Summary
I also submitted this to the community hub since it's unclear if these github issues are actively monitored and triaged.
from databricks_openai import DatabricksOpenAI fails in a clean Python 3.12 environment after installing databricks-openai==0.15.0 with normal dependency resolution.
On a fresh install, databricks-openai==0.15.0 resolves databricks-vectorsearch==0.74. Importing DatabricksOpenAI then eagerly imports VectorSearchRetrieverTool, which imports VectorSearchIndex from databricks.vector_search.client. In databricks-vectorsearch==0.74, that symbol does not appear to be available; the documented/public compatibility import appears to be VectorSearchClient.
pip check reports no broken requirements.
This appears to be more than a local compatibility issue: the default installation path for an official Databricks package currently produces a broken import in a clean environment. That raises a broader concern about release hygiene, CI coverage, source-code traceability, issue-tracker ownership, and whether these packages are suitable for production use without strict downstream pinning and independent smoke testing.
Environment
python --version
# Python 3.12.x
python -m pip show databricks-openai databricks-vectorsearch databricks-ai-search databricks-sdk openai
# databricks-openai==0.15.0
# databricks-vectorsearch==0.74
# databricks-ai-search==0.73
# databricks-sdk==0.94.0
# openai==2.41.0
python -m pip check
# No broken requirements found.
Minimal reproduction
python -m venv /tmp/db-openai-repro
source /tmp/db-openai-repro/bin/activate
python -m pip install --upgrade pip
python -m pip install databricks-openai==0.15.0
python -m pip show databricks-openai databricks-vectorsearch databricks-ai-search
python -m pip check
python - <<'PY'
from databricks_openai import DatabricksOpenAI
print(DatabricksOpenAI)
PY
Expected behavior
from databricks_openai import DatabricksOpenAI succeeds.
Actual behavior
ImportError: cannot import name 'VectorSearchIndex' from 'databricks.vector_search.client'
Traceback excerpt:
from databricks_openai import DatabricksOpenAI
...
from databricks_openai.vector_search_retriever_tool import VectorSearchRetrieverTool
...
from databricks.vector_search.client import VectorSearchIndex
ImportError: cannot import name 'VectorSearchIndex' from 'databricks.vector_search.client'. Did you mean: 'VectorSearchClient'?
Notes
Pinning databricks-vectorsearch<0.74 resolves the import failure locally:
python -m pip install "databricks-vectorsearch<0.74"
python - <<'PY'
from databricks_openai import DatabricksOpenAI
print("OK", DatabricksOpenAI)
PY
This suggests a compatibility issue between databricks-openai==0.15.0 and the currently resolved databricks-vectorsearch==0.74, or an eager import issue where importing DatabricksOpenAI requires vector-search retriever dependencies even when only the OpenAI client functionality is needed.
More broadly, this makes the package difficult to trust in production. A clean install resolves successfully, pip check passes, but the top-level documented import fails immediately. If these packages are not actively maintained or not recommended for production use, it would be very helpful for the PyPI pages and Databricks documentation to state that clearly and point users to the recommended supported alternative.
Production-readiness and source-of-truth concerns
There also appears to be a broader source-of-truth and maintenance-signaling problem across these packages.
databricks-vectorsearch has had multiple June 2026 releases, including 0.73 and 0.74, but the PyPI page does not clearly point to a GitHub repository or issue tracker. databricks-ai-search similarly does not make it obvious from PyPI where the source code, release process, or issue tracker lives.
If databricks/databricks-ai-bridge is the source repository used to publish databricks-vectorsearch or databricks-ai-search, that is not clear from the PyPI pages. It is also difficult to reconcile with the visible commit history: at the time of writing, databricks-vectorsearch has had June 2026 PyPI releases, while the latest visible commit on databricks/databricks-ai-bridge appears to be from May 13, 2026.
If those packages are built from some other internal or public repository, please link that repository from PyPI and from the relevant Databricks documentation. Without clear source links, users cannot tell:
- where the published package code comes from;
- where bugs should be reported;
- whether GitHub issues in this repository are monitored by the owners of the released packages;
- whether the PyPI package, GitHub source, and Databricks documentation are actually in sync;
- whether these packages are production-supported or best-effort examples.
This ambiguity is especially concerning because these are not merely community packages. They are Databricks-published packages used with a commercial platform. Production users need a clear support and maintenance story, not just a package name on PyPI.
The open issue backlog in this repository also makes it hard to know whether filing GitHub issues here is the right escalation path. If GitHub issues are not actively monitored or are not the support mechanism for these packages, please state that explicitly and direct users to the appropriate channel.
Suggested fix
One or more of:
- Update
databricks_openai.vector_search_retriever_tool to import/use the current vector search / AI Search API symbol.
- Relax eager imports in
databricks_openai.__init__ so importing DatabricksOpenAI does not require vector-search retriever dependencies to import successfully.
- Add an upper bound or compatibility constraint on
databricks-vectorsearch until the symbol mismatch is fixed.
- Release a patch version of
databricks-openai, for example 0.15.1, that prevents normal dependency resolution from installing a broken dependency set.
- Update CI/CD to verify
from databricks_openai import DatabricksOpenAI does not fail before releasing new versions to PyPI.
- Add a scheduled nightly CI job that creates a fresh environment, installs the latest released PyPI packages with normal dependency resolution, and runs basic import/smoke tests. This would catch breakages caused by newly released transitive dependencies even when no code has changed in this repository.
- Clarify whether
databricks-openai, databricks-vectorsearch, and databricks-ai-search are production-supported packages.
- Clarify where users should file issues for each of these packages.
- Add clear source repository and issue tracker links to the PyPI pages for
databricks-vectorsearch and databricks-ai-search.
- If
databricks/databricks-ai-bridge is not the source of truth for these packages, update the documentation and PyPI metadata so users can find the actual source of truth.
- If these packages are deprecated, experimental, or not maintained with production-level compatibility guarantees, add explicit warnings to the PyPI pages and Databricks docs.
Summary
I also submitted this to the community hub since it's unclear if these github issues are actively monitored and triaged.
from databricks_openai import DatabricksOpenAIfails in a clean Python 3.12 environment after installingdatabricks-openai==0.15.0with normal dependency resolution.On a fresh install,
databricks-openai==0.15.0resolvesdatabricks-vectorsearch==0.74. ImportingDatabricksOpenAIthen eagerly importsVectorSearchRetrieverTool, which importsVectorSearchIndexfromdatabricks.vector_search.client. Indatabricks-vectorsearch==0.74, that symbol does not appear to be available; the documented/public compatibility import appears to beVectorSearchClient.pip checkreports no broken requirements.This appears to be more than a local compatibility issue: the default installation path for an official Databricks package currently produces a broken import in a clean environment. That raises a broader concern about release hygiene, CI coverage, source-code traceability, issue-tracker ownership, and whether these packages are suitable for production use without strict downstream pinning and independent smoke testing.
Environment
Minimal reproduction
Expected behavior
from databricks_openai import DatabricksOpenAIsucceeds.Actual behavior
Traceback excerpt:
Notes
Pinning
databricks-vectorsearch<0.74resolves the import failure locally:This suggests a compatibility issue between
databricks-openai==0.15.0and the currently resolveddatabricks-vectorsearch==0.74, or an eager import issue where importingDatabricksOpenAIrequires vector-search retriever dependencies even when only the OpenAI client functionality is needed.More broadly, this makes the package difficult to trust in production. A clean install resolves successfully,
pip checkpasses, but the top-level documented import fails immediately. If these packages are not actively maintained or not recommended for production use, it would be very helpful for the PyPI pages and Databricks documentation to state that clearly and point users to the recommended supported alternative.Production-readiness and source-of-truth concerns
There also appears to be a broader source-of-truth and maintenance-signaling problem across these packages.
databricks-vectorsearchhas had multiple June 2026 releases, including0.73and0.74, but the PyPI page does not clearly point to a GitHub repository or issue tracker.databricks-ai-searchsimilarly does not make it obvious from PyPI where the source code, release process, or issue tracker lives.If
databricks/databricks-ai-bridgeis the source repository used to publishdatabricks-vectorsearchordatabricks-ai-search, that is not clear from the PyPI pages. It is also difficult to reconcile with the visible commit history: at the time of writing,databricks-vectorsearchhas had June 2026 PyPI releases, while the latest visible commit ondatabricks/databricks-ai-bridgeappears to be from May 13, 2026.If those packages are built from some other internal or public repository, please link that repository from PyPI and from the relevant Databricks documentation. Without clear source links, users cannot tell:
This ambiguity is especially concerning because these are not merely community packages. They are Databricks-published packages used with a commercial platform. Production users need a clear support and maintenance story, not just a package name on PyPI.
The open issue backlog in this repository also makes it hard to know whether filing GitHub issues here is the right escalation path. If GitHub issues are not actively monitored or are not the support mechanism for these packages, please state that explicitly and direct users to the appropriate channel.
Suggested fix
One or more of:
databricks_openai.vector_search_retriever_toolto import/use the current vector search / AI Search API symbol.databricks_openai.__init__so importingDatabricksOpenAIdoes not require vector-search retriever dependencies to import successfully.databricks-vectorsearchuntil the symbol mismatch is fixed.databricks-openai, for example0.15.1, that prevents normal dependency resolution from installing a broken dependency set.from databricks_openai import DatabricksOpenAIdoes not fail before releasing new versions to PyPI.databricks-openai,databricks-vectorsearch, anddatabricks-ai-searchare production-supported packages.databricks-vectorsearchanddatabricks-ai-search.databricks/databricks-ai-bridgeis not the source of truth for these packages, update the documentation and PyPI metadata so users can find the actual source of truth.