diff --git a/.DS_Store b/.DS_Store
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..47121b6
Binary files /dev/null and b/.DS_Store differ
diff --git a/.Rhistory b/.Rhistory
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e69de29
diff --git a/DATA 300 Recap.pdf b/DATA 300 Recap.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..85ec03c
Binary files /dev/null and b/DATA 300 Recap.pdf differ
diff --git a/Faye - Data Mini.pdf b/Faye - Data Mini.pdf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ad16b91
Binary files /dev/null and b/Faye - Data Mini.pdf differ
diff --git a/Faye Le idea.md b/Faye Le idea.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..29219c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Faye Le idea.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+Research Proposal: Finding the Best Content Category on Social Media (Instagram and YouTube) for Wealth Generation
+
+
+1) Research Question
+The research seeks to answer the following question:
+Which content category on social media platforms (Instagram and YouTube) is most effective for generating significant wealth, based on metrics such as follower count, likes, and comments?
+
+This study aims to determine which types of content—such as fashion, beauty, fitness, entertainment, education, or tech—are most likely to lead influencers to substantial financial success. Financial success in this context is proxied by high follower counts, strong engagement rates (likes and comments), and the ability to attract sponsorships or monetization opportunities.
+
+2) Data Source
+The datasets to be used for this project are:
+
+Kaggle: Social Media Influencers (June 2022 - Instagram Dataset)
+Kaggle: Social Media Influencers (June 2022 - YouTube Dataset)
+
+https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ramjasmaurya/top-1000-social-media-channels?select=social+media+influencers-youtube+june+2022+-+june+2022.csv
+https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ramjasmaurya/top-1000-social-media-channels?select=social+media+influencers-instagram+june+2022+-+june+2022.csv
+
+Data Overview: Both datasets cover key influencer metrics on Instagram and YouTube as of June 2022. The datasets include variables such as:
+
+Follower/ Subscriber Count: Total number of followers per influencer.
+Engagement Rate: Percentage of followers engaging with posts.
+Likes: Number of likes per post.
+Comments: Number of comments per post.
+Content Category: The type of content (e.g., fashion, fitness, tech).
+
+
+3) Methodology
+
+Distribution Analysis: Examine the distribution of followers/subscribers, likes, and comments across different content categories.
+Correlation Analysis: Assess the correlation between the number of followers/subscribers and engagement metrics such as likes and comments to evaluate how engagement drives follower growth.
+Category Breakdown: Analyze the performance of content categories (e.g., beauty, fitness, tech) on both platforms to identify the top-performing content for wealth generation.
+Model Specification:
+
+Regression Models: Use linear and multiple regression models to analyze the relationship between content category (independent variable) and the wealth generation metrics (dependent variables: followers, likes, comments, engagement score).
+Instagram: Followers = β0 + β1(Likes) + β2(Comments) + β3(Content Category)
+YouTube: Subscribers = β0 + β1(Likes) + β2(Comments) + β3(Content Category)
+Clustering: Use clustering techniques such as K-means to group content categories by engagement patterns and follower growth. This will help uncover trends in content category success based on platform dynamics.
+Outcome: The analysis will provide a ranking of content categories based on their potential to attract large audiences and generate high engagement on Instagram and YouTube. This will highlight which content types provide the highest financial opportunities for influencers.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
diff --git a/Idea 2.md b/Idea 2.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52958bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Idea 2.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+What content strategies (e.g., frequency, type of content) are more effective for micro- versus macro-influencers?
+
+1) Research Question
+
+What content strategies (e.g., frequency, type of content) are more effective for micro- versus macro-influencers?
+How does the content frequency impact the engagement rate of micro- vs. macro-influencers?
+
+2) Data Source
+https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1UxNZ32HYsgL9xDgGyd4xJThRwFZnQzsZ?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR1_bHDqNKD2ZckFRtzZpuPQOppk9s7W15KA-BBYloB9GWu8zmKFq6mXoyI_aem_EiyPi7re4UFmsUZGKEgYlQ
+
+Micro-Influencers: 1,000 - 100,000 followers
+Macro-Influencers: 100,000+ followers
+
+3) Methodology
+
+a) Data Cleaning and Classification
+
+Clean the dataset by removing any duplicate entries or incomplete data (e.g., missing values for #Followers, #Posts).
+Classify influencers into two groups:
+Micro-influencers: Less than 100,000 followers.
+Macro-influencers: More than 100,000 followers.
+b) Content Strategy Analysis
+
+Post Frequency: For each influencer, calculate their post frequency by dividing the total number of posts by the number of months or years the account has been active (if account creation date is available or can be estimated).
+Perform a comparison of post frequency between micro- and macro-influencers.
+​
+
+c) Statistical Analysis
+
+T-tests: Compare the average post frequency between micro- and macro-influencers to identify any significant differences.
+Correlation analysis: Analyze the correlation between post frequency and engagement rate for both micro- and macro-influencers.
+
+d) Visualization and Interpretation
+
+Use visualizations like bar charts, scatter plots, and histograms to showcase the distribution of post frequency, engagement rates, and how they differ between the two influencer categories.
+Interpret the results to determine which strategies (e.g., frequent posting, specific content types) lead to higher engagement for micro-influencers compared to macro-influencers.