Modality agnostic files. Retrieved from https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/03-modality-agnostic-files.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kan\304\261t_sentezi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kan\304\261t_sentezi.md" index 790ff89fc0..1e970e97ff 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kan\304\261t_sentezi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kan\304\261t_sentezi.md" @@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ "Systematic review" ], "references": [ - "for Evaluation, C. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", - "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Centre for Evaluation. (n.d.). Evidence Synthesis. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/centre-evaluation/evidence-synthesis", + "James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kapsaml\304\261_bilgi_ar\305\237ivi_a\304\237\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kapsaml\304\261_bilgi_ar\305\237ivi_a\304\237\304\261.md" index c7a25e39ac..59a0fdd3a6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kapsaml\304\261_bilgi_ar\305\237ivi_a\304\237\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kapsaml\304\261_bilgi_ar\305\237ivi_a\304\237\304\261.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Data sharing" ], "references": [ - "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" + "Anon. (n.d.). Ckan. Retrieved from https://ckan.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tsvetomira Dumbalska" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kapsay\304\261c\304\261l\304\261k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kapsay\304\261c\304\261l\304\261k.md" index 1d92a0a635..0cdf9fd7cb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kapsay\304\261c\304\261l\304\261k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kapsay\304\261c\304\261l\304\261k.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Social Justice" ], "references": [ - "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", - "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." + "Calvert, D. (2019). How to Make Inclusivity More Than Just an Office Buzzword. Retrieved from https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/how-to-make-inclusivity-more-than-just-an-office-buzzword", + "Martinez-Acosta, V. G., & Favero, C. B. (2018). A discussion of diversity and inclusivity at the institutional level: The need for a strategic plan. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 16(3), A252." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kat\304\261l\304\261ml\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kat\304\261l\304\261ml\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" index 5c8040a738..d0d0d18321 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kat\304\261l\304\261ml\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kat\304\261l\304\261ml\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" @@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ "Transformative paradigm" ], "references": [ - "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", - "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", - "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", - "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", - "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", - "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" + "Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S", + "Fletcher-Watson, S., Adams, J., Brook, K., Charman, T., Crane, L., Cusack, J., Leekam, S., Milton, D., Parr, J. R., & Pellicano, E. (2019). Making the Future Together: Shaping Autism Research Through Meaningful Participation. Autism, 23(4), 943–953.", + "Kiernan, C. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disability: Origins and issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.1999.tb00084.x", + "Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. The Guilford Press.", + "Ottmann, G., Laragy, C., Allen, J., & Feldman, P. (2011). Coproduction in practice: Participatory action research to develop a model of community aged care. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-011-9192-x", + "Rose, D. (2018). Participatory research: Real or imagined. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/kavramsal_replikasyon.md b/content/glossary/turkish/kavramsal_replikasyon.md index c3ffda9665..f75598eb91 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/kavramsal_replikasyon.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/kavramsal_replikasyon.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Generalizability" ], "references": [ - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", - "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Hüffmeier, J., Mazei, J., & Schultze, T. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.009", + "LeBel, E. P., McCarthy, R. J., Earp, B. D., Elson, M., & Vanpaemel, W. (2018). A unified framework to quantify the credibility of scientific findings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918787489" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Thomas Rhys Evans" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kay\304\261tl\304\261_rapor.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kay\304\261tl\304\261_rapor.md" index 2ca3820c49..34f55061f8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kay\304\261tl\304\261_rapor.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kay\304\261tl\304\261_rapor.md" @@ -11,10 +11,11 @@ "Research Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", - "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", - "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", - "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539" + "Chambers, C. D. (2013). Registered reports: a new publishing initiative at Cortex. Cortex, 49(3), 609–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016", + "Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022", + "Chambers, C. D., & Tzavella, L. (2020). Registered Reports: Past, Present and Future. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/43298", + "Findley, M. G., Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. J., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2016). Can results-free review reduce publication bias? The results and implications of a pilot study. Comparative Political Studies, 49(13), 1667–1703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655539", + "Center for Open Science. (2025). Registered Reports Initiative. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/registered-reports" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kesi\305\237imsellik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kesi\305\237imsellik.md" index b1129bd82f..afcd748a8a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kesi\305\237imsellik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kesi\305\237imsellik.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Open Science" ], "references": [ - "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", - "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" + "Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139–168.", + "Grzanka, P. R. (2020). From buzzword to critical psychology: An invitation to take intersectionality seriously. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 244–261.", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ke\305\237ifsel_veri_analizi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ke\305\237ifsel_veri_analizi.md" index 8bdbad5947..d050309ca5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ke\305\237ifsel_veri_analizi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ke\305\237ifsel_veri_analizi.md" @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Exploratory research" ], "references": [ - "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", - "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", - "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", - "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" + "Behrens, J. T. (1997). Principles and procedures of exploratory data analysis. Psychological Methods, 2(2), 131–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.2.131", + "Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799.", + "Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.", + "Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jenny Terry" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kitle_kaynakl\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kitle_kaynakl\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" index b5c2c6acda..86bd3f82cb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kitle_kaynakl\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kitle_kaynakl\304\261_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" @@ -10,19 +10,21 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", - "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", - "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", - "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", - "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", - "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/" + "Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058", + "Breznau, N. (2021). I saw you in the crowd: Credibility, reproducibility, and meta-utility. PS: Political Science & Politics, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000980", + "Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005", + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Lind, F., Gruber, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Content analysis by the crowd: Assessing the usability of crowdsourcing for coding latent constructs. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1317338", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646", + "Stewart, N., Chandler, J., & Paolacci, G. (2017). Crowdsourcing samples in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.007", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Cheplygina, V., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Havemann, J., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Ten simple rules for researchers collaborating on Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak", + "Uhlmann, E. L., Ebersole, C. R., Chartier, C. R., Errington, T. M., Kidwell, M. C., Lai, C. K., McCarthy, R. J., Riegelman, A., Silberzahn, R., & Nosek, B. A. (2019). Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(5), 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561", + "Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/", + "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", + "[https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/](https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/#:~:text=Crowdsourcing%20is%20the%20practice%20of,levels%20and%20across%20various%20industries)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kitlesel_a\303\247\304\261k_\303\247evrim_i\314\207\303\247i_dersler_massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kitlesel_a\303\247\304\261k_\303\247evrim_i\314\207\303\247i_dersler_massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md" index 2d0ebf2057..2cd621abdb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kitlesel_a\303\247\304\261k_\303\247evrim_i\314\207\303\247i_dersler_massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kitlesel_a\303\247\304\261k_\303\247evrim_i\314\207\303\247i_dersler_massive_open_online_courses_moocs_.md" @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Open learning" ], "references": [ - "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685" + "Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685", + "Open Science MOOC. (n.d.). https://opensciencemooc.eu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kitlesel_a\303\247\304\261k_\303\247evrim_i\314\207\303\247i_makaleler_moops_massively_open_online_papers_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kitlesel_a\303\247\304\261k_\303\247evrim_i\314\207\303\247i_makaleler_moops_massively_open_online_papers_.md" index aebc31ced9..60e43439c0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kitlesel_a\303\247\304\261k_\303\247evrim_i\314\207\303\247i_makaleler_moops_massively_open_online_papers_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kitlesel_a\303\247\304\261k_\303\247evrim_i\314\207\303\247i_makaleler_moops_massively_open_online_papers_.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", - "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" + "Himmelstein, D. S., Rubinetti, V., Slochower, D. R., Hu, D., Malladi, V. S., Greene, C. S., & Gitter, A. (2019). Open collaborative writing with Manubot. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(6), e1007128. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128", + "Tennant, J., Bielczyk, N. Z., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Masuzzo, P., & Steiner, T. (2019). Introducing Massively Open Online Papers (MOOPs). MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/et8ak" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kod_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kod_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" index 22276941a2..87b2dd7311 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kod_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kod_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Version control" ], "references": [ - "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", - "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" + "Petre, M., & Wilson, G. (2014). Code review for and by scientists. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1407.5648. https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5648", + "Scopatz, A. M., & Huff, K. D. (2015). Effective Computation in Physics: Field Guide to Research with Python (1st ed.). O’Reilly Media. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920033424.do" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kod_kitab\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kod_kitab\304\261.md" index 58c4557b46..ad0229f802 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kod_kitab\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kod_kitab\304\261.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Metadata" ], "references": [ - "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783" + "Arslan, R. C. (2019). How to Automatically Document Data With the codebook Package to Facilitate Data Reuse. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919838783", + "Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. (2025). What is a Codebook? https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/cms/1983" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/kompendiyum.md b/content/glossary/turkish/kompendiyum.md index a9e1650231..f7e5d60726 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/kompendiyum.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/kompendiyum.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Research compendium;" ], "references": [ - "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", - "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", - "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", - "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" + "Claerbout, J. F., & Karrenbach, M. (1992). Electronic documents give reproducible research a new meaning. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1992, 601–604. http://sepwww.stanford.edu/doku.php?id=sep:research:reproducible:seg92", + "Gentleman, R. (2005). Reproducible Research: A Bioinformatics Case Study. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 4, 1034. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1034", + "Marwick, B., Boettiger, C., & Mullen, L. (2018). Packaging data analytical work reproducibly using R (and friends). The American Statistician, 72(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1375986", + "Nüst, D. C., Boettiger, C., & Marwick, B. (2018). How to Read a Research Compendium. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1806.09525. https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09525" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Marwick" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kom\303\274nalite.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kom\303\274nalite.md" index 61033480b4..49cf987b7a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kom\303\274nalite.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kom\303\274nalite.md" @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ "Objectivity" ], "references": [ - "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Merton, R. K. (1938). Science and the social order. Philosophy of Science, 5(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/286513", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "David Moreau" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/konsorsiyum_yazarl\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/konsorsiyum_yazarl\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" index 1ef2d3427c..6f2eddd4d6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/konsorsiyum_yazarl\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/konsorsiyum_yazarl\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" @@ -8,8 +8,9 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yuki Yamada" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/konumsall\304\261k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/konumsall\304\261k.md" index fed9104502..10f8b69cee 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/konumsall\304\261k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/konumsall\304\261k.md" @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ "Perspective" ], "references": [ - "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158" + "Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158", + "Reflexivity. (2017). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-1530" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/konumsall\304\261k_haritas\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/konumsall\304\261k_haritas\304\261.md" index 8b9f680d31..1e1d5589a3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/konumsall\304\261k_haritas\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/konumsall\304\261k_haritas\304\261.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" + "Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social Identity Map: A Reflexivity Tool for Practicing Explicit Positionality in Critical Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406919870075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075" ], "drafted_by": [ "Joanne McCuaig" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/kriter_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/kriter_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" index 7d18fb6d51..44a8c3039b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/kriter_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/kriter_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", - "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." + "DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.", + "Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123." ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/k\303\274lt\303\274rel_vergilendirme.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/k\303\274lt\303\274rel_vergilendirme.md" index 1115cf897f..bd2507091f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/k\303\274lt\303\274rel_vergilendirme.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/k\303\274lt\303\274rel_vergilendirme.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Power relations" ], "references": [ - "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", - "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", - "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" + "Joseph, T. D., & Hirshfield, L. E. (2011). `Why don’t you get somebody new to do it?’ Race and cultural taxation in the academy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.496489", + "Ledgerwood, A., Hudson, S. T. J., Lewis, Jr., N. A., Maddox, K. B., Pickett, C., Remedios, J. D., & Wilkins, C. L. (2021). The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gdzue", + "Padilla, A. M. (1994). Research news and comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/k\303\274m\303\274latif_bilim.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/k\303\274m\303\274latif_bilim.md" index 7f6ae5a0b1..62245e1d6a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/k\303\274m\303\274latif_bilim.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/k\303\274m\303\274latif_bilim.md" @@ -7,10 +7,10 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", - "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", - "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", - "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" + "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", + "d’Espagnat, B. (2008). Is science cumulative? A physicist viewpoint. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison (pp. 145–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6279-7_10", + "Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.", + "Mischel, W. (2009). Becoming a Cumulative Science. Association for Psychological Science. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science" ], "drafted_by": [ "Beatrice Valentini" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/k\304\261z\304\261l_ekipler.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/k\304\261z\304\261l_ekipler.md" index 3e28138042..253bdea05d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/k\304\261z\304\261l_ekipler.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/k\304\261z\304\261l_ekipler.md" @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Adversarial collaboration" ], "references": [ - "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", - "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" + "Coles, N. A., Tiokhin, L., Arslan, R., Forscher, P., Scheel, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Red Team Challenge. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html", + "Lakens, D. (2020). The 20% Statistician: Red Team Challenge. The 20% Statistician. http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2020/05/red-team-challenge.html" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/literat\303\274r_taramas\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/literat\303\274r_taramas\304\261.md" index d089c04507..5ecf2bdeb2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/literat\303\274r_taramas\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/literat\303\274r_taramas\304\261.md" @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "Systematic reviews" ], "references": [ - "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", - "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", - "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", - "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" + "Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf", + "Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x", + "Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149", + "Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803" ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/makale_fabrikas\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/makale_fabrikas\304\261.md" index 8d2012387d..8bddef5b2c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/makale_fabrikas\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/makale_fabrikas\304\261.md" @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific publishing" ], "references": [ - "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", - "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" + "Byrne, J. A., & Christopher, J. (2020). Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? FEBS Letters, 594(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747", + "Hackett, R., & Kelly, S. (2020). Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills. Biology Open, 9(10), bio056556. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.056556" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/makale_i\314\207\305\237lem_\303\274creti_apc_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/makale_i\314\207\305\237lem_\303\274creti_apc_.md" index d91724857f..0482f1b063 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/makale_i\314\207\305\237lem_\303\274creti_apc_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/makale_i\314\207\305\237lem_\303\274creti_apc_.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", - "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" + "Grossmann, A., & Brembs, B. (2021). Current market rates for scholarly publishing services. F1000Research, 10(20), 20. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.1", + "Smith, A. C., Merz, L., Borden, J. B., Gulick, C., Kshirsagar, A. R., & Bruna, E. M. (2020). Assessing the effect of article processing charges on the geographic diversity of authors using Elsevier’s ‘Mirror Journal’ system. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s7cx4" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/manel.md b/content/glossary/turkish/manel.md index 492c679aa9..95ec6e5f01 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/manel.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/manel.md @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ "Under-representation" ], "references": [ - "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", - "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", - "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", - "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" + "Bouvy, J. C., & Mujoomdar, M. (2019). All-Male Panels and Gender Diversity of Issue Panels and Plenary Sessions at ISPOR Europe. PharmacoEconomics-Open, 3(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0153-0", + "Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2019). Gender Representation and Strategies for Panel Diversity: Lessons from the APSA Annual Meeting. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(4), 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519000908", + "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", + "Rodriguez, J. K., & Günther, E. A. (2020). What’s wrong with manels and what can we do about it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/whats-wrong-with-manels-and-what-can-we-do-about-them-148068" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/matthew_etkisi_bilimde_.md b/content/glossary/turkish/matthew_etkisi_bilimde_.md index 42e155f533..76cb9e0b55 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/matthew_etkisi_bilimde_.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/matthew_etkisi_bilimde_.md @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Stigler’s law of eponymy" ], "references": [ - "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", - "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", - "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" + "Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115", + "Bornmann, L., Ganser, C., Tekles, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2019). Does the hα index reinforce the Matthew effect in science? Agent-based simulations using Stata and R. arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11052.", + "Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/meta_analiz.md b/content/glossary/turkish/meta_analiz.md index 960e3d10a3..c14dcbc795 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/meta_analiz.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/meta_analiz.md @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ "Systematic Review" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Yeung, S. K., Feldman, G., Fillon, A., Protzko, J., Elsherif, M. M., Xiao, Q., & Pickering, J. (2020). Experimental Studies Meta-Analysis Registered Report Templates. https://osf.io/ytgrp/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Martin Vasilev; Siu Kit Yeung" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/meta_bilim_ya_da_meta_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/meta_bilim_ya_da_meta_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" index 1808a3d546..2a92b99281 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/meta_bilim_ya_da_meta_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/meta_bilim_ya_da_meta_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "Bilimsel uygulamaları tanımlama, açıklama, değerlendirme ve/veya geliştirme amacıyla bilimin kendisinin bilimsel olarak incelenmesidir. Meta-bilim genellikle bilimsel yöntemleri, analizleri, verilerin raporlanmasını ve değerlendirilmesini, araştırma sonuçlarının yeniden üretilebilirliğini ve tekrarlanabilirliğini ve araştırma teşviklerini araştırır.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", - "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" + "Ioannidis, J. P., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Eevaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264", + "Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. (2020). Metascience as a scientific social movement. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/4dsqa" ], "drafted_by": [ "Elizabeth Collins" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/metaveri.md b/content/glossary/turkish/metaveri.md index 1851e65e6d..a300bd53f4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/metaveri.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/metaveri.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Data" ], "references": [ - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations." + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "[https://schema.datacite.org/](https://schema.datacite.org/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Matt Jaquiery" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/model_felsefe_.md b/content/glossary/turkish/model_felsefe_.md index 07ab357c05..548baff543 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/model_felsefe_.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/model_felsefe_.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585" + "Guest, O., & Martin, A. E. (2020). How computational modeling can force theory building in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585", + "Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science/", + "Glass, D. J., & Hall, N. (2008). A brief history of the hypothesis. Cell, 134(3), 378–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.033" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/m\303\274dahalesiz_yeniden_\303\274retilebilir_ve_a\303\247\304\261k_sistematik_derlemeler_niro_sr_non_intervention_reproducible_and_open_systematic_reviews_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/m\303\274dahalesiz_yeniden_\303\274retilebilir_ve_a\303\247\304\261k_sistematik_derlemeler_niro_sr_non_intervention_reproducible_and_open_systematic_reviews_.md" index 8a3d76e895..3029067efb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/m\303\274dahalesiz_yeniden_\303\274retilebilir_ve_a\303\247\304\261k_sistematik_derlemeler_niro_sr_non_intervention_reproducible_and_open_systematic_reviews_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/m\303\274dahalesiz_yeniden_\303\274retilebilir_ve_a\303\247\304\261k_sistematik_derlemeler_niro_sr_non_intervention_reproducible_and_open_systematic_reviews_.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Systematic Review Protocol" ], "references": [ - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Asma Assaneea" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/nesnellik.md b/content/glossary/turkish/nesnellik.md index 0e5de36ba7..d21ca625a4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/nesnellik.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/nesnellik.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Neutrality" ], "references": [ - "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", - "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" + "Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, Universalism and Disinterestedness: Re-examining Contemporary Support among Academics for Merton’s Scientific Norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y", + "Merton, R. K. (1942). A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110375008-013" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/nicel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/nicel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" index 2828f50ef4..7c1be648f3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/nicel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/nicel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Statistics" ], "references": [ - "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." + "Goertzen, M. J. (2017). Introduction to Quantitative Research and Data. Library Technology Reports, 53(4), 12–18." ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/nitel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/nitel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" index ec306d467b..ad9897f3ce 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/nitel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/nitel_ara\305\237t\304\261rma.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reflexivity" ], "references": [ - "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", - "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" + "Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7", + "Levitt, H. M., Motulsky, S. L., Wertz, F. J., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082" ], "drafted_by": [ "Madeleine Pownall" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/olas\304\261l\304\261k_fonksiyonu.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/olas\304\261l\304\261k_fonksiyonu.md" index 3ef1999d39..d65d2ad341 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/olas\304\261l\304\261k_fonksiyonu.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/olas\304\261l\304\261k_fonksiyonu.md" @@ -11,11 +11,12 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", - "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Hogg, D., Bovy, J., & Lang, D. (2010). Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data. arXiv:1008.4686 [astro-ph.IM].", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework.", + "Huber, C. (2016). The Stata Blog: Introduction to Bayesian statistics, part 1: The basic concepts. In The Stata Blog. https://blog.stata.com/2016/11/01/introduction-to-bayesian-statistics-part-1-the-basic-concepts/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/olas\304\261l\304\261k_i\314\207lkesi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/olas\304\261l\304\261k_i\314\207lkesi.md" index 710fde9727..0e2ada4a42 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/olas\304\261l\304\261k_i\314\207lkesi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/olas\304\261l\304\261k_i\314\207lkesi.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Likelihood Function" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", - "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2003). Maximum Likelihood in R (pp. 1–9). Open Science Framework.", + "Geyer, C. J. (2007). Stat 5102 Notes: Maximum Likelihood (pp. 1–8). Open Science Framework." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/ontoloji_yapay_zeka_.md b/content/glossary/turkish/ontoloji_yapay_zeka_.md index 6850010003..d26af06ec7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/ontoloji_yapay_zeka_.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/ontoloji_yapay_zeka_.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Taxonomy" ], "references": [ - "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" + "Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. https://corais.org/sites/default/files/ontology_development_101_aguide_to_creating_your_first_ontology.pdf" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/openneuro.md b/content/glossary/turkish/openneuro.md index 56a43fe944..7e6b618526 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/openneuro.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/openneuro.md @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "OpenfMRI" ], "references": [ - "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", - "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", - "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" + "Poldrack, R. A., Barch, D. M., Mitchell, J. P., Wager, T. D., Wagner, A. D., Devlin, J. T., Cumba, C., Koyejo, O., & Milham, M. P. (2013). Toward open sharing of task-based fMRI data: The OpenfMRI project. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00012", + "Poldrack, R. A., & Gorgolewski, K. J. (2014). Making big data open: Data sharing in neuroimaging. Nature Neuroscience, 17(11), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3818", + "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/opsiyonel_durdurma.md b/content/glossary/turkish/opsiyonel_durdurma.md index 94d6a71a80..b8f22be113 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/opsiyonel_durdurma.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/opsiyonel_durdurma.md @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ "Sequential testing" ], "references": [ - "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", - "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", - "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", - "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" + "Beffara Bret, B., Beffara Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021). A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses. Meta-Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.869", + "Lakens, D. (2014). Performing high-powered studies efficiently with sequential analyses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(7), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2023", + "Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214", + "Schönbrodt, F. D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Zehetleitner, M., & Perugini, M. (2017). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences. Psychological Methods, 22(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000061" ], "drafted_by": [ "Brice Beffara Bret; Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ortak_\303\274retim.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ortak_\303\274retim.md" index 389de1af23..0d05efe0bd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ortak_\303\274retim.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ortak_\303\274retim.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Patient and Public Involvement (PPI)" ], "references": [ - "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", - "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", - "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", - "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/championing-co-production/what-does-co-production-mean-to-us" + "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", + "Graham, I. D., McCutcheon, C., & Kothari, A. (2019). Exploring the frontiers of research co-production: the Integrated Knowledge Translation Research Network concept papers. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0501-7", + "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Co-Production Collective. (n.d.). Our Approach. Co-Production Collective. https://www.coproductioncollective.co.uk/what-is-co-production/our-approach" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/p_de\304\237eri.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/p_de\304\237eri.md" index a5b96344a2..8021b1c743 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/p_de\304\237eri.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/p_de\304\237eri.md" @@ -8,9 +8,10 @@ "statistical significance" ], "references": [ - "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", - "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", - "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108" + "psyTeachR Team. (n.d.). P | Glossary. psyTeachR. https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary", + "Lakens, D. (2021). The Practical Alternative to the p Value Is the Correctly Used p Value. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(3), 639–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958012", + "Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108", + "[https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html](https://psyteachr.github.io/glossary/p.html)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/p_e\304\237risi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/p_e\304\237risi.md" index e532cd8838..a39d942087 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/p_e\304\237risi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/p_e\304\237risi.md" @@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ "Z-curve" ], "references": [ - "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", - "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" + "Bruns, S. B., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). P-curve and p-hacking in observational research. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0149144. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149144", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030850", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988", + "Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2019). P-curve won’t do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016). PLoS ONE, 14(3), e0213454. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213454" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bettina M. J. Kern" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/p_hackleme.md b/content/glossary/turkish/p_hackleme.md index 03f9da152a..15b9bb8d4b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/p_hackleme.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/p_hackleme.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/paradata.md b/content/glossary/turkish/paradata.md index 5378b5790c..2d5ffd8e05 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/paradata.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/paradata.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Process information" ], "references": [ - "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" + "Kreuter, F. (Ed.). (2013). Improving Surveys with Paradata. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118596869" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alexander Hart; Graham Reid" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/paranteze_alma_epoche_g\303\266r\303\274\305\237meleri.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/paranteze_alma_epoche_g\303\266r\303\274\305\237meleri.md" index d765811609..ad8cbb67c9 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/paranteze_alma_epoche_g\303\266r\303\274\305\237meleri.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/paranteze_alma_epoche_g\303\266r\303\274\305\237meleri.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Researcher bias" ], "references": [ - "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", - "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" + "Rolls, L., & Relf, M. (2006). Bracketing interviews: addressing methodological challenges in qualitative interviewing in bereavement and palliative care. Mortality, 11(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576270600774893", + "Sorsa, M. A., Kiikkala, I., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Bracketing as a skill in conducting unstructured qualitative interviews. Nursing Research, 22(4), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.8.e1317" ], "drafted_by": [ "Claire Melia" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/parking.md b/content/glossary/turkish/parking.md index 8ea5d9b1ab..ca15f5dced 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/parking.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/parking.md @@ -9,8 +9,10 @@ "Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)" ], "references": [ - "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", - "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831" + "Ikeda, A., Xu, H., Fuji, N., Zhu, S., & Yamada, Y. (2019). Questionable research practices following pre-registration. Japanese Psychological Review, 62, 281–295.", + "Yamada, Y. (2018). How to crack pre-registration: Toward transparent and open science. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831", + "[Ikeda et al. (2019)](https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/sjpr/62/3/62_281/_pdf/-char/ja)", + "[Yamada (2018)](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831/full)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Qinyu Xiao" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/pci_kay\304\261tl\304\261_raporlar.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/pci_kay\304\261tl\304\261_raporlar.md" index f9a5c132d2..2e403dc1e5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/pci_kay\304\261tl\304\261_raporlar.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/pci_kay\304\261tl\304\261_raporlar.md" @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Stage 2 study review", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Peer Community In Registered Reports. (2025). About PCI Registered Reports. https://rr.peercommunityin.org/about/about" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/plan_s.md b/content/glossary/turkish/plan_s.md index 4ce03d97bd..4192eec576 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/plan_s.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/plan_s.md @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "DORA", "Repository" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "cOAlition S. (2025). cOAlition S – Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality. https://www.coalition-s.org/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Olmo van den Akker" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/post_hoc.md b/content/glossary/turkish/post_hoc.md index 60548094bd..5d6c72b49c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/post_hoc.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/post_hoc.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "P-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/prepare_rehberi.md b/content/glossary/turkish/prepare_rehberi.md index 85c1071007..ba1feda4a6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/prepare_rehberi.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/prepare_rehberi.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "STRANGE" ], "references": [ - "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" + "Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677217724823" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/psikoloji_biliminin_geli\305\237tirilmesi_derne\304\237i.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/psikoloji_biliminin_geli\305\237tirilmesi_derne\304\237i.md" index 890a7f0914..b5679fd7fc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/psikoloji_biliminin_geli\305\237tirilmesi_derne\304\237i.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/psikoloji_biliminin_geli\305\237tirilmesi_derne\304\237i.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Society for Open, Reliable, and Transparent Ecology and Evolutionary biology (SORTEE)" ], "references": [ - "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" + "Improving Psychology. (n.d.). Improving Psychology. https://improvingpsych.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/psikometrik_meta_analiz.md b/content/glossary/turkish/psikometrik_meta_analiz.md index c93db83a12..c34dba78b6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/psikometrik_meta_analiz.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/psikometrik_meta_analiz.md @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Validity generalization" ], "references": [ - "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." + "Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (Third). SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ps\303\266donimle\305\237tirme.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ps\303\266donimle\305\237tirme.md" index 8cdf6926ec..8a018bad6f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ps\303\266donimle\305\237tirme.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ps\303\266donimle\305\237tirme.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Research ethics" ], "references": [ - "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", - "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" + "Mourby, M., Mackey, E., Elliot, M., Gowans, H., Wallace, S. E., Bell, J., Smith, H., Aidinlis, S., & Kaye, J. (2018). Are ‘pseudonymised’ data always personal data? Implications of the GDPR for administrative data research in the UK. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.01.002", + "Medical Research Council. (2019). Identifiability, anonymisation and pseudonymisation. Medical Research Council. https://mrc.ukri.org/documents/pdf/gdpr-guidance-note-5-identifiability-anonymisation-and-pseudonymisation/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Catia M. Oliveira" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ps\303\266doreplikasyon.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ps\303\266doreplikasyon.md" index 7f85636b92..2a4069b29b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ps\303\266doreplikasyon.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ps\303\266doreplikasyon.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", - "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", - "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" + "Davies, G. M., & Gray, A. (2015). Don’t let spurious accusations of pseudoreplication limit our ability to learn from natural experiments (and other messy kinds of ecological monitoring). Ecology and Evolution, 5(22), 5295–5304. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1782", + "Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942661", + "Lazic, S. E. (2019). Genuine replication and pseudoreplication: What’s the difference? In BMJ Open Science. https://blogs.bmj.com/openscience/2019/09/16/genuine-replication-and-pseudoreplication-whats-the-difference/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ben Farrar" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/pubpeer.md b/content/glossary/turkish/pubpeer.md index 10d8e78ee8..3a8c2f76c7 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/pubpeer.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/pubpeer.md @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ "Open Peer Review" ], "references": [ - "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/" + "PubPeer. (n.d.). PubPeer—Search publications and join the conversation. Pubpeer. https://www.pubpeer.com/", + "[www.pubpeer.com](http://www.pubpeer.com)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/python.md b/content/glossary/turkish/python.md index d2178ea270..841bcb47c6 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/python.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/python.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "R" ], "references": [ - "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." + "Lutz, M. (2001). Programming Python. O’Reilly Media, Inc." ], "drafted_by": [ "Shannon Francis" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/r.md b/content/glossary/turkish/r.md index f29d82df73..2a7a0e7e71 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/r.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/r.md @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Statistical analysis" ], "references": [ - "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/" + "R Project for Statistical Computing. (n.d.). R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. R Project. https://www.r-project.org/", + "R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/raporlama_k\304\261lavuzu.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/raporlama_k\304\261lavuzu.md" index f4b9eaabce..a227c2f41f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/raporlama_k\304\261lavuzu.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/raporlama_k\304\261lavuzu.md" @@ -10,9 +10,11 @@ "STROBE" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "Network, T. E. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/" + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", + "Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD", + "The EQUATOR Network. (n.d.). What is a reporting guideline? Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/what-is-a-reporting-guideline/", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/replikasyonda_yarat\304\261c\304\261_y\304\261k\304\261m_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/replikasyonda_yarat\304\261c\304\261_y\304\261k\304\261m_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" index 5539314adc..2abaadac42 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/replikasyonda_yarat\304\261c\304\261_y\304\261k\304\261m_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/replikasyonda_yarat\304\261c\304\261_y\304\261k\304\261m_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Theory" ], "references": [ - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", - "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J. H., Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., & others. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002", + "Tierney, W., Hardy III, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., & others. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/repo.md b/content/glossary/turkish/repo.md index 78820fe553..7ea1d22fc1 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/repo.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/repo.md @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ "Open Source", "Preprint" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Recommended Data Repositories. (n.d.). Scientific Data. https://www.nature.com/sdata/policies/repositories" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/reproducibilitea.md b/content/glossary/turkish/reproducibilitea.md index 057a37e2e7..807d65f755 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/reproducibilitea.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/reproducibilitea.md @@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" + "ReproducibiliTea. (n.d.). https://reproducibilitea.org/", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8" ], "drafted_by": [ "Emma Norris" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/riot_bilim_kul\303\274b\303\274.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/riot_bilim_kul\303\274b\303\274.md" index b0ab14d1ad..24725f4b43 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/riot_bilim_kul\303\274b\303\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/riot_bilim_kul\303\274b\303\274.md" @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Transparency" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "RIOT Science Club. (2021). http://riotscience.co.uk/" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Tamara Kalandadze" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/rozetler_a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/rozetler_a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_.md" index ea0eea2704..7b66cf8748 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/rozetler_a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/rozetler_a\303\247\304\261k_bilim_.md" @@ -10,8 +10,10 @@ "Triple badge" ], "references": [ - "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", - "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456" + "Hardwicke, T. E., Bohn, M., MacDonald, K., Hembacher, E., Nuijten, M. B., Peloquin, B. N., & others. (2020). Analytic reproducibility in articles receiving open data badges at the journal Psychological Science: an observational study. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 201494. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201494", + "Kidwell, M. C., Lazarević, L. B., Baranski, E., Hardwicke, T. E., Piechowski, S., Falkenberg, L. S., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456", + "Rowhani-Farid, A., Aldcroft, A., & Barnett, A. G. (2020). Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial. Royal Society Open Science, 7(3), 191818. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191818", + "Science, C. (n.d.). Open science badges. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/badges" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/sa\304\237laml\304\261k_analizleri_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/sa\304\237laml\304\261k_analizleri_.md" index d90cb7393b..a99dbc90ff 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/sa\304\237laml\304\261k_analizleri_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/sa\304\237laml\304\261k_analizleri_.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341), 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/semantometriler.md b/content/glossary/turkish/semantometriler.md index 88a640902e..3e51d3b02a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/semantometriler.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/semantometriler.md @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Contribution(p)" ], "references": [ - "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", - "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" + "Herrmannova, D., & Knoth, P. (n.d.). Semantometrics Towards Full text-based Research Evaluation. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.04180.pdf", + "Knoth, P., & Herrmannova, D. (2014). Towards semantometrics: A new semantic similarity based measure for assessing a research publication’s contribution. D-Lib Magazine, 20(11), 8. https://doi.org/10.1045/november2014-knoth" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/sistematik_derleme.md b/content/glossary/turkish/sistematik_derleme.md index 84b2412239..57263ffb25 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/sistematik_derleme.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/sistematik_derleme.md @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ "PRISMA" ], "references": [ - "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", - "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", - "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", - "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" + "Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.", + "Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097", + "Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & McKenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160", + "Topor, M., Pickering, J. S., Barbosa Mendes, A., Bishop, D. V. M., Büttner, F. C., Elsherif, M. M., & others. (2021). An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Intervention, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR). https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8gu5z" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jade Pickering" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/sistemi_oyuna_getirme.md b/content/glossary/turkish/sistemi_oyuna_getirme.md index e66b520082..dad8d8137e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/sistemi_oyuna_getirme.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/sistemi_oyuna_getirme.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "*P*\\-hacking" ], "references": [ - "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", - "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." + "Moher, D., Naudet, F., Cristea, I. A., Miedema, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Goodman, S. N. (2018). Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. PLOS Biology, 16(3), e2004089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089", + "Naudet, F., Ioannidis, J., Miedema, F., Cristea, I. A., Goodman, S. N., & Moher, D. (2018). Six principles for assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure. Impact of Social Sciences Blog." ], "drafted_by": [ "Adrien Fillon" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/sonsal_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/sonsal_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" index 8360aa8118..d70ba82055 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/sonsal_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/sonsal_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" @@ -11,8 +11,9 @@ "Prior distribution" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", - "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag" + "Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781", + "Lüdtke, O., Ulitzsch, E., & Robitzsch, A. (2020). A Comparison of Penalized Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models with Small Sample Sizes . https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3qag", + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/sorumlu_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_ve_i\314\207novasyon.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/sorumlu_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_ve_i\314\207novasyon.md" index 878b994281..6f06b7686c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/sorumlu_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_ve_i\314\207novasyon.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/sorumlu_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_ve_i\314\207novasyon.md" @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ "Public Engagement", "Transdisciplinary Research" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "European Commission. (2021). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Ana Barbosa Mendes" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_entegrasyon.md b/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_entegrasyon.md index c23a0e3ef6..4dad628d4c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_entegrasyon.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_entegrasyon.md @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@ "Social class" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" index 64079daf48..02cd2956fd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" @@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", - "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", - "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3" + "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", + "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", + "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/spesifikasyon_e\304\237risi_analizi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/spesifikasyon_e\304\237risi_analizi.md" index ab24232111..e47a9e99c8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/spesifikasyon_e\304\237risi_analizi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/spesifikasyon_e\304\237risi_analizi.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", - "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", - "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/seminarpapers/psyc16022016.pdf", + "Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2020). Specification curve analysis. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0912-z", + "Voracek, M., Kossmeier, M., & Tran, U. S. (2019). Which Data to Meta-Analyze, and How? Zeitschrift Für Psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000357" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/strange.md b/content/glossary/turkish/strange.md index 2a496b3e8a..3c239f8975 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/strange.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/strange.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" + "Webster, M. M., & Rutz, C. (2020). How STRANGE are your study animals? Nature, 582, 337–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01751-5" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/studyswap.md b/content/glossary/turkish/studyswap.md index d6c9e1f2b5..0757290807 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/studyswap.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/studyswap.md @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767" + "Chartier, C. R., Riegelman, A., & McCarthy, R. J. (2018). StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and resource exchange. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918808767", + "OSF. (n.d.). OSF | StudySwap: A platform for interlab replication, collaboration, and research resource exchange. https://osf.io/meetings/StudySwap/", + "[https://osf.io/view/StudySwap](https://osf.io/view/StudySwap)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/s\304\261f\304\261r_hipotez_anlaml\304\261l\304\261k_testi_nhst_null_hypothesis_significance_testing_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/s\304\261f\304\261r_hipotez_anlaml\304\261l\304\261k_testi_nhst_null_hypothesis_significance_testing_.md" index 283d102743..478b1e791f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/s\304\261f\304\261r_hipotez_anlaml\304\261l\304\261k_testi_nhst_null_hypothesis_significance_testing_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/s\304\261f\304\261r_hipotez_anlaml\304\261l\304\261k_testi_nhst_null_hypothesis_significance_testing_.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", - "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", - "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" + "Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., & Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918770963", + "Pernet, C. R. (2015). Null hypothesis significance testing: a short tutorial. F1000Research, 4, 621. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6963.3", + "Spence, J. R., & Stanley, D. J. (2018). Concise, simple, and not wrong: In search of a short-hand interpretation of statistical significance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02185" ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/s\304\261n\304\261rland\304\261rma_\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/s\304\261n\304\261rland\304\261rma_\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274.md" index f21ce545c7..81e8c6edfd 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/s\304\261n\304\261rland\304\261rma_\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/s\304\261n\304\261rland\304\261rma_\303\266l\303\247\303\274t\303\274.md" @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Falsification" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/tek_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/tek_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" index 914516acfe..cac0b8ba8e 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/tek_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/tek_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Triple-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/tekrarlanabilirlik.md b/content/glossary/turkish/tekrarlanabilirlik.md index 9ffb05f2a1..6da1d42432 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/tekrarlanabilirlik.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/tekrarlanabilirlik.md @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ "Robustness (analyses)" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", - "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "King, G. (1995). Replication, replication. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/420301", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/", + "Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2020). What is replication? PLOS Biology, 18(3), e3000691. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/tenzing.md b/content/glossary/turkish/tenzing.md index 902d48f2a0..3c5cde21ed 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/tenzing.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/tenzing.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "CRediT" ], "references": [ - "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." + "Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. Plos One, 15(12), e0244611." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marton Kovacs" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/teori.md b/content/glossary/turkish/teori.md index e1ef8570cf..e70cfdb383 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/teori.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/teori.md @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Theory building" ], "references": [ - "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Schafersman, S. D. (1997). An Introduction to Science. https://www.geo.sunysb.edu/esp/files/scientific-method.html", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aoife O’Mahony" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/teori_i\314\207n\305\237as\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/teori_i\314\207n\305\237as\304\261.md" index e18437de48..cdf22a31db 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/teori_i\314\207n\305\237as\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/teori_i\314\207n\305\237as\304\261.md" @@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ "Theoretical model" ], "references": [ - "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", - "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", - "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", - "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" + "Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H., Dalege, J., Kievit, R., & Haig, B. (2020). Theory Construction Methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/w5tp8", + "Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486", + "Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310758", + "Wacker, J. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(98)00019-9" ], "drafted_by": [ "Filip Dechterenko" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/tersine_p_hackleme.md b/content/glossary/turkish/tersine_p_hackleme.md index c154919c09..4a4527c6c8 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/tersine_p_hackleme.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/tersine_p_hackleme.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" + "Chuard, P. J. C., Vrtilek, M., Head, M. L., & Jennions, M. D. (2019). Evidence that non-significant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting? PLoS Biol, 17(1), e3000127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127" ], "drafted_by": [ "Robert M. Ross" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/te\305\237vik_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/te\305\237vik_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" index dbd252dbf5..418477c361 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/te\305\237vik_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/te\305\237vik_yap\304\261s\304\261.md" @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ "Structural factors" ], "references": [ - "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", - "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", - "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", - "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" + "Koole, S. L., & Lakens, D. (2012). Rewarding replications: A sure and simple way to improve psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462586", + "Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058", + "Schönbrodt, F. (2019). Training students for the Open Science future. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1031–1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0726-z", + "Smaldino, P. E., & McElreath, R. (2016). The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), 160384. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington; Olmo van den Akker" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/tip_i_hata.md b/content/glossary/turkish/tip_i_hata.md index 8d6530cfc4..8fe941fa9c 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/tip_i_hata.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/tip_i_hata.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Lisa Spitzer" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/tip_ii_hata.md b/content/glossary/turkish/tip_ii_hata.md index fc5d8d5279..5a4970f499 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/tip_ii_hata.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/tip_ii_hata.md @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ "Type I error" ], "references": [ - "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", - "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" + "Fiedler, K., Kutzner, F., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). The long way from α-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462587", + "Hartgerink, C. H., Wicherts, J. M., & Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017). Too good to be false: Nonsignificant results revisited. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.71" ], "drafted_by": [ "Olly Robertson" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/tip_m_hata.md b/content/glossary/turkish/tip_m_hata.md index b8c8c277a8..0fe62a7cee 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/tip_m_hata.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/tip_m_hata.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/tip_s_hata.md b/content/glossary/turkish/tip_s_hata.md index b5c03aa219..64e6e4c9a9 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/tip_s_hata.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/tip_s_hata.md @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Type II error" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", - "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" + "Gelman, A., & Carlin, J. (2014). Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642", + "Lu, J., Qiu, Y., & Deng, A. (2018). A note on Type S/M errors in hypothesis testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 72(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12132" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eduardo Garcia-Garzon" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/topluluk_projeleri.md b/content/glossary/turkish/topluluk_projeleri.md index 1f9893dfa5..c142d88d6b 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/topluluk_projeleri.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/topluluk_projeleri.md @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "ReproducibiliTea" ], "references": [ - "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", - "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", - "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." + "Ellemers, N. (2021). Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430", + "Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8", + "Shepard, B. (2015). Community projects as social activism. SAGE." ], "drafted_by": [ "Marta Topor" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/trust_i\314\207lkeleri.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/trust_i\314\207lkeleri.md" index b856675a1e..7f5f02b41b 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/trust_i\314\207lkeleri.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/trust_i\314\207lkeleri.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Repository" ], "references": [ - "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" + "Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aleksandra Lazić" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/t\303\274mevar\304\261m.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/t\303\274mevar\304\261m.md" index 2e66eeec83..fc69b3e49a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/t\303\274mevar\304\261m.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/t\303\274mevar\304\261m.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Hypothesis" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_analizi_ve_payla\305\237\304\261m\304\261nda_en_i\314\207yi_uygulamalar_komitesi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_analizi_ve_payla\305\237\304\261m\304\261nda_en_i\314\207yi_uygulamalar_komitesi.md" index 09e5ade2e5..5598bc37b8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_analizi_ve_payla\305\237\304\261m\304\261nda_en_i\314\207yi_uygulamalar_komitesi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_analizi_ve_payla\305\237\304\261m\304\261nda_en_i\314\207yi_uygulamalar_komitesi.md" @@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ "definition": "İnsan Beyin Haritalama Örgütü (OHBM; The Organization for Human Brain Mapping) nörogörüntüleme topluluğu, nörogörüntüleme verilerinin toplanması, analizi, raporlanması ve hem verilerin hem de analiz kodunun paylaşımında en iyi uygulamalar için bir kılavuz geliştirmiştir. Bu kılavuz, şeffaflığı ve tekrarlanabilirliği optimize etmek amacıyla raporlama yöntemlerini ve elde edilen nörogörüntüleri iyileştirmek için bir makale yazılırken veya bir dergiye gönderilirken dahil edilmesi gereken sekiz unsuru içermektedir.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", - "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" + "Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., & others. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500", + "Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., & others. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_dilimleme.md b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_dilimleme.md index 9396100442..bea4434af4 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_dilimleme.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_dilimleme.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Partial publication" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_g\303\266rselle\305\237tirme.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_g\303\266rselle\305\237tirme.md" index 00347b06ed..c1e8a42c7a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_g\303\266rselle\305\237tirme.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_g\303\266rselle\305\237tirme.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Plot" ], "references": [ - "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", - "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." + "Healy, K. (2018). Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.", + "Tufte, E. R. (1983). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_payla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_payla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" index e39196a12c..b7adf545f4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_payla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_payla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", - "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", - "for Data Sharing, S. C. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/en/support-centre-data-sharing/pages/about" + "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", + "Gollwitzer, M., Abele-Brehm, A., Fiebach, C., Ramthun, R., Scheel, A. M., Schönbrodt, F. D., & Steinberg, U. (2020). Data Management and Data Sharing in Psychological Science: Revision of the DGPs Recommendations.", + "Support Centre for Data Sharing. (n.d.). What is data sharing? Retrieved 11 July 2021. https://eudatasharing.eu/what-data-sharing" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_y\303\266netim_plan\304\261_dmp_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_y\303\266netim_plan\304\261_dmp_.md" index 801ebbb5ef..625dcde2ef 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/veri_y\303\266netim_plan\304\261_dmp_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/veri_y\303\266netim_plan\304\261_dmp_.md" @@ -11,8 +11,10 @@ "Open data" ], "references": [ - "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", - "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525" + "Burnette, M., Williams, S., & Imker, H. (2016). From Plan to Action: Successful Data Management Plan Implementation in a Multidisciplinary Project. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 5(1), e1101. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2016.1101", + "Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525", + "Research Data Alliance. (2020). Data management plan (DMP) common standard. https://github.com/RDA-DMP-Common/RDA-DMP-Common-Standard", + "Data management plans. (n.d.). https://sdr.library.stanford.edu/data-management-plans%20" ], "drafted_by": [ "Dominique Roche" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/veriye_eri\305\237im_ve_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_\305\237effafl\304\261\304\237\304\261_da_rt_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/veriye_eri\305\237im_ve_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_\305\237effafl\304\261\304\237\304\261_da_rt_.md" index fdc1bddb87..a13f6a49f6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/veriye_eri\305\237im_ve_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_\305\237effafl\304\261\304\237\304\261_da_rt_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/veriye_eri\305\237im_ve_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_\305\237effafl\304\261\304\237\304\261_da_rt_.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", - "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" + "Carsey, T. M. (2014). Making DA-RT a reality. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001753", + "Monroe, K. R. (2018). The rush to transparency: DA-RT and the potential dangers for qualitative research. Perspectives on Politics, 16(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700336X" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eike Mark Rinke" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/versiyon_kontrol\303\274.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/versiyon_kontrol\303\274.md" index 638d097c77..9306c0c9ae 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/versiyon_kontrol\303\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/versiyon_kontrol\303\274.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Source control" ], "references": [ - "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" + "Git. (n.d.). Git—About Version Control. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Getting-Started-About-Version-Control" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/webometriler.md b/content/glossary/turkish/webometriler.md index d61cbc3f65..2d9e7ea995 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/webometriler.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/webometriler.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ "Bibliometrics" ], "references": [ - "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" + "Bjørneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20077" ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yap\304\261_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yap\304\261_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" index b86d419d32..f4b7674b90 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yap\304\261_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yap\304\261_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" @@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ "Validation" ], "references": [ - "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", - "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", - "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" + "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", + "Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.", + "Smith, G. T. (2005). On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement. Psychological Assessment, 17(4), 396–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yard\304\261mc\304\261_hipotez.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yard\304\261mc\304\261_hipotez.md" index e197cfc1cb..a8b8ce39b5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yard\304\261mc\304\261_hipotez.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yard\304\261mc\304\261_hipotez.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Hidden moderators" ], "references": [ - "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", - "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." + "Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Macmillan International Higher Education.", + "Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programs: Vol. I. Cambridge University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa Aldoh" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yava\305\237_bilim.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yava\305\237_bilim.md" index cf5f84690c..0678b70e37 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yava\305\237_bilim.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yava\305\237_bilim.md" @@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ "research quality" ], "references": [ - "Academy, S. S. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", - "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", - "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" + "Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. Slow Science. http://slow-science.org/", + "Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let’s Publish Fewer Papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245", + "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sonia Rishi" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yay\304\261mla_ya_da_yok_ol.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yay\304\261mla_ya_da_yok_ol.md" index b4a8908e55..8c15822c87 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yay\304\261mla_ya_da_yok_ol.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yay\304\261mla_ya_da_yok_ol.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Slow Science" ], "references": [ - "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", - "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" + "Case, C. M. (1928). Scholarship in Sociology. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 323–340. http://www.sudoc.fr/036493414", + "Fanelli, D. (2010). Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLOS ONE, 5(4), e10271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010271" ], "drafted_by": [ "Eliza Woodward" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yay\304\261n_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261_dosya_\303\247ekmecesi_problemi_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yay\304\261n_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261_dosya_\303\247ekmecesi_problemi_.md" index c4c1327cce..7a6187d850 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yay\304\261n_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261_dosya_\303\247ekmecesi_problemi_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yay\304\261n_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261_dosya_\303\247ekmecesi_problemi_.md" @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ "Meta-Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", - "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", - "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", - "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", - "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", - "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" + "Dickersin, K., & Min, Y. (1993). Publication Bias: The Problem That Won’t Go Away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 703(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x", + "Devito, N., & Goldacre, B. (2019). Publication Bias. Catalogue of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/publication-bias/", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669529", + "Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x", + "Franco, A., Malhotra, N., & Simonovits, G. (2014). Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer. Science, 345(6203), 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255484", + "Lindsay, D. S. (2020). Seven steps toward transparency and replicability in psychological science. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 61(4), 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000222", + "Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. In Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470870168.ch1" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yazar_s\304\261ras\304\261_krediyi_belirler_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yazar_s\304\261ras\304\261_krediyi_belirler_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" index ccf684702b..a6b667a206 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yazar_s\304\261ras\304\261_krediyi_belirler_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yazar_s\304\261ras\304\261_krediyi_belirler_yakla\305\237\304\261m\304\261.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "First-last-author-emphasis norm (FLAE)" ], "references": [ - "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", - "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" + "Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8–10. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20166549", + "Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H., & Krauss, J. (2007). Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biology, 5(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050018" ], "drafted_by": [ "Myriam A. Baum" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" index a882d052a4..59b56c5885 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", - "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", - "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", - "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" + "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", + "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", + "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" ], "drafted_by": [ "Jacob Miranda" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ya\304\237mac\304\261_yay\304\261n.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ya\304\237mac\304\261_yay\304\261n.md" index ea1eef6728..d55adbe3a4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ya\304\237mac\304\261_yay\304\261n.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ya\304\237mac\304\261_yay\304\261n.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Gaming (the system)" ], "references": [ - "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" + "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", + "Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265" ], "drafted_by": [ "Nick Ballou" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" index 1b7ed8b1bf..cb82b79c14 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik.md" @@ -9,11 +9,12 @@ "repeatability" ], "references": [ - "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", - "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", - "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Barba, L. A. (2018). Terminologies for reproducible research. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802.03311.", + "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", + "Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible Research in Computational Science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213847", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code.", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine, & others. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. In Understanding Reproducibility and Replicability [Techreport]. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547546/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik_a\304\237\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik_a\304\237\304\261.md" index 93197cbf5c..75b8b07f10 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik_a\304\237\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik_a\304\237\304\261.md" @@ -5,10 +5,11 @@ "definition": "Yeniden üretilebilirlik ağı, genellikle araştırmacıların öncülük ettiği açık bilim çalışma gruplarından oluşan bir konsorsiyumdur. Bu gruplar, belirli bir ülke çapında, farklı disiplinlerden yerel araştırmacılar, gruplar ve kurumları, merkezi bir yönlendirme grubuyla bağlantılı hâle getiren ve araştırma ekosistemindeki dış paydaşlarla da iletişim kuran ‘wheel-and-spoke model – tekerlek ve jant modeli’* ile çalışır. Yeniden üretilebilirlik ağlarının amaçları arasında farkındalığı artırmak, eğitim faaliyetlerini teşvik etmek ve taban düzeyinde, kurumsal düzeyde ve araştırma ekosistemi düzeyinde en iyi uygulamaları yaygınlaştırmak vardır. Mart 2021 itibarıyla bu tür ağlar; Birleşik Krallık, Almanya, İsviçre, Slovakya ve Avustralya’da mevcuttur. *Bu model, iletişim, organizasyon, ulaşım ve sinirbilim gibi alanlarda kullanılan bir ağ modelidir. Merkezî bir çekirdekten (wheel) çevreye doğru uzanan bağlantılardan (spokes) oluşan bir sistemi ifade eder.", "related_terms": [], "references": [ - "Network, U. R. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", - "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", - "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", - "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" + "UK Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). UK Reproducibility Network. Retrieved 10 July 2021. https://www.ukrn.org/", + "GRN · German Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). A German Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://reproducibilitynetwork.de/", + "Swiss Reproducibility Network. (n.d.). https://www.swissrn.org/", + "Anon. (n.d.). Domov | SKRN (Slovak Reproducibility network). Retrieved from https://slovakrn.wixsite.com/skrn", + "AusRN. (n.d.). Australian Reproducibility Network. Retrieved from https://www.aus-rn.org/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Suzanne L. K. Stewart" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik_krizi_di\304\237er_ad\304\261yla_tekrarlanabilirlik_veya_tekrarlama_krizi_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik_krizi_di\304\237er_ad\304\261yla_tekrarlanabilirlik_veya_tekrarlama_krizi_.md" index d10fab1fc0..221e0c51f4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik_krizi_di\304\237er_ad\304\261yla_tekrarlanabilirlik_veya_tekrarlama_krizi_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yeniden_\303\274retilebilirlik_krizi_di\304\237er_ad\304\261yla_tekrarlanabilirlik_veya_tekrarlama_krizi_.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Reproducibility" ], "references": [ - "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114" + "Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/yinelenebilirlik.md b/content/glossary/turkish/yinelenebilirlik.md index c311aca158..6e7a511898 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/yinelenebilirlik.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/yinelenebilirlik.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ "Reliability" ], "references": [ - "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", - "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." + "ISO. (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1st ed.). International Organization for Standardization.", + "Stodden, V. C. (2011). Trust your science? Open your data and code." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif, Adam Parker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yollar\304\261_\303\247atallanan_bah\303\247e.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yollar\304\261_\303\247atallanan_bah\303\247e.md" index e96935bf91..07176898ad 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yollar\304\261_\303\247atallanan_bah\303\247e.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yollar\304\261_\303\247atallanan_bah\303\247e.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Specification Curve Analysis" ], "references": [ - "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" + "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Flávio Azevedo; Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yurtta\305\237_bilimi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yurtta\305\237_bilimi.md" index 89e7be60cc..f9a5780d5c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yurtta\305\237_bilimi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yurtta\305\237_bilimi.md" @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ "Crowdsourcing" ], "references": [ - "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", - "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" + "Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303", + "Lintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., & Vandenberg, J. (2008). Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 389(3), 1179–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif; Ana Barbosa Mendes" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/y\303\274zey_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/y\303\274zey_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" index c75b453bc9..6411e2a6a6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/y\303\274zey_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/y\303\274zey_ge\303\247erlili\304\237i.md" @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" + "Holden, R. B. (2010). Face Validity. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology (4th ed.). Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0341" ], "drafted_by": [ "Annalise A. LaPlume" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/z_e\304\237risi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/z_e\304\237risi.md" index f80ff4bd21..5cb63c022c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/z_e\304\237risi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/z_e\304\237risi.md" @@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ "Statistical power" ], "references": [ - "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", - "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" + "Bartoš, F., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Z-Curve 2.0: Estimating replication rates and discovery rates. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/urgtn", + "Brunner, J., & Schimmack, U. (2020). Estimating population mean power under conditions of heterogeneity and selection for significance. Meta-Psychology, 4, MP.2018.874. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.874" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley J. Baker" diff --git a/content/glossary/turkish/zenodo.md b/content/glossary/turkish/zenodo.md index 6f019df59e..02998b6f44 100644 --- a/content/glossary/turkish/zenodo.md +++ b/content/glossary/turkish/zenodo.md @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/" + "Zenodo. (n.d.). Zenodo—Research. Shared. https://www.zenodo.org/", + "[www.zenodo.org](http://www.zenodo.org)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247e\305\237itlilik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247e\305\237itlilik.md" index 991a3f1ef7..4102842660 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247e\305\237itlilik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247e\305\237itlilik.md" @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ "WEIRD" ], "references": [ - "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" + "Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U. (2020). Cultural Psychology, Diversity, and Representation in Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t7hp2" ], "drafted_by": [ "Ryan Millager; Mariella Paul" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ift_bilin\303\247lilik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ift_bilin\303\247lilik.md" index 807acf9771..66b192f4c0 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ift_bilin\303\247lilik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ift_bilin\303\247lilik.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Social integration" ], "references": [ - "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", - "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", - "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." + "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", + "Du Bois, W. E. B. (1968). The souls of black folk; essays and sketches. Johnson Reprint Corp.", + "Gilroy, P. (1993). The black Atlantic: Modernity and double consciousness. Harvard University Press." ], "drafted_by": [ "Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ift_k\303\266r_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ift_k\303\266r_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" index cce56f340d..4c66d20b26 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ift_k\303\266r_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ift_k\303\266r_hakem_de\304\237erlendirmesi.md" @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ "Triple-Blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ok_yazarl\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ok_yazarl\304\261.md" index 2945cc8f77..5ecbc539eb 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ok_yazarl\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247ok_yazarl\304\261.md" @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ "Team science" ], "references": [ - "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", - "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", - "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" + "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", + "Moshontz, H., Ebersole, C. R., Weston, S. J., & Klein, R. A. (2021). A guide for many authors: Writing manuscripts in large collaborations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12590", + "Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099" ], "drafted_by": [ "Yu-Fang Yang" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_analist_\303\247al\304\261\305\237malar\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_analist_\303\247al\304\261\305\237malar\304\261.md" index c468037151..d1853d6cf5 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_analist_\303\247al\304\261\305\237malar\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_analist_\303\247al\304\261\305\237malar\304\261.md" @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ "Scientific Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", - "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh", + "Silberzahn, R., Uhlmann, E. L., Martin, D. P., Anselmi, P., Aust, F., Awtrey, E., Bahník, Š., Bai, F., Bannard, C., Bonnier, E., & others. (2018). Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747646" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_evren_analizi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_evren_analizi.md" index 6d1b39fe02..3d1bc7c9f8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_evren_analizi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_evren_analizi.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Vibration of effects" ], "references": [ - "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", - "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" + "Del Giudice, M., & Gangestad, S. W. (2021). A traveler’s guide to the multiverse: Promises, pitfalls, and a framework for the evaluation of analytic decisions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920954925. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925", + "Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637" ], "drafted_by": [ "Tina Lonsdorf; Flávio Azevedo" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_laboratuvarl\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_laboratuvarl\304\261.md" index 0214211150..292b5e5da6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_laboratuvarl\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247oklu_laboratuvarl\304\261.md" @@ -12,12 +12,13 @@ "Replication" ], "references": [ - "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", - "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", - "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", - "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", - "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", - "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" + "Ebersole, C. R., Atherton, O. E., Belanger, A. L., Skulborstad, H. M., Allen, J. M., Banks, J. B., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). Many Labs 3: Evaluating participant pool quality across the academic semester via replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.012", + "Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristia, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Kline, M., Levelt, C., Lew-Williams, C., Nazzi, T., Panneton, R., Rabagliati, H., Soderstrom, M., Sullivan, J., Waxman, S., & Yurovsky, D. (2017). A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory-Building. Infancy, 22, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12182", + "Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., & et al. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178", + "Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., & … Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225", + "Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607", + "Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716", + "Pavlov, Y. G., Adamian, N., Appelhoff, S., Arvaneh, M., Benwell, C., Beste, C., & Mushtaq, F. (2020). #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the Replicability of Influential EEG Experiments. PsyArXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/528nr" ], "drafted_by": [ "Sam Parsons" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247okluluk.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247okluluk.md" index b283e101c1..f442c52871 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247okluluk.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247okluluk.md" @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ "Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST)" ], "references": [ - "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", - "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" + "Sato, T. (1996). Type I and Type II error in multiple comparisons. The Journal of Psychology, 130(3), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1996.9915010", + "Schulz, K. F., & Grimes, D. A. (2005). Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. The Lancet, 365(9470), 1591–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66461-6" ], "drafted_by": [ "Aidan Cashin" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247\304\261kar_\303\247at\304\261\305\237mas\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247\304\261kar_\303\247at\304\261\305\237mas\304\261.md" index 17027ebd75..770c68fd27 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247\304\261kar_\303\247at\304\261\305\237mas\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\247\304\261kar_\303\247at\304\261\305\237mas\304\261.md" @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" + "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2025). Author Responsibilities—Conflicts of Interest. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/author-responsibilities–conflicts-of-interest.html", + "Directory of Open Access Journals. (n.d.). https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Christopher Graham" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266deme_duvar\304\261_paywall_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266deme_duvar\304\261_paywall_.md" index 2947f673b1..37526ecd0d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266deme_duvar\304\261_paywall_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266deme_duvar\304\261_paywall_.md" @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ "Open Access" ], "references": [ - "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y" + "Day, S., Rennie, S., Luo, D., & Tucker, J. D. (2020). Open to the public: Paywalls and the public rationale for open access medical research publishing. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-0182-y", + "[https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/](https://casrai.org/term/closed-access/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_bask\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_bask\304\261.md" index c00af57f63..08742be781 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_bask\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_bask\304\261.md" @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ "Working Paper" ], "references": [ - "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", - "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" + "Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(5), e1005473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473", + "Elmore, S. A. (2018). Preprints: What Role Do These Have in Communicating Scientific Results? Toxicologic Pathology, 46(4), 364–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623318767322" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mariella Paul" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_bask\304\261_tabanl\304\261_dergi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_bask\304\261_tabanl\304\261_dergi.md" index f98524e924..b68934743d 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_bask\304\261_tabanl\304\261_dergi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_bask\304\261_tabanl\304\261_dergi.md" @@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ "Preprint" ], "references": [ - "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", - "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", - "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" + "Ginsparg, P. (1997). Winners and losers in the global research village. The Serials Librarian, 30(3–4), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v30n03_13", + "Ginsparg, P. (2001). Creating a global knowledge network. In Second Joint ICSU Press-UNESCO Expert Conference on Electronic Publishing in Science (pp. 19–23).", + "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Bradley Baker" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_kay\304\261t.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_kay\304\261t.md" index 099f07b469..55095e9d39 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_kay\304\261t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_kay\304\261t.md" @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ "Transparency" ], "references": [ - "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", - "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", - "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", - "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", - "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", - "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" + "Haven, T. L., & Van Grootel, L. (2019). Preregistering qualitative research. Accountability in Research, 26(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2019.1580147", + "Lewandowsky, S., & Bishop, D. (2016). Research integrity: Don’t let transparency damage science. Nature News, 529(7587), 459. https://doi.org/10.1038/529459a", + "Mertens, G., & Krypotos, A. M. (2019). Preregistration of analyses of preexisting data. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 338.", + "Navarro, D. (2020). Paths in strange spaces: A comment on preregistration.", + "Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114", + "Simmons, J., Nelson, L., & Simonsohn, U. (2021). Pre‐registration: Why and how. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_kay\304\261t_taahh\303\274d\303\274.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_kay\304\261t_taahh\303\274d\303\274.md" index f9a8a75438..1ed4e6a642 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_kay\304\261t_taahh\303\274d\303\274.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266n_kay\304\261t_taahh\303\274d\303\274.md" @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" + "Knowledge, F. O. (2020). Preregistration Pledge. https://freeourknowledge.org/2020-12-03-preregistration-pledge/" ], "drafted_by": [ "Helena Hartmann" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266nceli\304\237i_kapma.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266nceli\304\237i_kapma.md" index 857e85958a..0b21cc00b2 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266nceli\304\237i_kapma.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266nceli\304\237i_kapma.md" @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ "Preregistration" ], "references": [ - "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", - "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", - "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" + "Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V. M., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmekers, E.-J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70.85. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917751886", + "Laine, H. (2017). Afraid of scooping – Case study on researcher strategies against fear of scooping in the context of open science. In Data Science Journal (Vol. 16, pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-029", + "Tiokhin, L., Yan, M., & Horgan, T. J. H. (2021). Competition for priority harms the reliability of science, but reforms can help. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01040-1" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266nsel_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266nsel_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" index 9b41fc7929..cc1fb7b81a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266nsel_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266nsel_da\304\237\304\261l\304\261m.md" @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Likelihood function", "Posterior distribution" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "van de Schoot, R., Depaoli, S., King, R., Kramer, B., Märtens, K., Tadesse, M. G., Vannucci, M., Gelman, A., Veen, D., Willemsen, J., & Yau, C. (2021). Bayesian statistics and modelling. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-020-00001-2" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Alaa AlDoh" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266zet_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266zet_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" index 2e1ed1dcb8..bedf68458f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266zet_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266zet_yanl\304\261l\304\261\304\237\304\261.md" @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ "Selective reporting" ], "references": [ - "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." + "Duyx, B., Swaen, G. M., Urlings, M. J., Bouter, L. M., & Zeegers, M. P. (2019). The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: A case study on abstract reporting bias. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–8." ], "drafted_by": [ "Ali H. Al-Hoorie" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266\304\237renmede_evrensel_tasar\304\261m_\303\266et_.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266\304\237renmede_evrensel_tasar\304\261m_\303\266et_.md" index 6dc4141916..29b76fdb2c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266\304\237renmede_evrensel_tasar\304\261m_\303\266et_.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\266\304\237renmede_evrensel_tasar\304\261m_\303\266et_.md" @@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ "Teaching practice" ], "references": [ - "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", - "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", - "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." + "Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8–17. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-new-access-general-curriculum/docview/201139970/se-2?accountid=8630", + "Rose, D. (2000). Universal design for learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(3), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340001500307", + "Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Association for Supervision." ], "drafted_by": [ "Charlotte R. Pennington" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\274\303\247l\303\274_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\274\303\247l\303\274_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" index bad6e9e4b3..83f71d4a1c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\303\274\303\247l\303\274_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\303\274\303\247l\303\274_k\303\266r_hakemlik.md" @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ "Single-blind peer review" ], "references": [ - "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", - "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" + "Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X", + "Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237effafl\304\261k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237effafl\304\261k.md" index ab20a7bda5..e36836bb00 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237effafl\304\261k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237effafl\304\261k.md" @@ -11,9 +11,10 @@ "Trustworthiness" ], "references": [ - "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", - "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", - "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv." + "Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7). https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808", + "Lyon, L. (2016). Transparency: The Emerging Third Dimension of Open Science and Open Data. LIBER Quarterly, 25(4), 153–171. http://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10113", + "Syed, M. (2019). The Open Science Movement is for all of us. PsyArXiv.", + "[Syed (2019)](https://psyarxiv.com/cteyb/)" ], "drafted_by": [ "William Ngiam" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237effafl\304\261k_kontrol_listesi.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237effafl\304\261k_kontrol_listesi.md" index ed14d25d2b..e0a1d2a918 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237effafl\304\261k_kontrol_listesi.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237effafl\304\261k_kontrol_listesi.md" @@ -10,7 +10,9 @@ "Reproducibility", "Trustworthiness" ], - "references": [], + "references": [ + "Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6" + ], "drafted_by": [ "Barnabas Szaszi" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237\303\274pheli_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_uygulamalar\304\261_veya_\305\237\303\274pheli_raporlama_uygulamalar\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237\303\274pheli_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_uygulamalar\304\261_veya_\305\237\303\274pheli_raporlama_uygulamalar\304\261.md" index 142e195559..ada9afdcc7 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237\303\274pheli_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_uygulamalar\304\261_veya_\305\237\303\274pheli_raporlama_uygulamalar\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237\303\274pheli_ara\305\237t\304\261rma_uygulamalar\304\261_veya_\305\237\303\274pheli_raporlama_uygulamalar\304\261.md" @@ -21,12 +21,13 @@ "Salami slicing" ], "references": [ - "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", - "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", - "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", - "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", - "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", - "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0" + "Banks, G. C., Rogelberg, S. G., Woznyj, H. M., Landis, R. S., & Rupp, D. E. (2016). Editorial: Evidence on questionable research practices: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(3), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7", + "Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150", + "Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E. J., & Weinberg, L. M. (2014). Only human: Scientists, systems, and suspect statistics. Opticon1826, 16, 25. https://doi.org/10.5334/OPT.CH", + "John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953", + "Neuroskeptic. (2012). The nine circles of scientific hell. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 643–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459519", + "Sijtsma, K. (2016). Playing with data—Or how to discourage questionable research practices and stimulate researchers to do things right. Psychometrika, 81(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0", + "Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632" ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237\303\274pheli_\303\266l\303\247me_uygulamalar\304\261.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237\303\274pheli_\303\266l\303\247me_uygulamalar\304\261.md" index 03122ce2d5..f1e56668a4 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237\303\274pheli_\303\266l\303\247me_uygulamalar\304\261.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/\305\237\303\274pheli_\303\266l\303\247me_uygulamalar\304\261.md" @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ "Validity" ], "references": [ - "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" + "Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393" ], "drafted_by": [ "Halil Emre Kocalar" From f3828da481b2de6a77db07d8618eb7d3585d6193 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Wallrich Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:30:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 7/8] Deduplicate glossary references and fix ALLEA2017 corporate author MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Checked the BibTeX source for duplicates (should have done this when I first flagged them) and resolved all of them: - ALLEA2017: author {{ALLEA} - All European Academies} rendered as a person ("Academies, A. A. E."); fixed to a literal corporate name. - saegert_et_al_2007: an exact duplicate of the existing APA2007 that I had added earlier — removed the BibTeX entry and repointed the Social class cell to APA2007. - Nittrouer2018: appeared twice with the same key (abbreviated vs full author names) — removed the abbreviated duplicate. - cook1979quasi, Crowdsourcing2021, FilipeRenedoMarston2017: each a second key for a reference already keyed (Cook1979 / CrowdsourcingWeek2021 / FilipeEtAl2017); the duplicates were unused, so removed. Regenerated apa_lookup.json (713 -> 709, no duplicate keys or citation strings), the reference-list page, and per-term files. Note: ALLEA2017 (2017 revised edition) and ALLEA2021 (n.d.) may be the same document under two keys — left for the maintainer to confirm which to keep. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- content/glossary/_glossaries.json | 30 +++++++++---------- content/glossary/apa_lookup.json | 8 ++--- ...0\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" | 2 +- ...1\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" | 2 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" | 2 +- ...34\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" | 2 +- ...24\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" | 2 +- ...76\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/english/authorship.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/research_integrity.md | 2 +- content/glossary/english/social_class.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md | 2 +- .../german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md | 2 +- content/glossary/references/index.md | 3 +- ...ada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" | 2 +- .../turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" | 2 +- "content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" | 2 +- 18 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/glossary/_glossaries.json b/content/glossary/_glossaries.json index 520d649238..1be8522f71 100644 --- a/content/glossary/_glossaries.json +++ b/content/glossary/_glossaries.json @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -8343,7 +8343,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], @@ -9053,7 +9053,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -10826,7 +10826,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -18579,7 +18579,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], @@ -19308,7 +19308,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -21080,7 +21080,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -28436,7 +28436,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], @@ -29121,7 +29121,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -30748,7 +30748,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -37279,7 +37279,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], @@ -37884,7 +37884,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" @@ -39391,7 +39391,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -46368,7 +46368,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], @@ -46961,7 +46961,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json b/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json index 88feb46d08..3301277070 100644 --- a/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json +++ b/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ "Stanford_DataManagementPlans": "Stanford Libraries. (n.d.). Data Management Plans | Stanford Libraries. https://library.stanford.edu/research/data-management-services/data-management-plans", "EU_DataProtection": "European Commission. (n.d.). Data Protection. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection_en", "DataCite_MetadataSchema": "DataCite Schema. (n.d.). Datacite Metadata Schema. https://schema.datacite.org/", - "cook1979quasi": "Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Rand McNally.", "brown2010introduction": "Brown, J. (2010). An Introduction to Overlay Journals [Techreport]. Repositories Support Project: UK. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/19081/", "OpenNeuro": "OpenNeuro. (n.d.). A free and open platform for sharing MRI, MEG, EEG, iEEG, ECoG, ASL, and PET data—OpenNeuro. OpenNeuro. https://openneuro.org/", "AbeleBrehm2019": "Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384", @@ -14,7 +13,7 @@ "Albayrak2018b": "Albayrak, N. (2018). Academics’ role on the future of higher education: Important but unrecognised. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/11/29/academics-role-on-the-future-of-higher-education-important-but-unrecognised/", "AlbayrakOkoroji2019": "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", "AlbayrakAydemir2020": "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "ALLEA2017": "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA2017": "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "AllenMcGonagleOConnellND": "Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/", "Ali2021": "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", "APA2007": "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.", @@ -161,7 +160,6 @@ "Cronbach1955": "Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957", "Cronin2001": "Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097", "Crosetto2021": "Crosetto, P. (2021). Is MDPI a predatory publisher? https://paolocrosetto.wordpress.com/2021/04/12/is-mdpi-a-predatory-publisher/", - "Crowdsourcing2021": "Week, C. (2021). What is Crowdsourcing? https://crowdsourcingweek.com/what-is-crowdsourcing/", "Crutzen2019": "Crutzen, R., Ygram Peters, G. J., & Mondschein, C. (2019). Why and how we should care about the General Data Protection Regulation. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1606222", "Cruwell2019": "Crüwell, S., van Doorn, J., Etz, A., Makel, M. C., Moshontz, H., Niebaum, J. C., Orben, A., Parsons, S., & Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2019). Seven Easy Steps to Open Science: An Annotated Reading List. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 227(4), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000387", "Curran2009": "Curran, P. J. (2009). The seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological science: Introduction to the special issue. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015972", @@ -243,7 +241,6 @@ "FraserEtAl2021": "Fraser, H., Bush, M., Wintle, B., Mody, F., Smith, E., Hanea, A., & others. (2021). Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science).", "FreeOurKnowledgeND": "Free Our Knowledge. (n.d.). About. Retrieved from https://freeourknowledge.org/about/", "Frith2020": "Frith, U. (2020). Fast lane to slow science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.007", - "FilipeRenedoMarston2017": "Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biology, 15(5), e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403", "GalliganDyasCorreia2013": "Galligan, F., & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2013.01.003", "Garson2012": "Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing Statistical Assumptions (2012th ed.). North Carolina State University.", "GelmanLoken2013": "Gelman, A., & Loken, E. (n.d.). The garden of forking paths: Why multiple comparisons can be a problem, even when there is no “fishing expedition” or “p-hacking” and the research hypothesis was posited ahead of time. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/", @@ -464,8 +461,8 @@ "Nickerson1998": "Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175", "Nieuwenhuis2011": "Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2886", "Nisbet2002": "Nisbet, M. C., Scheufele, D. A., Shanahan, J., Moy, P., Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2002). Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise?: A Media Effects Model for Public Perceptions of Science and Technology. Communication Research, 29(5), 584–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365002236196", - "Nittrouer2018": "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", "NIHR2021": "NIHR Guidance on Co-Producing a Research Project. (2021). https://www.learningforinvolvement.org.uk/?opportunity=nihr-guidance-on-co-producing-a-research-project", + "Nittrouer2018": "Nittrouer, C., Hebl, M., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Trump-Steele, R., Lane, D., & Valian, V. (2018). Gender disparities in colloquium speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(1), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708414115", "Nogrady2023": "Nogrady, B. (2023). Hyperauthorship: The publishing challenges for “big team” science. Nature News. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00575-3 Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00575-3", "Nosek2019": "Nosek, B. A. (2019). Strategy for Culture Change. Center for Open Science. https://www.cos.io/blog/strategy-for-culture-change", "Nosek2012Bar_Anan": "Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215", @@ -710,6 +707,5 @@ "tenny_abdelgawad_2021": "Tenny, S., & Abdelgawad, I. (2021). Statistical Significance. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/", "borsboom_et_al_2004": "Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061", "nimon_2012": "Nimon, K. F. (2012). Statistical Assumptions of Substantive Analyses Across the General Linear Model: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00322", - "saegert_et_al_2007": "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association.", "anderson_et_al_2012": "Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032" } \ No newline at end of file diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" index bf9e455fca..9f30499854 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" index 3398389cae..789e7824a6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\267_\330\250\331\202\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\247\330\254\330\252\331\205\330\247\330\271\331\212_\330\251.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" index 67e19763a1..f187ec6153 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" index 7c46f1b4c0..2d5bcac9e6 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" index 2a399979c3..38a02425a8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" index 1b06ba8b7b..c1e93215a3 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\244\276\344\274\232\351\230\266\345\261\202.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/authorship.md b/content/glossary/english/authorship.md index 8313ad2362..0bf95f2a03 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/authorship.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/authorship.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md b/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md index 60c16fc9ca..f42c143ace 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/social_class.md b/content/glossary/english/social_class.md index 6dfa8a0082..1b478dd6fd 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/social_class.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/social_class.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md b/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md index 6534f7bec6..e44aed848e 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" index a5ca6bd5a2..ef4eff35aa 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md b/content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md index 3f21c87e90..938982b633 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/soziale_schicht.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git a/content/glossary/references/index.md b/content/glossary/references/index.md index 9fcd2184f1..c2e2330230 100644 --- a/content/glossary/references/index.md +++ b/content/glossary/references/index.md @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ We are currently working on a better way to display and cross-link the reference
Abele-Brehm, A. E., Gollwitzer, M., Steinberg, U., & Schönbrodt, F. D. (2019). Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing. Social Psychology, 50, 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000384
-
Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
Accelerator, P. S. (n.d.). Psychological Science Accelerator. https://psysciacc.org/
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Nilsonne, G., Van den Akker, O., Albers, C. J., van Assen, M. A. L. M., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. (2021). Guidance for Multi-Analyst Studies. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/5ecnh
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ..., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
@@ -24,9 +23,9 @@ We are currently working on a better way to display and cross-link the reference
Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.
Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/
Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806
+
ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
ALLEA. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/
-
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association.
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.
Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032
Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., Devries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0095
diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" index f2791f668d..008244d1ec 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" index 02cd2956fd..f971796f1c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/sosyal_s\304\261n\304\261f.md" @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ "Evans, O., & Rubin, M. (2021). In a Class on Their Own: Investigating the Role of Social Integration in the Association Between Social Class and Mental Well-Being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 014616722110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211021190", "Rubin, M., Evans, O., & McGuffog, R. (2019). Social class differences in social integration at university: Implications for academic outcomes and mental health. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 87–102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_6", "Rubin, M. (2021). Explaining the association between subjective social status and mental health among university students using an impact ratings approach. SN Social Sciences, 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00031-3", - "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status [Techreport]. American Psychological Association." + "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association." ], "drafted_by": [ "Mahmoud Elsherif" diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" index 59b56c5885..137e3f249c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "Academies, A. A. E. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" From 98e3a8046a60ed7e549479e8ecb0c71547dee28a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Wallrich Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 23:59:03 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 8/8] Consolidate ALLEA Code of Conduct to the 2023 revised edition ALLEA2017 and ALLEA2021 were the same document (European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity) under two keys. The current version is the 2023 Revised Edition (allea.org confirms 2017 is superseded). Replaced both with a single ALLEA2023 entry citing the 2023 edition with its DOI (10.26356/ECoC, verified via DataCite), removed the unused ALLEA2021, and repointed the two Sheet references (Authorship, Research integrity) from ALLEA2017 to ALLEA2023. apa_lookup.json: 709 -> 708; reference page and per-term files regenerated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- content/glossary/_glossaries.json | 20 +++++++++---------- content/glossary/apa_lookup.json | 3 +-- ...0\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" | 2 +- ...30\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" | 2 +- ...34\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" | 2 +- ...24\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/english/authorship.md | 2 +- .../glossary/english/research_integrity.md | 2 +- content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md | 2 +- .../german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" | 2 +- content/glossary/references/index.md | 3 +-- ...ada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" | 2 +- "content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" | 2 +- 13 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/glossary/_glossaries.json b/content/glossary/_glossaries.json index 1be8522f71..a06b1fd041 100644 --- a/content/glossary/_glossaries.json +++ b/content/glossary/_glossaries.json @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -8343,7 +8343,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], @@ -10826,7 +10826,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -18579,7 +18579,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], @@ -21080,7 +21080,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -28436,7 +28436,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], @@ -30748,7 +30748,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -37279,7 +37279,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], @@ -39391,7 +39391,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" @@ -46368,7 +46368,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json b/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json index 3301277070..54b3d2d26a 100644 --- a/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json +++ b/content/glossary/apa_lookup.json @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Albayrak2018b": "Albayrak, N. (2018). Academics’ role on the future of higher education: Important but unrecognised. Retrieved from https://lsepgcertcitl.wordpress.com/2018/11/29/academics-role-on-the-future-of-higher-education-important-but-unrecognised/", "AlbayrakOkoroji2019": "Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.", "AlbayrakAydemir2020": "Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/", - "ALLEA2017": "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA2023": "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "AllenMcGonagleOConnellND": "Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/", "Ali2021": "Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806", "APA2007": "American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.", @@ -636,7 +636,6 @@ "The_R_Foundation_n_d": "The R Foundation. (n.d.). The R Project for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/", "COPE2021": "The Committee on Publication Ethics. (n.d.). Transparency & best practice – DOAJ. DOAJ. https://doaj.org/apply/transparency/", "CONSORT2010": "The CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-32", - "ALLEA2021": "ALLEA. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", "OpenDefinition2021": "Definition, T. O. (n.d.). The Open Definition—Open Definition—Defining Open in Open Data, Open Content and Open Knowledge. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendefinition.org/", "OpenSourceDefinition2021": "Definition, T. O. S. (n.d.). The Open Source Definition. Open Source Initiative. https://opensource.org/osd", "SlowScience2010": "The Slow Science Academy. (2010). The Slow Science Manifesto. SLOW-SCIENCE.Org — Bear with Us, While We Think. http://slow-science.org/", diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" index 9f30499854..f2d7ae5ddc 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\330\247\331\204\330\252_\330\243\331\204\331\212\331\201.md" @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" diff --git "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" index f187ec6153..058d358642 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/arabic/\331\206\330\262\330\247\331\207\330\251_\330\247\331\204\330\250\330\255\330\253.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" index 2d5bcac9e6..f65cfe648f 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\344\275\234\350\200\205\347\275\262\345\220\215.md" @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" diff --git "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" index 38a02425a8..df403f5a8a 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/chinese/\347\240\224\347\251\266\350\257\232\344\277\241.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/english/authorship.md b/content/glossary/english/authorship.md index 0bf95f2a03..e4cf4b22e2 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/authorship.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/authorship.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" diff --git a/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md b/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md index f42c143ace..934143a4fe 100644 --- a/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md +++ b/content/glossary/english/research_integrity.md @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md b/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md index e44aed848e..cd49e7cf7f 100644 --- a/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md +++ b/content/glossary/german/autor_innenschaft.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117" diff --git "a/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" "b/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" index ef4eff35aa..d2eefd1e33 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/german/forschungsintegrit\303\244t.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git a/content/glossary/references/index.md b/content/glossary/references/index.md index c2e2330230..5a4e6b35cf 100644 --- a/content/glossary/references/index.md +++ b/content/glossary/references/index.md @@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ We are currently working on a better way to display and cross-link the reference
Albayrak, N., & Okoroji, C. (2019). Facing the challenges of postgraduate study as a minority student. A Guide for Psychology Postgraduates, 63.
Albayrak-Aydemir, N. (2020). The hidden costs of being a scholar from the global south. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/highereducation/2020/02/20/the-hidden-costs-of-being-a-scholar-from-the-global-south/
Ali, M. J. (2021). Understanding the Altmetrics. Seminars in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1930806
-
ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
-
ALLEA. (n.d.). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. ALLEA. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
+
ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC
Allen, L., & McGonagle-O’Connell, A. (n.d.). CRediT – Contributor Roles Taxonomy. Retrieved from https://casrai.org/credit/
American Psychological Association, Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on Socioeconomic Status. American Psychological Association.
Anderson, A. A., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Corley, E. A. (2012). The Role of Media and Deference to Scientific Authority in Cultivating Trust in Sources of Information about Emerging Technologies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edr032
diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" index 008244d1ec..301ac38cc8 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/ara\305\237t\304\261rmada_etik_b\303\274t\303\274nl\303\274k.md" @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ "Trustworthy research" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "Medin, D. L. (2012). Rigor without rigor mortis: The APS Board discusses research integrity. APS Observer, 25(5–9), 27–28. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/scientific-rigor", "Moher, D., Bouter, L., Kleinert, S., Glasziou, P., Sham, M. H., Barbour, V., & Dirnagl, U. (2020). The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737" ], diff --git "a/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" "b/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" index 137e3f249c..90a922f51c 100644 --- "a/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" +++ "b/content/glossary/turkish/yazarl\304\261k.md" @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ "Sequence-determines-credit approach (SDC)" ], "references": [ - "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. Retrieved from https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/", + "ALLEA - All European Academies. (2023). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (Revised Edition 2023). ALLEA - All European Academies. https://doi.org/10.26356/ECoC", "German Research Foundation. (2019). Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Research Practice. Code of Conduct.", "McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115", "Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: Survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLoS One, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117"