Skip to content

What are the criteria for the inclusion of a GFO extension? #47

Description

@k00ni

I would like to know at which point some GFO-related work is considered to be part of this repository (especially the OWL ontology) and when its more reasonable to keep both separate, but link to each other?

As an example here the work from Hanna Fiegenbaum: "Toward a formalization of artifacts in GFO" (PDF):

Fiegenbaum, Hanna. "Toward a formalization of artifacts in GFO." arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13452 (2024).

Her work is about an extension of material objects, called artifacts, which are intentionally made for a certain purpose. The following Github repository contains further content, such as axioms in a text file and a RDF/OWL:

https://github.com/hannafiegen/ArtifactGFO

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions