This issue comes from a Codex global scan of deepmodeling/tbplas at commit 4d3652b.
Severity: Medium
The About page says TBPLaS is released under “BSD license 2.0”, but the included license text is the three-clause BSD license, including the non-endorsement clause. The license label is inaccurate and can confuse downstream users reviewing licensing.
Code references:
|
License |
|
------- |
|
|
|
TBPLaS is release under the BSD license 2.0, the complete content of which is as following: |
|
|
|
.. include:: license.rst |
https://github.com/deepmodeling/tbplas/blob/4d3652b3dba8eb930e4869a6d41074f62d703692/LICENSE.rst#L6-L11
Suggested fix: update the About page to identify the license as BSD 3-Clause.
This issue comes from a Codex global scan of deepmodeling/tbplas at commit 4d3652b.
Severity: Medium
The About page says TBPLaS is released under “BSD license 2.0”, but the included license text is the three-clause BSD license, including the non-endorsement clause. The license label is inaccurate and can confuse downstream users reviewing licensing.
Code references:
tbplas/doc/source/about/index.rst
Lines 123 to 128 in 4d3652b
https://github.com/deepmodeling/tbplas/blob/4d3652b3dba8eb930e4869a6d41074f62d703692/LICENSE.rst#L6-L11
Suggested fix: update the About page to identify the license as BSD 3-Clause.