Skip to content

Final valutation #3

Description

@openp2pdesign

Overall, the project is quite good. There are only issues with the timeline of participation (see below) and with the organization of the files (see how Group 1 organized everything, for example).

Activity_Analisis ok-02.png
This makes no sense according to the framework of Activity Theory I explained you and that we are using. The description of the Activity with the other files is ok!

Activity_element3gen-04.png + Activity_element3gen-05.png + Activity_element3gen-06.png + Activity_element3gen-07.png
Why did you create a separate timeline for each role? The idea was to have one timeline for everybody. See what the other groups have done.

Branches.png
You could have elaborated a bit more the branches here...

Identify Flows(01)-03.png
You can add a text box to each flow telling what is flowing (blueprint? prototype? documentation? money?). You should also have put in black the activities when they are happening (which step in the timeline? But of course, you did the timeline as a separate file and in a different way...)

myBlackbook_poster.pdf
Should also be in .png file format.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Fields

    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions