Skip to content

Upstream kernel? #1

@amstan

Description

@amstan

I was looking at issue MiSTerArch/PKGBUILDs#12 and thought: wouldn't it be cool if we could just use the linux-armv7 arch package that's already tracking upstream?

Sigh, what am I getting into?

https://github.com/MiSTer-devel/Linux-Kernel_MiSTer/commits/MiSTer-v5.15

Doesn't seem like there's much to it. I can boil it down to:

  • DTS for de10 with lots of mister additions
    • I wonder if this can be upstreamed and the mister additions be had with just a dt overlay (that can even be loaded later via userspace)
  • Mister Framebuffer: 1 file, looks pretty self contained, could probably be a module
  • Mister Alsa driver: 1 file, looks pretty self contained, could probably be a module
  • A ton of random device (that people use with their misters) driver fixes that I'm baffled why they have to be in this kernel tree and not upstream. If I were to maintain my own kernel I would drop this.
  • A few intrusive core driver changes: usb overcurrent, vty count, input device ioctls.
  • EXFAT + loop device hacks, really unnecessary with something like Arch.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions