Most of the time, the number of clusters should be the number of cuts plus one. But sometimes, the function to estimate nCuts/nClusters automatically suggestsnClusters== nCuts. I always find myself changing that to nClusters== nCuts+1. I think it is sufficiently rare that nClusters== nCuts is really the best choice that we should never allow the auto-algorithm to suggest that.
Most of the time, the number of clusters should be the number of cuts plus one. But sometimes, the function to estimate nCuts/nClusters automatically suggestsnClusters== nCuts. I always find myself changing that to nClusters== nCuts+1. I think it is sufficiently rare that nClusters== nCuts is really the best choice that we should never allow the auto-algorithm to suggest that.