Skip to content

chore(deps): align QPK pin to f0d6bc739943 - #88

Closed
Pigbibi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
auto/qpk-pin-sync-f0d6bc739943
Closed

chore(deps): align QPK pin to f0d6bc739943#88
Pigbibi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
auto/qpk-pin-sync-f0d6bc739943

Conversation

@Pigbibi

@Pigbibi Pigbibi commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • 自动将 QPK pin 对齐到 f0d6bc739943
  • 若仓库使用 uv.lock,同步刷新 lockfile

Test plan

  • Repo CI 转绿

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Automated downstream QPK pin update after QPK_PIN landed on main.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Codex PR Review

Merge allowed: No issues found


Review by Codex PR Review bot • PR

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 26db67d9fe

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread pyproject.toml
dependencies = [
"pandas>=2.0",
"quant-platform-kit @ git+https://github.com/QuantStrategyLab/QuantPlatformKit.git@2381aa4577e9fd6329053a73a1c888929170eaf3",
"quant-platform-kit @ git+https://github.com/QuantStrategyLab/QuantPlatformKit.git@f0d6bc7399433b9a1ccdaab1f0874faf184cfa84",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep qsl.toml's QPK ref in sync

This changes the install/lock pin to f0d6bc..., but the repository's qsl.toml compatibility manifest still declares quant-platform-kit at 37c81901160c5b31127a27dba1c63944933fb6bf (qsl.toml lines 4-8). In contexts that consume the compat metadata rather than pyproject.toml—and the CI workflow has a dedicated “Check QPK pin and lock consistency” step—this release can still be paired with the older QPK commit instead of the one this dependency bump is meant to align to. Please update the compat manifest to the same ref, or explicitly exclude it from the pin consistency contract.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment thread pyproject.toml
dependencies = [
"pandas>=2.0",
"quant-platform-kit @ git+https://github.com/QuantStrategyLab/QuantPlatformKit.git@2381aa4577e9fd6329053a73a1c888929170eaf3",
"quant-platform-kit @ git+https://github.com/QuantStrategyLab/QuantPlatformKit.git@f0d6bc7399433b9a1ccdaab1f0874faf184cfa84",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Pin to the QPK_PIN value instead

The CI workflow's “Check QPK pin and lock consistency” step runs check_qpk_pin_consistency.py --pin-file external/QuantPlatformKit/QPK_PIN, and at QuantPlatformKit@f0d6bc739943... that QPK_PIN contains de18c2e9d93bcfc2220148a99749447059a6f4c6, not f0d6bc739943.... In PR/CI contexts that check out that QPK revision (or current QPK main with the same pin manifest), this line and the matching uv.lock entries will be reported as mismatches against the canonical pin, so the dependency check fails before tests run. Please pin this repo to the SHA from QPK_PIN and regenerate the lockfile.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@Pigbibi

Pigbibi commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Superseded: downstream pin sync must update qsl.toml compatibility metadata together with pyproject.toml and uv.lock.

@Pigbibi Pigbibi closed this Jul 10, 2026
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi deleted the auto/qpk-pin-sync-f0d6bc739943 branch July 10, 2026 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant