Support http auth for health checks #100
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
|
Yes, this feature would be really cool. We don’t even need new parameters: HTTP auth could be set like this: user:password@example.org. So, if the proxy allows providing a full URL instead of just the path, that would be perfect. I am not a go developer, but if PR like this will be merged, I am happy to do my best :) |
|
Hi, just joining the conversation in in order to know if there is interest to have this supported by kamal-proxy? maybe @kevinmcconnell, whenever you find the time, if can share your ideas or concerns about this it would be great :)! |
|
I'm curious, why would you want to protect the health check endpoint with basic auth? |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
It would be great to support two parameters:
health-check-usernamehealth-check-passwordExample of Docker app that needs HTTP auth: Transmission.
https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/transmission
kamal-proxy deploydoes not work when the root URL requires HTTP auth.All reactions