As it stands, a min_age_for_inclusion of 16.0 is considered invalid, as it is not an integer. This seems unnecessarily restrictive; there are certain instances where decimal ages might be expected if computed from DOB. The minimal restriction for age should probably be that it is a non-negative numeric.
As it stands, a
min_age_for_inclusionof16.0is considered invalid, as it is not an integer. This seems unnecessarily restrictive; there are certain instances where decimal ages might be expected if computed from DOB. The minimal restriction for age should probably be that it is a non-negative numeric.