Skip to content

T-3D-3D #198

@weidemann

Description

@weidemann

Measuring FCS with fluorescent proteins produces complex decays. For simplicity, Often I choose the T-3D-3D model with a single triplet to account for all blinking with a single time (Tau_trp) that is supposed to be still shorter than the protein diffusion (Tau_1) and couple of % for a longer diffusion term (Tau_2> ms) that covers longtail correlations of different origin (small amounts of aggregates, PSF distortions, cellular movements etc) . In aequous buffers, blinking times and the globular protein diffusion can be quite close.

I noticed many times that applying the confocal T-3D-3D model shows coupling of the triplet time (Tau_trp) and the shorter diffusion time (Tau_1). During fitting, both values run in parallel. I could not get rid of the stickyness of these two parameters. In contrast, applying the simpler T-3D model, both triplet and diffuion can be properly separated, although only a couple of µs apart.

Is there a technical reason for coupling of these two parameteres during fitting? I attach an example:
example-T-3D-3D.zip

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions