WebExtensions isn't fully supported yet, so try to target the current limited supported features.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/12/21/webextensions-in-firefox-45-2/
http://arewewebextensionsyet.com/
Right now the biggest block is the lack of chrome.storage.sync. I'd really prefer not to fork this into two versions, so this port may be delayed for a few months for now. If a fork is done, the port should be easy, since I think only onLoad.js and the manifest would have to be updated to use chrome.storage.local instead. I'm hesitant about this, since it means that all tags etc are lost if the the local storage gets wiped.
WebExtensions isn't fully supported yet, so try to target the current limited supported features.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/12/21/webextensions-in-firefox-45-2/
http://arewewebextensionsyet.com/
Right now the biggest block is the lack of chrome.storage.sync. I'd really prefer not to fork this into two versions, so this port may be delayed for a few months for now. If a fork is done, the port should be easy, since I think only onLoad.js and the manifest would have to be updated to use chrome.storage.local instead. I'm hesitant about this, since it means that all tags etc are lost if the the local storage gets wiped.