You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’m interested in discussing the challenges of integrating AI coding assistants (such as Codex or GPT-3.5-based tools) into JetBrains IDEs, especially in relation to the built-in IDE terminal.
How well do AI tools interact with the IDE terminal for tasks like running commands, interpreting build errors, or assisting with CLI workflows?
Are there limitations in context awareness between the editor and the terminal session?
Do performance, security, or workflow issues arise when AI tools are used alongside terminal-based development?
Have these integrations improved your productivity, or introduced new complexities?
I would appreciate hearing real-world experiences and best practices.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I’m interested in discussing the challenges of integrating AI coding assistants (such as Codex or GPT-3.5-based tools) into JetBrains IDEs, especially in relation to the built-in IDE terminal.
How well do AI tools interact with the IDE terminal for tasks like running commands, interpreting build errors, or assisting with CLI workflows?
Are there limitations in context awareness between the editor and the terminal session?
Do performance, security, or workflow issues arise when AI tools are used alongside terminal-based development?
Have these integrations improved your productivity, or introduced new complexities?
I would appreciate hearing real-world experiences and best practices.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions