Bad taxonomy serialisation

[simonLouvet]

I have a problem with the way taxonomies are serialised/modelled.
It is explicitly stated that this taxonomy is an ontology. That's why we didn't want to do anything when we removed the taxonomies from the owl files.

{
"@id": "https://github.com/datafoodconsortium/taxonomies/releases/latest/download/productTypes.rdf",
"@type": ["http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology"]
}

this should be

{
 "@id": "https://example.org/my-scheme",
 "@type": "skos:ConceptScheme",
 "dc:title": { "@value": "Taxonomy of DFC products", "@language": "en" },
 "dc:description": {
 "@value": "Hierarchy of food products for interoperability. ",
 "@language": "en"
 },
 "skos:hasTopConcept": [
 { "@id": "https://example.org/my-scheme#fruit" },
 { "@id": "https://example.org/my-scheme#vegetable" }
  ]
}

[lecoqlibre]

I don't understand what you are asking for @simonLouvet?

Do you want the "@type": "owl:Ontology" to be removed from the serializations?

I think that in the productTypes file there is also a rdf:type set to skos:ConceptScheme.