Korean-language usage guide for Open Code Review

[gameworkerkim]

Hello Open Code Review Team,

I recently updated a Korean-language usage guide for Open Code Review and wanted to share it with the community.

The guide covers installation, configuration, and practical usage examples so that Korean developers can adopt the project more easily.

Documentation:
https://github.com/gameworkerkim/vibe-investing/blob/main/TechDoc/LLM/Open%20code%20review%20guide.md

I would like to express my sincere appreciation for this project.

Open Code Review is one of the most impressive AI-powered code review tools I have used. The combination of automated review, security analysis, and developer workflow integration is both powerful and elegant.

As an engineer, security researcher, and open-source contributor in Korea, I believe this project deserves much wider recognition. I hope this Korean guide helps more developers discover and benefit from your work.

Thank you for creating such an outstanding project and for contributing it to the open-source community. Looking forward to future releases and improvements.

Best regards,
Dennis Kim

[lizhengfeng101]

Hi Dennis,

Thank you so much for your kind words and for taking the time to create a Korean-language guide for Open Code Review! This means a lot to us.

It's truly inspiring to see community members like you helping to bridge language barriers and making the project more accessible to Korean developers. Your guide covering installation, configuration, and practical usage examples is a wonderful contribution to the open-source community, and we have no doubt it will help many developers get started more easily.

We are glad that Open Code Review has made a strong impression on you as an engineer and security researcher. Feedback like yours motivates us to keep pushing forward. We are committed to continuing our high-quality iterations, making the tool even more powerful, performant, and developer-friendly.

We would also love to extend a warm invitation — if you are ever interested in joining us as a contributor, we would be thrilled to have someone with your expertise and passion on board. Together, we can build the most advanced and high-performance automated code review tool in the open-source ecosystem.

Thanks again for your support and for being such a valuable member of our community. We look forward to growing together!

Best regards,
Open Code Review Team

[gameworkerkim]

Subject: Re: Thank you for your warm invitation — I would be honored to contribute

To the Open Code Review Team,

Thank you so much for your kind invitation — I'd be truly honored to join as a contributor.

A bit about myself: I'm an engineer and security researcher based in Korea, with a focus on AI‑powered developer tools, software security (static analysis, vulnerability detection), and open‑source collaboration. I've been using Open Code Review in my own work, and I'm genuinely impressed by both its technical depth and its practical impact.

I'd love to help in areas that align with the team's current needs. My strongest suits are documentation/localization (especially Korean) and security rule development, but I'm also comfortable with testing, bug reporting, and community support. If there's a specific gap you'd like to fill, just point me in that direction.

Before jumping in, I'd appreciate some guidance on:

• Where the team needs help most right now
• The contribution workflow (coding standards, PR process, review cycle)
• Any "good first issue" or "help wanted" items you'd recommend
• Preferred communication channels (Slack, Discord, GitHub Discussions, etc.)

I'm committed to starting small — perhaps with docs or a minor fix — to learn the codebase and team dynamics first. I fully respect the project's established vision and will always defer to the core team's decisions. Quality and clear communication are very important to me.

I do have a few rough ideas for future improvements, but I'd rather learn the codebase thoroughly before sharing them — I'll bring them up later if they still seem relevant.

Thank you again for this opportunity. I'm genuinely excited to contribute and look forward to growing together with the project. Please let me know how I can get started, and feel free to assign me any task you think would be a good fit.

With gratitude,

Dennis Kim
GitHub: @gameworkerkim
Email: gameworker@gmail.com
https://www.linkedin.com/in/testcode/

[gameworkerkim]

Subject: Proposal: Korean (ko) translation support for Open Code Review

Hi Open Code Review Team!

I'm a developer interested in contributing a Korean (ko) localization to Open Code Review. Inspired by the Japanese docs added in PR #282, I've drafted a phased plan and some initial artifacts, and I'd love your feedback before opening PRs.

What I've prepared so far

Translation plan (phased, with PR breakdown and a review checklist)
Glossary (KO ↔ EN ↔ ZH) to keep terminology consistent; CLI commands, flags, paths, package names, URLs, and code blocks are kept untranslated
ko.ts scaffold — all 271 i18n keys translated, matching the structure of en.ts / ja.ts

You can review the work here

Folder: https://github.com/gameworkerkim/vibe-investing/tree/main/TechDoc/OpenCode_KR
Glossary: https://github.com/gameworkerkim/vibe-investing/blob/main/TechDoc/OpenCode_KR/Glossary.md
ko.ts: https://github.com/gameworkerkim/vibe-investing/blob/main/TechDoc/OpenCode_KR/ko.ts
Proposed rollout (small, reviewable PRs)

ko.ts + language wiring (types.ts, i18n context, Navbar switcher)
Site docs ko/ — onboarding set first (quickstart, installation, configuration, cli-reference)
Remaining docs + docsMap.ko registration
README.ko-KR / CONTRIBUTING.ko-KR sync
I'll follow the project's contribution rules (run npm run typecheck + npm run build, attach language-switch screenshots, keep the same file structure as EN/ZH/JA).

If the plan and glossary look good to you, I'd like to start with PR #1 (the ko.ts wiring). Please let me know if you have any preferences on scope, terminology, or PR granularity.

Thanks for the great project!

Best regards
Dennis Kim

[lizhengfeng101]

Hi Dennis,

Thank you so much for the incredibly thorough plan — the phased rollout, the KO ↔ EN ↔ ZH glossary, and a fully translated ko.ts scaffold covering all 271 i18n keys. Your enthusiasm and the care you've put into this are genuinely appreciated, and we would be delighted to have your support on Korean localization.

If you're up for it, we think this is a great point to start moving forward based on your plan — beginning with the ko.ts wiring and then extending to the site (the OCR homepage, onboarding docs, etc.), just as you outlined. Your PR granularity and terminology choices look reasonable to us.

One thing worth flagging up front: the project's main branch moves fairly quickly. To keep this effort in sync with the latest state and avoid your work drifting or going stale, it would help a lot if you could stay relatively responsive during review and rebase / sync with main frequently as you go. Smaller, incremental PRs (as you proposed) will make that much easier for everyone.

Looking forward to your PRs — thanks again for helping bring OCR to the Korean developer community!

Best regards,
Open Code Review Team

[gameworkerkim]

Hi lizhengfeng and Open Code Review team,

Thank you for reviewing the plan and for the go-ahead — much appreciated.

Here is how I plan to proceed

1. This week: re-sync my fork with the latest main and re-diff the ko.ts scaffold against the current en.ts/ja.ts key set, since main has moved since I drafted it in June.
2. PR A (this week): ko.ts + 'ko' in the Language type, i18n context wiring, browser language detection, and the navbar switcher. It will ship with passing typecheck/build and language-switch screenshots, linked to this discussion.
3. After PR A merges: PR B (onboarding docs — quickstart, installation, configuration, cli-reference), then the remaining site docs in one or two follow-up PRs to keep review load manageable.

On your note about main moving quickly: understood. I'll rebase frequently, keep each PR small and single-purpose, and aim to respond to review comments within 24 hours.

One small terminology point I'll handle in the Korean glossary: since "OCR" can be confused with optical character recognition in Korean contexts, Korean docs will spell out "Open Code Review (OCR)" on first mention.

Best regards,
Dennis Kim