You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 21, 2026. It is now read-only.
The QUALITY-SCORING.md document describes a quality scoring rubric for plugins, but there's no automated scoring tool or CI integration that actually applies these criteria to incoming plugins.
Plugin authors have no feedback on whether their submission meets the quality standards before opening a PR. Reviewers must manually evaluate each plugin against the rubric, which is inconsistent and time-consuming.
An automated quality checker (even a simple script) that scans new plugin submissions and reports on:
The
QUALITY-SCORING.mddocument describes a quality scoring rubric for plugins, but there's no automated scoring tool or CI integration that actually applies these criteria to incoming plugins.Plugin authors have no feedback on whether their submission meets the quality standards before opening a PR. Reviewers must manually evaluate each plugin against the rubric, which is inconsistent and time-consuming.
An automated quality checker (even a simple script) that scans new plugin submissions and reports on:
Would dramatically improve the review process and set clear expectations for contributors.