Problem
Users have reported that the four statements in Section C (Linkages and Leadership) are confusing and poorly written. On inspection there are four distinct issues.
Issue 1 — Subject–verb disagreement (all four statements)
"Our organisation" is a singular noun. All four statements use a plural verb form, which is grammatically incorrect.
| Statement |
Current |
Fix |
| C1 |
take part |
takes part |
| C2 |
take part |
takes part |
| C3 |
work with |
works with |
| C4 |
are members of |
is a member of |
Issue 2 — Redundant "outside our organisation" (C1 and C4)
C1 says "outside our organisation" when the subject of the sentence is already "Our organisation" — the phrase is self-referential and awkward. C4 repeats the same problem.
Proposed fix: replace with externally / external.
Issue 3 — C1 and C2 are near-identical (intent unclear)
- C1: "…advisory activities outside our organisation (for example, sitting on ethics committees; funding committees; editorial boards and reviewing papers)"
- C2: "…advisory activities outside organisations" (no examples)
The only difference is "our organisation" vs "organisations" (plural, no "our"). This distinction is opaque to respondents — it reads as a near-duplicate.
C2 needs domain expert clarification before the content can be reworded:
- Is C2 a copy-paste error and should be removed or replaced with a distinct concept?
- Was C2 intended to ask about activities spanning multiple organisations (e.g. NHS networks, national collaboratives) rather than individual external advisory roles?
Issue 4 — Semicolons instead of commas in C1 example list
The parenthetical in C1 uses semicolons as list separators, which is non-standard for a short inline list.
(for example, sitting on ethics committees; funding committees; editorial boards and reviewing papers)
Fix: use commas with an Oxford comma.
(for example, sitting on ethics committees, funding committees, editorial boards, and reviewing papers)
Proposed rewrites
C1 (grammar + redundancy + punctuation — ready to merge):
Our organisation takes part in research leadership and advisory activities externally (for example, sitting on ethics committees, funding committees, editorial boards, and reviewing papers)
C2 (grammar fix applied; content reword blocked pending domain expert input):
Our organisation takes part in research leadership and advisory activities outside organisations
C3 (grammar only — ready to merge):
Our organisation works with professional bodies and national and regional policy structures to influence the research agenda
C4 (grammar + redundancy — ready to merge):
Our organisation is a member of external forums which support research activity
Files affected
All seven sort_only_config*.json files in data/survey_config/ — Part C wording is currently identical across all variants:
sort_only_config.json
sort_only_config_ahp.json
sort_only_config_generic.json
sort_only_config_midwives.json
sort_only_config_nmahps.json
sort_only_config_nurses.json
sort_only_config_nurses_midwives.json
demography_only_config_*.json files are not affected (no Part C section).
@Joe-Heffer-Shef — could you confirm the intended meaning of C2 so we can complete that reword?
Problem
Users have reported that the four statements in Section C (Linkages and Leadership) are confusing and poorly written. On inspection there are four distinct issues.
Issue 1 — Subject–verb disagreement (all four statements)
"Our organisation"is a singular noun. All four statements use a plural verb form, which is grammatically incorrect.take parttakes parttake parttakes partwork withworks withare members ofis a member ofIssue 2 — Redundant "outside our organisation" (C1 and C4)
C1 says "outside our organisation" when the subject of the sentence is already "Our organisation" — the phrase is self-referential and awkward. C4 repeats the same problem.
Proposed fix: replace with
externally/external.Issue 3 — C1 and C2 are near-identical (intent unclear)
The only difference is "our organisation" vs "organisations" (plural, no "our"). This distinction is opaque to respondents — it reads as a near-duplicate.
C2 needs domain expert clarification before the content can be reworded:
Issue 4 — Semicolons instead of commas in C1 example list
The parenthetical in C1 uses semicolons as list separators, which is non-standard for a short inline list.
Fix: use commas with an Oxford comma.
Proposed rewrites
C1 (grammar + redundancy + punctuation — ready to merge):
C2 (grammar fix applied; content reword blocked pending domain expert input):
C3 (grammar only — ready to merge):
C4 (grammar + redundancy — ready to merge):
Files affected
All seven
sort_only_config*.jsonfiles indata/survey_config/— Part C wording is currently identical across all variants:sort_only_config.jsonsort_only_config_ahp.jsonsort_only_config_generic.jsonsort_only_config_midwives.jsonsort_only_config_nmahps.jsonsort_only_config_nurses.jsonsort_only_config_nurses_midwives.jsondemography_only_config_*.jsonfiles are not affected (no Part C section).@Joe-Heffer-Shef — could you confirm the intended meaning of C2 so we can complete that reword?