Markus Karg opened MTOOLCHAINS-6 and commented
The web site says that it is possible to use other toolchains besides <jdk>.
Actually the site links to a nonexistent TBD page. This is very ugly.
Please tell the truth on the web page: It is simply impossible to use any other toolschain type besides <jdk>!
It would be really cool, if someone could simply write:
<toolchains>
<type>installshield</type>
<provides>
<id>isx</id>
<version>10.0</version>
<vendor>macrovision</vendor>
</provides>
<configuration>
<installshieldHome>C:\Program Files (x86)\InstallShield X</installshieldHome>
</configuration>
</toolchains>
...and the plugin would in turn simply provide a property that one can read in the POM using ${installshieldHome} -- without any need to write Java code, register custom types, provide more xml, whatever!
This seems to be such an obvious need that I just cannot believe that it does not already work exactly that way in the 1.0 release of the toolchains plugin...! :-)
I really beg for that! :-)
Affects: 1.0
Issue Links:
Markus Karg opened MTOOLCHAINS-6 and commented
The web site says that it is possible to use other toolchains besides <jdk>.
Actually the site links to a nonexistent TBD page. This is very ugly.
Please tell the truth on the web page: It is simply impossible to use any other toolschain type besides <jdk>!
It would be really cool, if someone could simply write:
...and the plugin would in turn simply provide a property that one can read in the POM using
${installshieldHome} -- without any need to write Java code, register custom types, provide more xml, whatever!This seems to be such an obvious need that I just cannot believe that it does not already work exactly that way in the 1.0 release of the toolchains plugin...! :-)
I really beg for that! :-)
Affects: 1.0
Issue Links:
MNG-5718 Change 'provides' from Object to Properties in toolchains.xml
MNG-5720 Change 'configuration' from Object to Properties in toolchains.xml