Skip to content

[OpenSTEF 4.0] Review auto-generated documentation (PR #898) #901

@egordm

Description

@egordm

As a documentation maintainer
I want to verify the auto-generated docs pages for correctness
So that users are not misled by inaccurate content or broken links

❗Priority (What if we don't do this?/Are there any deadlines? etc.)

Auto-generated content may contain hallucinated API references, broken links, or inaccurate descriptions. Must be reviewed before merging into release/v4.0.0.

Definition of Done:

✅ Acceptance criteria

  • All cross-reference links resolve (no broken :ref:, :class:, :meth:)
  • Factual accuracy verified for generated concept pages
  • Code examples are syntactically correct and match current API
  • No hallucinated or outdated API references remain
  • Consistent formatting and terminology across pages
  • poe docs builds without errors after fixes

📄 Documentation criteria:

🧪 Test criteria:

  • poe docs builds cleanly after review fixes

⌛ Dependencies:

PR #898

🚀 Releasing:

Part of v4.0.0 documentation release

Other information:

🌍 Background

PR #898 was auto-generated by the openstef-doc-pipeline (FULL mode) producing 12 pages. Content needs human review for correctness.
Parent: #883

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

Status
In Progress

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions