Skip to content

Question about the very low DockQ of dyMEAN in Table 1 #52

Description

@ShuoAndy

I have a question regarding the dyMEAN benchmark result shown in Table 1 of your ICLR 2025 IgGM paper.

When I test dyMEAN on the RAbD dataset, its average DockQ stays around 0.3. However, your Table 1 reports dyMEAN’s DockQ at only ~0.1, which is a huge gap.

Could you share the core reasons behind this significant performance drop? I wonder if it comes from inconsistent evaluation pipelines, epitope input usage, sampling selection rules.

Thanks a lot for your clarification!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions