diff --git a/agents/conversation_learner/README.md b/agents/conversation_learner/README.md
index d88cb5d..4cd4b48 100644
--- a/agents/conversation_learner/README.md
+++ b/agents/conversation_learner/README.md
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 ## Architecture & Integration
 - **Trajectory Analysis**: Uses Cloud Logging to fetch recent conversational trajectories. For each conversation, the messages from every inference log entry are merged (deduplicated, in chronological order) into one transcript — earlier entries backfill any later entry whose `gen_ai.*.messages` label exceeded Cloud Logging's 64 KiB limit and was truncated.
 - **Per-conversation LLM-as-a-judge**: Each conversation is judged **independently and in parallel** (a direct Vertex `generate_content` call per conversation), extracting detection signals, gaps, and `ContextEnrichmentProposal` records. This bounds each judge's context for more consistent analysis and scales to many conversations, instead of analyzing every conversation in a single pass.
-- **Cross-conversation dedup**: A lightweight aggregation pass deduplicates proposals across conversations (same asset + gap type), keeping the highest-confidence instance, before saving to `proposal.json`.
+- **Cross-conversation aggregation**: A lightweight pass merges proposals across conversations by identity (same asset + gap type) into one learning, rolling up the recurrence signal — `occurrence_count`, `source_conversation_ids`, aggregated `supporting_evidence`, `first_seen`/`last_seen`, and a recurrence-boosted `confidence_grade` (noisy-OR over instances; `max_instance_confidence` preserves the best single instance) — before saving to `proposal.json`.
 
 ## Running Locally
 
diff --git a/agents/conversation_learner/agent.py b/agents/conversation_learner/agent.py
index 8a7a891..6f833f9 100644
--- a/agents/conversation_learner/agent.py
+++ b/agents/conversation_learner/agent.py
@@ -527,8 +527,9 @@ def load_instruction() -> str:
 # PER-CONVERSATION LLM-AS-JUDGE ORCHESTRATION
 # ==============================================================================
 # Each conversation is judged by its own direct generate_content call (bypassing
-# ADK), fanned out in parallel, then proposals are deduplicated across
-# conversations. This bounds each judge's context (vs. one giant pass over every
+# ADK), fanned out in parallel, then proposals sharing an identity are merged
+# across conversations (dedup + provenance roll-up + recurrence-boosted
+# confidence). This bounds each judge's context (vs. one giant pass over every
 # conversation), scales, and isolates per-conversation failures. Mirrors the
 # direct-call + asyncio.gather + retry pattern in agents/enrichment/src/common.py.
 
@@ -674,19 +675,78 @@ def _judge_conversation_sync(conversation_id: str, transcript: str) -> List[Dict
         return []
 
 
+def _noisy_or(confidences: List[Optional[float]]) -> float:
+    """Combines independent per-instance confidences via noisy-OR.
+
+    ``P = 1 - Π(1 - cᵢ)``. A learning corroborated by several conversations is
+    more trustworthy than any single instance, so recurrence raises confidence
+    while staying in [0, 1]; a lone instance is returned unchanged. Note this
+    saturates toward 1 with many instances — acceptable because recurring
+    signals are exactly what we want to surface; temper it if low-quality
+    proposals start accumulating.
+    """
+    prob_none = 1.0
+    for c in confidences:
+        prob_none *= 1.0 - min(max(c or 0.0, 0.0), 1.0)
+    return 1.0 - prob_none
+
+
+def _merge_group(members: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+    """Merges all proposals sharing one identity into a single enriched learning.
+
+    The highest-confidence instance supplies the representative fields (asset,
+    proposed value, instruction, eval candidate). On top of that we roll up the
+    cross-conversation signal: how many conversations surfaced it, which ones,
+    all supporting evidence, the time span, and a recurrence-boosted confidence
+    (``max_instance_confidence`` preserves the best single-instance grade).
+    Provenance (``_provenance``) is attached by the orchestrator; when absent
+    (e.g. direct unit-test calls) the count falls back to the member count.
+    """
+    representative = max(members, key=lambda p: p.get("confidence_grade") or 0.0)
+    merged = {k: v for k, v in representative.items() if k != "_provenance"}
+
+    conv_ids: List[str] = []
+    timestamps: List[str] = []
+    supporting: List[Dict[str, Any]] = []
+    for p in members:
+        prov = p.get("_provenance") or {}
+        cid, ts = prov.get("conversation_id"), prov.get("timestamp")
+        if cid and cid not in conv_ids:
+            conv_ids.append(cid)
+        if ts:
+            timestamps.append(ts)
+        ev = p.get("evidence")
+        if isinstance(ev, dict):
+            supporting.append({**({"conversation_id": cid} if cid else {}), **ev})
+
+    merged["confidence_grade"] = round(
+        _noisy_or([p.get("confidence_grade") for p in members]), 4
+    )
+    merged["max_instance_confidence"] = max(
+        (p.get("confidence_grade") or 0.0) for p in members
+    )
+    merged["occurrence_count"] = len(conv_ids) if conv_ids else len(members)
+    if conv_ids:
+        merged["source_conversation_ids"] = conv_ids
+    if supporting:
+        merged["supporting_evidence"] = supporting
+    if timestamps:
+        merged["first_seen"], merged["last_seen"] = min(timestamps), max(timestamps)
+    return merged
+
+
 def _aggregate_proposals(proposals: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
-    """Deduplicates proposals across conversations (lightweight aggregation pass).
+    """Merges proposals across conversations into deduplicated learnings.
 
-    Proposals with the same identity (see _proposal_identity) are treated as the
-    same learning; the highest-confidence instance is kept.
+    Proposals with the same identity (see _proposal_identity) describe the same
+    gap on the same asset and are merged into one record carrying the recurrence
+    signal — occurrence count, source conversations, aggregated evidence, time
+    span, and a recurrence-boosted confidence (see _merge_group).
     """
-    by_key: Dict[Tuple, Dict[str, Any]] = {}
+    groups: Dict[Tuple, List[Dict[str, Any]]] = {}
     for p in proposals:
-        key = _proposal_identity(p)
-        existing = by_key.get(key)
-        if existing is None or (p.get("confidence_grade") or 0) > (existing.get("confidence_grade") or 0):
-            by_key[key] = p
-    return list(by_key.values())
+        groups.setdefault(_proposal_identity(p), []).append(p)
+    return [_merge_group(members) for members in groups.values()]
 
 
 async def generate_learnings(
@@ -701,8 +761,8 @@ async def generate_learnings(
     """Analyzes agent conversation trajectories and saves enrichment proposals.
 
     Fetches trajectories from Cloud Logging, runs the LLM-as-judge independently
-    on EACH conversation in parallel, deduplicates the proposals across
-    conversations, saves them to proposal.json, and returns a summary.
+    on EACH conversation in parallel, merges proposals across conversations into
+    recurrence-aware learnings, saves them to proposal.json, and returns a summary.
 
     Args:
         conversation_id: A single conversation id to analyze.
@@ -738,12 +798,19 @@ async def generate_learnings(
             "No conversations with trajectories were found for the given parameters."
         )
 
-    # Render each conversation into its own transcript.
+    # Render each conversation into its own transcript, capturing its latest
+    # timestamp for provenance roll-up during aggregation.
     transcripts: Dict[str, str] = {}
+    conv_ts: Dict[str, Optional[str]] = {}
     for c_id, c_entries in grouped.items():
         lines: List[str] = []
         _render_conversation(c_entries, lines)
         transcripts[c_id] = "\n".join(lines)
+        latest = max(
+            (e.timestamp for e in c_entries if getattr(e, "timestamp", None)),
+            default=None,
+        )
+        conv_ts[c_id] = latest.isoformat() if latest else None
 
     # Fan out one judge call per conversation, concurrency-capped and retried
     # independently so a single failure yields [] rather than aborting the batch.
@@ -752,13 +819,18 @@ async def generate_learnings(
     async def _judge(c_id: str, transcript: str) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
         async with sem:
             try:
-                return await _with_retry(
+                proposals = await _with_retry(
                     lambda: asyncio.to_thread(_judge_conversation_sync, c_id, transcript),
                     what=f"judge[{c_id}]",
                 )
             except Exception as e:  # pylint: disable=broad-except
                 print(f"[judge] {c_id}: failed after retries: {e}", flush=True)
                 return []
+        # Tag each proposal with its source so aggregation can roll up the
+        # cross-conversation recurrence signal (stripped before saving).
+        for p in proposals:
+            p["_provenance"] = {"conversation_id": c_id, "timestamp": conv_ts.get(c_id)}
+        return proposals
 
     results = await asyncio.gather(*[_judge(c, t) for c, t in transcripts.items()])
     raw_proposals = [p for sub in results for p in sub]
@@ -768,11 +840,13 @@ async def _judge(c_id: str, transcript: str) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
 
     save_trajectory_analysis_result(json.dumps({"proposals": deduped}))
 
+    recurring = sum(1 for p in deduped if (p.get("occurrence_count") or 1) > 1)
     return (
         f"Total log entries retrieved: {len(entries)}. Unique conversations: {len(grouped)}.\n"
         f"Conversation IDs: {', '.join(grouped.keys())}\n"
         f"Analyzed each conversation independently; saved {len(deduped)} "
-        f"deduplicated proposal(s) (from {len(raw_proposals)} raw) to proposal.json."
+        f"deduplicated proposal(s) (from {len(raw_proposals)} raw; {recurring} "
+        f"recurring across multiple conversations) to proposal.json."
     )
 
 
diff --git a/agents/conversation_learner/review_app.py b/agents/conversation_learner/review_app.py
index aed024e..588ed28 100644
--- a/agents/conversation_learner/review_app.py
+++ b/agents/conversation_learner/review_app.py
@@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ def _conf(p):
     return p.get("confidence_grade") or 0.0
 
 
+def _occ(p):
+    return p.get("occurrence_count") or 1
+
+
 # --- load ---
 proposals_path = rs.DEFAULT_PROPOSALS_PATH
 if not os.path.exists(proposals_path):
@@ -102,7 +106,10 @@ def _conf(p):
 f_gap = sb.multiselect("Gap type", gap_opts, default=gap_opts)
 f_sig = sb.multiselect("Detection signal", sig_opts, default=sig_opts)
 f_conf = sb.slider("Min confidence", 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 0.05)
+max_occ = max((_occ(p) for p in merged), default=1)
+f_min_occ = sb.slider("Min occurrences", 1, max_occ, 1) if max_occ > 1 else 1
 f_query = sb.text_input("🔎 Asset contains")
+sort_by = sb.selectbox("Sort by", ["Occurrences", "Confidence"], index=0)
 
 sb.divider()
 sb.subheader("Bulk action")
@@ -123,10 +130,17 @@ def _visible(p):
             and _gap(p) in f_gap
             and _signal(p) in f_sig
             and _conf(p) >= f_conf
+            and _occ(p) >= f_min_occ
             and f_query.lower() in _asset_name(p).lower())
 
 
-filtered = [p for p in merged if _visible(p)]
+# Sort most-recurring (then highest-confidence) first by default, so high-impact
+# learnings aren't hidden behind the MAX_CARDS cap.
+_SORT_KEYS = {
+    "Occurrences": lambda p: (_occ(p), _conf(p)),
+    "Confidence": lambda p: (_conf(p), _occ(p)),
+}
+filtered = sorted((p for p in merged if _visible(p)), key=_SORT_KEYS[sort_by], reverse=True)
 
 tab_review, tab_analytics = st.tabs(["Review", "Analytics"])
 
@@ -139,9 +153,11 @@ def _visible(p):
         with st.container(border=True):
             head = st.columns([4, 1])
             with head[0]:
+                occ = p.get("occurrence_count") or 1
                 st.markdown(
                     _badge(gap, GAP_COLORS.get(gap, "#555")) + " "
                     + _badge(_signal(p), "#374151")
+                    + (f" {_badge(f'recurring ×{occ}', '#7c3aed')}" if occ > 1 else "")
                     + f" &nbsp; <b>{(p.get('target_asset') or {}).get('type', '?')}</b> "
                     + f"· <code>{_asset_name(p)}</code>",
                     unsafe_allow_html=True,
@@ -152,10 +168,19 @@ def _visible(p):
             with head[1]:
                 st.metric("confidence", f"{_conf(p):.2f}")
                 st.progress(min(max(_conf(p), 0.0), 1.0))
-            with st.expander("Evidence"):
-                st.write(ev.get("reasoning", ""))
-                if ev.get("trajectory_quote"):
-                    st.code(ev["trajectory_quote"])
+            with st.expander(f"Evidence ({occ} conversation{'s' if occ != 1 else ''})"):
+                supporting = p.get("supporting_evidence") or []
+                if supporting:
+                    for s in supporting:
+                        cid = s.get("conversation_id")
+                        if s.get("reasoning"):
+                            st.write((f"**{cid}** — " if cid else "") + s["reasoning"])
+                        if s.get("trajectory_quote"):
+                            st.code(s["trajectory_quote"])
+                else:
+                    st.write(ev.get("reasoning", ""))
+                    if ev.get("trajectory_quote"):
+                        st.code(ev["trajectory_quote"])
             with st.expander("Enrichment instruction"):
                 st.write(p.get("enrichment_agent_instruction", ""))
                 golden_sql = (p.get("eval_candidate") or {}).get("golden_sql")
@@ -171,8 +196,9 @@ def _visible(p):
             act[2].markdown(f"status: **{STATUS_BADGE.get(p['status'], p['status'])}**"
                             + (f" — _{p['review_note']}_" if p.get("review_note") else ""))
     if len(filtered) > MAX_CARDS:
-        st.info(f"Showing the first {MAX_CARDS} of {len(filtered)}. "
-                f"Refine filters or bulk-approve to narrow the queue.")
+        st.info(f"Showing the first {MAX_CARDS} of {len(filtered)} "
+                f"(sorted by {sort_by.lower()}). Refine filters (incl. min "
+                f"occurrences) or bulk-approve to narrow the queue.")
 
 with tab_analytics:
     st.subheader("By status")
diff --git a/agents/conversation_learner/tests/test_agent.py b/agents/conversation_learner/tests/test_agent.py
index a453475..180fc2f 100644
--- a/agents/conversation_learner/tests/test_agent.py
+++ b/agents/conversation_learner/tests/test_agent.py
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
     _conversation_filter,
     _format_message,
     _group_by_conversation,
+    _noisy_or,
     _parse_generic_payload,
     _proposal_id,
     _reasoning_engine_filter,
@@ -642,19 +643,37 @@ def test_groups_entries_and_skips_unlabeled(self):
 
 class TestAggregateProposals(unittest.TestCase):
 
-    def _p(self, name, gap="BUSINESS_LOGIC_GAP", atype="COLUMN", conf=0.5, instr="do X"):
-        return {
+    def _p(self, name, gap="BUSINESS_LOGIC_GAP", atype="COLUMN", conf=0.5,
+           instr="do X", conv=None, evidence=None):
+        p = {
             "classification": {"detection_signal": "DIRECT_USER_CORRECTION", "gap_type": gap},
             "target_asset": {"type": atype, "name": name},
             "proposed_enrichment": {"action": "UPDATE_OVERVIEW_ASPECT", "value": "v"},
             "confidence_grade": conf,
             "enrichment_agent_instruction": instr,
         }
-
-    def test_same_asset_and_gap_collapsed_keeping_higher_confidence(self):
+        if evidence is not None:
+            p["evidence"] = evidence
+        if conv is not None:
+            p["_provenance"] = {"conversation_id": conv,
+                                "timestamp": f"2026-01-0{conv[-1]}T00:00:00+00:00"}
+        return p
+
+    def test_same_asset_and_gap_merged_into_one(self):
         out = _aggregate_proposals([self._p("ds.t.col", conf=0.6), self._p("DS.T.COL", conf=0.9)])
         self.assertEqual(len(out), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(out[0]["confidence_grade"], 0.9)
+
+    def test_merge_preserves_best_instance_and_boosts_confidence(self):
+        out = _aggregate_proposals([self._p("ds.t.col", conf=0.6), self._p("ds.t.col", conf=0.9)])
+        # Best single-instance grade preserved; aggregate boosted above it.
+        self.assertEqual(out[0]["max_instance_confidence"], 0.9)
+        # noisy-OR(0.6, 0.9) = 1 - (0.4 * 0.1) = 0.96
+        self.assertAlmostEqual(out[0]["confidence_grade"], 0.96, places=4)
+
+    def test_single_instance_confidence_unchanged(self):
+        out = _aggregate_proposals([self._p("ds.t.col", conf=0.9)])
+        self.assertAlmostEqual(out[0]["confidence_grade"], 0.9, places=4)
+        self.assertEqual(out[0]["occurrence_count"], 1)
 
     def test_different_gap_type_not_merged(self):
         out = _aggregate_proposals([
@@ -667,6 +686,27 @@ def test_different_asset_not_merged(self):
         out = _aggregate_proposals([self._p("ds.t.a"), self._p("ds.t.b")])
         self.assertEqual(len(out), 2)
 
+    def test_provenance_rolled_up_across_conversations(self):
+        out = _aggregate_proposals([
+            self._p("ds.t.col", conf=0.6, conv="c1",
+                    evidence={"reasoning": "r1", "trajectory_quote": "q1"}),
+            self._p("ds.t.col", conf=0.8, conv="c2",
+                    evidence={"reasoning": "r2", "trajectory_quote": "q2"}),
+        ])
+        self.assertEqual(len(out), 1)
+        merged = out[0]
+        self.assertEqual(merged["occurrence_count"], 2)
+        self.assertEqual(merged["source_conversation_ids"], ["c1", "c2"])
+        self.assertEqual(len(merged["supporting_evidence"]), 2)
+        self.assertEqual(merged["first_seen"], "2026-01-01T00:00:00+00:00")
+        self.assertEqual(merged["last_seen"], "2026-01-02T00:00:00+00:00")
+        self.assertNotIn("_provenance", merged)  # transient key stripped before saving
+
+    def test_occurrence_counts_distinct_conversations(self):
+        # Two proposals from the SAME conversation count as one occurrence.
+        out = _aggregate_proposals([self._p("ds.t.col", conv="c1"), self._p("ds.t.col", conv="c1")])
+        self.assertEqual(out[0]["occurrence_count"], 1)
+
     def test_blank_name_distinct_instructions_not_collapsed(self):
         out = _aggregate_proposals([
             self._p("", atype="UNCATALOGED_ASSET", gap="UNCATALOGED_ASSET_DISCOVERY", instr="catalog table A"),
@@ -674,13 +714,29 @@ def test_blank_name_distinct_instructions_not_collapsed(self):
         ])
         self.assertEqual(len(out), 2)
 
-    def test_blank_name_same_instruction_collapsed(self):
+    def test_blank_name_same_instruction_merged(self):
         out = _aggregate_proposals([
             self._p("", atype="UNCATALOGED_ASSET", gap="UNCATALOGED_ASSET_DISCOVERY", instr="catalog A", conf=0.4),
             self._p("", atype="UNCATALOGED_ASSET", gap="UNCATALOGED_ASSET_DISCOVERY", instr="catalog A", conf=0.8),
         ])
         self.assertEqual(len(out), 1)
-        self.assertEqual(out[0]["confidence_grade"], 0.8)
+        self.assertEqual(out[0]["max_instance_confidence"], 0.8)
+
+
+class TestNoisyOr(unittest.TestCase):
+
+    def test_single_value_unchanged(self):
+        self.assertAlmostEqual(_noisy_or([0.7]), 0.7, places=4)
+
+    def test_recurrence_increases_confidence(self):
+        self.assertAlmostEqual(_noisy_or([0.6, 0.9]), 0.96, places=4)
+        self.assertGreater(_noisy_or([0.5, 0.5, 0.5]), 0.5)
+
+    def test_empty_is_zero(self):
+        self.assertEqual(_noisy_or([]), 0.0)
+
+    def test_none_treated_as_zero(self):
+        self.assertAlmostEqual(_noisy_or([None, 0.5]), 0.5, places=4)
 
 
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------