Skip to content

Rationalize features that are in parquet-format but don't have entry on implementation status #192

Description

@alamb

While working on #189 @emkornfield noticed there are several features that are in parquet-format but don't have entry on implementation status: https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/189/changes#r3470611445

Honestly I think most of these are so old, that it doesn't necessary add value, other then maybe providing a note on that page? Is there anything worth surfacing?

Looking more closely, these seem to be the modern ones:

  • logical-variant-shredding - should be covered under variant type support? But maybe called out separately
  • format-geospatial-statistics - should be covered under geospatial support? But maybe called out separately
  • format-binary-protocol-extensions - Not clear if this is actually something on its own without a defined footer we want to use?
  • format-ieee-754-total-order-and-nan-counts - This should be added (and we would ideally add a 2026 feature column for read support).

Originally posted by @emkornfield in #189 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions