Skip to content

Dubious about representation of gender #2

Description

@markwilkinson

In the "Personal Information" model, you have made a Snomed URI the value of the sio "has value" predicate. This is... likely not a great way to do it.

The measurement-value node could be rdf:type snomedct:feminine_gender, and the "has value" be "Female" or something like that... but it's likely not a good idea to use a Class URI as the value of a has-value predicate (which is intended to be some kind of literal)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions