Right now, the pre-specified features include features for measurement.value_as_number, capturing the last recorded numeric value for a measurement_concept_id - unit_concept_id combination. For the observation table there are no equivalent analyses, even though it too has value_as_number and unit_concept_id fields.
There is no real reason why those pre-specified features aren't currently included, and it will be important if people have patient-reported outcomes with numeric values.
Adding them would mean
Like their measurement counterparts, these features would be off by default.
If people are OK with this, I'm happy to prepare a PR.
Right now, the pre-specified features include features for
measurement.value_as_number, capturing the last recorded numeric value for ameasurement_concept_id-unit_concept_idcombination. For theobservationtable there are no equivalent analyses, even though it too hasvalue_as_numberandunit_concept_idfields.There is no real reason why those pre-specified features aren't currently included, and it will be important if people have patient-reported outcomes with numeric values.
Adding them would mean
Like their
measurementcounterparts, these features would be off by default.If people are OK with this, I'm happy to prepare a PR.