Automate ELITEA-1739_search-skills-by-name.md

[bermudas]

Automate https://github.com/EliteaAI/onetest-ai-tm-Elitea/blob/main/tests/automated-full-regression-ui/skills/ELITEA-1739_search-skills-by-name.md

[bermudas]

🔧 Started — moved to In Progress. Case: ELITEA-1739_search-skills-by-name.md (module: skills, source: EliteaAI/onetest-ai-tm-Elitea). No existing AFS found for this case; dispatching analyst slot first.

[bermudas]

🔧 Factory (test-automation-lead) works this card. Conversation da662085-f5d9-45de-aa02-ef3e559dd8dd — to take over: stop the loop, then claude --resume da662085-f5d9-45de-aa02-ef3e559dd8dd. One conversation per issue — for history read this thread, to steer comment on it.

[bermudas]

🚫 Blocked — analyst executed ELITEA-1739 end-to-end (AFS at test-specs/skills/l3_search-skills-by-name_ELITEA-1739.md, uncommitted per this project's AFS-delivery convention — will be bundled into the eventual implementer PR).

Finding: the case's central objective — "the Skills list search filters the visible list by name" — does not hold against the live product. The search box is a typeahead/omnisearch that opens a floating suggestion tooltip and navigates away on click; the main Skills list/table is never filtered, for partial, exact, or non-existent queries. This is exactly the case's own defined Fail condition.

Filed:

• [MAJOR] Skills list search does not filter the visible list — it's a navigate-away typeahead instead #128 (defect, MAJOR) — Skills list search does not filter the visible list.
• [CLARIFICATION] ELITEA-1739 test data uses skill names invalid under the live Name-field slug constraint #129 (question, clarification) — case's example skill names ("Formatter", "Code Reviewer", "Content Writer") violate the live Name field's slug-format validation; case-text drift, not a defect.

Why parked rather than automated-as-is: automating this case now would either (a) assert the case's original intent and fail permanently against a real, filed defect, or (b) assert the live typeahead/navigate-away behavior as if it were the intended contract before product has said so — premature, since #128 isn't triaged yet. Neither is acceptable per this project's no-defect-masking rule, and there's no existing human guidance on #128 to follow yet (isolated expect.soft() needs that guidance first).

Waiting on #128 #129

Parking this card as Blocked. Will resume once a human triages #128 (confirms intended behavior — real bug to fix, or typeahead-only is correct and the case text should be rewritten) and #129 (case-text correction), then drags this card back to Approved.

[bermudas]

Defect - try sending 'enter' after typing in the query
clarification - implement it the way product works, don't update test case, but automate it right

[bermudas]

📝 Un-blocked — human guidance received on both children:

• [MAJOR] Skills list search does not filter the visible list — it's a navigate-away typeahead instead #128: "try sending 'enter' after typing in the query" — re-verifying whether Enter triggers real list-filtering that the first analyst pass missed (search-box interaction, not just typing).
• [CLARIFICATION] ELITEA-1739 test data uses skill names invalid under the live Name-field slug constraint #129: "implement it the way product works, don't update test case, but automate it right" — keep the upstream case text as-is; automate against valid slug-format names (formatter/code-reviewer/content-writer), no case-text-edit action needed.

Moved back to In Progress. Dispatching analyst for a re-verification pass on the Enter-key behavior before deciding whether #128 is still a live defect or an AFS gap.

[bermudas]

📝 Re-verification complete: human guidance on #128 was correct — pressing Enter after typing is the missing interaction step. The main Skills list DOES filter correctly (partial/exact/non-existent/clear), confirmed via DOM, screenshots, and network. AFS status flipped defect-found → ready-for-automation (amended in place at test-specs/skills/l3_search-skills-by-name_ELITEA-1739.md).

#128 was an analysis gap, not a real product bug (original pass never pressed Enter) — recommend a human close/re-label it; not closing it myself.
#129 guidance carried forward as instructed — case text untouched upstream, automation uses valid slug names (formatter/code-reviewer/content-writer).

Recorded the skills module's cleanup decision in .agents/testing.md (no teardown, follows the agents/pipelines precedent — no destructive mutation in this case).

Dispatching implementer now.

[bermudas]

📝 Implementer green (3/3 local runs). PR #130 opened (tests/ELITEA-1739-search-skills-by-name → main, Refs #127). New module scaffolded: tests/skills.spec.ts, tests/pages/skillForm.page.ts, tests/pages/skillsList.page.ts; AFS bundled in the PR.

Two infra-only issues found and fixed during implementation (banner/onboarding-tour interception on Skills nav; a duplicate-skill race in the idempotent setup check) — no product defects, no masking.

Flagged (not actioned): .agents/testing.md's deferred shared-fixture extraction (tests/fixtures/auth.ts / trackConsoleErrors) marker said "do not let a 6th module land before this happens" — skills is that 6th module. This is a framework-scale decision for me to pick up as a separate, explicitly-authorized piece of work — not bundled into this PR, and not started now (out of scope for this issue).

Dispatching reviewer now.

[bermudas]

📝 PR #130 reviewer-approved (triangulated review, live-verified twice — no changes requested; one nit logged: AFS mis-attributed the Enter-key correction to #128's comments when it actually lives on this tracking issue #127 — cosmetic, not actioned).

Merge gate status: this repo's only CI (Playwright Tests, .github/workflows/playwright.yml) is workflow_dispatch-only by design (no pull_request trigger — deliberate per .agents/testing.md § CI integration), so gh pr checks 130 reports no checks at all. Per this session's delta ("missing checks → park as Blocked"), I'm not merging on my own reading of local/reviewer test output alone. Manually triggered the workflow against this PR's branch (run 29105930248) to get an actual gh pr checks-visible signal before deciding. Whole-suite run in progress — will report once it completes. Note: this suite intentionally contains known, already-filed product defects that are expected to stay red (e.g. GH#29/#43-style tickets) — the merge-relevant signal is specifically whether ELITEA-1739 passes within the run, not whether the entire suite is green (that's a standing, expected condition unrelated to this PR).

[bermudas]

📝 CI run still in progress (https://github.com/bermudas/EliteaPlaywrightAutomation/actions/runs/29105930248, started 16:02 UTC, ~12min elapsed as of this check — full-suite run, workers:1 sequential per this project's config, expect it to take a while). Card stays In Progress; nothing actionable until it completes. Will check gh pr checks 130 / the run conclusion on next wake and proceed with the merge decision then (green on ELITEA-1739 specifically + no new regressions vs. the suite's known-defect baseline → merge; red on ELITEA-1739 itself → back to implementer debug).

[bermudas]

🚫 Factory (test-automation-lead): 3 sessions without reaching Done or Blocked. Parking it as Blocked — a human should look, then drag back to Approved to retry.

[bermudas]

Skip CI for this, don't forget to update relevant issues (maybe close?)

[bermudas]

🔧 Factory (test-automation-lead) works this card. Conversation da662085-f5d9-45de-aa02-ef3e559dd8dd — to take over: stop the loop, then claude --resume da662085-f5d9-45de-aa02-ef3e559dd8dd. One conversation per issue — for history read this thread, to steer comment on it.