You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The research paper (bootstrap-validation.md) currently tracks per-cycle metrics via metrics.yaml (#72). This captures the micro view: individual APE cycles, delta failures, test deltas, etc.
What's missing is the macro view — platform-level usage data from the author's GitHub account that demonstrates the aggregate impact of using Inquiry as a methodology.
Proposed dimension
Add a new research dimension that tracks GitHub platform usage reports across all repositories and organizations:
1. Commit frequency over time
Total commits per month across all repos and orgs (before vs. after Inquiry adoption)
Commit distribution by repo/org
Active days per month
2. GitHub Copilot usage metrics
Copilot completions accepted/rejected over time
Copilot Chat usage frequency
Lines of code suggested vs. accepted
3. AI cost vs. project throughput
Monthly AI cost (Copilot subscription, API usage if any)
Number of projects advanced per month
Issues closed per month across all repos
Cost-per-issue or cost-per-commit as efficiency metrics
Data sources
GitHub contribution graph API — commit counts, active days
Context
The research paper (bootstrap-validation.md) currently tracks per-cycle metrics via metrics.yaml (#72). This captures the micro view: individual APE cycles, delta failures, test deltas, etc.
What's missing is the macro view — platform-level usage data from the author's GitHub account that demonstrates the aggregate impact of using Inquiry as a methodology.
Proposed dimension
Add a new research dimension that tracks GitHub platform usage reports across all repositories and organizations:
1. Commit frequency over time
2. GitHub Copilot usage metrics
3. AI cost vs. project throughput
Data sources
Relationship to existing research
Acceptance criteria
Labels
research, paper, metrics