Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
46 lines (30 loc) · 3 KB

File metadata and controls

46 lines (30 loc) · 3 KB

Contributing

Thanks for your interest in PRPs-agentic-eng.

A note on scope and expectations (please read first)

Up front, so it's clear: this repo is my personal agentic-engineering workflow — my prompts, my skills, my way of working. I use it on essentially every project I actively develop, which means the skills here are load-bearing to my daily work.

You are very welcome to:

  • Use it, fork it, and adapt it to your own workflow
  • Open issues and ideate — discussion and ideas are genuinely appreciated
  • Send pull requests

But please know up front that I'm deliberately picky about what I merge. Because these skills run my real projects, I won't accept changes that risk destabilizing that workflow — however good they are in the abstract. If a PR isn't merged, it's usually not a judgment on its quality; it's that I keep this surface small and stable on purpose. Often the best way to extend the framework for your needs is to copy the pieces you want into your own .claude/ and shape them there.

How the repo is structured

  • .claude/skills/ — the PRP skills (the working source). Each is a self-contained Agent Skill: a SKILL.md plus optional references/, templates/, and scripts/.
  • plugins/prp-core/ — the same skills packaged as a distributable Claude Code plugin. Its skills/ and agents/ are generated from .claude/ by scripts/sync_plugin.py — edit the .claude/ source, then regenerate; never edit the plugin copies directly.
  • old-prp-commands/ — the previous slash-command generation (including its old PRPs/templates/ and PRPs/ai_docs/), kept for reference only.
  • claude_md_files/ — framework-specific CLAUDE.md examples.

Authoring skills

The framework documents its own conventions — use the prp-meta-skill (/prp-core:prp-meta-skill) to author or refactor a skill. In short:

  • Lean SKILL.md (the decision spine); detail in references/; output shapes in templates/.
  • Third-person, trigger-rich description; imperative body.
  • Prescribe the craft, not your project's content — there's no canonical template; that's a per-project decision.
  • Keep each skill self-contained (no cross-skill file references).

Conventions

  • Commits: conventional style (feat(scope): …, fix(scope): …, refactor(scope): …, docs(scope): …), written as a human would — no AI attribution.
  • Branches: work on a feature branch. The default branches are main and development, kept in sync.
  • Validation: skills are markdown; the bundled prp_loop.py should pass python3 -m py_compile, and python3 scripts/sync_plugin.py --check must pass. Run any relevant project checks before opening a PR.

Submitting a PR

  1. Keep it focused — one capability or fix per PR.
  2. Mirror the existing skill structure and conventions.
  3. Explain what changed and why; reference any related issue.
  4. Expect questions, and expect load-bearing changes to get extra scrutiny.

Thanks for understanding — and for building on this.