Summary
A task from itsm split has 2 verifiers that cannot be satisfied at the same time.
Analysis
task_20251210_205620_593_391f1eff_ad65c160 from itsm has duplicate verifiers and 2 of them are mutually exclusive:
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM incident WHERE incident_id = \"INC_024\" AND configuration_item = \"CI_005\" AND caller_id = \"USER_005\" AND channel = \"phone\" AND status = \"new\" AND category = \"hardware\" AND impact = \"low\" AND urgency = \"high\" AND priority = \"moderate\";
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM incident WHERE incident_id = \"INC_024\" AND configuration_item = \"CI_005\" AND caller_id = \"USER_005\" AND channel = \"chat\" AND status = \"new\" AND category = \"hardware\" AND impact = \"low\" AND urgency = \"high\" AND priority = \"moderate\";
some verifiers check for INC_024 with channel "phone" and some check for INC_024 with channel "chat". A single incident row cannot have channel = "chat" and channel = "phone" simultaneously, and creating a second incident doesn't help since both variants hardcode incident_id = "INC_024" (a second incident would be INC_025, matching neither).
Summary
A task from
itsmsplit has 2 verifiers that cannot be satisfied at the same time.Analysis
task_20251210_205620_593_391f1eff_ad65c160fromitsmhas duplicate verifiers and 2 of them are mutually exclusive:some verifiers check for
INC_024with channel "phone" and some check forINC_024with channel "chat". A singleincidentrow cannot havechannel = "chat"andchannel = "phone"simultaneously, and creating a second incident doesn't help since both variants hardcodeincident_id = "INC_024"(a second incident would beINC_025, matching neither).