From 652b3f438b56c9e3b19eccf0365d7bbb2e1c214b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shuhei Ohno Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:50:28 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Flag incorrect charmonium comparison --- docs/src/GEM.md | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/src/GEM.md b/docs/src/GEM.md index 6b9580d..c40d90d 100644 --- a/docs/src/GEM.md +++ b/docs/src/GEM.md @@ -103,6 +103,12 @@ calculation reproduced here. ## Example of Charmonium +!!! warning + This comparison is currently incorrect. It uses the SGA parameters and + result from Arifi et al. rather than reproducing their GEM calculation. + The example will be updated after the optimized GEM parameters have been + recovered from the calculation notes. + The following calculation uses one Gaussian with ``\nu=0.2443`` and the SGA parameters of [Arifi et al. (2024)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07933). Natural units are used, so energies @@ -140,9 +146,6 @@ round(eta_c.E[1] * 1000; digits=6) | TwoBody.jl with the parameters above | 3013.183414 | | Arifi et al. SGA, Table 2 | 3012 | -The 1.18 MeV difference from the paper table is consistent with using the -rounded parameters and rounded variational exponent shown above. - ## API reference ```@docs; canonical=false