Possible Inconsistency: ViT-B/14 vs ViT-B/16

[JorgeGarcie]

While going through the repo and configs, I noticed a small inconsistency:

• In the paper (Table 1 and Appendix C), the Sparsh models are listed as ViT-B/14.
• However, the config files (config/model/*.yaml) specify patch_size: 16.
• The released checkpoints also appear to use 16×16 patch embeddings.

So it seems the models correspond to ViT-B/16 rather than ViT-B/14.

Just wanted to flag this in case it helps with reproducibility.