Hi,
currently it is not possible to define fields and dataProcessing because dataProcessing overwrites the whole content.
For example I'd like to define add a flexform to a text field.
The typoscript looks like this:
tt_content.text {
fields {
content {
fields {
flexform {
dataProcessing {
10 = FriendsOfTYPO3\Headless\DataProcessing\FlexFormProcessor
10 {
fieldName = pi_flexform
as = flexform
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
and the JSON output:
"content": {
"header": "header",
"subheader": "",
"headerLayout": 0,
"headerPosition": "",
"headerLink": "",
"bodytext": "bodytext"
"flexform": {
"additionalData": "data"
}
}
So I moved the dataProcessing one level up like this so additionalData property moves on level up:
tt_content.text {
fields {
content {
dataProcessing {
10 = FriendsOfTYPO3\Headless\DataProcessing\FlexFormProcessor
10 {
fieldName = pi_flexform
as = flexform
}
}
}
}
}
This leads to the dataProcessing overwriting the whole content:
"content": {
"additionalData": "data"
}
Are there any reasons not to merge the fields and dataProcessing? Or did I miss something and this is already possible?
In line 131 in FriendsOfTYPO3\Headless\ContentObject\JsonContentObject the fields are always overwritten if dataProcessing exists.
I'd be happy to create a PR if this is something to be considered.
If there would be any side effects, maybe this could be allowed with an flag in the json content object?
Best regards
David
Hi,
currently it is not possible to define fields and dataProcessing because dataProcessing overwrites the whole content.
For example I'd like to define add a flexform to a text field.
The typoscript looks like this:
and the JSON output:
So I moved the dataProcessing one level up like this so
additionalDataproperty moves on level up:This leads to the dataProcessing overwriting the whole content:
Are there any reasons not to merge the fields and dataProcessing? Or did I miss something and this is already possible?
In line 131 in
FriendsOfTYPO3\Headless\ContentObject\JsonContentObjectthe fields are always overwritten if dataProcessing exists.I'd be happy to create a PR if this is something to be considered.
If there would be any side effects, maybe this could be allowed with an flag in the json content object?
Best regards
David