Even though the source code is open, it's not clear under what license it is.
So far (without a license notice), it's proprietary and under the rules of strict copyright ownership by "the contributors".
I suggest adding an open source license (preferably GPLv3 or MIT in my point of view).
Here is some resource on that topic:
Open Source Initiative - list of popular and approved licenses
Wikipedia - Comparison of free and open-source software licenses
gnu.org - how to choose a license
Even though the source code is open, it's not clear under what license it is.
So far (without a license notice), it's proprietary and under the rules of strict copyright ownership by "the contributors".
I suggest adding an open source license (preferably GPLv3 or MIT in my point of view).
Here is some resource on that topic:
Open Source Initiative - list of popular and approved licenses
Wikipedia - Comparison of free and open-source software licenses
gnu.org - how to choose a license