Skip to content

Occ3D-Waymo Performance #9

Description

@andrewcaunes

Hello,

The performance reported for Occ3D-Waymo raises a few questions, I'd be happy to have your return on this:

  • Why do you not also report your CTF-Occ model from the Occ3d paper, which was SOTA ?
  • Why is the performance wildly different from the Occ3d paper's results for the same task and dataset ? The reported values for BEVFormer in the Occ3d paper is 18.73mIoU, while in your CVT-Occ paper, it's 24.58 for the same model and task ? Even BEVFormer w/o TSA obtains a 23.87 mIoU. Even accounting for the "Motorcycle" class that was removed in this paper, the difference is still of more than 3 mIoU
  • Why don't you evaluate on the 0.1m voxel size from Occ3D-Waymo as well ? It would be interesting to see.

Thank you in advance

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions